| *** markwash__ has quit IRC | 00:48 | |
| *** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:08 | |
| *** mestery has quit IRC | 03:33 | |
| *** SlickNik has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:35 | |
| *** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 03:40 | |
| *** mestery has quit IRC | 03:47 | |
| *** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:41 | |
| *** mestery has quit IRC | 04:57 | |
| *** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 04:59 | |
| *** mestery has quit IRC | 05:36 | |
| ttx | I'm on it | 06:46 |
|---|---|---|
| mikal | ttx: Greetings, earth human | 07:55 |
| ttx | mikal: hi, creature of the other hemisphere | 07:57 |
| ttx | #startmeeting ptl_sync | 07:57 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Sep 30 07:57:26 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 07:57 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 07:57 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'ptl_sync' | 07:57 |
| ttx | #topic Nova | 07:57 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/juno-rc1 | 07:58 |
| mikal | Yep | 07:58 |
| ttx | mikal: I count 5 bugs left | 07:58 |
| mikal | When I went to bed on Friday, I think all of those remaining bugs had fixes propsed | 07:58 |
| mikal | Obviously they haven't merged | 07:58 |
| mikal | How do you want to proceed here | 07:59 |
| *** zz_johnthetubagu has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 07:59 | |
| mikal | Walk through the five and discuss the state of each? | 07:59 |
| ttx | hard to blame the gate, it's empty this morning | 07:59 |
| ttx | mikal: yes please | 07:59 |
| *** zz_johnthetubagu is now known as johnthetubaguy | 07:59 | |
| mikal | Oh, I'm not | 07:59 |
| mikal | I was off sick over the weekend, and am explaining my lack of state | 07:59 |
| mikal | Ok, so... | 07:59 |
| mikal | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1373950 | 07:59 |
| mikal | The fix at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124063/ proposes to "roll forwards" instead of revert | 08:00 |
| mikal | Which I think is the wrong call at this point in the release | 08:00 |
| mikal | It also doesn't link to the alternate patch | 08:00 |
| johnthetubaguy | morning | 08:00 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: hey | 08:00 |
| mikal | Just walking through the bugs left in rc1 | 08:00 |
| ttx | yeah, couln't find it | 08:00 |
| mikal | We're on the first one still | 08:00 |
| ttx | (alternate patch) | 08:00 |
| johnthetubaguy | I tried to review all those yesterday | 08:01 |
| mikal | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124384/ seems to be the alternate patch | 08:01 |
| johnthetubaguy | basically, fix it, or revert it | 08:01 |
| johnthetubaguy | there are two fix it patches I think | 08:01 |
| ttx | and it's gating | 08:01 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: I see two reverts on the bug, but only one "fix" patch? | 08:01 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: I think its too late for a fix | 08:01 |
| mikal | I think we _have_ to revert | 08:02 |
| mikal | Given the bug is "this implementation doesn't make sense" | 08:02 |
| johnthetubaguy | let me check those patches, yeah | 08:02 |
| mikal | Nikola has WIP'ed his reverts | 08:02 |
| ttx | it's going to be added to gate queue anytime now | 08:03 |
| ttx | hmm, actually, it's in gate now | 08:03 |
| mikal | The fix patch you mean? | 08:03 |
| johnthetubaguy | I think nikola just added another RC1 bug | 08:03 |
| ttx | yes | 08:03 |
| mikal | OMG, yes now there are six | 08:03 |
| mikal | Shall we drag Nikola in here to talk through this bug? | 08:04 |
| ttx | why not | 08:04 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah | 08:04 |
| * mikal does that thing | 08:04 | |
| johnthetubaguy | I think we need to nuke it | 08:04 |
| johnthetubaguy | there is too much up for review | 08:05 |
| johnthetubaguy | its like a new feature | 08:05 |
| ttx | yes, from the sound of the bug it's a bit of a shot in the dark | 08:05 |
| johnthetubaguy | well, its quite well reasoned, just no chance of merging it now :( | 08:05 |
| *** ndipanov has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 08:06 | |
| mikal | Hi ndipanov | 08:06 |
| ndipanov | o/ | 08:06 |
| mikal | Thanks for joining us | 08:06 |
| ndipanov | np | 08:06 |
| mikal | We're just walking through the remaining RC bugs for juno | 08:06 |
| mikal | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1373950 is the current victim | 08:06 |
| * ndipanov looks | 08:06 | |
| mikal | The serial console stuff | 08:06 |
| ndipanov | ah yes | 08:06 |
| ndipanov | so I like sahid's fix | 08:06 |
| ndipanov | no reason not to ship it imho | 08:06 |
| mikal | I feel given we're meant to release like today, that its too late to roll forwards | 08:07 |
| johnthetubaguy | how can we merge it yesterday, is the issue really | 08:07 |
| ndipanov | mikal, well one patch failed CI | 08:07 |
| ndipanov | and the other one has a -1 from Jay but I responded to that | 08:07 |
| mikal | ndipanov: what patches are needed to roll forwards? | 08:07 |
| mikal | The bug doesn't make that obvious | 08:07 |
| ndipanov | one sec | 08:07 |
| ttx | mikal: if https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124384 is all thgere is to it, it's closer to roll forward than revert | 08:07 |
| ttx | or is there more ? | 08:08 |
| ndipanov | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124385/ and the one it depends on | 08:08 |
| ndipanov | which was approved but failed jenkins | 08:08 |
| mikal | There are five patches in that topic on gerrit though | 08:09 |
| johnthetubaguy | ndipanov: did you see the following three patches? | 08:09 |
| mikal | https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bug/1373950,n,z | 08:09 |
| ttx | Oh, it's a patchseries of 5 | 08:09 |
| johnthetubaguy | looks like there are a load of bugs around exceptions too | 08:09 |
| ndipanov | oh wow I missed that | 08:09 |
| ttx | mikal: agree it's very featury | 08:09 |
| johnthetubaguy | ndipanov: me too till just now | 08:09 |
| johnthetubaguy | ndipanov: I think we have to nuke the broken thing, and get it up for review again in a week | 08:10 |
| ndipanov | can you guys five me a sec | 08:10 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: +1 | 08:10 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: I agree, but let's give ndipanov a sec | 08:10 |
| ndipanov | I think the first 2 patches are enough but want to confirm | 08:10 |
| johnthetubaguy | ndipanov: gotcha | 08:10 |
| ndipanov | I think the rest was just nova reviewers reviewing | 08:10 |
| ttx | maybe we can look at the others, that will give us a better idea of how far we are from rc1 | 08:10 |
| johnthetubaguy | lets go to the next one | 08:10 |
| mikal | Ok, fair enough | 08:11 |
| ttx | which may affect our final decision | 08:11 |
| mikal | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1310135 | 08:11 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124162/ ? | 08:11 |
| johnthetubaguy | I guess, this is new since I last looked at the list | 08:12 |
| mikal | Yeah, that seems to be the only outstanding patch in that bug | 08:12 |
| ndipanov | so just after looking at the next patch in the series it is absolutely not critical | 08:12 |
| ndipanov | plus it actually does not reference the bug | 08:12 |
| johnthetubaguy | ndipanov: its just tidying up error cases? | 08:12 |
| ndipanov | yeah needlesly imho - I want to -1 it :) | 08:13 |
| ndipanov | so if we just slam in the first 2 we can call it a bug | 08:13 |
| ttx | ndipanov: so it's a series of 4 ? | 08:13 |
| ndipanov | 2 | 08:13 |
| ndipanov | only first 2 patches are relevant to the bug | 08:13 |
| mikal | ttx: I think he's saying its a series of two with some random stuff on the end | 08:14 |
| ndipanov | yes | 08:14 |
| ttx | ah ok | 08:14 |
| ndipanov | this | 08:14 |
| mikal | Are both of those two approved? | 08:14 |
| mikal | Only the first is, right? | 08:14 |
| ndipanov | mikal, yes | 08:14 |
| johnthetubaguy | I need to get my head around Jay's API comment, but the other could be approved soon | 08:14 |
| ndipanov | the second one has a -1 from jay | 08:14 |
| mikal | For clarity, what other one needs to merge? | 08:14 |
| ndipanov | but I think he missunderstood it | 08:14 |
| johnthetubaguy | ndipanov: next one on the list we need to approve too: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110319/ | 08:15 |
| ndipanov | so: | 08:15 |
| ndipanov | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124384/ | 08:15 |
| ndipanov | and | 08:15 |
| ndipanov | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124385/ | 08:15 |
| ndipanov | is needed for the bug | 08:15 |
| johnthetubaguy | ndipanov: sorry, that was a different list, the rc1 list | 08:16 |
| ndipanov | all else is cleanup | 08:16 |
| mikal | And 124384 is approved | 08:16 |
| ttx | and gating | 08:16 |
| mikal | 124385 is only 15 lines of delta | 08:16 |
| mikal | And only 1 line of actual code change, the rest is test implications | 08:16 |
| mikal | Oh I lie | 08:17 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: I just getting my head around if I like it or not | 08:17 |
| mikal | The serial proxy as well | 08:17 |
| ttx | also I think it's fine to change now, since the serial stuff is new iiuc | 08:17 |
| ndipanov | it removes the web option so we don't attempt to serve static content as there is non | 08:17 |
| ttx | whereas fixing postrelease would be a pita | 08:17 |
| ndipanov | ttx, yeah | 08:17 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: thats a good way of looking at it | 08:17 |
| ndipanov | my point exactly hence the critical bug | 08:17 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: I think I'd be ok with +2'ing that patch, what about you? | 08:18 |
| ttx | I vote for pushing it in rc1 | 08:18 |
| johnthetubaguy | ndipanov: I don't disagree, its just where we draw the line | 08:18 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: yeah, I think so | 08:18 |
| ttx | and if it's a big bag of fail, we nuke it in rc2 | 08:18 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: do it | 08:18 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: wanna +2 and +A then? | 08:18 |
| ndipanov | johnthetubaguy, btw I acked that patch | 08:18 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: I figured I would let you do that | 08:18 |
| ndipanov | ttx, it is a big bag of fail ... | 08:18 |
| ndipanov | :) | 08:18 |
| mikal | I live having three +2's there, it makes it clear we talkeda bout it | 08:18 |
| johnthetubaguy | OK | 08:18 |
| mikal | But sure, I can +A if you want | 08:19 |
| mikal | So, sounds like bug 1373950 is not a big problem for us now | 08:19 |
| ttx | next? | 08:20 |
| * mikal was just waiting for the +A to appear before moving on | 08:20 | |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: I went all "english" on jay with an appology, and felt better about it | 08:20 |
| mikal | Ok, back to bug 1310135 | 08:20 |
| ttx | so is that just https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124162/ ? | 08:21 |
| mikal | That needs https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124162/2 | 08:21 |
| mikal | Yes, with Jay's -1 having ben addressed as a misunderstanding | 08:21 |
| mikal | But no +2's yet | 08:21 |
| ttx | so can be overruled imho | 08:21 |
| mikal | Agreed. I think johnthetubaguy and I should agree to review that one after the meeting | 08:21 |
| johnthetubaguy | sure | 08:21 |
| mikal | Move on? | 08:21 |
| ttx | yesd | 08:21 |
| mikal | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1349888 | 08:22 |
| johnthetubaguy | next one I think is good | 08:22 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110319/ gating | 08:22 |
| johnthetubaguy | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114548/ | 08:22 |
| mikal | Its approved, so I asume in the gate | 08:22 |
| johnthetubaguy | oh wait, wrong order | 08:22 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: refresh | 08:22 |
| mikal | Its my fault | 08:22 |
| johnthetubaguy | lol | 08:22 |
| mikal | I opened the tabs before the list changed | 08:22 |
| mikal | Bug 1349888 has https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110319/ | 08:23 |
| mikal | Which is approved and gating | 08:23 |
| mikal | So let's move on from it | 08:23 |
| mikal | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1357372 | 08:23 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114548/ | 08:23 |
| mikal | Ahhh, garky pinged me about this one earlier today | 08:23 |
| mikal | My -1 has been addressed | 08:24 |
| johnthetubaguy | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114548/ | 08:24 |
| ttx | needs 2nd +2 | 08:24 |
| mikal | So, I can change that to an approve | 08:24 |
| johnthetubaguy | cool, thanks | 08:24 |
| ttx | potential security issue, but that won't block the bug being fixed anyway | 08:24 |
| ttx | ack | 08:24 |
| mikal | Ok, approved | 08:24 |
| mikal | So now gating (ish) | 08:24 |
| ttx | next | 08:24 |
| mikal | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1359138 | 08:24 |
| mikal | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118595/ | 08:25 |
| mikal | Basically unreviewed? | 08:25 |
| johnthetubaguy | OK, so I reviewed that, its super close | 08:25 |
| ttx | same case, probably a security issue | 08:25 |
| ttx | so would trigger a rc2 if we left it out | 08:25 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: I don't see youre review on 118595? | 08:25 |
| johnthetubaguy | see patchset 6 | 08:26 |
| mikal | Ah, I see | 08:26 |
| mikal | Ok, so that's another one johnthetubaguy and I promise to review? | 08:26 |
| johnthetubaguy | sure, although that list is getting big agin | 08:26 |
| johnthetubaguy | i just +2ed it though | 08:27 |
| mikal | Well, there's two we've promised to review so far | 08:27 |
| mikal | So waht was the one which got added while we were in this meeting? | 08:27 |
| johnthetubaguy | ndipanov: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118595/7 if you have a sec | 08:27 |
| ttx | I think those are all in the same timeframe, so probably not delaying anything | 08:27 |
| mikal | Ahhh, here it is | 08:27 |
| mikal | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1374902 | 08:27 |
| * ndipanov looks | 08:27 | |
| ttx | especially if we can enqueue them while queue is empty | 08:27 |
| mikal | The last one in our list | 08:27 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124612/ | 08:28 |
| mikal | Fix needs one more review | 08:28 |
| johnthetubaguy | I promised to review that | 08:28 |
| mikal | I can tto | 08:28 |
| mikal | Too even | 08:28 |
| mikal | So, we have three bugs which are gating | 08:28 |
| mikal | And three where we need to review the fix | 08:28 |
| mikal | But I think we could knock out those reviews really quickly if needed | 08:28 |
| mikal | So, I think we could have all of these bugs gating with say an hour | 08:29 |
| ttx | mikal: when you're satisfied with the state of master, you should push something like https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:master+topic:open-kilo,n,z on top of nova master | 08:29 |
| ttx | and I'll cut the branch from the previous commit | 08:29 |
| ndipanov | mikal, can you post the reviews I'll look at them | 08:29 |
| mikal | ndipanov: sure, in a sec | 08:29 |
| mikal | ttx: as in just ptl fiat a +A on a patch like that? | 08:29 |
| johnthetubaguy | ndipanov: mikal: yeah, over in #openstack-nova and we can pile on | 08:30 |
| ttx | yes, that's fine | 08:30 |
| mikal | Or you'll use the dependant sha from gerrit? | 08:30 |
| ttx | serves as sugnoff | 08:30 |
| ttx | signoff | 08:30 |
| ttx | dependant sha ? | 08:30 |
| mikal | Ok, so do self-approve in gerrit so it merges? | 08:30 |
| mikal | The gerrit review will have a parent sha | 08:30 |
| ttx | mikal: I can also push the change and you just -2 it until you're ready to +2/APRV it | 08:31 |
| mikal | I'm just clarifying that I should self merge that change | 08:31 |
| ttx | let me do that | 08:31 |
| mikal | Ok, that sounds better | 08:31 |
| mikal | In case I fat finger it or something | 08:31 |
| ttx | just a sec | 08:31 |
| ttx | hah, first nova repo clone on my new laptop. Stay put. | 08:32 |
| mikal | Heh | 08:32 |
| ttx | mikal: anything else ? | 08:32 |
| ttx | would be good to keep an eye on the rc1 list and make sure nobody adds stragglers | 08:32 |
| ttx | also you can start using juno-rc-potential tag | 08:33 |
| mikal | Yep, I can do that until I go to sleep | 08:33 |
| mikal | I will hand off to johnthetubaguy when I go night night | 08:33 |
| ttx | for stuff that could be interesting to backport in case we do an RC2 | 08:33 |
| johnthetubaguy | cool, I will keep an eye out | 08:33 |
| mikal | But I'd like to stay up for these last merges if possible | 08:33 |
| mikal | It depends how horribly the gate fails us | 08:33 |
| ttx | I think we are on track for a RC1 in less than 24 hours | 08:33 |
| mikal | Yay! | 08:33 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: you going to email the list about the tag, and open of specs, once we cut? | 08:33 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: so, there's some paperwork to do before we open specs | 08:33 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: but I will mail about the cutting of rc1 once we're ready | 08:34 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: jogo wants to chagne the spec template for kilo for example | 08:34 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/124981 | 08:34 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: yeah, I was wondering what we were going to change about that | 08:34 |
| ttx | mika: pleas e-2 ^ | 08:34 |
| mikal | ttx: done | 08:35 |
| mikal | Thanks | 08:35 |
| ttx | great | 08:35 |
| ttx | anything else ? | 08:35 |
| johnthetubaguy | cool, review time | 08:35 |
| * ttx grabs some coffee | 08:35 | |
| mikal | ttx: I think we're good for now? | 08:35 |
| ttx | mikal: yes we are | 08:36 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: enjoy the coffee | 08:36 |
| mikal | johnthetubaguy: let's move this over to openstack-nova then, as this is being meeting logged | 08:36 |
| ttx | mikal: also, anythig that makes it before that commit will obviously be in | 08:36 |
| ttx | we just won't wait on it to cut | 08:36 |
| mikal | Yep, I will send an "approve nothing" to the list now | 08:36 |
| johnthetubaguy | mikal: thanks | 08:36 |
| mikal | Unless you think that's overkill | 08:36 |
| ttx | that may be overkill | 08:37 |
| mikal | Ok, I shall calm down then | 08:37 |
| ttx | things which make it while we wait for the last blockers are generally fine | 08:37 |
| ttx | unless they are the first of a 10-patch series | 08:37 |
| mikal | I don't think much is being approved anyways from the state of the gate | 08:37 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, its the UK morning | 08:38 |
| ttx | oh, let me check translations status | 08:39 |
| ttx | not too bad, last one merged on Sep 26 | 08:39 |
| ttx | mikal: you may want to approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124295/ to have fresh ones | 08:40 |
| ttx | in the rc | 08:40 |
| * mikal looks | 08:41 | |
| *** mikal has quit IRC | 11:23 | |
| *** mikal has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:35 | |
| *** eglynn has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:38 | |
| eglynn | ttx: knock, knock ... ready when you are | 11:44 |
| *** ndipanov has left #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:46 | |
| ttx | #topic Ceilometer | 11:46 |
| ttx | eglynn: o/ | 11:46 |
| eglynn | #link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/juno-rc1 | 11:46 |
| eglynn | so we're looking in good shape to go with that | 11:47 |
| ttx | If you merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124958/ then I'll tag RC1 on the previous commit | 11:47 |
| eglynn | cool, that's approved | 11:47 |
| ttx | great, will cut proposed/juno and tag rc1 once that's gets in | 11:48 |
| eglynn | excellent :) | 11:48 |
| *** dhellmann has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
| ttx | I don't think there is much more to discuss | 11:49 |
| ttx | Oh, final summit slot allocation perhaps | 11:49 |
| eglynn | yeah that would be good to know | 11:49 |
| ttx | 6 scheduled slots + a full-day meetup on Friday | 11:49 |
| ttx | I'll publish the layout this week | 11:49 |
| *** dhellmann has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:50 | |
| eglynn | OK, I presume there's an across-the-board cut of circa 33% of the ATL slots per project | 11:50 |
| ttx | in general yes. there is also an adjustment based on project activity | 11:51 |
| eglynn | a-ha, k ... activity == number of BPs landed in juno? | 11:51 |
| ttx | rough metric based on number of reviews/commits/patchsets/BPs yes | 11:51 |
| ttx | to try to be fair | 11:52 |
| ttx | only 6 programs got a full-day meetup, too | 11:52 |
| eglynn | fair enough, sounds reasonable | 11:53 |
| eglynn | I'll bring that info back to the team | 11:53 |
| ttx | ok, questions at that point ? | 11:53 |
| ttx | any topic for the meeting tonight ? | 11:53 |
| eglynn | well, the relatively low number of PTL nominations is a concern | 11:55 |
| eglynn | ... but probably shouldn't be discussed til after the cinder & tripleO elections play out | 11:55 |
| eglynn | ... so I'll punt that to a later discussion | 11:56 |
| eglynn | that's it from me | 11:57 |
| ttx | ack | 12:06 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: I assume you're not around | 12:06 |
| *** eglynn is now known as eglynn-lunch | 12:15 | |
| ttx | dhellmann: ready when you are | 12:15 |
| dhellmann | ttx: o/ | 12:15 |
| ttx | #topic Oslo | 12:15 |
| ttx | dhellmann: I think we are doe as far as Oslo is concerned. Any remaining question ? | 12:16 |
| ttx | done* | 12:16 |
| dhellmann | we have one bug for which we will need a patch release of oslo.db soon | 12:16 |
| ttx | ok | 12:16 |
| dhellmann | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+bug/1374497 | 12:16 |
| dhellmann | I'll need to get you to make the branch, I think, since I didn't seem to have permissions when we tried that for the incubator | 12:17 |
| ttx | so how do you want to do that... on master or on a stable/juno branch ? | 12:17 |
| dhellmann | we'll merge the fix on master and then backport to stable/juno | 12:18 |
| dhellmann | I guess you could go ahead and create the branch now, let me find the hash | 12:18 |
| ttx | yes I can do that probably | 12:18 |
| ttx | I'll create a juno task on the bug as well | 12:18 |
| dhellmann | ooo, how do you do that? | 12:18 |
| ttx | arh, wait | 12:18 |
| *** mattoliverau has quit IRC | 12:19 | |
| ttx | I need to adjust "version under development" for solo.db first | 12:19 |
| ttx | when you get a chance you should set "development focus" to kilo for all oslo things :) | 12:20 |
| dhellmann | it looks like 1.0.1 was our last release, so we would want to branch from that point so we can make 1.0.2 | 12:20 |
| dhellmann | ok, I'll do that | 12:20 |
| ttx | that allows to create backport tasks for juno | 12:20 |
| ttx | like that: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+bug/1374497 | 12:20 |
| ttx | we alsoprobably want to create a milestone target for oslo.db | 12:21 |
| dhellmann | ok, after that's done, where do I click to add the juno task? | 12:21 |
| ttx | next-juno ? or some version number? | 12:21 |
| ttx | do you have "target to series" below the bug tasks ? | 12:21 |
| dhellmann | let's call it next-juno and let the script rename it | 12:21 |
| dhellmann | ah, I see that now | 12:21 |
| ttx | the script might tag off master though | 12:21 |
| dhellmann | oh, true | 12:22 |
| dhellmann | ok, let's call it 1.0.2 then | 12:22 |
| ttx | ok creating | 12:22 |
| ttx | so that way it's clear you need to backport | 12:22 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+bug/1374497 | 12:23 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I wanted to do that yesterday but didn't know how | 12:23 |
| ttx | I think it may be simpler to do it by hand for a 1.0.2 (tag and fixrelease the only bug) | 12:23 |
| dhellmann | it looks like the master version of the patch is committed, so if you make the branch I think we can get that release done today | 12:23 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I'll do all of the lp stuff by hand | 12:23 |
| ttx | oh, branch. right. | 12:24 |
| ttx | which commit should I start from ? | 12:24 |
| dhellmann | the one tagged 1.0.1 is 2849f1bdca0c39b342d434c06cdc23dc6cf946f4 | 12:24 |
| *** eglynn-lunch has quit IRC | 12:25 | |
| ttx | dhellmann: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.db/ | 12:25 |
| ttx | should be all set | 12:25 |
| dhellmann | excellent, thanks | 12:25 |
| ttx | ok, anything else ? | 12:25 |
| dhellmann | do you have an opinion on whether or not we should keep using alpha version numbers for oslo releases? | 12:26 |
| dhellmann | there was a ML thread about testing libraries that has been focusing on the versioning | 12:26 |
| ttx | No strong opinion. I kinda liked the wheel hack that was making alpha semi-invisible | 12:26 |
| dhellmann | you and I seem to be in the minority there :-) | 12:27 |
| dhellmann | that's the only thing I had to bring up | 12:27 |
| ttx | so, here is an example | 12:27 |
| ttx | while we were working on rootwrap 1.3 | 12:27 |
| ttx | there was some fix that was necessary for a cinder feature to land (required a new rootwrap filter class) | 12:28 |
| ttx | we could publish an alpha and make cinder use it | 12:28 |
| ttx | without affecting the others which could just wait for the final | 12:28 |
| ttx | I felt like it was kind of cool, but I can survive release number inflation I guess | 12:29 |
| dhellmann | that's another good case | 12:29 |
| dhellmann | I've been focusing on the stable branches | 12:29 |
| ttx | basically, some oslo lib changes are requested by consumers, while some others are general improvements | 12:29 |
| ttx | in the first case, alphas let those pioneer projects consume that extra feature they requested | 12:29 |
| ttx | while the others would consume the "general improvements" when we demm them ready and finished | 12:30 |
| ttx | deem* | 12:30 |
| ttx | all other things equal I think it's a good thing to have... but if that creates problems then we can do without those. | 12:31 |
| dhellmann | would that work with our global requirements syncing? | 12:31 |
| dhellmann | yeah, the only problems we seem to have are people not liking the fact that we're calling them alphas -- I'm not aware of any actual technical issues we've had | 12:31 |
| ttx | it did work, because global would have >=1.2.0 and cinder would have >=1.3.0.0a2 | 12:31 |
| dhellmann | ah, ok | 12:32 |
| dhellmann | well, wait, that's what I mean -- how would you make cinder's requirements different from the global list? I thought we had a check job that prevented that. | 12:32 |
| ttx | hmm, I think it worked. Maybe it doesn't ;) | 12:33 |
| dhellmann | something to experiment with :-) | 12:33 |
| ttx | ok well, let's continue the discussion on the ml | 12:33 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I just wanted to make sure you'd seen the thread | 12:34 |
| dhellmann | ttx: that's all I had for today, so unless there's anything else I'm going to see about finding some breakfast | 12:35 |
| ttx | go go go breakfast | 12:35 |
| ttx | ttyl | 12:35 |
| dhellmann | ttx: thanks, ttyl | 12:40 |
| ttx | jgriffith: ready when you are | 13:59 |
| jgriffith | ttx: okie | 14:02 |
| ttx | #topic Cinder | 14:02 |
| ttx | last time I looked you were ready | 14:02 |
| jgriffith | Yeah | 14:02 |
| jgriffith | holding steady | 14:03 |
| ttx | you just need to approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124960/ | 14:03 |
| jgriffith | go the last VMWare patch merged last night | 14:03 |
| ttx | and I'll cut the proposed juno branch from the previous commit | 14:03 |
| jgriffith | Okie Dokie | 14:03 |
| jgriffith | +2/A'd | 14:04 |
| ttx | ok, will push soon | 14:04 |
| jgriffith | great, thx as always | 14:04 |
| ttx | let me know if you have something big warranting opening a RC2 window | 14:04 |
| jgriffith | Will do | 14:04 |
| ttx | anything to discuss at meeting ? | 14:04 |
| jgriffith | Nope, not from my side | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | just a push for testing | 14:05 |
| ttx | jgriffith: cinder has 7 scheduled slots and a half-day meetup in paris in my proposed layout | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | ttx: thnking | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | I think I"m fine with that | 14:05 |
| ttx | as requested after ATL, I avoided conflicts with Swift, and you don't go last for once | 14:05 |
| jgriffith | particularly with the 1/2 day meetup added to it | 14:06 |
| jgriffith | ttx: haha... people sure did whine about being last | 14:06 |
| jgriffith | ttx: I just thought it was "best for last" type thing | 14:06 |
| ttx | well, with all meetups happening on Friday you still have some activity on Friday | 14:06 |
| jgriffith | Yeah... I think this is good | 14:07 |
| ttx | but I got you a morning space | 14:07 |
| jgriffith | It'll be interesting to see how the new format works | 14:07 |
| ttx | indeed | 14:07 |
| jgriffith | It'll be nice to have a morning space | 14:07 |
| jgriffith | I am looking forward to it | 14:07 |
| jgriffith | By Friday afternoons I"m usually pretty much toast | 14:07 |
| ttx | any question ? | 14:07 |
| jgriffith | none | 14:07 |
| ttx | ok then, enjoy your day! | 14:08 |
| jgriffith | thanks... you as well | 14:08 |
| ttx | will ping you when I start tagging | 14:08 |
| jgriffith | I'll be here :) | 14:08 |
| ttx | dolphm: ready when you are | 14:11 |
| dolphm | ttx: o/ | 14:15 |
| * morganfainberg lurks as well. | 14:15 | |
| ttx | #topic Keystone | 14:15 |
| ttx | we got the RC1 out this morning | 14:15 |
| ttx | so now the focus is on keeping track of new bugs, especially those filed with the juno-rc-potential tag | 14:16 |
| ttx | we usually open a RC2 window in case of a new release blocker (regression, security issue, etc...) | 14:16 |
| dolphm | ttx: should it not deprecate the juno-rc-potential tag in favor of juno-backport-potential now? | 14:16 |
| ttx | no, we use juno-backport-potential after release | 14:16 |
| ttx | for stable/juno backports | 14:17 |
| ttx | rc-potential are for things that may trigger a new rc | 14:17 |
| dolphm | in that case, we have one new medium/high bug since RC1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1375772 | 14:17 |
| ttx | err, got dropped | 14:18 |
| ttx | what was the last thing you got from me ? | 14:18 |
| dolphm | <ttx> rc-potential are for things that may trigger a new rc | 14:18 |
| ttx | ok, you got everything then ;) | 14:18 |
| ttx | questions on that ? | 14:18 |
| dolphm | no, just that we have one bug since RC that potentially falls in that bucket | 14:19 |
| dolphm | https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1375772 | 14:19 |
| ttx | ok -- first step is to get it fixed in master anyway | 14:19 |
| ttx | we'll let the bugs pile up for a couple days at least | 14:19 |
| ttx | otherwise nobody will test the rc1 | 14:19 |
| dolphm | ack | 14:20 |
| ttx | in other news, keystone has 7 scheduled slots and a half-day meetup in Paris | 14:20 |
| dolphm | ttx: noted! | 14:21 |
| ttx | I'll publish the proposed layout soon | 14:21 |
| ttx | anything you'd liek to discuss at meeting later today ? | 14:21 |
| dolphm | i don't believe so | 14:22 |
| ttx | ok, then talk to you both later | 14:22 |
| morganfainberg | ttx, thanks | 14:22 |
| ttx | notmyname: you can go now if that's convenient | 14:24 |
| notmyname | ttx: good morning | 14:24 |
| ttx | notmyname: some bird told me you were in a meetup those days | 14:24 |
| ttx | #topic Swift | 14:25 |
| notmyname | :-) | 14:25 |
| notmyname | east coast mornings come early | 14:25 |
| ttx | notmyname: so, how close are we from a rc1 in swiftland ? | 14:25 |
| notmyname | still thinking early next week | 14:25 |
| notmyname | we've got 3 things we're tracking right now https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews | 14:25 |
| notmyname | and we'll get at least two of them done this week | 14:26 |
| notmyname | hopefully all three | 14:26 |
| ttx | ok -- would be good if we could do it before end of week | 14:26 |
| ttx | if not, very early next week | 14:26 |
| notmyname | yup. hackathon ends on thursday :-) | 14:26 |
| ttx | so that we get a full week to prove it out | 14:26 |
| notmyname | today we're working on the metadata one and have a collaborative review of the ring-builder patch | 14:27 |
| ttx | sounds good | 14:27 |
| notmyname | err..have a review today of that patch | 14:27 |
| notmyname | that "today" word is important in that sentence :-) | 14:28 |
| ttx | as far as summit goes, like I told last week, you get 6 scheduled slots and a half-day meetup | 14:28 |
| notmyname | sounds good | 14:28 |
| ttx | I avoided the conflicts with the summit talks you have on Wed | 14:28 |
| notmyname | I'll be working on getting the scheduling today | 14:28 |
| notmyname | ah, thanks :-) | 14:28 |
| ttx | which places the swift scheduled sessions on Thursday | 14:28 |
| notmyname | ok. and then half-day on friday? | 14:29 |
| ttx | yes, friday morning | 14:29 |
| notmyname | ok, great | 14:29 |
| ttx | will publish the proposed layout later this week | 14:29 |
| ttx | questions ? things you'd like to discuss at meeting today ? | 14:30 |
| notmyname | yes, one question | 14:30 |
| notmyname | I saw your TC agenda email. anything I need to know about for today's TC meeting? | 14:30 |
| notmyname | wrt swift | 14:30 |
| ttx | not really. We need to decide if it's worth having TC meetings during the TC election season | 14:31 |
| notmyname | okk | 14:31 |
| notmyname | oh, just one more question | 14:31 |
| notmyname | about requirements | 14:31 |
| notmyname | global-requirements is frozen, right? | 14:31 |
| ttx | but I think we need to make progress on the big tent questions before going into swift potential alignment on some of the "differences" | 14:31 |
| notmyname | ok | 14:31 |
| notmyname | agreed | 14:31 |
| ttx | we can't say "adopt common release" one week, only to say that most projects should follow the swift model the next week. | 14:32 |
| notmyname | heh | 14:32 |
| notmyname | when does global reqs get unfrozen? oct 17? | 14:32 |
| ttx | global-requirements is frozen yes | 14:32 |
| ttx | when all projects do RC1s | 14:32 |
| notmyname | ah ok | 14:32 |
| ttx | then we cut the stable/juno requirements branch | 14:32 |
| notmyname | ok | 14:33 |
| ttx | so the exact date might be under your control :) | 14:33 |
| ttx | since I expect all other projects to be done in the next 2 days | 14:33 |
| notmyname | swift will need a new version of eventlet very soon. not for juno, but asap to keep dev work flowing | 14:33 |
| *** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:33 | |
| notmyname | ok :-) | 14:33 |
| ttx | I don't think you'll have to wait long between your RC1 and that requirement unfreeze | 14:34 |
| notmyname | ok | 14:34 |
| ttx | notmyname: ok then, have a good hackathon | 14:34 |
| notmyname | thanks | 14:34 |
| ttx | #link Swift 2.2.0 blockers at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews | 14:34 |
| ttx | err | 14:35 |
| ttx | #info Swift 2.2.0 blockers at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews | 14:35 |
| ttx | mestery: ready when you are | 14:35 |
| mestery | ttx: o/ | 14:35 |
| ttx | #topic Neutron | 14:35 |
| ttx | 5 bugs left @ | 14:36 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-rc1 | 14:36 |
| ttx | let's go through them | 14:36 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1357055 | 14:36 |
| ttx | not sure that qualifies as RC1 blocker | 14:37 |
| mestery | I agree, and I will remove this one. | 14:37 |
| ttx | critical, maybe, but can be fixed in master and/or backported | 14:37 |
| mestery | Ack | 14:37 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1374573 | 14:37 |
| ttx | that one qualifies, nice regression | 14:37 |
| mestery | Ack | 14:38 |
| ttx | That would be https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124975/ ? | 14:38 |
| * mestery looks | 14:38 | |
| mestery | Apologies for being slow, new computer today so still sorting things out. | 14:38 |
| ttx | if yes, could use some review | 14:38 |
| ttx | HP computers, beh | 14:38 |
| mestery | :) | 14:38 |
| mestery | Actually a Mac ;) | 14:38 |
| mestery | But just not setup yet | 14:38 |
| ttx | even WORSE | 14:38 |
| mestery | Hhahahaha | 14:39 |
| mestery | So, that review is for but 1374573 | 14:39 |
| mestery | I'll sort that out with kevinbenton and armax today | 14:39 |
| mestery | This one is a release blocker I think | 14:39 |
| ttx | agreed | 14:39 |
| mestery | Per discussion in the neutron meeting yesterday | 14:39 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1323729 | 14:39 |
| mestery | So hopefully we can wrap this today | 14:39 |
| mestery | We would really like to land this one today, I'll sync with markmcclain on it. | 14:40 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123624/ + https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123625/ | 14:40 |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:40 | |
| mestery | Last I checked, markmcclain was still doing some testing. Not sure if this is a release blocker or not though. | 14:40 |
| ttx | that's the things which were moved to ML2, right ? | 14:41 |
| mestery | Yes | 14:41 |
| mestery | We're removing the plugins and keeping the agents | 14:41 |
| ttx | I think it should be a release blocker, you don't really want to maintain that fcode for one more release :) | 14:41 |
| mestery | hahahah | 14:41 |
| mestery | agreed | 14:41 |
| mestery | so lets leave this one | 14:41 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1348309 | 14:41 |
| ttx | so that one is a bit more mysterious | 14:42 |
| mestery | Agreed | 14:42 |
| mestery | There are lots of reviews on there. | 14:42 |
| mestery | Like this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123273/ | 14:42 |
| mestery | And this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/119253/ | 14:42 |
| mestery | Both need to merge to close it I think | 14:42 |
| ttx | "This was a know backlog item when DVR code merged" | 14:42 |
| mestery | Yeah, carl_baldwin was tracking these, and this is the last one. | 14:42 |
| mestery | Let me verify with carl_baldwin today if this really is a release blocker or not. | 14:43 |
| mestery | I suspect it can be backported, but I'll verify. | 14:43 |
| ttx | feels like the BP did beat the FF clock but left out half the implementation to do so | 14:43 |
| mestery | Could be yes :) | 14:44 |
| ttx | ok, and the last one: | 14:44 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1346444 | 14:44 |
| mestery | I don't know how htis one got in there | 14:44 |
| mestery | It must have snuck in yesterday | 14:44 |
| mestery | Yes, looks like salv added it yesterday. | 14:44 |
| ttx | I think it's fine if it gets in... but I wouldn't block on it | 14:45 |
| mestery | Agreed. | 14:45 |
| ttx | so let's remove it from list | 14:45 |
| mestery | Got it. | 14:45 |
| mestery | Done | 14:45 |
| mestery | Down to 3 now, much better. | 14:46 |
| ttx | mestery: So.. I can post an open-kilo change that you can -2 until you're ready to tag | 14:46 |
| mestery | ttx: Sounds good, thanks! | 14:46 |
| mestery | ttx: Tagging the neutron release is the same as tagging the clients, right? | 14:46 |
| mestery | I may have some questions for you when I get to that ;) | 14:46 |
| ttx | mestery: I'll do it | 14:47 |
| mestery | OK, thanks :) | 14:47 |
| ttx | on the commit just before that open-kilo merge | 14:47 |
| ttx | so that review serves as a signoff | 14:47 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/125081 | 14:47 |
| ttx | please -2 it for the time being | 14:47 |
| ttx | so that it doesn't get accidentally merged | 14:48 |
| ttx | (that's the first kilo commit basically) | 14:48 |
| ttx | (we cut proposed/juno branch from the commit just before that) | 14:48 |
| mestery | Done, added -2. | 14:48 |
| mestery | Ack | 14:48 |
| ttx | mestery: ok, hat's all I had. Let's get those stragglers in | 14:48 |
| mestery | Thanks ttx! | 14:49 |
| ttx | mestery: anything to discuss at meeting ? | 14:49 |
| mestery | Not much from my side. I will attend, but will slightly distracted, HP has me in meetings most of the day today meeting new people :) | 14:49 |
| ttx | Oh, and neutron gets 11 scheduled slots and a full-day meetup in Paris. | 14:49 |
| mestery | Yay! Awesome! | 14:49 |
| mestery | So, have you heard that I won't be in Paris | 14:49 |
| mestery | ? | 14:49 |
| mestery | My wife is pregnant and due date is November 7. | 14:49 |
| ttx | no i haven't | 14:49 |
| mestery | Can't risk travelign with baby due date that week. | 14:49 |
| ttx | yeah, that qualifies | 14:50 |
| mestery | Will rely on markmcclain and the rest of the team to run the summit for me. | 14:50 |
| mestery | :) | 14:50 |
| mestery | Bummed I will miss folks in person. | 14:50 |
| mestery | But we have a strong team and I will rely on them in my abscense. | 14:50 |
| ttx | mestery: ok, will miss you though | 14:50 |
| mestery | Sam here, thanks ttx! | 14:51 |
| ttx | david-lyle: ready ? | 14:51 |
| david-lyle | ttx yeah | 14:51 |
| ttx | #topci Horizon | 14:51 |
| ttx | #topic Horizon | 14:51 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/juno-rc1 | 14:52 |
| ttx | 3 bugs left | 14:52 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1299517 | 14:52 |
| ttx | Is that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96766/ ? | 14:52 |
| david-lyle | Yes | 14:53 |
| ttx | ok, one more +2 | 14:53 |
| david-lyle | I need to do final pass on that today and it should be in | 14:53 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1367720 | 14:53 |
| ttx | blocked on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120411 | 14:53 |
| ttx | which may need a nudge | 14:54 |
| ttx | and https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1252403 | 14:54 |
| ttx | which hinges on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116596/ | 14:54 |
| ttx | which could also use a nudge | 14:54 |
| ttx | david-lyle: I'll push a "first kilo" change, for you to approve when you're all god with juno | 14:55 |
| david-lyle | Sure | 14:55 |
| ttx | good* | 14:55 |
| ttx | let me do that now so that you can -2 it | 14:55 |
| ttx | david-lyle: anything you wanted to discuss at meeting today ? | 14:55 |
| david-lyle | No we're set | 14:56 |
| ttx | david-lyle: https://review.openstack.org/125088 | 14:56 |
| ttx | please -2 it for the time being | 14:56 |
| ttx | and approve when you're all happy and all blockers are in | 14:56 |
| david-lyle | -2 applied | 14:57 |
| ttx | david-lyle: horizon gets 6 scheduled slots and a half-day meetup in Paris | 14:57 |
| david-lyle | Excellent | 14:57 |
| ttx | ok, so please get all those last reviews in... we need to cut RC1 asap now :) | 14:57 |
| ttx | david-lyle: talk to you later! | 14:57 |
| david-lyle | Will try to wrap today | 14:58 |
| david-lyle | Later | 14:58 |
| ttx | david-lyle: feel free to approve the open-kilo when ready, I'll use that as a signal that I can tag and branch. | 14:59 |
| *** eglynn-lunch has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:59 | |
| *** mestery has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 15:03 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 15:09 | |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: ready when you are | 15:34 |
| ttx | zaneb: ready when you are | 15:44 |
| zaneb | ttx: o/ | 15:44 |
| ttx | #topic Heat | 15:44 |
| zaneb | it's going the right direction now :) | 15:44 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/juno-rc1 | 15:44 |
| ttx | 3 bugs left! | 15:44 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1374128 | 15:45 |
| zaneb | I just approved the patch for one of them | 15:45 |
| ttx | do we really need to block release on that one ^ | 15:45 |
| zaneb | I'm not sure, but it is looking like a candidate to be dropped | 15:46 |
| ttx | zaneb: it's fine to include it if it makes it in time, just maybe not worth it to block on it | 15:46 |
| zaneb | the abandon/adopt one is not being worked on, so it will have to be dropped | 15:46 |
| ttx | would also make a decent thing to include if we ever did another rc | 15:46 |
| zaneb | the question is whether to replace it with one to disable that whole feature by default | 15:46 |
| ttx | zaneb: agreed | 15:46 |
| zaneb | which I started a discussion about on the ML | 15:47 |
| ttx | ok | 15:47 |
| ttx | let's keep that bug in as a tracker | 15:47 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1347571 | 15:47 |
| ttx | that would be the one you just approved | 15:48 |
| zaneb | correct | 15:48 |
| ttx | zaneb: ok, so... I would untarget 1374128 (tag it juno-rc-potential instead) | 15:48 |
| ttx | wait for some closure on 1301314 | 15:48 |
| ttx | and wait for 1347571 to make it through gate | 15:49 |
| ttx | if the fix for 1374128 makes it while we wait for the other two, that's fine :) | 15:49 |
| zaneb | ok, I just tagged + untargeted it | 15:50 |
| ttx | Let me push an open-kilo change that you can -1 while we wait for the last fixes | 15:50 |
| ttx | err -2. | 15:50 |
| ttx | zaneb: please temporarily -2: https://review.openstack.org/125104 | 15:51 |
| ttx | when all targeted bugs are fixed, you can approve that one. It will serve as a signoff: I'll branch and tag from the previous commit in log | 15:52 |
| zaneb | done | 15:52 |
| ttx | OK. I think that covers everything | 15:53 |
| zaneb | cool | 15:53 |
| zaneb | just spoke to therve | 15:53 |
| ttx | Proposed design summit layout gives Heat 7 scheduled sessions and a full-day meetup in Paris | 15:53 |
| zaneb | expecting a patch within the next hour on the Barbican one | 15:53 |
| ttx | zaneb: cool | 15:53 |
| zaneb | excellent :) | 15:53 |
| ttx | anything you'd like to discuss at meeting tonight ? | 15:54 |
| ttx | questions on rc1/anything ? | 15:54 |
| zaneb | so after rc1 we just wait for bugs to come in to decide whether to do further rcs? | 15:55 |
| ttx | yes... we ask people to tag rc wanabbes with "juno-rc-potential" so that we reviw them | 15:55 |
| ttx | a new RC window is usually triggered by some regression or some security issue | 15:55 |
| zaneb | ok, cool. that's what I thought I remembered | 15:56 |
| ttx | but hen we pile up a few other easy backports | 15:56 |
| ttx | the idea being to fix all in master asap, and to backport during the RC window | 15:56 |
| * zaneb is feeling almost like a competent PTL this week | 15:56 | |
| ttx | you finally get it, but then we change ! | 15:56 |
| zaneb | lol | 15:56 |
| ttx | It's to keep me on my toes I see | 15:57 |
| ttx | zaneb: ok, talk to you later! | 15:57 |
| zaneb | got to keep it interesting ;) | 15:57 |
| zaneb | will do, cheers! | 15:57 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: you can go now if you're around | 15:58 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, I'm ready | 16:05 |
| ttx | #topic Sahara | 16:05 |
| ttx | One bug left https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1375773 | 16:06 |
| SergeyLukjanov | #link https://launchpad.net/sahara/+milestone/juno-rc1 | 16:06 |
| SergeyLukjanov | yup | 16:06 |
| ttx | gating now | 16:06 |
| SergeyLukjanov | it's in the gate I think | 16:06 |
| SergeyLukjanov | let me check | 16:06 |
| ttx | then you canb approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124959/ | 16:06 |
| SergeyLukjanov | okay | 16:07 |
| SergeyLukjanov | and you'll tag the prev. commit? | 16:07 |
| ttx | yes | 16:07 |
| ttx | maybe wait for that last commit to merge before approving | 16:07 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, yeah, it's much more safe | 16:07 |
| ttx | i.e. wait for 125032 to merge before +2ing 124959 | 16:07 |
| ttx | I'll pick it up once it merged, and branch/tag | 16:08 |
| ttx | probably tomorrow morning at this point | 16:08 |
| ttx | together with cinder and nova | 16:08 |
| SergeyLukjanov | yeah, gotcha | 16:08 |
| ttx | then we'll pile up bugs with juno-rc-potential | 16:08 |
| ttx | tag | 16:08 |
| ttx | and see if we have anythiong worth the hassle of a respin | 16:09 |
| ttx | if any bug is found, just fix it on kilo/master | 16:09 |
| ttx | so that it's ready to backport in case we want it | 16:09 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, ack | 16:09 |
| ttx | Questions on that ? | 16:10 |
| SergeyLukjanov | we've been doning the same for icehouse release | 16:10 |
| ttx | Anything you'd like us to discuss at meeting today ? | 16:10 |
| SergeyLukjanov | nope | 16:10 |
| SergeyLukjanov | thank you | 16:10 |
| ttx | At design summit, you can count on 5 scheduled sessions and a half-day meetup | 16:10 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ok, that's great | 16:11 |
| ttx | ok then, talk to you later. Will ping you when I tag | 16:11 |
| SergeyLukjanov | thanks | 16:13 |
| ttx | #endmeeting | 16:13 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Sep 30 16:13:32 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:13 |
| SlickNik | ttx: o/ appointment got done early — so here now if you want to sync up | 16:13 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-09-30-07.57.html | 16:13 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-09-30-07.57.txt | 16:13 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-09-30-07.57.log.html | 16:13 |
| ttx | SlickNik: oh | 16:13 |
| SlickNik | d'oh | 16:13 |
| ttx | let's do this | 16:13 |
| ttx | #startmeeting ptl_sync | 16:13 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Sep 30 16:13:58 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:13 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:13 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'ptl_sync' | 16:14 |
| ttx | #topic Trove | 16:14 |
| ttx | so.. 7 bugs, that's a bit too much | 16:14 |
| ttx | let's go over them | 16:14 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1349939 | 16:14 |
| SlickNik | Sounds good. | 16:14 |
| ttx | that one is security, so probably good to have prerelease | 16:15 |
| SlickNik | Yup, I want to really take this. | 16:15 |
| ttx | just needs a second +2 | 16:15 |
| SlickNik | It already has one +2 | 16:15 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117174/ | 16:15 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1356645 | 16:15 |
| SlickNik | Yup, I'm going to drive these getting reviewed by core today. | 16:15 |
| ttx | same here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123677/ | 16:15 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1357065 | 16:15 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120874/ needs more love | 16:16 |
| *** eglynn-lunch has quit IRC | 16:16 | |
| ttx | difficult to fix postrelease though | 16:16 |
| ttx | do you think it can gather the required approvals sometimes today ? | 16:17 |
| SlickNik | Okay, so I will pick that one myself and drive that to closure today. | 16:17 |
| ttx | ok | 16:17 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1357704 | 16:17 |
| ttx | not sure we need to block on this one | 16:18 |
| ttx | I mean, if it makes it in the required time, then all the better | 16:18 |
| SlickNik | This one is medium pri — it's a good to have. Okay to punt to kilo for sake of time. | 16:18 |
| ttx | ok, remove it from RC1 | 16:18 |
| SlickNik | Doing that right now. | 16:18 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1362310 | 16:19 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121938/ just needs a second +2 | 16:19 |
| ttx | also difficult to fix postrelease | 16:19 |
| ttx | lets keep it in | 16:19 |
| SlickNik | Agreed. | 16:19 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1370125 | 16:20 |
| ttx | hmm, just missing second +2 | 16:20 |
| SlickNik | I was in the process of reviewing this one. :) | 16:20 |
| ttx | also difficult to fix postrelease | 16:20 |
| ttx | so let's keep it in | 16:20 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1375311 | 16:21 |
| SlickNik | So I think this is nice to have. | 16:21 |
| SlickNik | I'll punt it to kilo. | 16:21 |
| ttx | this one could be fixed postrelease | 16:21 |
| ttx | yep, if it makes it befor ethe others go in, let's include it | 16:21 |
| SlickNik | If it makes it in, so be it. If not, it's still good. | 16:21 |
| SlickNik | Okay, | 16:22 |
| ttx | so remove rc1 from that last one | 16:22 |
| ttx | I'll push an open-kilo change that you can merge when all is done | 16:22 |
| ttx | you can -2 it for the time being | 16:22 |
| ttx | just a sec | 16:22 |
| ttx | anythign you wanted to discuss in meeting today ? | 16:23 |
| SlickNik | Nope, wanted to talk about the summit slots — but I think that might already be on the agenda. | 16:23 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/125113 | 16:23 |
| ttx | please -2 it for now ^ | 16:23 |
| SlickNik | Nothing particular, just curious to see how they're shaping up | 16:23 |
| ttx | when everything is in and you're satisfied, approve it | 16:24 |
| ttx | I'll tag RC1 from the commit just before that one | 16:24 |
| SlickNik | Sounds good. Thanks ttx! | 16:24 |
| ttx | ok... and Trove will have 4 scheduled slots and a half-day meetup in Paris | 16:24 |
| ttx | to use with your design summit planning | 16:24 |
| ttx | #endmeeting | 16:25 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Sep 30 16:25:23 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:25 |
| * ttx runs | 16:25 | |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-09-30-16.13.html | 16:25 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-09-30-16.13.txt | 16:25 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-09-30-16.13.log.html | 16:25 |
| SlickNik | Sounds good — Do we know as yet which day the slots will likely be? | 16:25 |
| ttx | SlickNik: let me check | 16:25 |
| ttx | Thusrday | 16:26 |
| ttx | so that it doesn't conflict with your talk on Wed | 16:26 |
| * ttx really runs now | 16:27 | |
| SlickNik | Okay, thanks. That makes it easy for me. | 16:27 |
| * SlickNik get's out of the way to let ttx exit hastily | 16:27 | |
| SlickNik | gets* | 16:27 |
| SlickNik | Thanks ttx! | 16:27 |
| SlickNik | Talk to you later this afternoon. | 16:28 |
| *** AzherKhan has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:54 | |
| *** AzherKhan has quit IRC | 17:33 | |
| *** AzherKhan has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 17:33 | |
| *** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu | 18:03 | |
| *** david-lyle is now known as david-lyle_afk | 18:05 | |
| *** david-lyle_afk has quit IRC | 18:38 | |
| *** AzherKhan has quit IRC | 18:42 | |
| *** khaazher has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:43 | |
| *** khaazher has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
| *** khaazher has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:43 | |
| *** khaazher has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
| *** eglynn-lunch has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 18:45 | |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, version bump to 2015.1 has been merged into sahara (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124959/ | 18:59 |
| *** david-lyle_afk has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 19:26 | |
| *** david-lyle_afk is now known as david-lyle | 19:26 | |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: ok, will tag rc1 tomorrow morning | 19:40 |
| *** mordred is now known as jeblair | 20:21 | |
| *** jeblair is now known as mordred | 20:21 | |
| *** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 20:21 | |
| *** eglynn-lunch is now known as eglynn | 20:49 | |
| *** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_ | 21:30 | |
| *** markwash__ has quit IRC | 22:02 | |
| *** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:10 | |
| *** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:11 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:12 | |
| *** mattoliverau has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
| *** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:13 | |
| *** david_lyle__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:14 | |
| *** david-lyle_ has quit IRC | 22:16 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 22:17 | |
| *** david_lyle__ has quit IRC | 22:20 | |
| *** eglynn has quit IRC | 22:33 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:39 | |
| *** markwash__ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:40 | |
| *** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:41 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 22:44 | |
| *** AndroUser2 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 23:00 | |
| *** david-lyle_ has quit IRC | 23:02 | |
| *** AndroUser2 has quit IRC | 23:14 | |
| *** markwash__ has quit IRC | 23:52 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!