Friday, 2025-09-19

*** mhen_ is now known as mhen01:48
gibibauzas: Hi! if you have a bit of time this backport will look familiar to you https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2115905%22 :)h06:57
bauzaslolilol07:00
jlejeunegibi: hello, same request for mine https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961601 :)07:01
gibijlejeune: on it07:07
jlejeunethanks :)07:08
gibijlejeune: maybe its me but I only see the regression test being backported there. do you have the actual fix backported on top of that as well?07:11
jlejeuneyes but I haven't yet create the changes, doing07:12
gibiOK. I'm +2 on the regression test backports. Feel free to ping me when the fix backports are up. 07:14
jlejeuneperfect07:14
opendevreviewJulien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Adds regression test for bug LP#2044235  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96160107:36
opendevreviewJulien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: nova-conductor puts instance in error state  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96177407:36
opendevreviewJulien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: nova-conductor puts instance in error state  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96177507:40
opendevreviewJulien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: nova-conductor puts instance in error state  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96177807:41
jlejeunegibi: here there are ^07:42
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Reproduce bug/2115905  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96024107:47
gibijlejeune: thanks08:02
gibijlejeune: one small suggestion, you can put all these to the same gerrit topic that was used for the original bugfix so it is easy to see the list of backports in a single query08:06
jlejeunegibi: indeed, can I add a topic after having created the change ?08:30
gibijlejeune: yes on the web UI you can add it by hand08:33
jlejeunenice, done :)08:40
gibijlejeune: thanks08:46
gibielodilles: there is a simple clean backport series from jlejeune in https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug-2044235%22 if you have time :)08:47
elodillesgibi: ACK, will add it to my TODO :]08:48
gibielodilles: thanks!08:48
gibiUggla: (and others) I kept monitoring the nova-tox-py312-threading job to see if we have unexplained failures. I found three cases where this job failed but the eventlet based unit test job does not. I filed a bug and I will patch the ignore list to not run these two test cases until I have time to go back to burning down that ignore list https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/212518508:50
gibiIf anybody sees a nova-tox-py312-threading run that fails while the normal unit test job passes then please let me know08:51
Ugglagibi, ok I think we could share this in our next meeting and follow up on it if you wish.08:53
gibisure I will try to remember of it in the next meeting j)08:57
gibi:)08:57
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [nova-tox-py312-threading]Ignore failing tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96178109:00
gibiUggla: ^^ this is the immediate fix09:00
Uggla👍09:00
gibibauzas: sean-k-mooney: ^^ if you are around this fix a small gate instability09:00
bauzasgibi: looking (sorry was on meeting)09:31
bauzasgibi: thanks for continuing looking at our CI <309:32
gibiyeah I feel like I introduced a voting job so I responsible keeping that job in good health :)09:33
sean-k-mooneygibi: done11:22
sean-k-mooneygibi: sorry was not around in my morning today11:23
gibisean-k-mooney: thanks, and no worries :)12:03
gibiheads up I saw multiple multinode job failing due to the fact that the subnode nova-compute cannot connet to rabbit.12:15
gibimaybe it is intermitten infra issue but if you also see it happening on your patches then it might worth to report to infra12:16
fricklergibi: infra is watching you already ;) do you have an example I could look at?12:17
sean-k-mooneygibi: the last tim ethat happend it was a build where the nodes came form 2 diffent providers12:19
sean-k-mooneyso it woudl be good to check if all nodes came form the same provider in that failed job run12:20
gibifrickler: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/488552424c654e2e8a4d8c5cb82f02a0/logs12:20
gibifrickler: and thanks for keeping an eye on it (on me?!)12:21
fricklersean-k-mooney: yes, that was one of my ideas, but both from sjc3 in the above case12:22
sean-k-mooney https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/488552424c654e2e8a4d8c5cb82f02a0/log/zuul-info/inventory.yaml12:22
sean-k-mooneythey are both form raxflex12:22
sean-k-mooneyhttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/488552424c654e2e8a4d8c5cb82f02a0/log/zuul-info/inventory.yaml#32012:22
sean-k-mooneyso it not that htis time12:22
gibihttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7055bb2bfcb84b6388f67ad3181f8043 this was the another case I hit today12:22
sean-k-mooneyfrickler: the two node might be in diffent subnets12:24
sean-k-mooneyim not sure what the cider is but once is sueing 10.0.16.132 and the other is  10.0.17.239 for the private ip12:25
sean-k-mooney255.255.240.012:26
sean-k-mooneyok so they are in a /20 so in the same subnet12:26
sean-k-mooneyso there shoudl nto eb any firewalling between the nodes then12:27
sean-k-mooneywell assumign they are in the same secuiryt group and we allow access from member of the same secuirty group but i dont think secuirty groups are likely to be the issue here12:28
sean-k-mooneyif it was it woudl affect all jobs on that provider12:28
fricklerthere should not be two ethernet interfaces. we same some changes recently that could cause this. let's move to #opendev12:28
sean-k-mooneyack, ya i notcied there are 2 interface and 2 diffent private ips12:29
sean-k-mooneyack on swaping12:29
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Centralize cooperative yield  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95099112:35
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [hacking] N374 do not use time.sleep(0) to yield  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95099212:35
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make RBD Tpool usage conditional  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95608912:40
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make libvirt Tpool proxying conditional  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95609012:40
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix ProviderTree copying with threading Lock  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95609112:40
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [test]Further categorization of disabled unit tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95609212:40
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [vncproxy]Handle ssl.wrap_socket removal in py312  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95591512:40
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Warn on long task wait time for executor  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95266612:40
bauzasgibi: frickler: I probably have another related failure https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/2ba0b6a8665e4c66883119ca7c602f6a12:59
gibiFYI, next week I want to get back to the normal eventlet sync meeting schedule. I updated the doc with the current status and things that can be reviewed already https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vCOmD7kxmRFk9IG8WbVhyqKlCpOPDZFJgkUSwYdQHbM/edit?tab=t.013:01
*** haleyb|out is now known as haleyb13:04
bauzasgibi: cool, I guess that procedurally, we just need another blueprint for the Gazpacho release to be accepted13:07
gibiuhh ohh yeah13:14
gibiI promised to do that13:14
gibilet me remember if I did it already :)13:14
gibiohh hey I did it https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/eventlet-removal-gazpacho13:15
gibias acceptance I'm not affraid of asking for it on the next meeting13:15
* gibi goes updating the agenda for the next nova meeting 13:16
bauzascool :)13:18
* bauzas plays the lawyer role, not the PTL one :)13:18
bauzaslawyer czar, lemme be it :)13:19
bauzasI'm French, I'm naturally leaning towards this role13:19
gibimeeting agend has been amended, French lawsuite suit successfully avoided :)j13:22
bauzasheh13:26
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova master: Add admin context when filling metadata on ImagePropsWeigher  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96167314:17
opendevreviewSylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Regression test for ImagePropsWeigher due to missing context  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96180314:21
opendevreviewSylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Add admin context when filling metadata on ImagePropsWeigher  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96180414:21
opendevreviewSylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Regression test for ImagePropsWeigher due to missing context  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96180514:26
opendevreviewSylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Add admin context when filling metadata on ImagePropsWeigher  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96180614:26
elodillesgibi jlejeune : the bug fix has landed AFTER stable/2025.2 was cut, so it needs to be cherry picked to stable/2025.2 first :S https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug-204423516:07
elodillesand note that as long as we are before the Final RC deadline, it should be merged to stable/2025.2 only if this bug is release critical :/16:09
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova stable/2024.1: libvirt: Disable VMCoreInfo device for SEV-encrypted instances  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95991417:49
-opendevstatus- NOTICE: All hosted mailing lists are undergoing maintenance for the next hour: https://lists.opendev.org/archives/list/service-announce@lists.opendev.org/message/UTMXRWWTE5WA3IF6WS3BIEJAORI2D62V/20:01

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!