| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Reproduce bug/2115905 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960241 | 09:07 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: [PCI tracker]Remove non configured devs when freed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960242 | 09:07 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: [pci]Keep used dev in Placement regardless of dev_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960243 | 09:07 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Reproduce bug/2115905 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960244 | 09:14 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: [PCI tracker]Remove non configured devs when freed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960245 | 09:14 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: [pci]Keep used dev in Placement regardless of dev_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960246 | 09:14 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Reproduce bug/2115905 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960248 | 09:21 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: [PCI tracker]Remove non configured devs when freed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960249 | 09:21 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: [pci]Keep used dev in Placement regardless of dev_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960250 | 09:21 |
| opendevreview | Johannes Kulik proposed openstack/nova master: api: Pre-query not deleted members in server groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959696 | 09:41 |
| Uggla | dansmith, I have seen you point above, would you like to "quickly" discuss about it at PTG ? | 13:30 |
| dansmith | Uggla: I would like it fixed right now (i.e. stop forcing edits to my code) and yes, a quick discussion to get agreement that there should always be _some_ way to run the linters in read-only mode might be good | 13:38 |
| *** benj_6 is now known as benj_ | 13:43 | |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: remove hardcoded in-place config for autopep8 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960150 | 14:01 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: refactor autopep8 pre-commit config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960167 | 14:01 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130 | 14:22 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130 | 14:26 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Revert "Allow autopep8 to fix more things" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960150 | 14:51 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: refactor autopep8 pre-commit config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960167 | 14:51 |
| opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: renable autopep8 agressive=3 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960274 | 14:51 |
| Uggla | Nova meeting in around 40mn. | 15:19 |
| bauzas | elodilles: just a silly question, can we backport some patch that's merged on master branch in between RC1 and GA ? | 15:43 |
| bauzas | I mean, can we merge the backport to say Epoxy branch in between RC1 and Flamingo GA? | 15:44 |
| gibi | bauzas: thanks for asking! | 15:46 |
| opendevreview | Nell Jerram proposed openstack/nova master: Add managed='no' flag to libvirt XML definition for VIF type TAP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960284 | 15:48 |
| elodilles | bauzas: in Flamingo release, the RCs will be published as final release, | 15:50 |
| bauzas | that, I know | 15:50 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: as far as i am aware we are not ment to unless we are either ok with including them in an RC2 if its requried or we know there will now be one | 15:50 |
| bauzas | lemme give a specific example | 15:51 |
| sean-k-mooney | if we backport before RC1 is tagged it shoudl be ok however | 15:51 |
| sean-k-mooney | i.e. before the sabel tbranch is created | 15:51 |
| elodilles | bauzas: that means, that teams can backport bug fixes and if those are release critical, then further RCs can be proposed | 15:51 |
| opendevreview | Nell Jerram proposed openstack/nova master: Add managed='no' flag to libvirt XML definition for VIF type TAP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960284 | 15:51 |
| elodilles | bauzas: until Final RC deadline -> https://releases.openstack.org/flamingo/schedule.html | 15:51 |
| bauzas | elodilles: my question is specifically about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960242 | 15:52 |
| elodilles | i.e. until week R-1 | 15:52 |
| bauzas | elodilles: the master patch was merged in master which was Flamingo, this was proposed against Epoxy, can I +W it once we're past RC1 ? | 15:52 |
| sean-k-mooney | thats already merged in master before rc1 is created | 15:52 |
| bauzas | correct | 15:52 |
| sean-k-mooney | so it will be in stable/2025.2 | 15:53 |
| sean-k-mooney | so i dont see why that cant proceed | 15:53 |
| sean-k-mooney | there is no chach of a regression | 15:53 |
| bauzas | I was thinking we were holding stable approvals on /any/ stable branch during the RC phases, but that's probably me who's overthinking | 15:53 |
| sean-k-mooney | going form 2025.1 to 2025.2 | 15:53 |
| sean-k-mooney | unless it has teh poteial to impact grenade i dont hink we need too | 15:54 |
| sean-k-mooney | so older banches like 2024.2 i think does not require any freeze | 15:54 |
| elodilles | bauzas: you can, but the question is whether it is RC critical, and if not, will it cause trouble when an RC critical issue comes up and an RC2 needs to be proposed | 15:54 |
| bauzas | of course once we branch 2025.2 with RC1, any master patch merged after couldn't be backported to 2025.1 as it would require to be merged first on 2025.2 which is only accepting regression fixes | 15:54 |
| sean-k-mooney | elodilles: the patch in question was merged on master 4 days ago | 15:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954613 | 15:55 |
| elodilles | sean-k-mooney: yes, but i guess bauzas just used it as an example :) | 15:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | so in this specific example it will be included in rc1 anyway | 15:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack | 15:56 |
| bauzas | elodilles: not exactly an example, I'm a stable core and I was about to review that 2025.1 proposal, so I was wondering whether I should/could +W it after Thursday | 15:56 |
| elodilles | sean-k-mooney: and of course, as you wrote, too, until RC1 is not merged, and stable/2025.2 branch is not cut, everything will be included from 'master' | 15:56 |
| elodilles | bauzas: i see. so the question is then, if we see that too risky to merge now, just before the flamingo release. we can postpone the backport for later time, when we are over the 2025.2 Flamingo coordinated release | 15:58 |
| elodilles | bauzas: so yes, the best is to keep master (and then stable/2025.2) as stable as possible, and maybe postpone every (risky) backports | 15:58 |
| sean-k-mooney | im not sure if this woudl be condiered risky for what its worth at least when it comes to posibel impact on the 2025.2 release | 15:59 |
| elodilles | bauzas: as far as i remember you usually said that after RC1 cut stable backports to stable/<current_series> should be avoided to merge, unless they are release critical o:) | 15:59 |
| sean-k-mooney | yep ^ | 16:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | and the bot patches | 16:00 |
| elodilles | so that is a nice and safe approach :) | 16:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | its imporant to merge the bot patches including any translation patches that might be propsoed once the stable branhc is created | 16:01 |
| bauzas | elodilles: that's correct yes, that was my thinking but maybe I was overthinking it | 16:01 |
| elodilles | sean-k-mooney: yes. as those should be pretty harmless and in fact, needed (but no need for an RC2 if those are the only merged patches on the stable branch) | 16:02 |
| elodilles | bauzas: it's better to be safe than sorry o:) | 16:03 |
| Uggla | #startmeeting nova | 16:03 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Sep 9 16:03:44 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Uggla. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:03 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:03 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | 16:03 |
| Uggla | Hello everyone | 16:03 |
| sean-k-mooney | o/ | 16:03 |
| ratailor | o/ | 16:04 |
| elodilles | o/ | 16:04 |
| dansmith | o/ | 16:04 |
| Uggla | Let's start | 16:05 |
| fwiesel | o/ | 16:05 |
| Uggla | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | 16:05 |
| bauzas | \o | 16:05 |
| Uggla | #info No Critical bug | 16:05 |
| Uggla | #topic Gate status | 16:05 |
| Uggla | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | 16:06 |
| gibi | o/ | 16:06 |
| Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | 16:06 |
| * gibi is distracted :/ | 16:06 | |
| Uggla | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | 16:06 |
| Uggla | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | 16:06 |
| Uggla | #info Please try to provide a meaningful comment when you recheck | 16:06 |
| Uggla | I'm not aware of any issue on the upstream CI. Am I right ? | 16:07 |
| elodilles | maybe worth to mention osc-placement | 16:08 |
| sean-k-mooney | oh? | 16:08 |
| sean-k-mooney | is there somethign we need to adress | 16:08 |
| elodilles | tox-functional-py39 job is failing on its master and stable/2025.2 branch | 16:08 |
| sean-k-mooney | oh | 16:08 |
| sean-k-mooney | so we shoudl delete that | 16:08 |
| elodilles | i've prepared a patch for that: https://review.opendev.org/q/I7726c99961ef41c7cf5ec71bf28df15eee191877 | 16:08 |
| sean-k-mooney | and make suer we have a 3.12 job instead | 16:08 |
| sean-k-mooney | ah the clinet branches were cut last week | 16:09 |
| sean-k-mooney | so we need to backport it to 2025.2 as well | 16:09 |
| elodilles | sean-k-mooney: exactly | 16:09 |
| sean-k-mooney | since hte branch already exists | 16:09 |
| elodilles | yes | 16:09 |
| sean-k-mooney | we already have a 3.12 version fo the job so +2 | 16:09 |
| elodilles | yes, that too | 16:10 |
| gibi | I'm +2 | 16:10 |
| elodilles | thanks o/ | 16:10 |
| elodilles | then it should be fine now :] | 16:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | this is a test only chnage so i dont thinkw e need to do another release right | 16:10 |
| elodilles | sean-k-mooney: yes. no need for another release | 16:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | +1 | 16:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | anything else for ci? | 16:11 |
| elodilles | nothing from me | 16:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | gibi: you mentioned there was a pyroute2 issues | 16:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | has the bump been reverted/capped | 16:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | or are we waiting on anohter release by the pyroute2 maintainer | 16:12 |
| * Uggla know that gibi is busy in another call. | 16:13 | |
| sean-k-mooney | ah no worries we can move on | 16:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/957657 might have been the patch | 16:13 |
| Uggla | maybe, we can come back later to that point later | 16:13 |
| tkajinam | o/ | 16:13 |
| Uggla | skiping next point because gmaan is on pto. | 16:14 |
| Uggla | #topic Release Planning | 16:14 |
| Uggla | #link https://releases.openstack.org/flamingo/schedule.html | 16:14 |
| Uggla | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | 16:14 |
| Uggla | #info RC1 target is Thursday. | 16:14 |
| Uggla | #info PTG etherpad for 2026.1 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.1-ptg | 16:14 |
| elodilles | and we have the RC1 release patches proposed ;) | 16:15 |
| Uggla | thx elodilles ! | 16:15 |
| elodilles | nova: https://review.opendev.org/960103 and placement: https://review.opendev.org/960108 | 16:15 |
| gibi | (lets get back to pyroute2 at the end of the meeting)h | 16:15 |
| Uggla | gibi 👍 | 16:15 |
| Uggla | Do not forget to register to PTG | 16:16 |
| Uggla | https://openinfra.org/ptg/ | 16:16 |
| Uggla | #topic Review priorities | 16:16 |
| Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.2-status | 16:16 |
| Uggla | There are bugs listed on the documents. | 16:17 |
| Uggla | Bug maybe you should have a look at these 2: | 16:17 |
| Uggla | #link 699176: Faults from cell DB missing in GET /servers/detail | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/699176 | 16:17 |
| Uggla | #link 955657: Preserve vTPM state between power off and power on | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955657 | 16:17 |
| Uggla | #topic OpenAPI | 16:18 |
| Uggla | #link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22openapi%22+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned | 16:18 |
| Uggla | #info still 28 remaining atm. | 16:18 |
| Uggla | #topic Stable Branches | 16:19 |
| Uggla | elodilles please go ahead. | 16:19 |
| elodilles | thanks | 16:19 |
| elodilles | #info stable/2025.2 branch were cut for nova libraries | 16:19 |
| elodilles | osc-placement is covered already, so skipping that o:) | 16:19 |
| elodilles | #info stable/2025.* and stable/2024.* seem to be in OK state | 16:20 |
| elodilles | #info stable/2025.* and stable/2024.* seem to be in OK state | 16:20 |
| elodilles | #info as soon as nova + placement RC1 patches land, stable/2025.2 branches will be cut for them | 16:20 |
| elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | 16:20 |
| elodilles | that's all from me about stable, back to you Uggla | 16:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement master: [CI] Drop unsupported py39 based functional job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/959873 | 16:21 |
| elodilles | \o/ | 16:21 |
| Uggla | elodilles, I think only the prelude is missing from a "process" point of view. | 16:22 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Select appropriate image for stateless firmware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959988 | 16:23 |
| elodilles | Uggla: yes, i think that's correct | 16:23 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Select appropriate firmware for stateless firmware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959988 | 16:23 |
| elodilles | as cycle highlights have merged | 16:23 |
| sean-k-mooney | Uggla: you proposed that? last week corect or whas that the cycle highlights | 16:23 |
| Uggla | I guess we might still land some bugs too. | 16:23 |
| elodilles | Uggla: before RC1? | 16:24 |
| sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959188 | 16:24 |
| elodilles | Uggla: because in that case please add a -1 to the RC1 patch so that the release team will wait for an update there | 16:25 |
| Uggla | sean-k-mooney cycle highlights patch was merged, but the prelude is just a "copy" of the highlights. | 16:25 |
| Uggla | elodilles, I will do it, we discussed a patch I need to check | 16:26 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Ignore unsupported firmware architectures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959985 | 16:26 |
| elodilles | ACK, thanks o/ | 16:27 |
| Uggla | sean-k-mooney, not sure I answered you question.. | 16:27 |
| sean-k-mooney | Uggla: its fine i foudn the review | 16:27 |
| Uggla | sean-k-mooney thx | 16:27 |
| sean-k-mooney | i see bauzas has a -1 | 16:27 |
| Uggla | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | 16:27 |
| sean-k-mooney | but i have not looked at why | 16:27 |
| fwiesel | #info fwiesel back from PTO | 16:27 |
| Uggla | fwiesel anything you want to discuss ? | 16:27 |
| fwiesel | That's it from my side. Didn't had the time yet to look into anything except my backlog of e-mails. | 16:28 |
| fwiesel | Uggla: So, back to you | 16:28 |
| Uggla | fwiesel, thx, I just hope you pto were good. ;) | 16:28 |
| Uggla | #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal. | 16:29 |
| Uggla | #link Blog: https://gibizer.github.io/categories/eventlet/ | 16:29 |
| gibi | no news | 16:29 |
| gibi | or rather no actionable new | 16:29 |
| gibi | news | 16:29 |
| gibi | I'm waiting for master to open for G | 16:29 |
| Uggla | 👍 | 16:30 |
| dansmith | gibi: I was trying to get my s-g patch set revised yesterday | 16:30 |
| gibi | in the background I'm brewing a rally job that might be able to compare the performance of nova between eventlet and threading | 16:30 |
| dansmith | the tooling was making that hard, but I'm hoping to be able to get that up soon in G | 16:30 |
| gibi | dansmith: cool. I will review when it is up | 16:30 |
| gibi | that is it from me | 16:31 |
| Uggla | thx gibi | 16:31 |
| Uggla | #topic Open discussion | 16:31 |
| Uggla | I know bauzas wants to discuss about open infra topic. | 16:32 |
| Uggla | bauzas please go ahead. | 16:32 |
| bauzas | nothing important, this was a question whether we would want Nova presence at the OIF Summit pavilion https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/MM4OJO5CCC4GHMYUN3OJBDHTSZNB32H2/ | 16:33 |
| gibi | I cannot be there | 16:35 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.2: [CI] Drop unsupported py39 based functional job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/959874 | 16:35 |
| Uggla | bauzas, I don't manage to open the link is it something we could do ? | 16:36 |
| stephenfin | Uggla: The OpenInfra Summit 2025 will host an Open Source Pavilion booth space where open source projects can book an hour or two to showcase their work, engage with attendees, and share updates on their latest developments at the Summit. If you are interested in taking advantage of this opportunity for your project please fill out this form [0] and the event planners will get back to you with scheduling details. | 16:36 |
| bauzas | gibi: I'll be there, my question was whether you were wanting me to represent the Nova project | 16:37 |
| stephenfin | That's the bulk of it | 16:37 |
| stephenfin | (It took ages to load for me too) | 16:37 |
| gibi | bauzas: ahh I see | 16:37 |
| stephenfin | bauzas: What are you thinking? Something AI/GPU-flavoured? | 16:37 |
| gibi | bauzas: showing the latest updates might make sense | 16:37 |
| Uggla | thx stephenfin | 16:37 |
| bauzas | previously we were providing project updates | 16:37 |
| gibi | yeah someting like that^^ | 16:37 |
| bauzas | looks like the pavilion is the new form | 16:37 |
| stephenfin | Ah, nice one | 16:38 |
| bauzas | cool, then that's settled | 16:38 |
| bauzas | and Uggla, will you be at the summit ? | 16:38 |
| Uggla | yes | 16:38 |
| bauzas | fancy co-presenting ? | 16:38 |
| gibi | bauzas: if you could also mention to the folks that we are removing eventlet and ask them to try threading mode and report any issues that would be awesomej | 16:38 |
| dansmith | gibi: yeah, definitely | 16:39 |
| bauzas | gibi: that will certainly be part of the project updates :) | 16:39 |
| Uggla | gibi 👍 | 16:39 |
| dansmith | definitely try to get some people on board for testing and providing feedback | 16:39 |
| Uggla | bauzas, will be happy to copresent with you | 16:39 |
| bauzas | cool, settled as I said | 16:40 |
| gibi | ahh I see it will be in France hence we will have nice representation | 16:40 |
| bauzas | moving on ? | 16:40 |
| Uggla | anything else you want to discuss ? | 16:41 |
| gibi | o/ | 16:41 |
| gibi | pyroute2 | 16:41 |
| Uggla | sure, sorry I was about to forget about it! Thx | 16:41 |
| gibi | so the previous issue about async loops are reproduces with 0.9.4 as well | 16:42 |
| gibi | so the supposed fix wasn't a real fix, it probably decreased the chance of happening | 16:42 |
| gibi | I pinged the release channel asking if we can revert back to 0.8.x so late in the cycle. I got no answers yet | 16:42 |
| tkajinam | you mean requirements channel ? | 16:43 |
| gibi | I pinged the release channel I'm not aware of having a separate channel to requirements | 16:44 |
| elodilles | #openstack-requirements o:) | 16:44 |
| tkajinam | yeah | 16:44 |
| elodilles | but i think i pinged the release folks | 16:44 |
| sean-k-mooney | gibi: is there a workaround | 16:44 |
| elodilles | on release channel | 16:44 |
| sean-k-mooney | beyond downgrading | 16:44 |
| gibi | sean-k-mooney: try again and it will succeed | 16:44 |
| elodilles | (yeah, i did ping them) | 16:44 |
| gibi | the issue happens pretty infrequently | 16:45 |
| gibi | https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-vif/+bug/2109396 | 16:45 |
| sean-k-mooney | i guess you could also use the legacy vsctl driver if we have not deleted that yet | 16:45 |
| gibi | this is the bug it has the links | 16:45 |
| sean-k-mooney | oh actully no | 16:45 |
| gibi | I also don't have clear answer if we can revert the requirements | 16:46 |
| gibi | later on stable | 16:46 |
| tkajinam | though I've been struggling to get any feedback there. Maybe sending an email to ml would be a good option, hoping that Tony and Sean may be reading it. though I know release team has full +2 access to requirements, too. | 16:46 |
| tkajinam | I mean I've been struggling to get any feedback in #openstack-requirements | 16:47 |
| gibi | I will drop a mail to the ML | 16:47 |
| sean-k-mooney | gibi: i guess the reals concern with the cap | 16:47 |
| tkajinam | frickler has been the only one there for some time (though he is not a req team member but a release team member) | 16:47 |
| sean-k-mooney | is has neutron started depending on it | 16:47 |
| sean-k-mooney | and what are distos shiping | 16:47 |
| sean-k-mooney | if we cant cap it later we mgith eb able to work around it with a retry in os-vif by cathcing the RuntimeError | 16:48 |
| gibi | at least ykarel is aware of the issue from neutron as he discovered that the issue is happening with 0.9.4 | 16:48 |
| sean-k-mooney | meaning they likely would not object to the cap? | 16:49 |
| gibi | I don't want to solve it here. I will drop a mail to ML asking for guidance from requirements team | 16:49 |
| sean-k-mooney | i.e. its impacting them also | 16:49 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack | 16:49 |
| gibi | I think they saw it in CI | 16:49 |
| gibi | making interface attach failing | 16:49 |
| gibi | but the failure is during the call from nova | 16:50 |
| gibi | not a call form neutron to os-vif | 16:50 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack well as i said we may be able to catch that excption and retry a limtied number of tiem in os-vif | 16:50 |
| sean-k-mooney | kind of like we do for powering off cores | 16:50 |
| gibi | sure. I rather want pyroute2 to fix the async code | 16:50 |
| sean-k-mooney | btu i know neutron uses it more widely | 16:50 |
| gibi | anyhow I have nothing further on this | 16:51 |
| elodilles | (i added this to release team's weekly meeting's agenda for Friday, but i really hope that this will be sorted out until then :S) | 16:52 |
| gibi | no worries I think we can go out with Flamingo even if the bug is there. Occasional failures that are fixed by the human retrying is not an end of the world | 16:53 |
| gibi | elodilles: thanks!j | 16:53 |
| elodilles | gibi: thanks too in advance for your mail to ML about this | 16:53 |
| Uggla | good, anything else ? | 16:55 |
| tkajinam | I was wondering if I could get any thoughts for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2122296 . we don't have enough time and I likely skip the meeting next week but we can discuss it later here or the meeting in 2 weeks | 16:55 |
| tkajinam | that's about sateless firmware but I also want to discuss similar problem with sev/sev-es, too | 16:56 |
| sean-k-mooney | i belive we had a similar situration with secure boot before | 16:56 |
| sean-k-mooney | i.e. if you enabel uefi adn dont reqeust secure boto we shoudl not use the SB+SMM one right | 16:57 |
| tkajinam | yeah | 16:57 |
| tkajinam | we have firmware detection logic for secure boot now so I'm wondering if I should follow that pattern. | 16:57 |
| tkajinam | though this means that we may break existing usage with firmware without explicit support declared | 16:57 |
| tkajinam | (I feel like such usage would be anyway broken but want to hear any opinion about it | 16:58 |
| sean-k-mooney | ya i dont have context loaded but i think that would be a good thing to fix eventually | 16:58 |
| tkajinam | this is just for early heads-up | 16:58 |
| sean-k-mooney | we cant rely on libvirt to select it? | 16:59 |
| tkajinam | we can, though that would be a huge change | 16:59 |
| sean-k-mooney | i vagely recall that being a thing in newer relases | 16:59 |
| tkajinam | libvirt is now capable to select a correct firmware with only flags provided | 16:59 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack. that is prbaly the correct long term solution | 16:59 |
| tkajinam | Uggla, I think we can wrap up the call (unless anyone else has additional topics) | 17:00 |
| tkajinam | s/call/meeting/ | 17:00 |
| * gibi is done | 17:00 | |
| Uggla | ok time to close. Thanks everyone. | 17:01 |
| Uggla | #endmeeting | 17:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Sep 9 17:01:09 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 17:01 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-09-16.03.html | 17:01 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-09-16.03.txt | 17:01 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-09-16.03.log.html | 17:01 |
| gibi | Uggla: thanks | 17:01 |
| elodilles | thanks o/ | 17:01 |
| tkajinam | thanks ! | 17:02 |
| Uggla | you are welcome | 17:02 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.2: Update .gitreview for stable/2025.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/959744 | 17:03 |
| sean-k-mooney | elodilles: just an fyi i have created a watcher release note prelude and will be proposing the cycle hights for it soon. once that is done i think we are also mostly done with watcher release artifacts | 17:06 |
| sean-k-mooney | elodilles: my hope is to have those both merged before rc1 is created on thursday | 17:06 |
| gibi | Uggla: FYI I've just approved https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959604 As I consider the content to be safe to land close to RC1. We have extensive discussion about the solution on IRC last week | 17:08 |
| gibi | s/have/had/ | 17:09 |
| Uggla | gibi, thx and sorry for the mistake in the meeting. :) | 17:09 |
| gibi | Uggla: no worries | 17:10 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130 | 17:13 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.2: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2025.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/959745 | 17:15 |
| opendevreview | Nell Jerram proposed openstack/nova master: Add managed='no' flag to libvirt XML definition for VIF type TAP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960284 | 17:18 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: setup: Remove pbr's wsgi_scripts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902688 | 17:19 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate mypy configuration to pyproject.toml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953703 | 17:19 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate codespell configuration to pyproject.toml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953704 | 17:19 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate setup configuration to pyproject.toml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953705 | 17:19 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Update libvirt version support matrix for Flamingo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960301 | 17:25 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Update libvirt version support matrix for Flamingo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960301 | 17:25 |
| tkajinam | ^^^ this might be worth merging before rc1 | 17:25 |
| * tkajinam is double-checking code-name of 2025.2 | 17:26 | |
| elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ACK, will check those tomorrow, thanks for the heads up o/ | 19:12 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!