| *** stevemar_ has joined #openstack-release | 00:00 | |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 00:30 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tony Breeds proposed openstack/releases: Tag oslo.utils 1.4.2 https://review.openstack.org/245610 | 00:33 |
|---|---|---|
| *** stevemar_ has quit IRC | 00:42 | |
| *** stevemar_ has joined #openstack-release | 00:44 | |
| *** stevemar_ has quit IRC | 00:49 | |
| *** dougwig has quit IRC | 01:33 | |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa has quit IRC | 01:33 | |
| *** jhesketh has quit IRC | 01:33 | |
| *** mattoliverau has quit IRC | 01:33 | |
| *** isviridov_away has quit IRC | 01:34 | |
| *** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-release | 01:34 | |
| *** bswartz has quit IRC | 01:35 | |
| *** jroll has quit IRC | 01:35 | |
| *** fungi has quit IRC | 01:35 | |
| *** jhesketh has joined #openstack-release | 01:37 | |
| *** jroll has joined #openstack-release | 01:38 | |
| *** fungi has joined #openstack-release | 01:38 | |
| *** bswartz has joined #openstack-release | 01:39 | |
| *** dougwig has joined #openstack-release | 01:40 | |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa has joined #openstack-release | 01:42 | |
| *** isviridov_away has joined #openstack-release | 01:45 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-release | 02:06 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-release | 03:21 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 03:40 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 03:47 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-release | 03:48 | |
| *** dims has quit IRC | 04:08 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-release | 05:06 | |
| *** sileht has quit IRC | 05:12 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 05:31 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-release | 05:44 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 05:50 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-release | 05:56 | |
| *** stevemar_ has joined #openstack-release | 06:11 | |
| *** stevemar_ has quit IRC | 06:14 | |
| *** dhellmann has quit IRC | 06:28 | |
| *** dhellmann has joined #openstack-release | 06:28 | |
| *** dhellmann has quit IRC | 06:34 | |
| *** dhellmann has joined #openstack-release | 06:34 | |
| *** matt____ has joined #openstack-release | 07:10 | |
| *** sileht has joined #openstack-release | 07:11 | |
| *** jhesketh_ has joined #openstack-release | 07:12 | |
| *** mattoliverau has quit IRC | 07:15 | |
| *** jhesketh has quit IRC | 07:15 | |
| *** tristanC has quit IRC | 07:15 | |
| *** E1nherjer has joined #openstack-release | 07:16 | |
| *** tristanC has joined #openstack-release | 07:20 | |
| *** E1nherjer has left #openstack-release | 07:23 | |
| *** E1nherjer has joined #openstack-release | 07:23 | |
| *** E1nherjer has left #openstack-release | 07:30 | |
| *** E1nherjer has joined #openstack-release | 07:30 | |
| *** E1nherjer has left #openstack-release | 07:30 | |
| *** E1nherjer has joined #openstack-release | 07:31 | |
| *** E1nherjer has left #openstack-release | 07:31 | |
| *** E1nherjer has joined #openstack-release | 07:31 | |
| *** E1nherjer has left #openstack-release | 07:32 | |
| *** E1nherjer has joined #openstack-release | 07:32 | |
| *** E1nherjer has left #openstack-release | 07:32 | |
| *** E1nherjer has joined #openstack-release | 07:32 | |
| *** E1nherjer has left #openstack-release | 07:33 | |
| *** E1nherjer has joined #openstack-release | 07:33 | |
| *** E1nherjer has left #openstack-release | 07:34 | |
| *** E1nherjer has joined #openstack-release | 07:34 | |
| *** E1nherjer has left #openstack-release | 07:35 | |
| *** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 09:08 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-release | 10:17 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack-infra/release-tools: Allow to unset assignee/milestone for bug with no activity https://review.openstack.org/230529 | 10:36 |
| *** jhesketh_ has quit IRC | 10:40 | |
| *** jhesketh has joined #openstack-release | 10:47 | |
| *** stevemar_ has joined #openstack-release | 11:12 | |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-release | 11:12 | |
| *** stevemar_ has quit IRC | 11:15 | |
| *** emildi has quit IRC | 11:28 | |
| dims | lifeless : i cannot understand why pyeclib gets dropped off everytime the bot runs - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245504/2/upper-constraints.txt,cm | 12:00 |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 12:00 | |
| dims | lifeless : any ideas? | 12:00 |
| sdague | dims: are there logs for the bot run? | 12:11 |
| dims | sdague ack one sec | 12:35 |
| dims | sdague looks clean http://logs.openstack.org/periodic/propose-requirements-constraints-master/dbf1a17/console.html | 12:36 |
| *** gordc has joined #openstack-release | 12:38 | |
| sdague | I wonder if it's because it can't compile it on that node | 12:40 |
| sdague | and it's failing out silently | 12:40 |
| sdague | unfortunately, the actual work the job is doing is all hidden | 12:40 |
| dims | sdague : y possible. i whipped up a vm and tried that, when the compile fails, it does bail out in my vm | 12:47 |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-release | 12:48 | |
| dims | sdague : in my local runs, it gets updated to "PyECLib===1.1.1" still looking at it | 12:52 |
| *** mugsie_ is now known as mugsie | 12:55 | |
| *** stevemar_ has joined #openstack-release | 13:33 | |
| *** bswartz has quit IRC | 13:45 | |
| gordc | dims: you folks planning on moving forward on this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232918/ | 13:48 |
| dims | gordc: "need lifeless to chime in on this." | 13:49 |
| gordc | dims: kk, just asking because the oslo.config constraint is blocking liberty for ceilometer integration tests currently. | 13:51 |
| dims | gordc : ack. lots of folks waiting on it :( | 13:51 |
| gordc | dims: good to know it's a collective sorrow.lol | 13:52 |
| *** ubuntu1 is now known as anteaya | 13:52 | |
| dims | dhellmann : ^^^ can we please unblock liberty requirements bot updates? | 13:52 |
| gordc | dims: unrelated question, but regarding py26 patches, you plan on dropping python2.6 classifier in a separate patch? | 13:55 |
| dims | gordc : the idea was to drop the classifier after we stop the jobs | 13:57 |
| dims | gordc right now, the tox.ini changes should still all work with the py26 jobs | 13:58 |
| gordc | dims: kk... /me goes to change score | 13:58 |
| dims | gordc : we should also think about major version bumps to indicate that we are dropping support (once we stop jobs) | 13:59 |
| gordc | dims: i was just going to send an email about versioning. | 13:59 |
| sdague | dhellmann: you up and about yet? | 13:59 |
| openstackgerrit | Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/releases: Release openstack-doc-tools 0.32 https://review.openstack.org/245781 | 13:59 |
| dims | gordc ++ we can talk about it on ML | 14:00 |
| *** AJaeger has joined #openstack-release | 14:00 | |
| dims | gordc mostly last week was just getting the message out about shutting down oslo-incubator and dropping py26 | 14:00 |
| sdague | I'm kind of wondering if we can consolidate the reno jobs into the docs jobs on the build side, because there is a phantom ~60 minute cost for spinning up and throwing away a node | 14:01 |
| bauzas | so, I'm trying to figure out where dhellmann addressed that question previosuly | 14:02 |
| AJaeger | sdague: we limitted reno jobs already in a good way, so they run only if there is a file changed there. | 14:02 |
| sdague | AJaeger: oh, ok | 14:02 |
| AJaeger | sdague: check zuul/layout.yaml | 14:02 |
| sdague | yeh, see it now. It's not just files changed there, but that should mostly address my concerns | 14:03 |
| *** nikhil_k_ is now known as nikhil__ | 14:03 | |
| AJaeger | sdague: do you think the file section is too broad? | 14:04 |
| sdague | no, it's probably what it needs to be | 14:04 |
| AJaeger | sdague: good ;) | 14:04 |
| sdague | but it's going to trigger this on a bunch more changes than relnotes | 14:04 |
| sdague | anyway, just thinking about possibilities to have all the docs content built in a dedicated job. Because we've got the apiguide as well in nova | 14:05 |
| AJaeger | sdague: and for the apiguide we have proper files section as well I hope... | 14:06 |
| AJaeger | sdague: but merging these together would be fine - but needs a complete rework on how we build docs | 14:07 |
| AJaeger | sdague: right now we use "python setup.py build_sphinx" - and that needs to be changed, since for e.g. nova we need three sphinx invocations. | 14:07 |
| AJaeger | And then "tox -e docs" needs to place files correctly for publishing to various directories... | 14:08 |
| sdague | AJaeger: yeh | 14:08 |
| sdague | it just does seem that proliferation of targets is going to be worse, because then everyone has to build and manage multiple tox envs | 14:09 |
| AJaeger | sdague: If you go for it, I happily assist with reviewing but will not drive this. | 14:09 |
| sdague | tox is really designed for changing something substantial in the environment, like python interpretter | 14:09 |
| sdague | not being a job dispatcher | 14:09 |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|brb | 14:09 | |
| dhellmann | sdague, AJaeger : just coming online | 14:09 |
| sdague | yeh, well, I don't have the time this cycle to understand the docs build change enough to address this | 14:10 |
| dhellmann | combining the docs builds makes some sense. We could add all of the commands directly to the docs env, I guess. | 14:10 |
| AJaeger | dhellmann: but then you need to publish properly as well... | 14:10 |
| AJaeger | doc/build/html goes to /developer/$repo/ but releasenotes/build/html goes to /releasenotes/$repo | 14:11 |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : true, but maybe we can fix up those builders/publishers to let us combine them | 14:11 |
| AJaeger | and apiguide/build/html goes to developer.openstack.org/api-guide/compute for nova. | 14:11 |
| sdague | it would definitely be super nice if they could all be consolidated | 14:11 |
| AJaeger | dhellmann: yes, that should work... | 14:11 |
| AJaeger | sdague: yes, we can consolidate them. Good idea. | 14:12 |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : even if we only combine the check/gate jobs that would save a ton of test resources | 14:12 |
| AJaeger | sdague, dhellmann: I know have an idea - will write up an infra spec and tell you about it... | 14:12 |
| sdague | AJaeger: awesome, thank you | 14:12 |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : cool | 14:12 |
| dhellmann | sdague : thanks for raising this | 14:13 |
| sdague | dhellmann: no prob, thanks for looking into it so quickly | 14:13 |
| *** bswartz has joined #openstack-release | 14:14 | |
| AJaeger | dhellmann: see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245589/ - we have draft display for relesenotes now | 14:14 |
| *** nikhil__ is now known as nikhil_k | 14:15 | |
| AJaeger | dims, dhellmann : Could you release openstack-doc-tools today, please? See https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245781/ | 14:15 |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : I like the draft display, it should make it easier for contributors to understand what their reno file is going to end up looking like | 14:16 |
| AJaeger | sdague, dhellmann: The draft display is a challenge for a combined job: WE would need an "index.html" page for it to jump between those two. Right now it works nicely since each document has its own job... | 14:17 |
| AJaeger | dhellmann: yep, stevemar_ proposed that yesterday, I implemented, and infra was ultra-fast approving without any push ;) | 14:17 |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : cool, can you dig up the patch so I can understand what was needed? | 14:19 |
| AJaeger | dhellmann: Ib542084a275a5bfe82c48517d48372fec6411e16 - and then Id17911beede59d0c4d363a0a6515a4014acc88df | 14:20 |
| AJaeger | my first merged patch was broken | 14:20 |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : ok, thanks | 14:21 |
| odyssey4me | I was thinking that a time-saving feature addition to reno would be to allow the release note to be based on a commit message's content. | 14:25 |
| dhellmann | odyssey4me : you can't edit a commit message after it has merged | 14:25 |
| dhellmann | odyssey4me : also, the commit message and release note typically have different audiences, and different levels of detail | 14:26 |
| dhellmann | at least, they should | 14:26 |
| odyssey4me | dhellmann I mean the other way around. eg: once a commit has merged, or once you've done an initial commit, then run reno new --commit <sha> --type upgrade sug-goes-here | 14:26 |
| odyssey4me | then it puts together a starting yaml file with the commit contents, which you can edit before doing a new commit (or commit amending) | 14:27 |
| AJaeger | odyssey4me: if you think it's something that would help you, please send patches for reno. | 14:28 |
| AJaeger | odyssey4me: I agree with dhellmann that I expect that the audiences are so different that you better start from scratch or copy and paste only very little content. | 14:28 |
| dhellmann | odyssey4me : that's an interesting approach, but how often do you think it would be used? like I said, different audiences imply different content. I'd be interested in learning more about some examples of where it would save time, though. | 14:28 |
| odyssey4me | AJaeger sure, for now I'm just curious about whether anyone else thinks it may be useful | 14:28 |
| AJaeger | ;) | 14:29 |
| AJaeger | odyssey4me: It might be too early for that - too few users of reno. | 14:29 |
| odyssey4me | well, before I found out about reno I was thinking that our commit messages should be published as release notes with a little tooling to exclude a list of commits... then reno came along, which I think is better | 14:30 |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-release | 14:30 | |
| odyssey4me | for now it's just a thought - let me spend some time working with it more before really deciding whether it's worth persuing | 14:32 |
| dhellmann | odyssey4me : I had some ideas at one point to teach reno to scan commit messages for things like bug ids, but lifeless pointed out that most bug fixes don't warrant a release note so it's really easier to add them after the fact, even if it means a second commit | 14:32 |
| odyssey4me | dhellmann yeah, I was kind thinking that perhaps some sort of tag in a commit message and a well known structure in the commit message could automatically generate a release note - perhaps even using a git hook (like git-review does) of some sort | 14:34 |
| odyssey4me | that only saves people from having to use reno, but then with all the structure requirements they may as welll use reno, right :p | 14:35 |
| dhellmann | odyssey4me : right, with the structure requirements and the mutability requirements, we can't do too much based solely on the commit message | 14:36 |
| *** mestery has joined #openstack-release | 14:39 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-release | 15:03 | |
| dims | dhellmann : oslo releases for this week is ready when you get a chance please, no rush - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245465/ | 15:03 |
| dhellmann | dims : ack | 15:03 |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus24 | 15:14 | |
| dhellmann | dims : do you want to weigh in on this liberty oslo.log release? https://review.openstack.org/240025 | 15:16 |
| dims | dhellmann : so i wanted to ask you here.. we just approved u-c update to oslo.log in that bot proposed review to 1.13.0 - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232918/35/upper-constraints.txt,cm | 15:20 |
| dims | dhellmann : so do we still need a oslo.log release | 15:20 |
| dims | mriedem ^^ | 15:20 |
| dims | mriedem dhellmann given that we don't have a cap in liberty | 15:20 |
| sdague | dhellmann: just wanted to say, reno is really neat. Thanks for making that. | 15:22 |
| dhellmann | dims : I assume we plan to release stable libs and adjust the constraints, right? | 15:22 |
| dims | dhellmann you mean the release-constraints.txt file? | 15:23 |
| dhellmann | sdague : thanks, the requirements came from discussions with ttx and lifeless; lots of good ideas | 15:23 |
| mriedem | dims: dhellmann: so we could drop https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241846/ since u-c is already using 1.13.0 in stable/liberty | 15:23 |
| dhellmann | dims : I mean upper-constraints | 15:23 |
| mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240025/ was to get a stable/liberty backport out | 15:23 |
| dhellmann | dims : unless we're already past that one | 15:23 |
| dims | dhellmann upper-constraints is now 1.13.0 | 15:23 |
| dhellmann | ok | 15:23 |
| mriedem | but it was cherry picked from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/227688/ which is now in 1.12.0 | 15:24 |
| dhellmann | dims , mriedem: the reason we release from stable libs is to let distros update their packages | 15:24 |
| mriedem | so stable/liberty could use that, so i guess i'll abandon all changes | 15:24 |
| dims | mriedem i am ok with cherry-pick to stable/liberty. was just not sure about making a release | 15:24 |
| mriedem | dims: the cherry pick in oslo.log is already done | 15:24 |
| mriedem | the releases change was to release that as 1.11.1, but if stable/liberty u-c is at 1.13.0, i don't think we need it, | 15:25 |
| mriedem | since stable/liberty can be using effectively master oslo.log | 15:25 |
| dims | mriedem right | 15:25 |
| mriedem | so i'll abandon | 15:25 |
| dims | mriedem : need to wait for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232918/ to merge | 15:25 |
| mriedem | meh, i just abandoned | 15:27 |
| mriedem | i can restore later if needed | 15:27 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Release openstack-doc-tools 0.32 https://review.openstack.org/245781 | 15:27 |
| AJaeger | dhellmann: thanks for the release of openstack-doc-tools! | 15:33 |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : np | 15:33 |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : regarding your question about voting on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/242027/, I agree, we should flip that switch as soon as we can | 15:44 |
| AJaeger | dhellmann: send a patch and I'll +2 ;) | 15:44 |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : sounds good | 15:45 |
| AJaeger | better that way than you doing the +1 ;) | 15:45 |
| *** dtantsur|brb is now known as dtantsur | 15:46 | |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : is this all we need? https://review.openstack.org/245841 | 15:46 |
| * AJaeger checks | 15:47 | |
| AJaeger | dhellmann: add it to the gate of the template as well | 15:47 |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/releases: python-ceilometerclient 2.1.0 https://review.openstack.org/245842 | 15:48 |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : updated | 15:48 |
| AJaeger | dhellmann: +2 | 15:49 |
| dhellmann | AJaeger : ty | 15:52 |
| jroll | dhellmann: I notice glance has reno in master and reno[sphinx] in stable/liberty, is that intentional or is one wrong? | 16:17 |
| jroll | (in test-requirements.txt) | 16:17 |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 16:19 | |
| dhellmann | jroll : we'd like to have reno[sphinx] everywhere, but there was an issue with the requirements checking job that dims is working on fixing so for some projects only "reno" was working in master | 16:22 |
| jroll | dhellmann: got it, thanks | 16:22 |
| *** AJaeger has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-release | 16:50 | |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 17:34 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-release | 17:39 | |
| *** AJaeger has joined #openstack-release | 17:41 | |
| *** bdemers has quit IRC | 17:46 | |
| *** bdemers has joined #openstack-release | 17:53 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 18:00 | |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-release | 18:03 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-release | 18:07 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 18:07 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-release | 18:14 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 18:15 | |
| *** doug-fish has quit IRC | 18:20 | |
| *** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release | 18:21 | |
| *** doug-fish has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
| cp16net | dims: i saw that you mentioned the bot updated the upper-contraints file before my patch landed. dhellmann said this patch needed to be linked to the client release patch. I'm wondering if its nessesary to make this patch if the bot comes along and does it for us. | 18:35 |
| cp16net | ref: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241332/ | 18:36 |
| *** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release | 18:46 | |
| *** doug-fis_ has joined #openstack-release | 18:58 | |
| *** doug-fi__ has joined #openstack-release | 19:00 | |
| *** doug-fish has quit IRC | 19:01 | |
| dhellmann | cp16net : normally the bot won't do that because you'd have submitted the constraints change before we cut the release | 19:01 |
| *** doug-fis_ has quit IRC | 19:02 | |
| cp16net | ok just checking thanks | 19:03 |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-release | 19:05 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 19:09 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-release | 19:23 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 19:27 | |
| dhellmann | cp16net : np, we're still finding edge cases in the processes, so thanks for raising this | 19:28 |
| dhellmann | gordc : should https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245842/ be for 2.0.1 instead of 2.1.0? I don't see any new features there, just the bug fix. | 19:31 |
| gordc | dhellmann: 2.0.1 works. just have a habit of making minor version changes. will post update. | 19:34 |
| dhellmann | gordc : sounds good, thanks | 19:34 |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/releases: python-ceilometerclient 2.1.0 https://review.openstack.org/245842 | 19:35 |
| *** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa | 19:35 | |
| *** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus24 | 19:36 | |
| dhellmann | dims : until we get to a critical point in the schedule, requirements changes to projects we manage (i.e., https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244778/) can be approved by a single reviewer. We still need 2 reviews for new requirements and changes to things we use but don't release ourself. | 19:43 |
| dhellmann | bknudson_ : do we still need this block on keystonemiddleware and keystoneclient? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235923/ | 19:43 |
| dims | dhellmann thanks! yes, that sounds like the right thing to do. | 19:44 |
| bknudson_ | dhellmann: yes, on liberty | 19:44 |
| bknudson_ | although maybe not... I don't quite get if we're using g-r on liberty or if it's u-c that matters. | 19:45 |
| dhellmann | dims : yeah, we were doing that until right before the release last cycle | 19:45 |
| dhellmann | bknudson_ : a little of both; I'll approve it | 19:46 |
| dhellmann | bknudson_ : we still don't have constraints in the unit test jobs | 19:46 |
| *** redrobot has quit IRC | 19:57 | |
| *** Guest98343 has joined #openstack-release | 19:58 | |
| *** Guest98343 is now known as redrobot | 20:00 | |
| dhellmann | gordc : I added you to a pymongo requirements change review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241765/ | 20:00 |
| gordc | dhellmann: kk. will take a look. | 20:00 |
| openstackgerrit | gordon chung proposed openstack/releases: python-ceilometerclient 2.0.1 https://review.openstack.org/245842 | 20:02 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases: Oslo releases for week of Nov 16, 2015 https://review.openstack.org/245465 | 20:21 |
| openstackgerrit | devdatta-kulkarni proposed openstack/releases: solum and python-solumclient release https://review.openstack.org/245963 | 20:24 |
| *** doug-fi__ is now known as doug-fish | 20:24 | |
| *** matt____ is now known as mattoliverau | 20:44 | |
| stevemar_ | dhellmann: o/ | 20:58 |
| dhellmann | stevemar_ : o/ | 20:58 |
| stevemar_ | dhellmann: i would like to propose a new zaqarclient release, it contains a fix that makes it usable (it had an entrypoint conflict with osc :( ) | 20:58 |
| stevemar_ | dhellmann: so, my question | 20:58 |
| stevemar_ | I would also like this backported to liberty, since i think it's there too :( | 20:59 |
| stevemar_ | my question is, if i need to backport it... do number this new release as 0.3.0, and the liberty release as 0.2.1? https://github.com/openstack/python-zaqarclient/releases | 20:59 |
| stevemar_ | it's still in the 0 major version, so i'm a bit confused about semver naming | 21:00 |
| dhellmann | stevemar_ : yes, because we passed the release boundary the minor version needs to be updated | 21:00 |
| stevemar_ | dhellmann: alrighty | 21:01 |
| stevemar_ | dhellmann: thank you as always, sir | 21:02 |
| dhellmann | stevemar_ : np, thanks for checking | 21:02 |
| *** sileht has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
| *** doug-fish has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
| *** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release | 21:25 | |
| openstackgerrit | Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/releases: zaqarclient 0.3.0 https://review.openstack.org/245991 | 21:27 |
| stevemar_ | mriedem: ^ | 21:27 |
| *** AJaeger has left #openstack-release | 21:28 | |
| openstackgerrit | Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/releases: zaqarclient 0.3.0 https://review.openstack.org/245991 | 21:32 |
| *** bswartz has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
| openstackgerrit | Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/releases: zaqarclient 0.3.0 https://review.openstack.org/245991 | 21:40 |
| *** jhesketh has quit IRC | 22:17 | |
| *** jhesketh has joined #openstack-release | 22:18 | |
| *** doug-fish has quit IRC | 22:20 | |
| *** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release | 22:21 | |
| *** doug-fish has quit IRC | 22:24 | |
| *** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release | 22:29 | |
| *** doug-fish has quit IRC | 22:34 | |
| *** pleia2 has quit IRC | 22:54 | |
| *** mordred has quit IRC | 22:54 | |
| *** jeblair has quit IRC | 22:54 | |
| *** mugsie has quit IRC | 22:54 | |
| *** peterstac has quit IRC | 22:54 | |
| *** mugsie has joined #openstack-release | 22:56 | |
| *** pleia2 has joined #openstack-release | 22:56 | |
| *** jeblair has joined #openstack-release | 22:56 | |
| *** bdemers_ has joined #openstack-release | 22:58 | |
| *** peterstac has joined #openstack-release | 22:59 | |
| *** mriedem is now known as mriedem_away | 23:01 | |
| *** beekneemech has joined #openstack-release | 23:05 | |
| *** bdemers has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** sdague has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** bnemec has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** lifeless has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** bdemers_ is now known as bdemers | 23:06 | |
| *** sdague has joined #openstack-release | 23:07 | |
| *** mordred has joined #openstack-release | 23:08 | |
| *** lifeless has joined #openstack-release | 23:09 | |
| *** jhesketh has quit IRC | 23:21 | |
| *** jhesketh has joined #openstack-release | 23:23 | |
| *** gordc has quit IRC | 23:33 | |
| stevemar_ | dhellmann: uh oh, docs fail on releases? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245991/ | 23:35 |
| *** bswartz has joined #openstack-release | 23:38 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!