Thursday, 2013-08-08

*** rhsu has joined #openstack-qa00:03
*** hemna is now known as hemnafk00:05
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-qa00:14
*** woodspa has joined #openstack-qa00:18
*** rhsu has quit IRC00:19
*** woodspa has quit IRC00:22
*** woodspa has joined #openstack-qa00:23
*** rhsu has joined #openstack-qa00:25
*** rhsu has quit IRC00:26
dkranzlifeless: Thanks for the info. That is very helpful.  clarkb: Peace. We just moved tempest off of nose completely.00:39
dkranzclarkb: There are people who have nose plugins and have been using them for a long time, before there was a testr.00:40
clarkbdkranz: sorry I have such horrible memories of the horror00:40
dkranzclarkb: I was exploring possible upgrade paths.00:40
clarkbdkranz: normally I would sympathize but by nature those things are horribly broken...00:40
dkranzclarkb: Well, nose was used by a fair number of people. Including us for a *long* time :)00:41
dkranzclarkb: But I am not disagreeing with you.00:41
clarkband we did have to reimplement several things that were in nose to make people happy. There is a subunit to pyunit colorizor in nova so that you can get colorized output if you want, and the html reported script was ported to report off of subunit00:42
clarkband coverage is implemented independently00:42
clarkb(ish, we actually use a small hack and have testr call cover.py instead of python when running the tests to get coverage)00:43
clarkbI guess what I am trying to say is we have more properly done the above and ditched the equivalent nose plugins because ugh00:43
dkranzclarkb: Fair enough. Now that we are logging irc here I can just point people at this thread :).00:50
*** woodspa_ has joined #openstack-qa01:26
*** woodspa_ has quit IRC01:27
openstackgerritDean Troyer proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Add tools/install_pip.sh  https://review.openstack.org/3982701:29
*** woodspa has quit IRC01:30
openstackgerritIvan-Zhu proposed a change to openstack-dev/grenade: add nova v3 api support in upgrade  https://review.openstack.org/4013402:28
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa03:03
*** LiangZheng has joined #openstack-qa03:10
*** HenryG has quit IRC03:22
*** turul_ has joined #openstack-qa03:27
*** turul_ is now known as afazekas03:28
afazekasstevebaker: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40538/03:29
stevebakerafazekas: that was deliberate.03:30
stevebakerthere we go, grumpy comments made ;)03:34
stevebakerpossibly it is time to create a demo_admin user in devstack03:35
afazekasstevebaker: I remember it was in you commit message, I just wanted to be sure nothing changed..03:36
stevebakeryep, thanks for the headsup03:36
afazekasDo you know,  will this change be updated https://review.openstack.org/#/c/34866/11 ?03:39
lifelessdkranz: I'm happy to help folk achieve any specific goal they have with testr.03:43
lifelessdkranz: I'm a small-tools + clean-interfaces guy these days; if there is a place where a plugin interface will help testr, I'll gladly add plugins03:44
lifelessdkranz: (I wrote the bzr plugins API)03:44
stevebakerafazekas: i don't know, I hope so03:46
lifelessdkranz: but testr is growing bits as folk need them rather than me going and aggressively making it all plugin based. I think thats largely because the problems testr wants to solve are being solved first-time-around, so I don't have a rilliant feel for the ways extensions will need to interact.03:46
clarkbI haven't felt a need for a proper plugin system yet. I attribute a lot of that to subunit03:47
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Remove wait_for_image_resp_code  https://review.openstack.org/3899503:51
clarkblifeless: it would be kind of cool if for test in `testr list-tests | sed 1d` ; do testr run $test ; done could be expressed in a way that didn't run discover over and over and over again03:51
clarkbI think the better way to do it is just run the test directly right? using testtools.run?03:52
lifelessclarkb: a) it can; b) I have a patch just about ready to go to do testr run-tests --isolated and do it all for you in one step03:52
clarkbooh03:52
clarkbI approve of this change03:52
lifelessclarkb: testr lists-tests | sed 1d; do testr run-tests --load-list <(echo $test); done03:54
lifelessclarkb: will avoid discovery for you today, IIRC.03:55
clarkbgood to know, thanks03:57
afazekasstevebaker: a demo_admin sounds good to me, sooner or later the special user will be generated in tempest side anyway03:59
*** afazekas has quit IRC04:31
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC04:33
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Remove duplicate image tests for tenant authZ  https://review.openstack.org/3964104:41
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Flag InstanceCfnInitTestJSON as the first slow heat test  https://review.openstack.org/4073804:41
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-qa04:52
*** Ater has joined #openstack-qa04:52
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Handle the credentials as object  https://review.openstack.org/3864105:03
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: .conf suffix for the horizon config on Fedora  https://review.openstack.org/4035205:13
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack/tempest: setUpClass/tearDownClass full chain  https://review.openstack.org/3934605:24
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Remove wait_for_image_resp_code  https://review.openstack.org/3899505:31
mkoderer afazekas ping05:54
afazekasmkoderer: pong06:00
afazekasI can remove the never used code from the end of the files06:01
afazekasThe info level logging happens on exception06:01
mkodererafazekas: ;) sorry that I wasn't clear in my final commet06:01
afazekasSo it can be even error level, but it should be on lover level than error06:01
mkodererafazekas: yes that's just minor thinks06:02
mkodererafazekas: just because the whole file is called "debug"06:02
mkodererafazekas: and that's why it sounded more like debug messages06:02
afazekasthere will be more things there when needed, and it will get some config option06:02
afazekasbut those prints will indicate missing iptables NAT rules06:03
afazekas2 issue happens on the neutron job06:03
afazekas missing fixed IP06:03
afazekasmissing floating IP rules06:03
mkodererI mean such function is useful for many use cases06:03
afazekasSo what needs to be changed ?06:04
afazekasor here : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38980/06:04
mkodereryes delete those "Mini tests"06:05
mkodererthat's a good question06:05
mkodererits already on the agenda of the qa meeting today06:06
mkodererI think with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38980/ we could stop duplicating code06:07
afazekasProbably I will -1 the testr serial default, since I did not find the log is saved on the gate06:07
afazekasmkoderer: I will submit a configurable test son, and you will see how this options can be used to have focused or less focused test06:09
mkodererafazekas: what do you think about the idea to introduce a new decorator for the stress test06:10
afazekasBTW: neutron issues usually happens after ~20 euca run  (removed volume test part)06:10
mkodererso we could easily mark tempest test that they can be used as stresstest?06:11
afazekasmkoderer: every not numbered test method can be used in the stress tests now06:11
mkodererafazekas: yes but not all are usefull for it06:11
afazekasWe should tag all user test case anyway, as part of the API validation subset (refstack)06:11
mkodererafazekas: and not all are tested06:11
afazekasIf you can tag a good collection it is good for me06:12
mkodererok never heard about it06:12
mkodererI mean I like the idea that the author on a certain test can think about tagging it as stresstest just by adding a line06:13
mkodererI hope we can use all scenario tests as stress test06:14
afazekashttps://etherpad.openstack.org/RefStackBlueprint06:14
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-qa06:15
afazekasso the story is the providers provides several users for API validation testing06:15
afazekasProbably without full admin privileges :)06:15
afazekaswith disabled per class tenant isolation, the test set which can work can be used06:16
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Dump basic network info  in the test_network_basic_ops  https://review.openstack.org/4043506:17
mkodererafazekas: sound really interesting06:17
mkodererafazekas: is this already somehow official? need to tell my boss about this plan06:18
afazekashttp://refstack.org/ it has web page, probably mordred and sdague can tell you the status06:23
mkodererI already found it ;) thanks06:24
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-qa06:30
*** tkammer has joined #openstack-qa06:33
*** jhenner has quit IRC06:33
openstackgerritanju Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Added negative tests for server  https://review.openstack.org/4081306:55
openstackgerritanju Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Added negative tests for server  https://review.openstack.org/4081306:56
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-qa06:57
*** Anju has joined #openstack-qa07:02
*** jhenner has quit IRC07:03
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC07:05
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa07:21
openstackgerritMarc Koderer proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Change logging in stress test  https://review.openstack.org/4056607:24
mkodererAnju: ping07:35
mkodererAnju: regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40813/ - can you add random values like in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/4004907:37
Anjumkoderer : yeah yeah sure sure07:40
*** giulivo has joined #openstack-qa07:42
Anjumkderer: last time u said to not use rand in netwrok funtions07:42
Anjumkoderer: last time u said to not use rand in netwrok funtions07:42
mkodererAnju: no it was just because of the "variable"07:42
mkoderernot about random or not07:43
openstackgerritanju Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Added negative tests for server  https://review.openstack.org/4081307:48
openstackgerritanju Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Added negative tests for server  https://review.openstack.org/4081307:49
mkodererAnju: thanks07:51
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Adds tests covering Swift's Account Quota middleware  https://review.openstack.org/3965907:53
Anjumkoderer: i should say thanks :)07:53
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-qa07:54
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC08:12
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo08:22
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Add test for swift ACLs  https://review.openstack.org/3882308:27
*** psedlak has joined #openstack-qa08:31
openstackgerritanju Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Added negative tests for server  https://review.openstack.org/4081308:45
openstackgerritFabien Boucher proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add tests for swift container listing filters  https://review.openstack.org/4041608:51
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-qa08:57
openstackgerritnayna-patel proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Added a test case to create bulk networks in single API call.  https://review.openstack.org/4082609:02
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-qa09:07
openstackgerritIvan-Zhu proposed a change to openstack/tempest: port test_images and test_server_actions into v3 part2  https://review.openstack.org/3960909:07
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Skip more security group tests until bug 1182384 is fixed  https://review.openstack.org/4066909:11
*** Ater has left #openstack-qa09:12
openstackgerritGiulio Fidente proposed a change to openstack/tempest: scenario test involving glance, cinder and nova functionalities  https://review.openstack.org/3894309:57
openstackgerritGiulio Fidente proposed a change to openstack/tempest: scenario test involving glance, cinder and nova functionalities  https://review.openstack.org/3894310:01
openstackgerritnayna-patel proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Testcase to create bulk networks in one API call  https://review.openstack.org/4082610:02
openstackgerritGiulio Fidente proposed a change to openstack/tempest: scenario test involving glance, cinder and nova functionalities  https://review.openstack.org/3894310:02
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC10:38
*** LiangZheng has quit IRC10:40
*** weshay has joined #openstack-qa10:57
*** yfried has joined #openstack-qa11:23
*** woodspa has joined #openstack-qa11:25
*** yfried has left #openstack-qa11:29
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-qa11:35
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-qa11:41
openstackgerritanju Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Added negative tests for server  https://review.openstack.org/4081311:41
*** sthaha has joined #openstack-qa11:55
*** weshay has quit IRC12:03
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-qa12:08
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC12:34
openstackgerritFabien Boucher proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add tests for swift container listing filters  https://review.openstack.org/4041612:43
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa12:43
*** weshay has joined #openstack-qa12:45
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-qa12:59
openstackgerritMarc Koderer proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Change logging in stress test  https://review.openstack.org/4056613:11
mordredmkoderer: it's in work - what can I tell you? you wanna help out? :)13:11
mkoderermordred: ?13:12
mordredmkoderer: refstack13:12
mkoderermordred: aha ;) it's ok it was just out of interest13:15
mkoderermordred: but thx for asking ;)13:15
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-qa13:17
*** krtaylor has quit IRC13:29
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Stress ssh_floating test  https://review.openstack.org/4068013:43
*** afazekas has quit IRC13:47
*** dkranz has quit IRC14:00
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-qa14:14
*** sthaha has quit IRC14:15
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-qa14:15
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Stress ssh_floating test  https://review.openstack.org/4068014:20
*** burt has joined #openstack-qa14:24
*** adalbas has quit IRC14:28
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-qa14:44
*** tkammer has quit IRC14:47
openstackgerritKyle Mestery proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Support per-MechanismDriver config with ML2  https://review.openstack.org/4088215:02
afazekasgiulivo: ping15:06
giulivopong aga15:06
giulivoauch afazekas15:06
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/39346/15:06
afazekaswhy do you want to add an additional method to the base class ?15:06
afazekasWhy is it problem If we add similar validation to tearDownClass and setUpClass as testtool has with tesrDown and setUp ?15:07
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-qa15:11
giulivohi afazekas so in relation to 115:12
giulivoI'd add it because by doing so we ensure every base class has both setUpClass and tearDownClass defined and calling correctly the sup methods as a general rule; it looks like the object_storage base class is the only one which does not have a tearDownClass method defined15:15
giulivoin relation to 215:15
*** krtaylor has quit IRC15:15
afazekasgiulivo: wo normally delete the testDown/setUP/ ... methods what just calls the super15:15
afazekass/wo/we/15:16
giulivooh okay15:16
giulivoso my idea was just to ensure that was set for all base classes, because that is what the commit is about15:17
giulivobut there is no point (apart from styling) to add that for object_storage, I understand that15:17
giulivoso I'd be okay to leave this completely out as per your submission15:18
giulivoit's not that important15:18
afazekasthe code in the base class will prevent the merging changes with missing super call15:18
giulivoin relation to the checks, I don't see any check for the setUp and tearDown but only for setUpClass and tearDownClass15:18
giulivonow my idea was, what is the reason to enforce a check in the code?15:19
afazekasbacose those are done by the testools base class anyway15:19
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC15:20
giulivoI mean, with your changes, the only situation which could cause that not to be executed is a new testclass which implements basetestcase rather than some specific base$componentTest, correct?15:21
afazekasWe have single base class  and every test class must inherit from that directly or indirectly15:23
giulivoyeah indeed so after your changes, the only way to miss class setup/teardown is inheriting directly from basetest class15:24
afazekasYou need to add a new tearDownClass or setUpClass method + an existing test case, to trigger the checker15:24
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa15:25
afazekasgiulivo: it is about detecting forgetting  super call15:26
giulivoafazekas, so maybe I'm reading it wrong15:26
afazekasIt is not restriction for declare those methods, if they are not declared the base class will do what it needs to without an issue15:26
giulivoif I implement some BaseObjectTest and in my setUpClass don't call super, is that detected?15:27
afazekasYou are free to not declare those methods, but if you do, you need to call the super15:27
afazekasgiulivo: If you have at least on test case in the class , yes15:28
giulivookay so I misread that because I thought that was only working on the baseTestCaase15:28
giulivothen now I understand the reason for the check15:28
afazekascool :)15:29
giulivoso I can change my review15:29
afazekasgiulivo: thank you15:31
giulivosorry for the confusion15:31
afazekasnp15:32
afazekasgiulivo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39752/ what is the issue with this ?15:35
giulivoafazekas, oh that's a long story15:36
giulivowe tried to address that before the meeting with mkoderer15:36
giulivobasically we had two constrasting suggestions15:36
giulivomkoderer, suggested to split those into as many separated stress tests15:36
giulivoI suggested to merge those into a single more scenario-like stress test15:36
giulivo(cause I don't see what we would be stressing by just running pause/unpause concurrently)15:36
afazekasI would suggest random action call  based on valid transition table15:37
giulivoagreed, indeed I don't see what is the point of those tests the way they are now15:37
giulivothey'd better be served by running the existing pause/unpause api unit tests as stress15:38
afazekasIt can be changed to different way anytime, now we do not have action calling stress test, so not the ideal form is also more then not having those15:38
openstackgerritDavid Kranz proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Provide tox entry for running slow heat tests  https://review.openstack.org/4089715:38
giulivoafazekas, but again, the way they are now, they're just the api tests runned concurrently, that is something which can be addressed by your change to run api tests as stress tests15:39
giulivoinstead, making them some sort of scenario tests for those, bring it closer to your idea of a transition table15:39
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/38980/15:39
giulivoyes that is what I'd have used15:40
afazekaswhat is the problem with  setUpClass/tearDownClass  ?15:40
giulivowait a sec15:40
giulivoso regarding the stress tests, I don't see the reason to merge those the way they are now15:40
giulivoIMHO we either run the api tests or make them a scenario15:40
giulivoinstead, regarding the last review , 3898015:41
giulivowhat I'm suggesting there is to drop the support for "per thread" or "global" setUp/tearDown15:41
giulivoand stick with per thread execution15:42
afazekasone option never harms, especially if the default value  is what you like15:42
afazekasI think both cases is useful15:43
giulivoI think both cases is useful too, but I agree with dkranz that there is potential for that to be wrongly used15:44
mtreinishsdague: so on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40723/ afazekas pointed out the logs aren't full anymore the solution to this is to enable the debug option. (because testr doesn't screw up logging settings like nose)15:45
mtreinishshould I fix it in the tempest.conf.sample or just set it in devstack?15:45
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-dev/devstack: Add call trace in error message  https://review.openstack.org/3988715:45
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-qa15:46
afazekasgiulivo: anything can be used wrongly, it is not a reason not to create them.15:47
giulivoafazekas, oh that's not what I'm saying either, I'm all for approving that15:48
afazekasmtreinish: I would prefer If the sample would make it good, but for me either way is ok15:48
giulivowas just suggesting a little change on that particular option15:48
mtreinishafazekas: my only concern with doing it in the sample is that debug logging is on by default for anyone who uses the sample as a base config15:49
mtreinishand I'm sure that there are use cases where the debug logs aren't useful (they normally aren't)15:49
afazekasmtreinish: It is test tool,  you must be very optimistic to not use it on debug level :)15:50
afazekasBTW: is anybody ever tried to disable the debug or verbose mode in devstack ?15:51
dkranzafazekas, giulivo How should we resolve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38980/15:51
giulivodkranz, that is what we were discussing ... I think that is a very nice addition, my only concern was about the setting for "per thread" or "global" setUp/tearDown execution, I'd prefer that to be removed to avoid false errors despite it being an useful option for some use cases15:54
dkranzgiulivo: Makes sense to me.15:54
afazekasdkranz: As I remember the scenarios are not working multiple times If you call the setUpClass twice, there is a manager related logic in the test.py which prevents it.15:55
*** mkollaro has quit IRC15:57
dkranzafazekas, giulivo I can live with whatever you guys agree.15:57
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/40680/ this has more option, and looks like triggered  something else what we saw on the gate as well.16:01
*** anteaya has quit IRC16:01
giulivoafazekas, so let's try this16:02
giulivoI'll propose a rename for the option (so that hopefully it is easier to understand what it does) and +116:02
giulivomakes sense?16:02
afazekasok16:03
giulivoI'd call that class_setup_per_thread rather than class_setup_in_run16:03
giulivolooks okay?16:03
giulivoor maybe you've better ideas?16:03
afazekasok16:04
afazekasI think I will keep only the test_method option,  with a full method name16:05
* giulivo didn't really want to stop that, I'd like to have some -0.5 to gerrit :)16:05
afazekasIt makes easier to copy the failing test method form the output :)16:05
giulivoyou mean remove the option completely?16:06
afazekasyou know it rounds to 0 :)16:06
afazekas"test_class": "tempest.cli.simple_read_only.test_glance.SimpleReadOnlyGlanceClientTest"16:06
afazekas"test_method": "test_glance_fake_action",16:06
afazekaswill be16:06
giulivodoh16:06
giulivokeep the option, I know it'll be useful16:06
afazekas"test_method": "tempest.cli.simple_read_only.test_glance.SimpleReadOnlyGlanceClientTest.test_glance_fake_action"16:06
*** thomasbiege2 has joined #openstack-qa16:07
giulivooh I agree with that16:07
giulivothat is nice16:07
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC16:07
afazekasI'll do it tomorrow16:08
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC16:11
giulivodoh16:11
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-qa16:13
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away16:14
mkoderergiulivo: there are new about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39752/?16:20
giulivosays I've no permissions to open16:20
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-qa16:48
sdaguemkoderer: did you put it in draft by accident?16:56
mkoderersdague: where?16:56
mkoderersdague: I don't see it...?16:57
sdagueoh, the ? at the end is messing up gerrit :)16:57
sdaguegiulivo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39752/16:57
giulivohi there, thanks16:58
mkoderersdague: which "?" ....16:58
sdaguemkoderer: giulivo: there are new about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39752/?16:59
sdaguexchat links with the ?16:59
sdagueok, almost qa meeting time16:59
giulivoso I tried to add all I had to say in the review, to me in this layout they don't hurt but aren't very helpful, we could easly run the api tests concurrently by using this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38980/16:59
giulivoand avoid to maintain two copies16:59
giulivoof the same test16:59
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo17:17
*** HenryG has quit IRC17:25
mkoderersdague: I think we don't need this patch ...17:26
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa17:39
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-qa17:45
*** thomasbiege2 has quit IRC17:45
*** annegentle is now known as annegentle_vacay17:53
afazekassdague: I will chat with dprince about how to move a new OS the gate, but he is vocation AFAIK, so next week18:02
giulivomkoderer, when you said " I think we don't need this patch ... " you meant https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38980/ ?18:03
afazekaskashyap: are you here ?18:04
*** krtaylor has quit IRC18:04
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Change logging in stress test  https://review.openstack.org/4056618:15
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-qa18:36
*** psedlak has quit IRC18:48
*** mkollaro has quit IRC18:57
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC19:10
*** adalbas has quit IRC19:29
dkranzafazekas: dprince is back from vacation.19:29
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-qa19:44
*** annegentle_vacay has quit IRC19:53
openstackgerritJames E. Blair proposed a change to openstack-infra/devstack-gate: WIP: new nodepool  https://review.openstack.org/4095220:09
*** dkranz has quit IRC20:23
*** woodspa has quit IRC20:47
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC20:54
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa20:54
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-qa21:13
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-dev/devstack: Add tools/install_pip.sh  https://review.openstack.org/3982721:23
openstackgerritMatthew Treinish proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Rework class inheritance for scenario tests  https://review.openstack.org/4097521:32
openstackgerritMatthew Treinish proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add tenant isolation for scenario tests  https://review.openstack.org/3909921:32
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-qa21:40
*** lexinator has joined #openstack-qa21:58
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC21:59
*** burt has quit IRC22:07
*** mriedem has quit IRC22:12
*** weshay has quit IRC22:24
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Added negative tests for server  https://review.openstack.org/4081322:26
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away22:29
*** afazekas has quit IRC22:41
*** adalbas has quit IRC22:43
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-qa22:44
openstackgerritDean Troyer proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Add support for Docker as Nova hypervisor  https://review.openstack.org/4075923:38
*** wramthun has quit IRC23:51
*** wramthun has joined #openstack-qa23:53
*** jhenner has quit IRC23:54
*** wramthun has quit IRC23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!