Tuesday, 2013-08-20

*** LiangZheng has quit IRC00:00
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-qa00:12
*** LiangZheng has joined #openstack-qa00:17
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-qa00:37
*** anteaya has quit IRC00:58
*** mriedem has quit IRC01:33
*** malini is now known as malini_afk01:41
*** LiangZheng has quit IRC02:18
*** LiangZheng has joined #openstack-qa02:28
*** LiangZhe_ has joined #openstack-qa02:30
*** LiangZheng has quit IRC02:34
*** LiangZheng has joined #openstack-qa02:35
*** LiangZhe_ has quit IRC02:35
*** LiangZhe_ has joined #openstack-qa02:37
*** LiangZheng has quit IRC02:37
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC02:40
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-qa02:40
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-qa02:46
openstackgerritZhang Hua proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Mismatch dictionary key in the process of parsing XML  https://review.openstack.org/4279702:48
openstackgerritZhang Hua proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Skip os-fixed-ips test since neutron has not implemented it  https://review.openstack.org/4279802:48
openstackgerritZhang Hua proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Eliminate the impact of "wait_until='BUILD'"  https://review.openstack.org/4279902:48
openstackgerritZhang Hua proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Fixes all issues of tempest caused by async network allocation  https://review.openstack.org/4247202:48
*** mriedem has quit IRC02:49
*** afazekas_zz is now known as __afazekas_zz03:02
openstackgerritRyan Hsu proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Set missing attribute self.server in _create_and_attach utility  https://review.openstack.org/4280003:15
*** ivanzhu has joined #openstack-qa03:16
*** rhsu has joined #openstack-qa03:18
*** HenryG has quit IRC03:25
*** LiangZhe_ has quit IRC03:35
*** LiangZheng has joined #openstack-qa03:37
*** LiangZheng has quit IRC03:41
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-qa03:42
*** mberwanger has joined #openstack-qa03:59
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-dev/devstack: Redirect dpkg -l stderr to /dev/null  https://review.openstack.org/4176304:01
*** ivanzhu has quit IRC04:08
raiesafazekas: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/ jenkins gave -1 to it , I am unable to know the reason for it please check if possible04:10
afazekasraies: do you know this page: http://status.openstack.org/rechecks/04:11
raiesafazekas: No I do not know04:12
afazekasprobably you need to say 'recheck bug 1214094'  and jenkins will test it again04:12
afazekasIf the issue not fixed yet, we need to wait until it is fixed04:13
raiesafazekas: Now what I should do ? recommit same patch ?04:13
afazekasLooks like jenkis still  sick :(04:13
raiesafazekas: It mean I should try later in the evening ?04:14
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/7/tempest/api/network/test_networks.py it contains new line addition to L47, it usually not liked on review04:14
afazekasyou can try it now04:16
afazekashttp://status.openstack.org/zuul/04:16
afazekaslooks like it can pass now04:16
afazekasthe space '#vim' still removed, so you can amend it04:17
raiesafazekas: I will incorporate all the review comments in new patch except "list cases", and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/7/tempest/services/network/json/network_client.py L118 comment04:17
raiesyes I will also do that I remember04:17
afazekasNormally a change should not change unrelated whiespaces04:17
raiesafazekas: I will amend all except list cases, list cases are are fullfilling xml as well as json cases04:18
afazekasI will discuss the L118 with mtreinish04:18
raiesafazekas: You can see http://logs.openstack.org/73/41673/7/check/gate-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron-full/40c6187/testr_results.html.gz network xml and json cases are working good04:19
afazekasraies: can you separate the xml/json changes and the test case changes to two patch ?04:19
raiesafazekas : You mean to say that ,  for json I should call previous test case trend and for xml I should use the current once what I have used ?04:21
raiesafazekas : json -> do not change code use as of master branch (list cases)04:21
afazekasAre you sure the old test cases are not working with xml, but the now test cases really working with bath and really testing it ?04:22
raiesafazekas: xml --> check if xml interface then call current method what I have changed in patch 7 (list cases)04:22
raiesafazekas: yes I am sure04:23
raiesunit tests are also giving all pass04:23
raieswhat u say, what I have suggested above ?04:24
afazekasfor adding xml normally the L27 + L233... required in test case file04:25
raieswhich file ?04:25
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/7/tempest/api/network/test_networks.py04:26
afazekasthe other changes usually unrelated to xml04:26
afazekasI mean in that file04:27
raiesafazekas: Then what u want to suggest here ? for my case I wanted to make a local function in the end to check if interface is json/xml. if json use master branch code for list cases if xml then use code what i used in patch 7 list cases04:29
afazekasWhy the old code does not work with the xml version ?04:30
raiesold code uses following line -- >  "for n in ports_list:" , In case of xml response body is such that in "n" only single value "port/network/subnet" comes04:31
raiesafazekas: If u have time then please check after applying my patch04:32
* afazekas is waiting for image prepare04:33
*** LiangZheng has joined #openstack-qa04:37
raiesafazekas :04:38
*** mberwanger has quit IRC04:38
*** rhsu has quit IRC04:40
*** LiangZheng has quit IRC04:41
* afazekas is waiting for devstack04:44
*** LiangZheng has joined #openstack-qa04:50
* afazekas is planning to add DB restore capability to the devstack, instead of the boring time consuming sqlalchemy migrate wait04:50
raiesafazekas: are u there ?05:05
afazekasI had fight with the tox version upgrade, now I am ready for checking it05:06
raiesafazekas: please check.05:08
raiesafazekas :05:20
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa05:24
afazekasThe old network listing testcase is passing from me05:26
raiesafazekas: with xml ?05:27
afazekasyes05:27
raiesare u sure ?05:27
raiesafazekas: Please let me check05:28
afazekasI check is it really using xml :)05:29
afazekasthe full log contains xml traffic05:32
raiesafazekas: Really is working i checked :)05:32
raies sorry for the inconvenience05:32
raiesafazekas: Thanks for help :) Now I should recommit it :)05:32
afazekasnp05:33
afazekasPlease try to avoid the unnecessary line changes05:33
afazekasnew line removal and addition to an unrelated place is frequent -1 reason05:34
raiesyes I will check them also05:34
raiesvim space05:34
afazekasThe unrelated change chunks makes more difficult to read the unified diffs05:34
raiesnew line05:34
afazekassome cases you rename  things,  this kind of things not passes always on review05:35
*** yfried has joined #openstack-qa05:36
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/7/tempest/api/network/test_networks.py  L107-L110  type change can be on issue, I usually does not note them if just a few05:37
raiesafazekas : what is there, not all right there ?05:39
raiesafazekas :  till now what I incorporated is  - vim space , line 47 removal, mtrennish comment for base.py , previous code for list case restored, removed port negative case (will add in new review)05:41
afazekastest_create_update_delete_network_subnet renames are unrelated things05:41
afazekasfor the xml/json patch just add L27 and the L234.. to this file https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/7/tempest/api/network/test_networks.py05:42
afazekasI am searching for minor nits what sometimes noted on a review05:44
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/7/tempest/api/network/base.py L51 must be deleted05:44
raiesL51 is deleted in new patch what i will apply05:45
afazekastempest/services/network/xml/network_client.py update_port(self, port_id, new_name)05:46
afazekasas in the json version05:46
afazekaswait a sec ..05:47
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-qa05:48
afazekaskeep it as  name05:48
raiesin json it is new_name too05:49
raiesafazekas : then why to change ?05:49
afazekasOk use the same name as in the json05:50
afazekasthe json has the new_name version05:50
raiesafazekas: u there ?05:51
afazekasyes05:51
raiesin json is there new_name then why i should i change , I thing new_should be there otherwise I have to change a lot locations05:52
afazekashttp://www.fpaste.org/33335/76977949/05:52
openstackgerritKen'ichi Ohmichi proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Implement some test of extend-volume  https://review.openstack.org/4281305:52
raiesafazekas: I did not understand on "test_create_update_delete_network_subnet".  It has been accepted. Update is called in combination because of create so that created network can be updated , to not affect enviroment05:53
afazekasyou should use the same name with xml05:53
raiesafazekas: i can see here "new_name" https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/services/network/json/network_client.py ,05:56
raiesin update_port05:56
raiesafazekas: should I change it ?05:56
afazekasIMHO just calling them as 'name'  is better, I will ask mtreinihs what to do05:56
afazekasI am planning to create some rest client arg/param guideline, and imho the parameters should have the same name as in the request05:58
raiesafazekas: I dont want to amend here because if I am changing one for network then I have to change for port and subnet also at too many locations. Thats why I want to avoid05:58
afazekasso imho you should keep the 'name'  name , and the json version will be changed05:59
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-qa05:59
afazekasthese are used as positional argument you do not need to change ..05:59
raiesafazekas: then finally what u want ?06:01
raiesif it will affect u later then better would to rename it to "name"06:01
raiesafazekas: what u say ?06:01
afazekasIMHO the xml version is good as it is06:01
afazekassorry for the noise06:02
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC06:02
afazekasI thinked loudly06:02
raiesafazekas: np :)06:02
raiesnow i will commit new patch06:02
raiesafazekas: my changes are as - "vim space , line 47 removal, mtrennish comment for base.py , previous code for list case restored, removed port negative case (will add in new review)"06:03
raiesplease suggest if any more or I should proceed with commit :)06:03
* afazekas waiting for other core reviewer to awake 06:03
afazekasjenkins will say something to to the new version in 1 hour06:07
afazekaswe probably need to wait 3-4 hour for another reviewer anyway06:08
afazekasWhile waiting we can comment the other pending reviews ..06:09
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC06:13
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-qa06:17
raiesafazekas: During commit I changed description of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/ because 1 test case (port negative) is deleted , then something out stacnding error is comming06:19
afazekas?06:20
raies*outstanding commit06:22
raieswhen provoked for yes , commit got failed06:22
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Configure bash completion  https://review.openstack.org/4192806:27
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Defining a bash completion function  https://review.openstack.org/4240206:27
afazekasraies: can you elaborate it ?06:28
openstackgerritgaryk proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: VMware: update conder support for VMware configuration settings  https://review.openstack.org/4282406:48
afazekasWhat does  the  'commit got failed' means in this context ?06:48
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away06:49
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC06:50
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-qa06:53
*** tkammer has joined #openstack-qa06:59
openstackgerritgaryk proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: VMware: update cinder support for VMware configuration settings  https://review.openstack.org/4282406:59
raiesafazekas : during commit, if I want to delete a line in description then what precautions I should take ?07:00
*** Anju has joined #openstack-qa07:00
afazekasraies: Do not mix something with the change-id07:01
afazekasAre you speaking about the git commit message right ?07:01
raiesafazekas: yes07:01
raiesI want to delete a line in thevious descriptinon07:02
raieswhen I tried first there was outstanding commit queries and error I can't explaint it now07:02
afazekasChange-Id:  should be the last line  maybe it needs to be separate by a new line07:03
afazekaslooks like the new line is not required07:03
raiesafazekas: Let me try once again07:03
afazekasthere is some 'pep8' checking on the git commit message as well07:04
raiesok07:05
*** Anju_ has joined #openstack-qa07:07
*** Anju has quit IRC07:08
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa07:11
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC07:14
*** Anju has joined #openstack-qa07:21
*** Anju_ has quit IRC07:23
*** xqueralt-afk is now known as xqueralt07:26
openstackgerritgaryk proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: VMware: update cinder support for VMware configuration settings  https://review.openstack.org/4282407:37
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa07:38
openstackgerritraiesmh08 proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Adding network api xml support  https://review.openstack.org/4167307:40
raiesafazekas: I have added patch 8 after incorporating review comments. Please check and review it . Now I will be away for half an hour :)07:42
afazekasok07:43
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Configure bash completion  https://review.openstack.org/4192807:44
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC08:00
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo08:07
*** Anju has quit IRC08:10
afazekasraies: Do you really need to change more than 3 line in the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/8/tempest/api/network/test_networks.py ?08:23
*** giulivo has joined #openstack-qa08:25
afazekas"for the xml/json patch just add L27 and the L234.. to this file https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/7/tempest/api/network/test_networks.py"08:26
*** psedlak has joined #openstack-qa08:27
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa08:27
raiesafazekas: I didn't understand08:47
raiesafazekas: u there ?08:48
afazekasyes08:49
raiesafazekas: you have written "for the xml/json patch just add L27 and the L234.. to this file https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/7/tempest/api/network/test_networks.py"08:50
afazekaspatchet 8 still does unrelated changes in the test_networks.py, which are not mentioned even in the commit message08:50
raiesI did not understand this08:51
afazekasI say it on the review, to be more clear08:51
raiesok08:52
raiesafazekas: For what changes u are talking about ?08:54
raies as the create_por() function is modified as u had suggested to use keyword argument08:54
raiesso I need to change the code where create_port function is being used :)08:55
afazekasyou do not need, since it is an optional parameter08:56
*** Anju has joined #openstack-qa08:56
raiesafazekas: So I think, I have added more parameter to justify the keyword argument based function create_port ? It will be better to add I think08:58
raiesafazekas : It will affect the code in good way I thinl08:59
raies*think08:59
afazekasYes, but following the "Structural split of changes" is usually important09:00
afazekasLot of changes even not related to the port naming09:01
afazekas"Structural split of changes" is followed by almost all openstack project09:02
afazekasraies: what do you think what is more easy, convincing two core review they are ok in the same change, or just moving them into a second change ?09:04
raiesafazekas: ok I will apply a new patch with incorporating review comments :(09:05
raiesafazekas: please recheck your first comment and validate ? as in master branch single line is there09:08
afazekas??09:09
raiesl2409:09
raiesThis 2 line is required.09:09
afazekasL26 L27, keep those lines09:10
raiesafazekas: yes it was previously being used, u commented for any special purpose ?09:11
raiesafazekas: I mean it as 2 blank lines are needed09:12
afazekasno, the comment is in wrong place09:13
afazekasI just tried to say hat area is ok09:14
afazekasthe end of the file is also ok09:14
raiesafazekas: comment in L64 please see09:14
Anjuafazekas : ping09:15
Anjuafazekas : are u usig new master branch of devstack?09:16
afazekasraies: basically what is recommended to do,  us the original file and just add09:16
afazekas- class rename09:16
afazekas- interface09:16
afazekas- XML class09:16
afazekasAnju: yes09:17
*** sthaha has quit IRC09:17
raiesafazekas: ok09:17
afazekasProbably you need to upgrade tox09:17
afazekasAnju: ^^09:17
Anjuafazekas :  there is a error09:17
Anjuwhen i was usin it09:18
Anjuof xenserver09:18
afazekasI am not using xen09:18
afazekaswhat is the issue ?09:18
Anjujust wait09:18
Anjui am showing u a patch which is added in the master branch on aug 1009:19
Anjuyesterday when i clon a new devstack09:19
Anjuthen this problem occured09:19
raiesafazekas: I think L155  should be ok09:20
raiesafazekas: as this is required to check for response code ?09:20
raiesafazekas : u there ?09:22
afazekasraies: question is what can be in the same change, yes your are correct the response status code should be checked somewhere09:23
raies:)09:23
afazekasThe question is is it required for xml/json09:23
afazekasis the commit message covers this change ?09:23
raiesafazekas: not yet. But we add description there.09:24
afazekasraies: I can +2 it anyway (especially if you pay me beer),  but I am not sure it can pass ..09:24
Anjuafazekas : https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/commit/e0d4aebe7a584c94b3b17fde59fa710a2bf84bbb09:25
Anjuthese changes are currently in your stackrc file09:25
Anju?09:25
raiesafazekas: We Indian always ready to serve our guests (As "Atithi devo bhavah" -- guest is like god to us). When U will come India I will help you with beer and "Indian Desi Tharra"09:27
raiesafazekas: btw09:27
afazekasAnju: $ git log | grep e0d4aebe7a584c94b3b17fde59fa710a2bf84bbb09:28
afazekascommit e0d4aebe7a584c94b3b17fde59fa710a2bf84bbb09:28
*** sthaha has joined #openstack-qa09:28
raiesif u suggest I can remove the response code cheching09:28
afazekasgiulivo, mkoderer : what is your opinion in this quest?  ^^09:29
raiesafazekas: please give your final comment :) whether I should amend commit description or remove the response checking code09:29
Anjuafazekas : not clear to me09:30
afazekasraies: I have doubts anybody would ask why you not checking the response code in + xml change,  but someone might ask why do you add this in this change..09:31
giulivoafazekas, thanks for pinging, what is the review?09:31
afazekasAnju: what is your issue whit that change ?09:31
afazekasgiulivo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673/709:31
giulivoAnju, how is it going with your new account and the xml client?09:31
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC09:32
Anjugiulivi : hiii09:32
raiesafazekas: i think it should be there :) lets what get happen to it for sure. I am going to add it :)09:32
afazekasgiulivo: raies is the owner09:32
afazekasraies: At least add it to the commit message we will see is it able to pass in the same change :)09:33
Anjugiulivo : hiii, when i will add that u will get a mail :)09:33
raiesafzekas: ok I will add description in commit message09:34
giulivoAnju, sure, just asking, enjoy :)09:34
Anjugiulivo :  yeah ,thanks :)09:34
raiesafazekas: one more thing is there: L19709:34
Anjuafazekas : these changes was giving me a issue in devstack09:35
Anjuwhe i reinstalled it with master branch09:35
raiesafazekas: as list cases of subnet and network are like "for n in subnets/networks:"09:35
afazekasAnju: what is the issue, are you using xen ? are you sure that change causes the issue ?09:36
raiesafazekas: So I thaught that L197 should be like for n in ports: not ports_list09:36
Anjuafazekas : i want to know that  is this happening only in my system09:38
Anjuor with others.09:38
Anjuafazekas : that is why asked have u upgraded your devstack09:38
Anjuor using the old one09:38
raiesafazekas: u there ?09:39
afazekasraies: I will wait for another reviewer to comment it first09:39
raiesafazekas : any special reason ??09:39
afazekasraies: If they like it  (+2) I just need to approve, If do not like it I will not need to disagree on review09:41
raiesafazekas: ok09:42
raiesI am applying new patch09:42
raiesplease suggest someone to review it :)09:43
openstackgerritraiesmh08 proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Adding network api xml support  https://review.openstack.org/4167309:45
raiesafazekas: I have applied it now you can check it :)09:45
raiesafazekas: please check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42624/ also09:47
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Fixing the rest of the comment spacing issues  https://review.openstack.org/4246109:48
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/42624/ does not looks good09:48
afazekashttp://www.fpaste.org/33384/69922321/ I guess it looks like this09:50
raiesafazekas: any reason ?09:50
afazekasraies: this is the usual xml structure09:52
raiesafazekas: I will check it09:52
raiesgot it09:52
afazekasunless you want to specify a network with two name09:52
afazekas:)09:53
Anjuafazekas :09:57
Anjuyes when I delete  line no 186  https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/commit/e0d4aebe7a584c94b3b17fde59fa710a2bf84bbb09:59
Anjuin this in my stackrc file09:59
Anjuthen it was running09:59
Anjuafazekas : devstack installed successfully but api was not running10:00
*** LiangZheng has quit IRC10:04
afazekaswhich api ?10:06
Anjuanyone10:07
Anjumeans cli10:07
Anjui ran cli first10:07
afazekaswhich ?10:08
afazekasall of them ?10:08
Anjunova list10:08
afazekaswhat is the error message ?10:08
Anjuxenserver error10:09
afazekasdo you have issue with glance and keystone as well ?10:09
Anjuyes10:09
afazekaswhere do you see the xenserver error ?10:09
Anjuwhen i was running any cli10:09
Anjuit just showing me that one line message10:09
afazekasyou get 500 response with xen server ?10:10
Anjuthere was nothing like this10:10
Anjua simple message10:11
Anjuwhen i commented the 186 line ehich is introduced in new devstack master branch10:11
Anjuthen it was running10:12
afazekascan you paste somewhere a nova --debug list output10:12
Anjucant this time :(10:12
Anjuare u using the updted devstack10:12
Anju?10:12
afazekasnormally I get fresh devstack on every vm start10:13
Anjuu clone every time ?10:13
afazekasOn the image  I have all repos, I just need to pull them (in parallel), some places I also have local mirror10:14
Anjucheck that these lines are in your stackrc file if yes means that u are not facing this error https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/commit/e0d4aebe7a584c94b3b17fde59fa710a2bf84bbb10:14
afazekasAnju: try to remove the xenserver-core10:15
Anjuafazekas : yes i did the same10:16
Anjuwas running10:16
Anjuafazekas : then everytime everyone have to comment this line ?10:17
afazekasAnju: you just need to uninstall the  xenserver-core if you want the original behavior10:18
afazekasor add the VIRT_DRIVER=libvirt to your localrc10:19
Anjuok afazekas : will do and tell :)10:19
Anjuthanks for help10:19
afazekasAnju: you are welcome10:20
afazekasAnju: I think next time you should start with several pastebin entry about the issue10:20
Anjumeans ?10:22
Anjuafazekas : u are saying the output after debug10:23
afazekasfor example10:23
afazekasan actual output example usually tells more then several words without a context, I  was even not sure are you using xen or not10:25
Anjuyeah : correct ..so sry ..yesterday u were not good so didnt ask .and today i have not my system10:26
Anjuso10:26
Anju:)10:26
afazekas:)10:26
Anjuafazekas : did u check our stackrc file?10:27
Anjui means this code is added in that or not10:28
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC10:28
openstackgerritraiesmh08 proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Adding network api xml support  https://review.openstack.org/4167310:30
raiesafazekas: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42624/ and  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41673, I think now u can consider it10:33
raiesafazekas: u there ?10:36
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-qa10:37
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa10:37
afazekasraises:  the request in the test case starts with <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>10:38
afazekaswhy it has additional space ..10:39
raieswhich file ?10:40
afazekasnot the file, looks like our xml request formater adds a space even if the element does not have an attribute ...10:41
afazekasnot a real issue10:41
raiesafazekas : ok10:42
raiesafazekas: from tempest/api/network/test_networks.py i have almost incorporated suggested by you. Now you can mean it I think :)10:43
* afazekas is hunting for food10:45
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC10:45
*** mkollaro has quit IRC10:55
*** giulivo has quit IRC10:56
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-qa10:57
*** dosaboy has quit IRC10:59
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-qa11:02
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC11:12
*** Anju has quit IRC11:26
raiesafazekas: u there ?11:29
*** weshay has joined #openstack-qa11:31
openstackgerritIvan-Zhu proposed a change to openstack/tempest: port test_aggregates  and test_hosts into v3 part1  https://review.openstack.org/4286811:38
openstackgerritIvan-Zhu proposed a change to openstack/tempest: port test_aggregates and test_hosts into nova v3 part2  https://review.openstack.org/4286911:38
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa11:39
*** tkammer has quit IRC11:44
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC11:44
*** tkammer has joined #openstack-qa11:44
raiesafazekas: u there ?11:45
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-qa11:49
*** raies has quit IRC11:52
afazekasraies: pong11:53
*** afazekas is now known as afazekas_no_irq11:59
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-qa12:04
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-qa12:19
*** giulivo has joined #openstack-qa12:23
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-qa12:29
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa12:35
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-qa12:39
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC12:47
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-qa12:49
*** dkranz has quit IRC12:55
*** jog0 is now known as jog0-away13:01
*** mberwanger has joined #openstack-qa13:01
*** adalbas has quit IRC13:03
openstackgerritIvan-Zhu proposed a change to openstack/tempest: port test_services into nova v3 part1  https://review.openstack.org/4288013:12
*** whayutin_ has joined #openstack-qa13:14
*** weshay has quit IRC13:16
openstackgerritIvan-Zhu proposed a change to openstack/tempest: port test_services into nova v3 part2  https://review.openstack.org/4288513:19
*** HenryG has quit IRC13:27
*** malini_afk is now known as malini13:34
*** mberwanger has quit IRC13:35
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Configure bash completion  https://review.openstack.org/4192813:41
*** burt has joined #openstack-qa13:42
*** thomasbiege2 has joined #openstack-qa13:43
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC13:46
openstackgerritIvan-Zhu proposed a change to openstack/tempest: port test_aggregates and test_hosts into nova v3 part2  https://review.openstack.org/4286913:47
*** whayutin_ has quit IRC13:49
*** weshay has joined #openstack-qa14:01
*** raies has joined #openstack-qa14:22
raiesafazekas: hi14:23
afazekas_no_irqraies: hi14:24
*** thomasbiege2 has quit IRC14:28
giulivoping afazekas_no_irq14:30
giulivodoh _no_irq ! :(14:30
afazekas_no_irqgiulivo: pong14:32
giulivosorry for irq I didn't notice that until hit TAB :(14:33
afazekas_no_irqIt was an NMI :)14:33
giulivoso the question is about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/3693714:33
giulivowhat is the reason for that?14:33
afazekas_no_irq+72, -17514:33
afazekas_no_irqYou just need to add 4 lines instead 8 for new client14:34
afazekas_no_irqThere is two possible re-factor at the moment14:34
giulivoyeah indeed I was tempted to +1 but thought it was nice to have easy access to the class names for both JSON and XML clients14:34
raiesok14:34
afazekas_no_irqmy change moves closer to single authentication per user style14:35
afazekas_no_irqthe other refactor possibility is adding factory to all rest client to provide the correct interface (xml/json + version)14:35
afazekas_no_irqBut actually it just adds more code, without a real benefit14:35
afazekas_no_irqso probbaly  another smaller transform may came when someone touching the authentication location in the model14:36
afazekas_no_irqI did not wanted to create 800 line change for handling everything14:37
*** mkollaro has quit IRC14:38
*** __afazekas_zz has quit IRC14:41
*** raies has quit IRC14:43
openstackgerritraiesmh08 proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Adding network api xml support  https://review.openstack.org/4167314:47
*** sthaha has quit IRC14:50
*** raies has joined #openstack-qa14:51
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa14:51
raiesafazekas: hi14:51
openstackgerritMatthew Treinish proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add tenant isolation to the swift tests  https://review.openstack.org/4216914:51
raiesafazekas_no_irq14:53
raiesafazekas_no_irq: I applied patch 1114:53
afazekas_no_irqgiulivo: ^^14:54
yfriedHi, is there anyone who isn't running tempest on devstack, but on an actual openstack?15:04
mriedemyfried: yeah, me, on rhel 6.415:08
yfriedmriedem: after I have a live openstack setup, what are the steps to configure tempest to work with it? anything not on tempest.conf?15:10
mriedemyfried: not really15:11
mriedemyfried: you could probably just use run_tests.sh -V -f in tempest to run it15:11
mriedemi don't ues a virtual environment though15:11
mriedemsince i'm in a vm15:11
mriedemyfried: this is old, but it's what i used to get started: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_run_Tempest_tests15:12
mriedemyfried: most of the work for me was configuring tempest.conf to match the values in my installation, e.g. neutron network, glance image ids, tenant id's, etc etc15:13
*** yfried has quit IRC15:18
openstackgerritTal Kammer proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Initial basic setup of openstack and tempest config file  https://review.openstack.org/4292015:18
jaypipesmtreinish: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42797/ is good to have your +1A on... easy win IMO15:39
mtreinishjaypipes: yep15:41
*** afazekas_no_irq is now known as afazekas15:42
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-qa15:42
afazekasjaypipes, mtreinish: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42018/15:42
*** giulivo has quit IRC15:47
afazekastkammer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QFK1cLhytY :)15:47
*** xqueralt has left #openstack-qa15:48
jaypipesafazekas: done15:49
tkammerafazekas, lol15:51
mtreinishjaypipes: on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42798 you +A'd that without another +2. Also, I would have -1'd it because he could have just raised a skipException if neutron was enabled in setupClass.15:52
tkammerafazekas, there is another one I love: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-Cr0EWwaTk15:52
mtreinishinstead of using a decorator on every test method15:52
jaypipesmtreinish: sorry, I thought cyeoh +2d it...15:53
jaypipesmtreinish: I guess he only _1d it15:53
jaypipes+1d... sorry15:53
jaypipesmtreinish: removed +1A... please feel free to comment on it.15:54
afazekastkammer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt7zsortIXs :)15:55
mtreinishjaypipes: ok thanks I'll do that.15:55
jaypipesmtreinish: sorry bout that15:56
mtreinishjaypipes: do you know if the -1 is enough to prevent the merge15:56
mtreinishjaypipes: its not a problem I've made that mistake before too15:56
jaypipesmtreinish: no.. -2 will prevent15:56
mtreinishshould I do that then?15:56
jaypipeswith a big red X :)15:56
jaypipesmtreinish: sure, if it is important, go for it.15:56
afazekasmtreinish: Is the skip tracker working when something skipped in a class ?15:59
mtreinishafazekas: not yet it's on my todo list15:59
*** tkammer has quit IRC16:00
mtreinishbut we normally only use it with optional features at the class level so there often isn't a bug associated with it.16:00
afazekasmtreinish: BTW on the pending patch imho it should allow just the skip(  and skipIf(16:00
*** yfried has joined #openstack-qa16:00
mtreinishafazekas: that won't work with multi-line skips then16:02
mtreinishunless I start getting fancy with the detection and regex16:02
mtreinishwhich I'm not sure how to go about doing, the skip detection logic starts getting more complex16:03
*** Anju has joined #openstack-qa16:08
afazekasmtreinish: can you show me an example where it is not working ? and where it starts working ?16:09
mtreinishafazekas: look at any skipif that takes 2 lines because the condition is too long.16:10
mtreinishafazekas: right now the skip tracker looks for the skip regex16:10
mtreinishand in the next line the start of a method with a def16:10
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC16:13
afazekasyes16:22
afazekastkammer: I added several notes, I will try it in real life on this week16:24
afazekasmtreinish: I see guilivo also commented it16:26
*** psedlak has quit IRC16:36
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-qa16:38
*** yfried has quit IRC16:39
*** jhenner has quit IRC16:41
*** afazekas has quit IRC16:54
raiesjaypipes: hi16:57
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away17:01
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-qa17:06
*** jhenner has quit IRC17:15
*** raies has quit IRC17:16
*** hemnafk is now known as hemna17:22
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC17:34
*** Anju has quit IRC18:11
openstackgerritJoshua Harlow proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add a more detailed message about the volumes missing.  https://review.openstack.org/4296418:12
openstackgerritJoshua Harlow proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add a more detailed message about the volumes missing.  https://review.openstack.org/4296418:14
*** yfried has joined #openstack-qa18:35
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa18:43
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC18:43
*** openstack` has joined #openstack-qa18:51
*** openstack has quit IRC18:51
*** openstack` is now known as openstack18:52
openstackgerritAvishay Traeger proposed a change to openstack-dev/grenade: Update Cinder's policy.json file  https://review.openstack.org/4297118:53
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-qa18:53
openstackgerritRavi Chunduru proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: blueprint quantum-fwaas-devstack Adds support for Openstack Networking FWaaS (Firewall)  https://review.openstack.org/3714718:59
openstackgerritRussell Bryant proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Enabled the compute admin API by default  https://review.openstack.org/4297419:01
*** mriedem1 has joined #openstack-qa19:02
*** mriedem has quit IRC19:03
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-qa19:06
afazekasmtreinish: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42169 do we really need a new admin user ?19:14
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo19:15
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-qa19:17
mtreinishafazekas: I'd rather err on the side of caution and have everything in there own tenant and user. But, it's probably not strictly required, I didn't do a thorough audit of how the tests use the admin user.19:18
mtreinishbut even if not's needed now I could easily see a condition where the isolation might be useful in future tests19:18
afazekasI see more issue in long run to introducing not necessary admin isolation, then it may solve now19:19
afazekasThe admin usually not limited by tenant,  the in most cases does not creates a resource in his tenant19:21
afazekasMay just in some tenant 'isolation' related test case19:21
afazekas The admin usually not limited by tenant,  in most cases admin does not creates a resource in his tenant19:22
afazekas May be he does just in some tenant 'isolation' related test case, but those are not the best example19:23
* afazekas go to sleep, I have more grammar issue than usually19:23
mtreinishafazekas: the admin users can't create resources in tenants they're not a member of. But, they are able to control global state (which includes tenant membership)19:25
mtreinishso in that sense the tenant isolation doesn't mean much if they can add themselves to any tenant19:26
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-qa19:26
mtreinishbut I don't really see any harm in creating an isolated admin user and tenant for the swift tests19:26
afazekasIt is unnecessary in swift case IMHO19:29
*** malini is now known as malini_afk19:34
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC19:34
afazekasmtreinish: I am hesitant for a +2, but I am close to do that. Removing the admin isolation, or proving it is required will be good for +2. Or I just need to sleep for it :)19:40
afazekasmtreinish: +2, but I still not think it is really required19:48
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-infra/devstack-gate: Use git.openstack.org as origin  https://review.openstack.org/4269319:52
afazekascyeoh, jaypipes, mtreinish: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/34866/19:52
*** afazekas has quit IRC19:54
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa19:58
openstackgerritAvishay Traeger proposed a change to openstack-dev/grenade: Update Cinder's policy.json file  https://review.openstack.org/4297120:21
*** HenryG has quit IRC20:23
openstackgerritClark Boylan proposed a change to openstack-infra/devstack-gate: Replace review.o.o with git.o.o.  https://review.openstack.org/4298920:28
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC20:42
openstackgerritRussell Bryant proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Enable the compute admin API by default  https://review.openstack.org/4297420:43
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away21:16
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-qa21:22
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC21:26
*** jhenner has quit IRC21:48
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-qa21:51
openstackgerritSalvatore Orlando proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Colorize Neutron log output and refactor log setup code  https://review.openstack.org/4300621:54
*** weshay has quit IRC21:55
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC22:00
*** mriedem1 has quit IRC22:03
*** burt has quit IRC22:08
openstackgerritKen'ichi Ohmichi proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Cleanup: Add common "create security rule" method  https://review.openstack.org/4230322:52
*** sthaha has joined #openstack-qa22:58
*** sthaha has joined #openstack-qa22:58
openstackgerritKen'ichi Ohmichi proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Cleanup: Add common "ssh-login server" method  https://review.openstack.org/4256923:08
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-qa23:31
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-qa23:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!