Wednesday, 2025-10-08

*** mhen_ is now known as mhen02:01
opendevreviewSam Morrison proposed openstack/nova master: Filter out deleted instances when looking for build timouts  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88012502:09
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw_tpm_secret_security image property  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/94019606:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw:tpm_secret_security extra spec validation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/94019706:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `user` secret security  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/94250206:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `host` secret security  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/94179506:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add vtpm_secret_(uuid|value) to LibvirtLiveMigrateData  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95262806:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/94148306:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: bump service version and require it for live migration  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96205106:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/94202106:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/92577106:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95262906:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95697506:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96205206:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add documentation and reno for live migration  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96288906:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95747706:13
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/94202106:20
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/92577106:20
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95262906:20
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95697506:20
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96205206:20
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add documentation and reno for live migration  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96288906:20
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95747706:20
opendevreviewNicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95968206:46
opendevreviewRajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Fix 'nova-manage image_property set' command  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96334806:47
jlejeunehello all, can someone may have time to check my change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963156 please ?07:14
*** sambork_ is now known as sambork07:20
bauzasjlejeune: looking07:51
jlejeunebauzas: thanks, it's the first step to help me to reproduce the bug#2085135 07:55
bauzasjlejeune: ack, I don't have a context, so this is related to a bug ?07:56
jlejeuneyes, that one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/208513507:57
jlejeunelike explained in my commit message, I noticed that in tests, we don't update the mapped field of compute nodes after creating their mapping object, and I think we should, like it's done here: https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/commit/cc742602bcdeff185ff120452e4f301398f6aa7b/nova/objects/host_mapping.py#L20908:00
jlejeunebauzas: I've replied to your comments08:13
bauzascool will look08:16
bauzasjlejeune: ah right, thanks, you were right about the fact we need to call twice the ServiceFixture but could you please add the bug report in the commit msg ?08:19
opendevreviewJulien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Update start_service() function in test  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96315608:33
jlejeunebauzas: done08:34
bauzasjlejeune: thanks, will do another round08:34
bauzasjlejeune: I'm just looking now at what lookups for context nested cell cache08:37
jlejeunethanks bauzas !08:42
jlejeunebauzas: do I need to ask for more reviews from another core devs ?09:15
bauzashopefully no :)09:17
bauzasI have more time for this cycle upstream \o/09:17
jlejeunebauzas: ok, cool :)09:35
opendevreviewSylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add a regression test for ImagePropsWeigher  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96335710:28
opendevreviewSylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Fix fill_metadata usage for the ImagePropertiesWeigher  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96335810:28
opendevreviewPavlo Shchelokovskyy proposed openstack/nova master: Return Conflict from attach_interface when no PCI slots  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96336310:57
sean-k-mooneyjlejeune: on i remeber this bug report, so ok you making the test setup work more like reality with the cell db update and adjusting the two test that fail as a sidefect.10:57
jlejeunesean-k-mooney: exactly, thanks for your votes11:21
jlejeuneI'm going to push my new regression test when that first change will be merged11:21
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova master: Update start_service() function in test  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96315611:35
opendevreviewJulien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Adds regression test for bug LP#2085135  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96336811:45
jlejeunebauzas: sean-k-mooney: here it is ^11:48
sean-k-mooneycan you rebase the fix change on top of the repoducer. regression test shoudl idealy be in the regression folder in a file named test_bug_#######.py11:53
opendevreviewJulien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Reset the mapped field of nodes at service deletion  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/93302211:59
jlejeunedone for the rebase12:00
sean-k-mooneythat does not seem to be rebased on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96336812:02
sean-k-mooneyso i was expectign to see that with the rebase it would fial in ci 12:03
sean-k-mooneyuntil you later update it to modify the regression test to nolonger assert that the excption is raised12:03
jlejeunefor me  it made more sense to put it in test_host_mapping module but I can move it in a dedicated module if you insist 12:07
*** iurygregory_ is now known as iurygregory12:08
gibibauzas: can you look back to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/947260 I promise it is very simple12:09
bauzasgibi: thanks for the reminder12:10
bauzasdid it12:10
gibithanks12:12
opendevreviewJulien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Adds regression test for bug LP#2085135  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96336812:19
opendevreviewJulien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Adds regression test for bug LP#2085135  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96336812:20
opendevreviewJulien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Reset the mapped field of nodes at service deletion  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/93302212:25
opendevreviewJulien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Reset the mapped field of nodes at service deletion  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/93302212:29
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Prune a_c search space by invalid prefixes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96277612:29
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Inline _consolidate_allocation_requests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96305212:29
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Release notes for bug/2126751  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96327512:29
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Prune a_c search space by invalid prefixes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96277612:52
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Inline _consolidate_allocation_requests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96305212:52
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Release notes for bug/2126751  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96327512:52
gibidansmith: I fixed the comments and replied to you questions12:55
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel12:56
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Release notes for bug/2126751  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96327512:56
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement stable/2025.2: Remove excessive logging from GET a_c  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96338213:03
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement stable/2025.1: Remove excessive logging from GET a_c  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96338313:04
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement stable/2024.2: Remove excessive logging from GET a_c  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96338413:05
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Prune a_c search space by invalid prefixes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96277613:26
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Inline _consolidate_allocation_requests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96305213:26
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Release notes for bug/2126751  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96327513:26
dansmithgibi: replied13:41
bauzasdansmith: not sure you saw it, but I eventually found the solution so please review that series : https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2125935%2213:52
bauzasbtw. I lol'd when I saw BTTF2 and BTTF1 (the best movies <3)13:53
bauzass/BTTF2/BTTF313:53
dansmiththere is more BTTF trivia sprinkled (by me) through our tests, FYI... but yep, will look in a bit13:56
bauzasthanks13:59
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Prune a_c search space by invalid prefixes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96277614:10
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Inline _consolidate_allocation_requests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96305214:10
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Release notes for bug/2126751  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96327514:10
gibidansmith: thanks. I think everything is fixed now ^^14:10
dansmithgibi: just one more nit.. just ooooooone more14:25
dansmith(not really)14:25
gibi:)14:26
gibithanks14:26
dansmithgibi: so the inlining patch.. is that really a big benefit?14:28
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova master: Remove nova.service.process_launcher  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/94726014:29
gibiyep it can half runtime or bigger configs like for for a compute with 21 devs and a flavor with 21 devs requested14:30
gibis/or/for/14:30
dansmithbut why? just overhead for the function call?14:30
dansmith(few minutes late to the eventlet call, fyi)14:30
gibiit is not just inlining the call it is avoiding recalculation of things by re-using intermediate data and relying on the fact that the logic behind the call is cumulative14:31
dansmithokay, would we get most of the benefit by just making a better function instead of having to inline? I haven't looked at it in detail yet, so..14:33
sean-k-mooneygibi: dansmith  i belive this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/679385 was related to that work but its not the optimistation i was refering too15:16
gibisean-k-mooney: https://blog.leafe.com/graph-database-follow-up/ this describes one of the experiment15:18
sean-k-mooneyoh it was tetsuro that was workign on this15:20
sean-k-mooneyya i remeber taliksing about graphql as well i belvie this was all arount th time of the second vancouver summit15:20
gibiI remember the room where Ed showed his trials but I cannot associate a city to the room :)15:23
sean-k-mooneyit may have been the second denver one also 15:28
sean-k-mooneyit was one of the last in person ones15:28
sean-k-mooneybut ya the preor post had some imperssin ve early showing https://blog.leafe.com/placement-graph-examples/ honestly whyile i do think adopting a graph based db on teh backend might ultimpalty make sense. moving an existing cloud and supproting the full api of placemetn with its special cases liek memerof  ectra woudl be non trivail to do 15:32
sean-k-mooneyneo4j is perhapse even more popular today the it was back then with the riase of llms and rag15:33
sean-k-mooneybut java is less so15:33
*** sfinucan is now known as stephenfin15:44
opendevreviewMerged openstack/os-resource-classes master: Drop basepython  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-resource-classes/+/96280616:15
opendevreviewMerged openstack/placement master: Remove remaining basepython  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/96280417:11
opendevreviewsean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add ResourceProviderWeigher for capacity-aware scheduling  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95313119:17
opendevreviewsean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add ResourceProviderWeigher for capacity-aware scheduling  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95313120:25
opendevreviewsean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add ResourceProviderWeigher for capacity-aware scheduling  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95313123:12
opendevreviewsean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add ResourceProviderWeigher for capacity-aware scheduling  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/95313123:21

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!