| opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/os-vif stable/wallaby: set default qos policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/886778 | 06:18 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/os-vif stable/wallaby: set default qos policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/886778 | 06:23 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Deprecate AggregateImagePropertiesIsolation opts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783396 | 10:59 |
| frickler | gibi: we are hitting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871968 on zed, anything we can help to make progress with that backport? | 11:47 |
| gibi | frickler: I double checked that now and it seems it is OK so I +2d it | 12:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | hehe i was about to do the same | 12:01 |
| sean-k-mooney | frickler: so to answer your question appreeantly the answer is ping us :) | 12:01 |
| frickler | oh, I was assuming the CI failure was because it was missing some other backport as basis. that was an easy one, then, thx | 12:01 |
| sean-k-mooney | no the commit gibi asked about was merged when master was zed | 12:02 |
| kashyap | Can anyone unpack this for me: qemu_6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.11 -- whta does the "2ubunut 6.11" mean? | 12:15 |
| kashyap | The QEMU package version is 6.2; but what is "2ubuntu6.11"? Some "release" number? | 12:15 |
| frickler | "+dfsg-2" usually is the debian version number and then "ubuntu6.11" is the 11th iteration of the 6th ubuntu patch of that | 12:17 |
| kashyap | frickler: I see; thanks for the decryption; "11th iteration of the 6th ubuntu patch" -- means there really were 5 iterations of the patch that are searchable? | 12:19 |
| kashyap | (Not that I want to find; but just curious) | 12:19 |
| frickler | 1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6 is the version that was released with Jammy, so according to stable policy all updates are patches of that | 12:20 |
| frickler | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu has some of what you may want to look at | 12:20 |
| frickler | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu5 is an older iteration from the development cycle it seems | 12:22 |
| kashyap | Yeah, was looking there; thank you | 12:24 |
| frickler | the main canonical developer is available on #ubuntu-server in libera if you have more specific questions | 12:24 |
| kashyap | frickler: The reason I'm asking is - I'm about to bump libvirt/QEMU versions for Bobcat | 12:24 |
| kashyap | Before that I just wanted to send an email to -discuss upstream list w/ it | 12:24 |
| kashyap | The distros we care about are: Debian 12, Ubuntu Jammy (22.04), CentOS 9 Stream -- that's all, yeah? | 12:25 |
| frickler | Not sure about debian 11 vs. 12, 12 may have been to late for bobcat | 12:25 |
| frickler | we don't have it running in opendev yet, even less in devstack | 12:26 |
| kashyap | Oh, so the upstream CI is testing w/ Debian 11? (Cc: sean-k-mooney --^) | 12:26 |
| frickler | for now, yes | 12:26 |
| kashyap | frickler: Good to know, so lemme check Debian 11 | 12:26 |
| frickler | not sure if nova tests on debian at all, though | 12:27 |
| sean-k-mooney | we dont currently but if we are advertisign the next version we are slecting for C and later | 12:28 |
| sean-k-mooney | then we should look at debian 12 i think | 12:28 |
| kashyap | frickler: So that's the Debian-11, right? For libvirt, at least - https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye/libvirt | 12:28 |
| kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Yeah, for next version definitely Bookworm (12) | 12:29 |
| frickler | there's also https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye-backports/libvirt which I think could be acceptable | 12:29 |
| frickler | iiuc zigo curates those | 12:30 |
| sean-k-mooney | we basiclaly just need to do a servay of what is in current LTS/Stable to determin our next min libvirt | 12:30 |
| kashyap | Yep | 12:30 |
| kashyap | I'll send out an email something like this from the past - https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010907.html | 12:31 |
| sean-k-mooney | the ones that kashyap will be updating to for this cycle are already known | 12:31 |
| sean-k-mooney | and quite old | 12:31 |
| kashyap | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L221,#L222 | 12:32 |
| sean-k-mooney | so we will be movign to libvirt 7.0.0 and qemu 5.2.0 we likely should ue libvirt 8.0.0 as the new value for NEXT_MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION and | 12:33 |
| kashyap | Yes, Jammy has: | 12:33 |
| kashyap | libvirt-daemon: 8.0.0-1ubuntu7.5 -- https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy-updates/libvirt-daemon | 12:33 |
| kashyap | And: | 12:33 |
| kashyap | qemu-system-x86: 6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.11 -- https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/qemu-system-x86 | 12:33 |
| kashyap | - CentOS Stream 9: libvirt-daemon-kvm-9.3.0-2.el9.x86_64.rpm - qemu-kvm-8.0.0-4.el9.x86_64.rpm | 12:33 |
| sean-k-mooney | and proably qemu 6.2 | 12:34 |
| sean-k-mooney | debainb and stream 9 both have 7.x but ubuntu 22.04 has 6.2 | 12:35 |
| frickler | yes, that'll likely need to wait another cycle until 24.04 LTS is out | 12:36 |
| sean-k-mooney | yep but i think thats fine | 12:37 |
| kashyap | Then lowest common denominator is Jammy (22.04) here | 12:37 |
| kashyap | So whatever is in Jammy is what we go w/ for the NEXT_MIN | 12:37 |
| sean-k-mooney | we can annouch our next min version to to 22.04 deps for C/2024.1 and then in D revaluate what they should be after ubuntu 24.04 is out | 12:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | kashyap: yep | 12:38 |
| kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Can you rephrase this, it's not clear to me: "... deps for C/2024.1" | 12:39 |
| sean-k-mooney | well the earlist we could bump to the new min deps you will be propsoing is 2024.1 or the C release | 12:39 |
| sean-k-mooney | we dont have to do that but its also the skip level update release that will be used to move between 22.04 and 24.04 | 12:40 |
| kashyap | Oh, sure; we're only declaring the next_min; the bump only happens once C is out | 12:40 |
| sean-k-mooney | so having our min version match what 22.04 ships is not a bad thing | 12:40 |
| kashyap | Okay; I'll sumamrize in the email to list, then you/others can respond if you want anything to add | 12:41 |
| kashyap | Just so it's recorded | 12:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack it will also be recoded in https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/reference/libvirt-distro-support-matrix.html when your done too but never hurts to send it to the list | 12:41 |
| kashyap | Yep :) | 12:43 |
| opendevreview | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: Pick next min libvirt / QEMU versions for "C" (2024) release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886825 | 14:06 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: kashyap: sorry I was a bit afk, but tbc, I don't want that we should bump the minimum version for Bobcat, like sean said, rather on 2024.1 C | 14:09 |
| zigo | frickler: sean-k-mooney: As far as I'm concerned, bullseye is dead, long live bookworm. The last version where I had support for Bullseye was Zed. | 14:09 |
| zigo | So no problem if upgrading to libvirt 9... | 14:09 |
| zigo | You guys can take whatever is in bookworm as what I can support minimum, and probably, also whatever's in bookworm-backports... | 14:10 |
| zigo | If needed, I can even do the backports myself, if you ask early enough. | 14:11 |
| kashyap | zigo: bauzas: Please comment here: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-June/034231.html | 14:11 |
| kashyap | (Cc: sean-k-mooney, frickler) | 14:11 |
| zigo | Experimental has 9.4.0, so probably it will be uploaded to Unstable soon, then migrate to Trixie, and then I can backport to Bookworm. | 14:11 |
| * zigo wrote on the thread | 14:17 | |
| kashyap | Thanks! | 14:26 |
| *** efried1 is now known as efried | 19:21 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!