Wednesday, 2026-03-11

opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Add functional reproducer for bug 2125030  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97904100:55
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova master: Support multiple allocations for vGPUs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/84575704:44
nicolairuckelmelwitt: Should I just abandon this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979866 and create a new one with the correct cherry-picks?08:05
opendevreviewMax proposed openstack/nova master: fix: orphaned attachments during migration delete  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97204509:16
opendevreviewNicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Add functional reproducer for bug 2125030  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97986409:29
opendevreviewNicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Move cleanup of vTPM secret from driver to compute  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97986509:29
opendevreviewNicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Preserve vTPM state between power off and power on  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97986609:29
nicolairuckelThe gate fails with an sqlalchemy error for me: https://b49a1a6bd7022e637e55-03d448e06513a4e4bb78797852449f92.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/openstack/cf4f116365064c10b0f3e76c6db33568/testr_results.html I vaguely remember people here talking about some sqlalchemy stuff. Was that related to that?09:55
nicolairuckelI ran the same command (tox -epy312-threading -vv --skip-missing-interpreters=false) locally without any errors.09:55
gibinicolairuckel: am I blind or that job should not even run that test case due to the known issue https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/threading_unit_test_excludes.txt#L3810:34
opendevreviewSylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests for NUMA aware vswitches  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97999910:42
nicolairuckelgibi: That test doesn't seem to be excluded for 2025.2 though.10:45
opendevreviewThibaut Démaret proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: add disk rotation_rate support for local disks  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97969311:02
gibiI will investigate11:09
nicolairuckelhttps://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/2025.2/threading_unit_test_excludes.txt11:10
elodillessorry, i did not see the discussion and rechecked it, but at least nova-tox-py312-threading has passed now o:)11:24
gibiOK so https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953475 is in 2025.2 so the job expected to run that branch11:25
gibiI guess there was a fix on the exclude list that was not backported to 2025.211:25
nicolairuckeland 2025.1 if I see that correctly11:26
gibiyepp https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961781 this is missing from stable. I will do the backports11:27
nicolairuckelthank you11:27
gibithanks for notifying11:27
gibinicolairuckel: I don't think the job should run on 2025.1 11:28
gibibut let me double check11:28
nicolairuckelIt's very self-serving for me. :D11:28
gibi:) that is fine 11:29
gibiyeah it does not exists on 2025.111:29
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: [nova-tox-py312-threading]Ignore failing tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/98001311:30
gibielodilles: ^^11:31
elodillesthanks, looking o/11:31
*** tobias-u1 is now known as tobias-urdin11:33
elodillesgibi: +2+W'd it11:34
elodillesthanks for backporting it o/11:34
gibithanks for the quick review11:39
r-taketnHello, Uggla, gibi, bauzas. Regarding sev refactor series, my understanding from this week's irclogs is that reviews will restart after stable/2026.01(RC1) branch is cut. Is that correct? 11:46
gibir-taketn: yes that was agreed on the last nova meeting on Monday11:46
r-taketnGot it. Thanks for confirming.11:48
DominikDanelski[m]sean-k-mooney: If you were interested, I addressed your comments and finally dealt with the flaky tests in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969251 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968446 so both now pass.13:23
opendevreviewDominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Object changes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97820913:28
opendevreviewDominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Scheduler changes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97117613:30
opendevreviewDominik proposed openstack/nova master: Regression test for Placement allocations remaining during failed schedule  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96925113:37
opendevreviewDominik proposed openstack/nova master: Remove Placement allocations in the broken build cleanup  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/96844613:38
sean-k-mooneyDominikDanelski[m]: ill need to find some dedicated time to reveiw the actual fix but we can likely proceed with the repoducer13:39
sean-k-mooneyi think the acual fix is reasonable13:40
nicolairuckelI noticed something else that seems odd to me. The CI fails for one of my backports to 2025.1 (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979866) because of the check-cherry-pick job. Since the cherry-picked commit wasn't merged to 2025.2 yet that makes sense to me. But shouldn't this also fail then? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979865.13:40
sean-k-mooneybut i have not loaded context on the code to really say definititvly13:40
opendevreviewAkira KAMIO proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: honor flavor disk bus and SCSI model for BFV  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/98007213:55
opendevreviewThibaut Démaret proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: add disk rotation_rate support for local disks  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97969314:05
Ugglagibi or melwitt can you have a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/934984/9  there is a +2 from dansmith and sean-k-mooney previously. So I think it can be merged. Unless dansmith has an objection ?14:46
dansmithno direct objection other than that rc1 is tomorrow and we really need to be quieting down.. you decide if it's better to do that now vs backport on friday.. like, if we start seeing failures after rc1 is cut...14:47
sean-k-mooneyi can review again im not against +2ing but im inclidned to hold +w until rc1 is tagged14:48
Ugglasean-k-mooney, dansmith, we merged the reproducer. Is it ok if we don't merge the fix before rc1 ?14:52
sean-k-mooneysure why would it not be14:52
opendevreviewMax proposed openstack/nova master: fix: device_by_alias should respect config type  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97565114:52
dansmithof course14:52
sean-k-mooneywe have had repoduces in the code base fo months before the acual fix14:52
sean-k-mooneyits just a test and has no runtime impact on the shipped nova content14:53
Ugglaok so it will be after rc1.14:53
sean-k-mooneywe can proably merge it early next week 14:53
sean-k-mooneywe just wotn cherry pick it until after the offical release is done14:53
sean-k-mooneynote ill be on pto monday->wednesday inclusive14:54
Ugglasean-k-mooney, dansmith, bauzas, gibi, gmaan I think nothing on your radars that still needs to land before RC1 ?14:55
Ugglamelwitt too ^ 14:55
dansmithnothing on my radar, although the dev alias fixes from MaxLamprecht[m] are definitely on my short list after14:55
sean-k-mooneynot form me. i have some bug fixes i would like review on but not before rc1 or the final rc14:55
Ugglastephenfin too ^ 14:56
sean-k-mooneyUggla: i think most of us are in a wait and see holding patten until the rc is done and trying to minimise change14:56
Ugglasean-k-mooney, yep that's my feeling too. But just checking with all of you.14:57
sean-k-mooneyUggla: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2140631%22 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975500 are the changes i personally want to make progress on next but they can wait a week or two14:58
sean-k-mooneythe second id very low risk but we can backprot that to enable the ci testing later. neutorn alrady have it enabeld on there side14:59
Ugglasean-k-mooney ok14:59
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/placement stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/98009415:00
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/placement stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/98009515:00
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/placement master: Update master for stable/2026.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/98009615:00
sean-k-mooneyon a releated note ^ they have actully started creating the rc/stable branch today so the point is sort of mute15:01
sean-k-mooneyUggla:  on an unrelated note did you ever start woring on manilla share hotplug or live migration supprot15:04
sean-k-mooneyi know we wanted to do add supprot for memfd as well15:04
sean-k-mooneyto improve the overall expeince15:04
sean-k-mooneyis that still somethign your interested in?15:04
Ugglasean-k-mooney, this is on the radar for H. I know I'll have some time to prepare the spec for share hotplug and live migration support. So we could discuss at the PTG.15:06
stephenfinUggla: nothing from me either. I have a few bug fixes starting at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974687/ but they're all latent issues/not regressions15:06
stephenfinthough I will note server share support is still not done in SDK or OSC15:06
stephenfinthat should really happen in H: it's been 3 or 4 cycles now15:06
Ugglastephenfin, i know  :(15:06
sean-k-mooneyUggla: ya it would be nice ot have at least a daft spec on that topic before the ptg if you intened to progress it but cool good to know15:07
sean-k-mooneystephenfin: 2 it merged in 2025.115:07
sean-k-mooneybut yes it should15:07
stephenfin3 we won't get it done in G15:08
stephenfin:)15:08
sean-k-mooneyi guess it depend on how you count be either way ya it shoudl be resolved if we expect to extend it in h15:08
sean-k-mooneyi woudl assum that horizon also does not have supprot for it15:09
Ugglasean-k-mooney, stephenfin, my understanding is that it is an "internal" priority now, so that might help.15:09
sean-k-mooneycoudl be good to add to a cross project session15:09
opendevreviewAkira KAMIO proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: support flavor disk/cdrom bus and SCSI model  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/98007215:09
stephenfinthat would be my assumption. And I don't think Gophercloud does either so right now no one can use it using our clients15:09
stephenfinexcept if they're using gtema's rust client, perhaps15:09
gmaanUggla: stephenfin we need to get this in before rc1, still stuck in gate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97849415:21
sean-k-mooneystephenfin: speaking of sdk/client supprot have you added suprpot for flavor seach by name15:21
sean-k-mooneyi.e. openstack flavor list --name ...15:21
stephenfinoh, I thought that had merged already15:21
sean-k-mooneyit may have i just never checked15:21
sean-k-mooneyoh you mean ganshams link15:22
sean-k-mooneythat woudl quallify for rc2 anwyay and befcause fo the oder we do the rpc version pinning we alwasy? have one15:22
stephenfinyeah. I haven't done the client changes yet15:23
sean-k-mooneyok i should go back to testing things o/15:25
stephenfinsean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/98010115:27
sean-k-mooneydo we need changes (seperatly) for 10315:28
sean-k-mooneyto acoont for the rild cleanup15:29
opendevreviewMerged openstack/placement master: Update master for stable/2026.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/98009615:29
sean-k-mooneymaybe it woudl be good to have a list of these soemwhere15:29
opendevreviewMerged openstack/placement stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/98009415:30
opendevreviewMerged openstack/placement stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/98009515:32
gibiUggla: nothing on my radar that needed in rc115:51
gibibut I see we are tracking a fix above15:51
opendevreviewSylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests for NUMA aware vswitches  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97999916:07
Ugglagibi, yes gmaan's patch which does not want to land. :)16:34
opendevreviewSylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests for NUMA aware vswitches  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97999917:48
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Move cleanup of vTPM secret from driver to compute  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97905220:37
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend vTPM live migration spec  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/98016521:28
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Propose vTPM live migration: 'deployment' mode  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/98016621:28
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Propose vTPM live migration: 'deployment' mode  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/98016621:31
melwittUggla: my lame attempt to split the spec ^ I kept the original blueprint url the same but updated the "title" to say 'host' mode. and I made a new blueprint for 'deployment' mode here https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vtpm-live-migration-deployment-mode (which is linked in the new spec)21:34
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova master: Fix wrong strict assertion of quota class set id  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/97849421:45

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!