Tuesday, 2022-01-11

opendevreviewMerged openstack/devstack master: Added AlmaLinux to CentOS 8 family  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/80096801:53
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:36
*** pojadhav- is now known as pojadhav08:54
opendevreviewLajos Katona proposed openstack/devstack master: Deprecate lib/neutron  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/82365313:15
*** whoami-rajat__ is now known as whoami-rajat13:36
alexYefimovHi14:06
alexYefimovHi abhiskekk14:10
alexYefimovabhishekk ...14:10
abhishekkalexYefimov, hi14:10
alexYefimovFirst time here. 14:11
abhishekkWelcome14:11
abhishekklooking for specific information?14:11
alexYefimovI am interested in getting more involved with Openstack upstream. Work for RH.14:12
alexYefimovWhen is the openstack-qa meeting suppose to start?14:13
alexYefimovHi Jason!14:15
kopecmartinalexYefimov: hi, the meeting should start at 15:00 UTC - https://meetings.opendev.org/#QA_Team_Office_hours14:15
kopecmartinalthough i see we have a mistake in our agenda then 14:16
kopecmartinhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting14:16
kopecmartinbecause we have there 14:00 utc , which is the old time, let me fix that14:16
alexYefimovOkay ... so meeting at 1500 UTC.  14:17
abhishekkalexYefimov, ack, sounds good14:17
kopecmartinsearching mail , we moved the meeting one hour later in November - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-November/025722.html14:17
kopecmartinbut we totally forgot to update the agenda on the wiki, sorry for that14:17
kopecmartin#startmeeting qa15:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue Jan 11 15:00:29 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'qa'15:00
kopecmartin#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting15:00
kopecmartinagenda ^^15:00
gmanno/15:01
kopecmartinhi, let's start15:02
jparolyo/15:02
alexYefimovqa-yoga-priority lists incorrect QA office hours15:02
gmann?15:03
kopecmartinalexYefimov: you mean this one? 15:03
kopecmartin#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-yoga-priority15:03
alexYefimovyes15:03
kopecmartinoh, yeah, that's another location we forgot to edit 15:04
kopecmartinit was used during the priority items planning 15:04
kopecmartinhowever, i see how it can be confusing15:04
kopecmartinfor the record, the current time of the meeting is always displayed here15:05
kopecmartin#link https://meetings.opendev.org/#QA_Team_Office_hours15:05
kopecmartinand 15:05
kopecmartin#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting15:05
kopecmartinthanks alexYefimov, i'll fix the time in that etherpad15:05
kopecmartin#topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)15:07
kopecmartinnothing specific from me here15:07
kopecmartin#topic Yoga Priority Items progress15:07
kopecmartin#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-yoga-priority15:07
kopecmartinany updates on the priority items?15:07
gmannnothing much to share today from me15:07
kopecmartinack, nothing from my side neither15:09
kopecmartin#topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning15:09
kopecmartini've noticed that next PTG dates have been announced already15:09
kopecmartin#link https://www.openstack.org/ptg/15:09
gmannyeah15:09
kopecmartinit's gonna be virtual again15:10
kopecmartini'll create a new etherpad for the topics to cover 15:10
gmann+1, thanks 15:10
kopecmartinmoving on15:11
kopecmartin#topic Gate Status Checks15:11
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)15:11
kopecmartinany blockers to review?15:11
gmannI have not noticed in this week15:12
soniya29kopecmartin, is pythontempestconf gate stable now?15:12
kopecmartinsoniya29: i don't think so15:13
jelabarre-rhthat last link isn't retrieving a valid page, BTW15:13
kopecmartinsoniya29: there is at least one failure which is related to interop and all interop projects suffer from it , but we're trying to get to bottom of it15:14
kopecmartinjelabarre-rh: hmm, it works for me15:14
jelabarre-rhhmmm...  did a copy/paste and it worked15:14
soniya29kopecmartin, okay15:14
jelabarre-rhjust however hexchat sent it then.  nevermind15:15
kopecmartin:) 15:15
kopecmartin#topic Periodic jobs Status Checks15:15
kopecmartin#link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-xena-py3&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable15:15
kopecmartin#link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic15:15
kopecmartinall seems good15:15
kopecmartin#topic Sub Teams highlights15:16
kopecmartinChanges with Review-Priority == +115:16
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)15:16
kopecmartin5 changes there ^15:16
kopecmartini reviewed some, I'll try to check the rest soon15:16
kopecmartinanyone feel free to check and review them too15:17
fricklerfeel free to complain if I spread too many +1s there15:17
soniya29kopecmartin, reviewed a few today morning15:17
kopecmartinfrickler: it's fine, even better, i don't have always time to check for example devstack patches specifically , this helps me15:18
gmannlib/neutron deprecation lgtm, +A15:18
kopecmartinin general , i think that having priority +1 on patches which were already reviewed by one core is great, it speeds the process up15:19
alexYefimovkopecmartin:  I see any changes.  Do I need permissions changed?15:19
soniya29just a question, is it mandatory to have primary, alt, admin, roles from  different projects within tests?15:19
kopecmartinalexYefimov: you don't see anything when you open this ?  https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking) 15:20
alexYefimovError 400 (Bad Request): line 1:180 mismatched input '<EOF>' expecting ')'  Endpoint: /changes/15:20
gmannsoniya29: no, it depends on what to test in test case. it may need those if they are verifying the cross project resources 15:21
frickleralexYefimov: you may need to be logged in before opening that link15:22
soniya29gmann, so it will depend on the test case, right?15:22
kopecmartinalexYefimov: hmm, that's weird, maybe your irc client changes that link somehow when you click on it or copy from it?15:22
gmannsoniya29: right15:22
alexYefimovkopecmartin: I am logged ... can seem my name15:22
kopecmartini tried to open in in a private window, being logged in/out shouldn't matter15:22
gmannyeah, try copy paste15:22
alexYefimovsame error15:23
soniya29gmann, today i was reviewing a patch where i found this - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/81928415:23
gmannsoniya29: ok, I will check it15:24
gmannalexYefimov: are you able to open this ? https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Ftempest15:24
soniya29gmann, since we are saying it will depend on the test case, we dont need to do any modification in tempest with intention of having different roles / same roles15:25
frickleror try https://fricklercloud.de/devstack-rp1 15:25
alexYefimovgmann, link works fine15:25
alexYefimovboth work fine15:25
gmannhumm, then it should work as that also a query of gerrit 15:26
fricklero.k., the latter is a redirect to the same thing that kopecmartin shared15:26
gmannsoniya29: I need to check in review, have not looked yet15:26
soniya29gmann, take your own time, i was just curious so i asked :)15:27
gmannsoniya29: sure. thanks 15:27
kopecmartinlet's move on 15:28
kopecmartin#topic Open Discussion15:28
kopecmartinregarding openstack-health15:28
kopecmartinarxcruz|ruck: will focus on their (tripleo's) dashboard and then if there will be need to resurrect that one functionality (test pass/fail rate) we'll have a look again15:29
kopecmartinuntil then, no work regarding openstack-health will be done, we just need to prioritize other things atm 15:29
kopecmartinthat's to conclude our last week's discussion15:31
kopecmartinany updates regarding the expanding the devstack team with potential candidates? 15:31
gmannso no volunteer for maintaining the o-h ?15:31
soniya29we are facing this issue with many projects, devstack, o-h, patrole15:32
kopecmartinnot yet, arxcruz|ruck mistaken this o-h for their o-h 15:32
gmannoh15:33
kopecmartinhowever, I'm planning to do a few experiments with it locally, so that i get better understanding of it, might help in the future if we wanted to resurrect the service15:33
kopecmartinso we may postpone the repo retirement 15:33
gmannmtreinish looked at the current failure and it is in subunit2sql, and few workaround to fix it with sqlalchemy cap or so15:34
kopecmartinwhat does it mean now? will it function if we find a new hosting? 15:35
gmannkopecmartin:  I do not think that is fixed. but yes hosting is next things we need to discuss. 15:35
kopecmartinso we're almost at the beginning again :D 15:37
gmannyeah, we still need someone to take care of o-h maintenance which is not large work but still need someone. 15:39
kopecmartinok, let's do this, let me take a look at it and experiment with it locally first15:39
kopecmartinand let's discuss after that15:39
gmannsounds good15:40
kopecmartinany updates regarding the expanding the devstack team with potential candidates?15:40
soniya29kopecmartin, i can help there but i am already occupied so not sure about bandwidth15:41
kopecmartinsoniya29: o-h or devstack?15:42
soniya29kopecmartin, devstack15:42
gmannkopecmartin: not yet. I again forget. I will send today after meeting15:42
kopecmartinsoniya29: thanks, i see you also wanted to help with one of the items on our priority list, that's a lot of work , take it easy :) 15:43
kopecmartingmann: ok, np , thanks15:43
kopecmartinok then, anything else for the open discussion? 15:44
soniya29kopecmartin, yeah, that's why i am not sure :)15:44
fricklerthere were two new devstack bugs about pip install failing15:44
fricklerI could not reproduce and asked for more information15:44
fricklerbut maybe someone else has an idea15:45
frickler#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/195704815:45
frickler#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/195692815:45
kopecmartini've noticed that the devstack numbers went down, thanks frickler for triaging 15:46
kopecmartin#link #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-yoga15:46
kopecmartin#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-yoga15:46
kopecmartini had also an issue with running ./stack.sh again (after ./unstack.sh and ./clean.sh) , something with py3.8 , maybe pip too, i don't remember15:48
kopecmartini didn't have time so i just started on a new clean vm15:48
kopecmartinbut maybe that's the reproducer, to deploy it, then clean, unstack and deploy again 15:48
fricklerah, I only do unstack, no clean, will give it another try with that15:49
gmannyeah, usually clean work for me but have not tried recently 15:50
kopecmartingmann: regarding this bug15:50
kopecmartin#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/194893515:50
kopecmartinwe have 2 options how to address that15:51
kopecmartin1. leave the --concurrency arg as it is and proceed with the proposed patch15:51
kopecmartin2. improve the documentation of the argument as you suggested in the other comment and rename the argument as well - let's go with something like --creds-number15:51
gmannkopecmartin: not sure about 2nd one as concurrency seems easy to understand? like what we have in tempest or stestr15:53
gmannkopecmartin: current proposed  patch make it more confusing like it double the concurrency so no way to generate/run serially 15:54
gmannI was suggesting to change the default value instead of hard coding it with *2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/822434/2/tempest/cmd/account_generator.py15:54
gmann#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/822434/2/tempest/cmd/account_generator.py15:54
kopecmartini see, so we can just increase the default value (1->2)15:55
kopecmartinthat sounds good and easy enough 15:56
gmannyeah, as that is most test case requirement is. and anyone need single creds can change it to 115:56
kopecmartinprefect, let's go with that then 15:56
kopecmartinthat's it15:57
kopecmartinanything else to discuss?15:57
gmannnothing else from me15:57
soniya29nothing from my side15:58
kopecmartinthank you all for attending, see you next week 15:58
kopecmartin#endmeeting15:58
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue Jan 11 15:58:12 2022 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:58
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-01-11-15.00.html15:58
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-01-11-15.00.txt15:58
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-01-11-15.00.log.html15:58
opendevreviewMerged openstack/devstack master: Deprecate lib/neutron  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/82365317:29
opendevreviewMerged openstack/devstack stable/xena: Don't enable the dstat service in CI jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/82375517:29
opendevreviewMerged openstack/devstack stable/wallaby: Don't enable the dstat service in CI jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/82375617:33
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off17:38
opendevreviewMerged openstack/devstack master: Fix cloning requirements when GIT_DEPTH is set  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/82378418:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!