Wednesday, 2024-11-27

opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.db master: Deprecate iteritems  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.db/+/93631401:58
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.serialization master: Ignore iteritems() and use items() solely  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.serialization/+/93631502:02
*** mhen_ is now known as mhen02:19
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Introduce backend system in oslo.service  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/93578308:01
*** ralonsoh_ is now known as ralonsoh10:07
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Introduce backend system in oslo.service  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/93578312:18
tkajinamwe are supposed to start the meeting, right ?13:06
tkajinamdamani[m], ^^^13:06
damani[m]#startmeeting oslo13:08
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed Nov 27 13:08:42 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is damani[m]. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:08
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:08
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'oslo'13:08
damani[m]hberaud, tkajinam, meeting time 13:09
hberaud[m]o/13:09
damani[m]#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/epoxy-oslo-meeting-tracking13:09
tkajinamo/13:09
damani[m]do you have some topic you would like to discuss 13:12
hberaud[m]nope13:13
tkajinamgive me a few sec13:14
damani[m]#topic add the backend for olso.service 13:14
damani[m]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/935783?usp=dashboard13:16
tkajinamdamani[m], will you explain something about it ?13:21
hberaud[m]still there?13:21
* tkajinam added a few review links to the etherpad to mention these later13:22
damani[m]tkajinam, can you eventually take a look to that patch13:22
damani[m]otherwise, nothing more 13:22
hberaud[m]tkajinam: I validated your patches, I put one or two comments13:23
damani[m]#topic a few oslo.utils patches need attention13:23
tkajinamI've left a quick comment but will take a look later... though I probably have to look into heat problems first13:23
damani[m]ok i will take a look 13:24
tkajinamdamani[m], I wonder if you have any update about the implementation coming next ? I think comments from hberaud[m] and me are dependent on it, I guess13:24
tkajinamI think we are agreeing with the overall design of that switch and then we have to see how the switch will be used next13:25
hberaud[m]yes my comments totally depends on the following steps13:25
hberaud[m]For now I've nothing more to add,  all i had to say is already said13:26
damani[m] i have answered to the comment 13:27
hberaud[m]I'll let Mike and Takashi decide, I'd have prefered not using the NotImplementedError and not introduce the option while we have no available backends, but if they are ok with that, then I'll put my +213:29
hberaud[m]I'll put a comment13:30
damani[m]tkajinam, i agree with you and we can have the option already now 13:30
damani[m]and i will remove the threading at the moment 13:30
tkajinamI think we can continue the discussion in the review. at this stage I believe we don't need huge update from the current state and it's safe to submit the subsequent changes for actual logic implementation13:30
damani[m]hberaud, i have put a comment about the NotImplementedError again this morning 13:31
damani[m]but ok i will change it 13:31
*** iurygregory_ is now known as iurygregory13:31
hberaud[m]Yeah I see your answer13:31
damani[m]some other topic we need to discuss this week?13:31
hberaud[m]nope13:32
damani[m]#topic action for the next meeting 13:32
damani[m]update the meeting with all the dates 13:32
tkajinamyeah and we may put the template with on-going work like oslo.service update13:33
damani[m]#topic open discussion13:33
damani[m]tkajinam, yes right 13:33
damani[m]something else?13:34
damani[m]otherwise i think we are done for today 13:34
tkajinamnothing else. we can discuss details about the patches I put in the doc in gerrit13:34
tkajinamonce these are merged I'll proposed a new release. just fyi13:34
damani[m]sounds good 13:34
damani[m]tkajinam, hberaud, thanks a lot for your time and your participation 13:35
tkajinam:-)13:35
damani[m]#endmeeting13:36
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed Nov 27 13:36:38 2024 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)13:36
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/oslo/2024/oslo.2024-11-27-13.08.html13:36
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/oslo/2024/oslo.2024-11-27-13.08.txt13:36
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/oslo/2024/oslo.2024-11-27-13.08.log.html13:36
hberaud[m]thanks damani 13:36
tkajinamthank you13:37
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.utils master: Add a release note about the new crypt utilities  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/93637113:37
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Introduce backend system in oslo.service  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/93578313:37
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.utils master: Add a release note about the new crypt utilities  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/93637113:39
damani[m]code review done 13:47
damani[m]about oslo.service i have remove threading from the choices 13:47
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Introduce backend system in oslo.service  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/93578313:50
damani[m]hberaud, the option is not anymore exposed 13:50
damani[m]the code is here but not exposed 13:51
damani[m]and about the NotImplementedError as i said if the key is not present that mean a component is not provide by the backend 13:53
damani[m]so for me it seems align with the not implemented 13:53
damani[m]but if you really want i can change it 13:53
hberaud[m]My comments are cosmetic things, lets go through Mike is comment14:01
hberaud[m]His approach will surely decide what we want14:02
hberaud[m]And what we should have14:03
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Introduce backend system in oslo.service  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/93578314:03
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Introduce backend system in oslo.service  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/93578314:05
damani[m]hberaud, zzzeek, tkajinam, i have updated the patch 14:05
damani[m]i think now it's good :)14:05
damani[m]i hope 14:05
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Introduce backend system in oslo.service  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/93578314:15
opendevreviewMerged openstack/oslo.log master: Remove windows support  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.log/+/93263114:17
*** iurygregory_ is now known as iurygregory14:42
opendevreviewMerged openstack/oslo.utils master: Fix get_my_ipv6 in absence of IPv6  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/93624714:46
opendevreviewMerged openstack/oslo.utils master: Fix get_my_ipv4 in absence of IPv4  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/93627315:11
zigohberaud[m]: Hi there ! Could we have reviews for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/931899 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/935525 so I can have https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/936357 to pass ?15:14
hberaud[m]zigo: well both path are already reviewed15:15
hberaud[m]gates are processing...15:16
zigoOh, missed them, this happened this afternoon, sorry for this.15:16
hberaud[m]np15:16
zigoThen I guess the question is: will there be a new oslo.utils release soon then?15:16
hberaud[m]s/path/patches/15:16
hberaud[m]no idea, that's more a question for damani  or tkajinam 15:17
opendevreviewMerged openstack/oslo.utils master: Add utility to replace crypt.crypt  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/93189915:23
zigo:)15:24
opendevreviewMerged openstack/oslo.utils master: Add utility to replace crypt.mksalt  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/93552515:37
tkajinamhberaud[m], could you review this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/936371 ?15:53
hberaud[m]OMW15:53
tkajinamthx15:53
tkajinamonce that is merged I'll proposed a release. I noticed there is a breaking change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/903924 being included in the new release so I'll adjust the version number then15:54
hberaud[m]done15:54
tkajinamhberaud[m], thx !15:54
hberaud[m]let me know if you need a review on the release side15:54
tkajinamhberaud[m], will do. thx !15:55
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.utils master: Adjust the version in descriptions  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/93638315:55
opendevreviewMerged openstack/oslo.utils master: Add a release note about the new crypt utilities  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/93637115:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!