| * ttx slowly emerges from a pile of other things -- hoping everything is shiny in releaseland | 11:12 | |
| ttx | what's the situation on broken Watcher / oslo.db thing? | 11:14 |
|---|---|---|
| elodilles | i haven't seen any RC2 yet. not for watcher nor for other deliverables | 11:39 |
| opendevreview | Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/releases master: Release ironic 24.2.0 for caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/914200 | 13:21 |
| jamespage | ttx, elodilles: vitrage has the same challenge https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2011061 | 15:35 |
| jamespage | I have been trying to untangle the remaining test failures with the patch I have up but I'm not progressing very quickly | 15:36 |
| frickler | so I repeat my suggestion of documenting these as known bugs in the release notes of these projects for the release | 15:55 |
| frickler | elodilles: any timeframe for the updates of the remaining unmaintained patches? asking for an update for the upcoming tc meeting | 15:55 |
| elodilles | frickler: let's merge the keystone and barbican patches ASAP, then I'll try to go through the rest of the patches, if not this week, then next week, after release | 15:57 |
| elodilles | jamespage: thanks for the heads up and thanks for working on this. it's sad that those projects are inactive :/ | 15:58 |
| elodilles | frickler: i'm also tend to accept that we have to release them as they are if the bug cannot be fixed before the final rc release deadline :/ | 16:00 |
| jamespage | frickler: I think we need to recognise that this in effect makes these two projects unusable and I'm not sure a known bug in the release notes is sufficient? | 16:00 |
| elodilles | i don't want to do any churn around oslo.db if the only remaining blockers are in inactive projects. but maybe it's just me. | 16:01 |
| jamespage | neither of those two is marked inactive for caracal fwiw | 16:04 |
| frickler | elodilles: +1, reverting oslo.db once again is a nogo for me | 16:04 |
| frickler | jamespage: but it looks like they should be, given lack of active development? | 16:05 |
| frickler | elodilles: +2ed the two vwx patches, if you want to approve them | 16:05 |
| jamespage | I can't disagree with that - there appears to be an inflight review for vitrage | 16:05 |
| elodilles | frickler: will do that after the nova meeting, thanks o/ | 16:06 |
| frickler | jamespage: they didn't even merge release patches for the previous cycle. we should make that an early warning trigger before m-2 next cycle https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/vitrage/+/895304 | 16:08 |
| jamespage | agreed | 16:08 |
| opendevreview | Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/releases master: Release ironic 24.1.1 for caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/914279 | 16:21 |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [searchlight] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910397 | 16:30 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [keystone] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910411 | 16:33 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [barbican] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910419 | 16:43 |
| elodilles | done ^^^ | 16:55 |
| elodilles | frickler: i've reviewed and commented a couple of transition patches, please revisit them: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:vwx-unmaintained+is:open+label:PTL-Approved%252B1 | 16:55 |
| elodilles | frickler: i'm also hesitant with monasca. i feel that maybe some folks could use monasca on old branches and there is a tiny, but maybe bigger than zero possibility that someone wants to fix something on the last existing branches at some point... :/ | 16:58 |
| elodilles | i'll try to continue the reviews later | 16:59 |
| frickler | elodilles: it seems nobody even fixes things in master and I really would like to be able to get rid of zuul config errors for the old branches at least | 16:59 |
| elodilles | frickler: if that is the only problem i'm ready to clean up the zuul config errors in unmaintained/* branches o:) | 17:11 |
| frickler | elodilles: ok, I'll remember that ;) | 17:14 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [Telemetry] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910405 | 17:20 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [searchlight] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910397 | 17:28 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [cyborg] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910393 | 17:28 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [mistral] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910392 | 17:38 |
| frickler | cleanup time :) | 18:01 |
| elodilles | frickler: ACK, tomorrow i'll run the branch deletion script o/ | 18:07 |
| frickler | elodilles: I already started the eol script, do you think waiting until tomorrow would be better? | 18:07 |
| elodilles | not at all | 18:14 |
| elodilles | it's just around EOB to me :) | 18:15 |
| elodilles | thanks for dealing with the branch deletions o/ | 18:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!