Friday, 2024-04-26

opendevreviewIlia Baikov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Initial commit on blueprint  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/91710803:12
opendevreviewIlia Baikov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Initial spec on cloud-init for dynamic vendordata  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/91710903:19
opendevreviewIlia Baikov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Initial spec on cloud-init for dynamic vendordata  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/91710903:38
opendevreviewIlia Baikov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Initial spec on cloud-init for dynamic vendordata  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/91710903:46
opendevreviewIlia Baikov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Initial spec on cloud-init for dynamic vendordata  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/91710903:59
opendevreviewIlia Baikov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Initial spec on cloud-init for dynamic vendordata  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/91710904:07
opendevreviewIlia Baikov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Initial spec on cloud-init for dynamic vendordata  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/91710904:55
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: AggregateMultitenancyIsolation to support unlimited tenant  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/89651207:07
opendevreviewRajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix concurrent migration of vms with multiattach volume failure  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/87227807:28
sahido/ bauzas sean-k-mooney dansmith, any chance to make progress on that one? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/89651207:58
bauzas\o08:04
bauzassahid: I need to do a couple of reviews next week, tbh those two last weeks, I was off Gerrit :)08:04
bauzasit's tracked in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status, so don't worry, we'll look at it :)08:05
sahidah cool thanks08:07
elodillesbauzas and release liaisons: when you have time please review these open release patches: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/releases+file:%5Edeliverables/.*/nova.yaml+is:open10:25
bauzasI'll try10:25
elodillesthanks in advance o/10:27
elodillesi know you are busy :S10:27
sean-k-mooneysimondodsley: no, and CONF.host is requried to be unique in the cloud or at least within a cell. if the there are other things usign the stroage backend that could have the same hostnames but different FQDNs then CONF.Host shoudl be an FQDN11:48
sean-k-mooneysimondodsley: today there is not api conrtract between nova and cinder that allows cidner to depend on the compute node uuid11:49
sean-k-mooneyat least not that im aware of11:49
sean-k-mooneythe attachment api is specified in teerms of the host field https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage/v3/index.html?expanded=detach-volume-from-server-detail#create-attachment11:50
opendevreviewKonrad Gube proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose using extend volume completion action for 2024.2  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/91713311:51
sean-k-mooneywe also pass the iqn in the connector 11:51
sean-k-mooneysimondodsley: is there a particalr feature or bug you are tring to work on?11:52
sean-k-mooneysimondodsley: we recentlly added a stable compute uuid feature. the closet thing i think we might consider would be a config flag to use the compute uuid as the value fo host11:54
simondodsleysean-k-mooney: it's actually a bug i'm trying to fix related to synchronously replicated cinder volumes. When configured so the volume can attach to the hypervisor from both backends at the same time (for redundancy) the host object on the array is allocated different names, so it can cause issues during cinder failover events. To get the UUID of the hypervisor will allow us to have consistent host object names across the 13:18
simondodsleybackends13:18
sean-k-mooneyok but that is not something cinder should be lookign up13:19
simondodsleyi can see that, but i'm trying to find a way to get to this value - it would be incredibly helpful13:20
sean-k-mooneyits an admin only api and cidner should not really be calling out to that13:20
sean-k-mooneywe would need an api change in cinder13:20
sean-k-mooneyand nova or os-brick coudl pass it in the attachment as part of the connector13:20
simondodsleyok - let me look into that and have a chat with the cinder cores13:22
simondodsleythanks13:22
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Migrate to JSON Schema Draft 2020-12  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/91584517:34
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add 'removed' decorator  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/91573617:34
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Don't do version check if nothing required  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/91573717:34
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add remaining missing query parameter schema  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/91573817:34
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Ensure all APIs have a request query schema  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/91573917:34
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Add '[api] response_validation' option  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/91574017:34
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body validation helper  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/91574117:34
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server action APIs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/91574217:34
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for remaining server action APIs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/91574317:34

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!