| opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830918 | 00:10 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Make more project level APIs scoped to project only https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828670 | 00:17 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add volume-rebuild support to cinder module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830882 | 00:17 |
| opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend unified limits spec to explain "API limit" enforcement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/829413 | 00:27 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Move keypair quota error message into exception https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828186 | 01:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add stub unified limits driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712137 | 01:49 |
| opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830918 | 02:10 |
| *** bhagyashris is now known as bhagyashris|ruck | 04:38 | |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 07:11 | |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368 | 07:31 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830939 | 07:55 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368 | 08:10 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883 | 08:13 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Assert quota related API behavior when noop https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712140 | 09:46 |
| *** bhagyashris_ is now known as bhagyashris|ruck | 09:55 | |
| *** bhagyashris_ is now known as bhagyashris|ruck | 10:44 | |
| sean-k-mooney | gibi: bauzas FF also applies to docs changes? | 10:54 |
| bauzas | no | 10:54 |
| sean-k-mooney | ok stephen has https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:notifications-docs and i was going to go review them | 10:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | they will need a second +2 anyway but just wonderingif they should wait until after rc1 | 10:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | if they can merge before it ill try and review them later today | 10:56 |
| sean-k-mooney | otherwise i was going to wait and come back in a few weeks | 10:56 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: reenable greendns in nova. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830966 | 11:12 |
| elodilles | bauzas sean-k-mooney : fyi, yesterday was the deadline for yoga-milestone-3 client library releases, python-novaclient - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/830249 , and osc-placement - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/830227 | 11:23 |
| elodilles | if you have a sec and could review them that would be awesome :) | 11:24 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack ill look at them now | 11:24 |
| elodilles | sean-k-mooney: thanks \o/ | 11:24 |
| sean-k-mooney | thanks for the reminder i forgot that m3 was the release deadline for client libs | 11:25 |
| sean-k-mooney | /libs// | 11:25 |
| elodilles | no worries :) | 11:32 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: reenable greendns in nova. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830966 | 11:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | the nova client one looks correct so ill +1 that shortly | 11:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | gibi: i have not reviewed this yet but do we want to try and land https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/828545 | 11:50 |
| sean-k-mooney | before we do the osc-pacement release later today | 11:50 |
| whoami-rajat | sean-k-mooney, Hi, I'm not totally sure if which of the two reason is for the -2 on my patch (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/827163) | 12:01 |
| whoami-rajat | 1) if it's regarding proposing changes directly to OSC (in favor of deprecation of novaclient), i can do that sure | 12:01 |
| whoami-rajat | 2) If it's regarding client freeze (due to which my patch wouldn't land in yoga) then the patch is up for review since long time and noone provided this feedback before | 12:02 |
| sean-k-mooney | whoami-rajat: the freeze was yesterday | 12:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | am but as of this cycle we are nolonger addign feature to novaclients cli | 12:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | so that is the main rason for -2 | 12:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | if you want to add helper funciton its fine | 12:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | but in this case i think just adding it to osc is the way to go | 12:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | im not sure is see a usecase wehre other projects will want to import nova client to trigger a rebuild but i guess heat coudl leverage that so im not againt having the libary functions in novaclient | 12:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | the sdk woudl be better in the long run | 12:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | but we intend to keep supporting novaclient as a python lib for a few cycles until sdk has full parity | 12:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | whoami-rajat: i know -2 can seam a bit harsh but it was a mix of procedual and directional i would have just left a -1 if we were not past the feature freeze for the cycle | 12:15 |
| sean-k-mooney | whoami-rajat: by the way just incase you are not aware -2 does not mean never it means the review has an objection directonaly or procerdurally beyond the content or quality of the code under review. if you recive a -2 it should always have an explaination as to why and you shoudl always feel free to reach out and discuss how to move forward as you have | 12:26 |
| gibi | sean-k-mooney: regarding the osc-placement change, I will take that later as the lib FF happend last week | 13:08 |
| gibi | ohh the yoga schedul has the client FF at the same time as the service FF | 13:10 |
| gibi | still it is not super important | 13:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | yes | 13:10 |
| gibi | this part of placement is mostly for machine consumption | 13:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | technially it would have been yesterday | 13:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | ok in that case i guess this can wait till next cycle | 13:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | and i can approve the release patch | 13:11 |
| gibi | yes it can wait | 13:17 |
| gibi | thanks for looking at the release patches | 13:17 |
| gibi | I had a crazy morning so I will only start really looking at gerit now | 13:17 |
| sean-k-mooney | thats ok | 13:18 |
| sean-k-mooney | i signed up to be release liason this cycle so i really shoudl have done it yesterday but i was kind of tired after all the reviews this week | 13:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | its not that any of them were hard really but all that context switching has a way of catching up with you that other work does not | 13:19 |
| gibi | yes, the last two days was really review heavy | 13:20 |
| gibi | but I think we have a farly good FF period | 13:21 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 13:21 | |
| gibi | *fairly | 13:21 |
| chateaulav | sean-k-mooney: with all the changes merged yesterday. is it best to rebase and then continue the ci job patchset | 13:44 |
| kashyap | chateaulav: Thank you for the work on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/pick-guest-arch-based-on-host-arch-in-libvirt-driver | 13:48 |
| kashyap | chateaulav: Hehe, you also added RISC-V too | 13:49 |
| kashyap | Sorry that I couldn't take a deeper look earlier! I trust the existing reviews :) | 13:49 |
| chateaulav | kashyap: lol, well tried, that will be another cycle. hit some roadblocks with ovo and there is some other things in its early stages that will help for eaiser implementation later | 13:50 |
| chateaulav | thanks and no worries | 13:50 |
| kashyap | chateaulav: ;-) For RISC-V stuff, check out the blog of Rich Jones (of libguestfs) here: https://rwmj.wordpress.com/tag/risc-v/ | 13:51 |
| kashyap | He does a lot of testing w/ new hardware. And also maintains the Fedora RISC-V | 13:51 |
| chateaulav | will do, i got to the point of having it somewhat function, i was working through the loading custom firmware descriptor files for riscv becuase it uses specific uboot and opensbi | 13:53 |
| chateaulav | have a lot of links and hadnt stumbled upon that one, so def will help | 13:54 |
| opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix migration with remote-managed ports & add FT https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829974 | 13:58 |
| sean-k-mooney | chateaulav: am you could rebase the zuul patch altohg if you do while you are working on it its proably better to disable the other jobs | 14:02 |
| dmitriis | sean-k-mooney, gibi: addressed comments in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/829974 Tried testing revert_resize with cold migration but connection info doesn't seem to be updated to the right state (of the node an instance was migrated from) - would prefer to figure out why that is in a follow-up if possible | 14:02 |
| sean-k-mooney | chateaulav: just comment them out until you get your jobs working | 14:02 |
| sean-k-mooney | then you can uncomment them | 14:02 |
| sean-k-mooney | chateaulav: it just saves ci time | 14:02 |
| chateaulav | k | 14:02 |
| sean-k-mooney | dmitriis: ack sure we can likely cover revert seperatly in a differnt patch | 14:03 |
| sean-k-mooney | dmitriis: have you tried it locally | 14:03 |
| gibi | dmitriis: thanks. I will try to look at the patch | 14:03 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 14:03 | |
| sean-k-mooney | dmitriis: as in does it work in reality and this is a func test issue or is revert actully broken | 14:04 |
| dmitriis | sean-k-mooney: I've only tried in a func test form, need to do that with updated packages on a real env and 2 nodes | 14:05 |
| dmitriis | still need to set up a virtualized setup with only 1 DPU - will work on that | 14:05 |
| dmitriis | sean-k-mooney: fwiw, I think the issue might not be specific to remote-managed ports as I get something like this: | 14:10 |
| dmitriis | > /home/ubuntu/src/opendev/nova/nova/tests/fixtures/libvirt.py(1226)verify_hostdevs_interface_are_vfs() | 14:10 |
| dmitriis | -> pci_info_from_connection = self._connection.pci_info.devices[ | 14:10 |
| dmitriis | n | 14:10 |
| dmitriis | KeyError: 'pci_0000_80_00_4' | 14:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | dmitriis: technially resize can be doen on a singel host | 14:11 |
| dmitriis | I'll try adding a test case to regular SR-IOV suite and see if it fails in the same way | 14:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | so you can resize to a new flavor | 14:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | then tell it to revert | 14:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | resize and cold migration use the same code | 14:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | cold migration is implemetned as a resize to the same flaovr | 14:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | dmitriis: ack, im not sure if we have revert resize test for sriov | 14:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | so ya it might just be a defect in the fixture | 14:12 |
| dmitriis | sean-k-mooney: yeah, I'll try to add one but I'll probably run into the same | 14:12 |
| whoami-rajat | sean-k-mooney, yes, and if i would've got the feedback that the patch is not acceptable in novaclient, I would've worked on the OSC alternative before feature freeze as my patch was proposed on Jan 31st | 14:29 |
| whoami-rajat | the problem is the nova side changes have merged and to make the full feature working, we need nova side changes as well | 14:30 |
| whoami-rajat | even if we get the nova API patch merged, without the client, i don't see much use of it for an end user | 14:30 |
| whoami-rajat | I suppose they rely on clients rather than directly hitting the API | 14:31 |
| whoami-rajat | s/nova/cinder side changes have merged for the feature | 14:32 |
| sean-k-mooney | well i guess we can try and do a early osc release after rc1 | 14:33 |
| sean-k-mooney | technially it would be teh Zed version but that would be an option | 14:34 |
| sean-k-mooney | once rc1 is tagged the stable branches get created and master reopens for the next release | 14:34 |
| sean-k-mooney | thats in about 2 weeks time | 14:34 |
| sean-k-mooney | so if the osc team were open to it you coudl still proably get it in a osc release before the zed release is widely available | 14:35 |
| whoami-rajat | sean-k-mooney, ack, i will explore that option, thanks | 14:36 |
| sean-k-mooney | it looks like we have not actully compelte ll the work items form the last ptg | 14:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | whoami-rajat: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-ptg#L513 | 14:39 |
| sean-k-mooney | specificaly we have not update dthe sepc template to call out the requriemtn for sdk/osc | 14:39 |
| sean-k-mooney | ill try and update the zed one to make that more clear to other going forward | 14:39 |
| whoami-rajat | ack, that will be helpful | 14:40 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 15:00 | |
| bauzas | ok, fwiw, starting to use the -2 hammer | 15:01 |
| bauzas | gibi: I guess there is no procedural markup for the any-traits series ? | 15:08 |
| gibi | bauzas: what do you mean by procedural markup? | 15:08 |
| bauzas | oh shit, nevermind, found the story | 15:08 |
| bauzas | gibi: I guess we can close https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2005345 ? | 15:09 |
| gibi | yeeah | 15:09 |
| bauzas | ok, doing it | 15:09 |
| gibi | I thought my commit messages updated the story but it didn't | 15:09 |
| gibi | :/ | 15:09 |
| gibi | I will add a link to the story to point to the implementation topic | 15:09 |
| gibi | hm | 15:10 |
| gibi | the comments are there | 15:10 |
| gibi | just no tasks were created | 15:10 |
| gibi | ahh comments is only from the spec patch | 15:10 |
| gibi | storyboard :/ | 15:10 |
| bauzas | yeah :( | 15:11 |
| dansmith | bauzas: are you starting the -2 hammer for features? | 15:17 |
| bauzas | dansmith: I'm on it | 15:18 |
| bauzas | just did the implemented scrubbing | 15:18 |
| bauzas | now, next is the procedural hammer | 15:18 |
| dansmith | okay | 15:18 |
| dansmith | I guess that volume-backed-rebuild one is going to be off the table | 15:18 |
| dansmith | I think it's missing osc support and tempest testing | 15:18 |
| dansmith | bummer :( | 15:18 |
| sean-k-mooney | osc support missed yes but is the api change merged? | 15:19 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 15:19 |
| dansmith | bauzas: the splitting helped uncover that it was introducing a data loss bug for the old path, so I'm super glad we did that | 15:19 |
| dansmith | sean-k-mooney: no | 15:19 |
| bauzas | dansmith: hah, good to know | 15:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | dansmith: ok then ya i guess that will miss | 15:20 |
| sean-k-mooney | the cinder side is done? | 15:20 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 15:23 |
| whoami-rajat | sean-k-mooney, yes, cinder side changes are merged | 15:24 |
| whoami-rajat | bauzas, dansmith is there a chance we can get FFE for it? | 15:25 |
| dansmith | whoami-rajat: up to bauzas but without osc and tempest yet it seems like a stretch :/ | 15:25 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 15:26 |
| whoami-rajat | i think we already discussed the OSC thing above, tempest I will complete by monday for sure | 15:26 |
| bauzas | whoami-rajat: I haven't planned any FFE yet | 15:26 |
| dansmith | well, I'll review the latest set in a bit regardless | 15:27 |
| bauzas | whoami-rajat: I can left dansmith to reviewing the series | 15:27 |
| bauzas | whoami-rajat: but my concern is about the API microversion, it's a bit late | 15:27 |
| dansmith | whoami-rajat: I really want to see tempest before I even +2, FWIW | 15:28 |
| dansmith | for something like this that'd always be my plan | 15:28 |
| whoami-rajat | ack, I'm still working on passing the reimage_boot_volume parameter from API->Compute, bumping up RPC versions for conductor, compute, tests for it etc that is more work than i anticipated | 15:29 |
| whoami-rajat | almost done with it | 15:29 |
| dansmith | whoami-rajat: ah, I thought that was done in the latest.. | 15:30 |
| whoami-rajat | but again, I don't want to force any decisions, if the team doesn't want to include this as part of Yoga, we can continue work in Z | 15:30 |
| whoami-rajat | dansmith, completed it in manager but the 3rd patch is getting larger and larger | 15:30 |
| whoami-rajat | will update that in sometime | 15:30 |
| whoami-rajat | need to deal with the breaking tests since there's a new parameter in like 10-15 methods | 15:31 |
| whoami-rajat | so the 2nd patch is ready for review | 15:31 |
| whoami-rajat | but 3rd needs some more work | 15:31 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 15:32 |
| chateaulav | just running my one ci job, please dont think im trying to kill the pippeline. lol | 15:34 |
| bauzas | whoami-rajat: we'll open the Zed release in two weeks | 15:36 |
| bauzas | I mean, the master will be Zed in two weeks | 15:36 |
| plibeau1 | gibi: Hello, I have reply on your question for this change: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/803713 | 15:36 |
| bauzas | whoami-rajat: so I propose you to provide again the spec for Zed as just a pre-approved spec | 15:36 |
| bauzas | we could accept this spec quickly | 15:37 |
| gibi | plibeau1: I've added your patch to my review queue | 15:37 |
| bauzas | so we could just review your implementation changes again in less than one month | 15:37 |
| plibeau1 | gibi: thx | 15:37 |
| sean-k-mooney | chateaulav: no worries did you see my comment | 15:37 |
| bauzas | gibi: do you know where I could find a document for the -2 comment ? :) | 15:37 |
| bauzas | gibi: I mean, when I'll -2 the existing changes | 15:38 |
| gibi | I don't think it is documented in the PTL guide | 15:38 |
| chateaulav | sean-k-mooney: yeah it was acting weird the first couple times when i did just that, think i got it set right now | 15:38 |
| gibi | I just used a sentece stating that we are in feature freeze | 15:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | chateaulav: you still hae the templates mind if i quickly fix it for you | 15:39 |
| bauzas | gibi: yeah, that's what I thought | 15:39 |
| bauzas | gibi: I'm pretty sure I can find it | 15:39 |
| kashyap | bauzas: Thx for the paperwork here - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/virtio-as-default-display-device | 15:39 |
| kashyap | ! | 15:39 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 15:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | chateaulav: ^ that should just run your job in check and check for merge conflicts | 15:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | oh the alias | 15:43 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 15:45 |
| sean-k-mooney | chateaulav: if you want to keep an eye on it you can see it running here https://zuul.openstack.org/status#828372 | 15:47 |
| whoami-rajat | bauzas, ack | 15:47 |
| sean-k-mooney | im going to go to the store at the top of the hour then work form my laptop. when i get back so ill be off irc for a bit | 15:57 |
| bauzas | gmann: melwitt: I trust you for rechecking again your already approved patches in case you have problems with the CI | 16:14 |
| bauzas | I'll do a quick check on Monday morning my time to see if everything is merged | 16:14 |
| gmann | bauzas: yeah. release time and CI will behave like that :) | 16:21 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883 | 16:26 |
| whoami-rajat | dansmith, ^ done with final patch | 16:26 |
| dansmith | ack | 16:27 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Make unified limits APIs return reserved of 0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712141 | 16:40 |
| bauzas | ok, I'm done for this (busy) week | 16:50 |
| bauzas | see ya folks | 16:50 |
| whoami-rajat | dansmith, hey, the OSC client rebuild call is calling novaclient (AFAICS) so we do need the change in novaclient as well right? https://github.com/openstack/python-openstackclient/blob/master/openstackclient/compute/v2/server.py#L3541 | 16:56 |
| whoami-rajat | or there will be a structural change proposal to remove dependency of novaclient somehow... | 16:57 |
| dansmith | whoami-rajat: I'm not on top of the state of that stuff.. I expect there are a bunch of calls not converted to native that still use novaclient? not sure | 16:57 |
| dansmith | but if rebuild is currently going through novaclient today, I doubt anyone is going to make you change that before you merge :) | 16:57 |
| whoami-rajat | ack, I'm totally confused with the deprecating novaclient and proposing changes directly to OSC first then... | 16:59 |
| whoami-rajat | sean-k-mooney, can you help with my query above? ^ | 16:59 |
| dansmith | whoami-rajat: yeah just not sure, but you're right to be confused/frustrated.. I'll look for sean-k-mooney to answer aw well | 17:00 |
| dansmith | *as | 17:00 |
| whoami-rajat | good to know I'm not the only one :) | 17:03 |
| whoami-rajat | so this is my patch for OSC but it won't work without the novaclient patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/831014 | 17:16 |
| whoami-rajat | similar to the --hostname parameter introduced in 2.90 which depends on the novaclient patch https://github.com/openstack/python-openstackclient/commit/8e833a3ed26467a1190ba69d8ba716a7cd1cccb3 | 17:17 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 17:19 |
| dmitriis | sean-k-mooney: I ended up getting the same result while trying to do a revert for an instance with a non-remote-managed PCI device https://paste.opendev.org/show/blQLSgsFtQbryq3q6ZJM/. I'll see if I can modify the fixture in a follow-up to test this. | 17:39 |
| sean-k-mooney | whoami-rajat: we deprecated the nova cli not the python-novaclient package | 17:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | it can still be used as a lib but we declared we woudl not continue to extend the nova command line clint and only add new microversion to osc | 17:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | whoami-rajat: you can helps to novaclient, openstack sdk or just osc direclty without updating novaclient | 17:59 |
| dansmith | the latter would require him to refactor all of the rebuild code in osc, so not likely right? | 18:01 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 18:01 |
| sean-k-mooney | yes. we idealy want people to update sdk instead of nova python client | 18:02 |
| sean-k-mooney | the only thing we decided to deprecate this cycle was the nova cli so im fine with removing the -2 form the novaclient patch after rc1 if we remove the addtion of the new partmar to the cli | 18:03 |
| whoami-rajat | if i update my novaclient patch without the shell changes (not extending nova CLI) and modify the rebuild method called by OSC, would it be acceptable? | 18:04 |
| sean-k-mooney | yep | 18:04 |
| sean-k-mooney | that is perfectly fine | 18:04 |
| whoami-rajat | ack | 18:04 |
| sean-k-mooney | we will be keeping it as a lib for other projefct to use to programticaly call nova for a few releases | 18:04 |
| sean-k-mooney | eventually we would like heat ectra to use the sdk | 18:05 |
| sean-k-mooney | but we have not made plans to remove it as a lib in the near term | 18:05 |
| sean-k-mooney | but now that we have feature partiy for api microversion in osc we dont wnat ot continute adding support for microversion in nova client | 18:06 |
| whoami-rajat | got it | 18:10 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 18:10 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add support to rebuild boot volume https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/827163 | 18:15 |
| sean-k-mooney[m] | whoami-rajat: I dropped -2 on ^ but the release note still reference the nova cli change you dropped | 18:32 |
| whoami-rajat | sean-k-mooney[m], ack, will update it | 18:34 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add support to rebuild boot volume https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/827163 | 18:35 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 19:15 |
| chateaulav | sean-k-mooney: last individual run, then i should be able to tie a bow on the ci job | 19:19 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 20:18 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add logic to enforce local api and db limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712139 | 21:37 |
| opendevreview | Jonathan Race proposed openstack/nova master: zuul-job for Adds Pick guest CPU architecture based on host arch in libvirt driver support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828372 | 21:58 |
| chateaulav | sean-k-mooney: ci is good to go, I uncommented the other jobs and moved it under the other nova-XX jobs. let me know if you need anything further for it. | 21:59 |
| chateaulav | o/ | 21:59 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Log which instance event was timed out https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/819817 | 22:20 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add debug log for scheduler weight calculation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817632 | 22:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!