Tuesday, 2015-09-22

*** flwang1 has quit IRC00:05
*** patchbot has quit IRC00:23
*** patchbot has joined #openstack-relmgr-office00:23
*** dims_ has quit IRC00:42
*** nikhil has quit IRC00:45
openstackgerritSteve Martinelli proposed openstack/releases: release openstackclient 1.7.0  https://review.openstack.org/22612001:24
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office01:26
*** dims has quit IRC02:33
*** david-ly_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office02:39
*** david-lyle has quit IRC02:40
*** dhellmann has quit IRC02:40
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-relmgr-office02:41
*** dansmith has quit IRC02:41
*** dansmith has joined #openstack-relmgr-office02:42
*** dansmith is now known as Guest2437802:42
*** Kiall has quit IRC02:45
*** Kiall has joined #openstack-relmgr-office02:45
*** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle03:17
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-relmgr-office03:22
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office03:34
*** armax has quit IRC03:55
*** dims has quit IRC04:09
*** smcginnis has quit IRC05:12
*** smcginnis has joined #openstack-relmgr-office06:53
*** david-lyle has quit IRC06:58
ttxstevebaker: around ?07:00
stevebakerttx: hi07:01
ttxstevebaker: wanted to quickly check your FFEs07:02
stevebakerttx: lets do it07:02
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/liberty-rc107:02
ttxshows nested-validation still in progress07:02
ttxhow far is it ?07:03
ttxI see two patches in-gate07:03
stevebakerits on the final stretch, likely just needs reviews now07:03
ttxare those the last ones ?07:03
stevebakeryep, this closes it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/224078/07:03
ttxok, so it's gating. No need to make a hard call07:04
stevebakerttx: this bug requires a schema change, so it has an FFE too https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/148954807:04
openstackLaunchpad bug 1489548 in heat "max_resources_per_stack causes scaling issues on large stacks" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Steve Baker (steve-stevebaker)07:04
ttxok, blocked on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226134/207:05
ttxWould be good to find a reviewer for that one07:05
stevebakerI'll see what I can rustle up in #heat07:05
ttxBut your bug list looks reasonable, we should be able to tag a RC1 later this week07:05
ttxstevebaker: that's all I needed, thx for your time!07:05
stevebakercool, thanks!07:06
ttxI'll keep an eye on the in-flight patches and recheck them if necessary07:06
stevebakerok07:06
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-relmgr-office07:14
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur07:16
*** dougwig has quit IRC07:41
*** thingee has quit IRC07:41
*** jraim has quit IRC07:41
johnthetubaguyttx: still got a bug I would love to get merged, but we can't backport. Feels like we are close to an answer: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200485/08:38
ttxjohnthetubaguy: that's fine. Let's give it a couple more days and tag on Thursday ?08:40
johnthetubaguyttx: sure thing, we might get it wrapped up by tomorrow, but Thursday sounds like a good aim08:40
ttxKiall, flaper87: ping me when around for a quick RC1 status check08:42
Kiallttx: hey, I'm around.08:42
ttxKiall: https://launchpad.net/designate/+milestone/liberty-rc108:43
ttxshows 9 release-critical issues08:43
ttxand not much progress since last week08:43
ttxAre all those release blockers ? How far are they from landing ?08:43
flaper87ttx: pong08:44
ttx(who is working on them ? A lot of them appear unassigned)08:44
ttxflaper87: https://launchpad.net/zaqar/+milestone/liberty-rc108:44
KiallYea, we're (slowely) working though them - I have the HP team gathered in Dublin for the week, and intend to knock as many out today as possible.08:44
ttxflaper87: still shows 4 RC bugs, how far are they ?08:44
Kiallre are all critical - some could be dropped, but will make that call once all the must fixes (Critical's) are done08:44
ttxKiall: ok, so we should plan to tag RC1 toward the end of week08:44
ttxto give you time to knock them down08:45
flaper87ttx: I'm moving them out08:45
Kiallttx: yes, that sounds good. The client should be ready for release now.. We unblocked the gate yesterday and landed the outstanding few changes..08:46
ttxflaper87: we can do a RC2 if we fix enough of them in master to justify backports / respin08:46
ttxKiall: cool, maybe push the corresponding openstack/releases change and dhellmann will pick it up when he wakes up08:46
KiallWill do.08:46
ttxKiall: thx!08:47
flaper87ttx: all sorted, we (zaqar team) had already talked about those. There's one that I just approved08:48
flaper87once that patch lands, we should be good to go08:48
ttxflaper87: ok, I might push the tag and branch today then08:49
flaper87the rest can wait till m-108:49
flaper87ttx: sounds great08:49
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|brb08:59
flaper87ttx: patch landed, fwiw09:07
ttxflaper87: I'll sanity-check with dhellmann that creating the stable branch for zaqar won't crash the world, and do it09:08
ttxflaper87: checking if we have a requirements update to sync09:08
flaper87ttx: yup09:09
ttxflaper87: nothing in the pipe apparently09:09
ttxyou did merge one two days ago09:10
ttxso you might just be up to snuff09:10
flaper87ttx: mmh, wait, actually. We landed a falcon update later09:20
flaper87erm09:20
flaper87s/later/yesterday/09:20
flaper87lemme get the link09:20
flaper87we might need that requirements update for liberty09:20
flaper87ttx: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225886/09:21
flaper87that09:21
flaper87There's been some discussions on letting that in w/ fungi, dhellmann, zigo and other folks09:21
ttxyeah, removing the cap sounds like it doesn't hurt anyone09:22
ttxflaper87: how did that discussion go ? Any objection ?09:22
flaper87no objections so far09:22
flaper87as far as I can tell09:22
ttxI'll approve it now so that you can propagate to zaqar09:22
flaper87ttx: sweet09:23
flaper87thanks09:23
ttxflaper87: keep an eye on it and propose the corresponding requirement sync in zaqar?09:23
flaper87ttx: yup, I was writing just that09:24
flaper87I'll keep an eye on it and make sure it lands09:24
ttxmaybe make it a depends09:24
flaper87ttx: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225269/09:24
flaper87I did that yday09:24
flaper87well, fungi started it09:24
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office09:47
*** dougwig has joined #openstack-relmgr-office09:53
*** jraim has joined #openstack-relmgr-office09:54
*** thingee has joined #openstack-relmgr-office09:55
*** sdague has joined #openstack-relmgr-office10:00
*** dtantsur|brb is now known as dtantsur10:08
dimsdhellmann: we need to get this going - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226120/ - this will unblock eventually the os-client-config upperconstraints problem10:11
openstackgerritMerged openstack-infra/release-tools: make version comparison more robust  https://review.openstack.org/22140811:28
openstackgerritMerged openstack-infra/release-tools: If the release request includes highlights, add them to the release notes  https://review.openstack.org/22266211:28
openstackgerritMerged openstack-infra/release-tools: if no version is provided, default to most recent entry  https://review.openstack.org/22266311:30
openstackgerritMerged openstack-infra/release-tools: print the actual release command being run in case we have to retry  https://review.openstack.org/22266411:30
openstackgerritMerged openstack-infra/release-tools: Support stable branches in repos not under openstack/  https://review.openstack.org/22328911:30
*** gordc has joined #openstack-relmgr-office11:31
*** bdemers has quit IRC12:06
ttxgordc: ping re: Ceilometer RC1 status12:20
gordcttx: hey12:22
ttxgordc: https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/liberty-rc1 shows you're pretty close12:22
gordcttx: i think we should be ok to tag end of day today.12:22
ttxgordc: sounds good, let me know when the last bits hit the road12:22
gordcthe remaining items has two +2, just verifying if we can't merge12:22
gordci also have small test fix i'd like to get in so as there's a related kilo patch which would probably use it.12:23
ttxgordc: ack12:24
mesterydhellmann: Now that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225807/ has merged, I'd like to again propose a version of python-neutronclient before you cut the branch (if you haven't already)13:08
mesteryhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/225807/ is the revert of the commit which removed the Cisco CLI commands.13:08
openstackgerritKyle Mestery proposed openstack/releases: Release of python-neutronclient 3.0.1  https://review.openstack.org/22567313:10
mesterydhellmann: ^^^ should be good now, I'll be in and out a bit between now and Neutron meeting but will sync with you post that (11AM EDT) for sure. Thanks!13:11
*** dims has quit IRC13:14
ttxmestery: while you're around13:14
mesteryttx: yes13:15
mesteryhow can I help?13:15
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office13:15
ttxLbaaS was in-flight yesterday but is now delayed13:15
mesteryttx: We had a mini meeting on that yesterday13:15
mesteryI think we decided the Octavia BP would be deferred, but I'll confirm in Neutron meeting today13:15
mestery99% it's out, unless some breakthrough happened overnight :)13:15
ttxmestery: sound good13:15
mesteryttx: And only 4 bugs left, so we'll ahve those under control today as well13:16
ttxmestery: great thx13:16
mesteryttx: anytime, your welcome :)13:16
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-relmgr-office13:28
bswartzttx: manila RC1 should be 929ab21ae71dd4a23d087a9a3ac162ada824283113:29
ttxbswartz: yes, just waiting for dhellmann to sanity-check that we can start issuing RC1s13:30
bswartzk13:30
ttxactually we might want to land the "open Mitaka" change and cut from previous commit, let me check13:31
*** mriedem_away is now known as mriedem13:31
ttxbswartz: yes, I'll rpopose a version bump for your review. That would mark the first commit of the Mitaka development, and we'll cut th release branch (and tag RC1) from previous commit in history13:32
ttxjust a sec13:33
ttxneed to doublecheck if we want x+1 or y+1 in there13:34
openstackgerritBen Swartzlander proposed openstack/releases: Release Manila-UI 1.2.0  https://review.openstack.org/22632113:35
ttxdhellmann: I think we said we would bump X between series for milestone-driven things, right ?13:36
bswartzy+1?13:37
ttxshould mitaka be 2.0.0 or 1.1.0 basically13:37
bswartzwe switched to the new versioning scheme right? manila liberty is 1.0.0 and manila mitaka is 2.0.013:37
ttxrigth, that's my assumption, but I want to sanity-check it with Doug before we proceed13:37
bswartz2.0.0 please13:38
ttxbah let's merge that and backpedal if necessary13:38
ttxhttps://review.openstack.org/22632313:38
ttxbswartz: once that merges I'll cut the release branch and tag RC113:39
ttx(from the previous commit in history)13:39
ttx(ensures that nothing slips between the two commits)13:39
*** bdemers has joined #openstack-relmgr-office13:47
ttxthingee: ping for quick RC1 status check13:53
*** mriedem is now known as mriedem_meeting13:53
ttxthingee: I see one bug left in https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/liberty-rc1 -- how close is this ? Planning RC1 for tomorrow ?13:53
ttxredrobot: ping for a quick release status check as well14:09
ttxredrobot: yesterday we said you would mark the last feature implemented and create a few bugs to cover for the last reelase-critical bits, but I'm not sure that appears on https://launchpad.net/barbican/+milestone/liberty-rc1 yet14:10
dhellmannttx: I'm not sure we settled on when to bump X, but several projects have wanted to bump the major version number14:12
dhellmannon cycle boundaries, that is14:12
dhellmannmestery: ack, looking at that release now14:12
ttxdhellmann: ok, we need to bump the preversion on the first mitaka commit then14:13
mesterydhellmann: Thanks! Running neutron meeting, so async for 45 minutes or so14:13
ttxdoing it for Manila14:13
bswartzdhellmann: +114:13
ttxdhellmann: once they move to post-version / intermediary they can more easily control that14:13
ttxlet's keep X bumps for milestone-driven thingies for the time being14:14
dhellmannmestery: np, see the comments on the patch when you have a minute14:14
dhellmannttx: makes sense14:14
mesterydhellmann: Ack14:14
ttxdhellmann: only case where that might look funny is for projects converting to intermediary and making a "major release" as their first intermediary thing14:14
ttxbut then ironic went through it14:15
ttxso it's not exactly a new concept14:15
ttxdhellmann: so I'll be cutting stable/liberty branches for projects that are ready today. Any last-minute objection ?14:16
ttxI'm checking that they don't have any requirements update pending14:16
dhellmannttx: I agree with sticking to major version updates for cycle boundaries, for now14:17
dhellmannttx: I realized last night that we haven't added reno to the requirements lists, but we can do that in the stable branch14:17
ttxyeah14:17
dhellmannI have a couple of libraries to release, which I'll do right after the glance drivers' meeting14:18
dhellmannI think it's safe to start branching the other projects in the mean time, as long as we hold off on the requirements until all of the constraints are updated14:18
ttxack14:19
jrolldhellmann: ttx: you still good with ironic stable/liberty on thursday?14:21
ttxjroll: sure14:22
jrollcool, thanks14:22
openstackgerritKyle Mestery proposed openstack/releases: Release of python-neutronclient 3.1.0  https://review.openstack.org/22567314:25
mesterydhellmann: Ack on comments, thusly published ^^^14:25
*** jhesketh has quit IRC14:25
openstackgerritDean Troyer proposed openstack/releases: release openstackclient 1.7.0  https://review.openstack.org/22612014:27
*** wshao has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:28
*** jhesketh has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:28
ttxflaper87: pushed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226347/ with a dependency on the req update14:29
flaper87ttx: danke, the patch should land soon14:30
ttxthat way it will be ready when we need it14:30
*** bdemers has quit IRC14:37
*** bdemers has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:38
morganttx: last bug open for RC1. If it isnt gating today it is punted14:39
morganttx: for keystone14:39
ttxmorgan: sounds good. Do you want me to prepare a mitaka version bump for your approval pleasure when everything is in ?14:40
ttxthat way we can easily signal when it's "ready"14:40
ttxjust make sure you don't approve it too early14:40
morganttx: sure. i'll mark it WIP so no one else accidentally bumps it too soon14:43
ttxmorgan: here: https://review.openstack.org/22635614:43
morganttx: cool!14:43
*** bdemers_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:49
*** bdemers has quit IRC14:49
*** bdemers_ is now known as bdemers14:49
*** TravT has quit IRC14:49
*** Guest24378 is now known as dansmith14:56
*** nikhil has quit IRC14:58
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:58
*** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:02
*** mriedem_meeting is now known as mriedem15:06
*** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:07
*** bswartz has quit IRC15:08
*** TravT has quit IRC15:17
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:19
*** dims has quit IRC15:20
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:28
morganttx: last bug was punted. Unless you tell me to hold going to let the mitaka open review gate (cc dhellmann lifeless )15:34
morganttx: for keystone15:34
*** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:36
ttxmorgan: sounds good, just get 226356 merged first15:36
morganttx: just approved it15:37
morganttx: that was what i was referencing :)15:37
morganShould enter gate in ~10min. So about an hour from opening Mitaka development15:38
morganOr so15:38
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk15:45
ttxdavid-lyle, SergeyLukjanov, SlickNik: ping for quick release status update15:46
ttxthingee, redrobot: around?15:46
redrobotttx o/15:46
*** TravT has quit IRC15:46
ttxredrobot: yesterday we said you would mark the last feature implemented and create a few bugs to cover for the last reelase-critical bits, but I'm not sure that appears on https://launchpad.net/barbican/+milestone/liberty-rc1 yet15:46
ttxoh, you updated it15:47
* ttx should refresh more often15:47
redrobotttx yes, sorry, didn't get to launchpad until early today15:47
ttxredrobot: ok, you're good then15:47
redrobotttx thanks!15:47
ttxredrobot: how much time do you think it will take to burn those last blockers ?15:48
thingeettx: hi, yes that patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225891/ has a couple of +2's ... I'm waiting on verification that it has been tested, but otherwise should be in today15:48
thingeeand we should be in shape for rc1 cut tomorrow15:48
redrobotttx I'm thinking most will land today... maybe a couple will land tomorrow.15:48
ttxredrobot: ok, I'll follow along, just keep the page updated15:48
*** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:48
ttxthingee: ok good15:49
* ttx needs to run15:53
ttxI'll be back in ~3 hours for meetings and RC1 tagging15:53
Kiallttx: fixes for all designate rc1 stuff up for review, should all be merged before this tomorrow tomorrow.. (Except 1 bug, which we've marked Incomplete as we can't reproduce it, but I trust the reporter enough I'm going to wait for him to get reproduce steps..)15:55
david-lylettx: last horizon FFE in15:59
david-lylejust working on bugs now15:59
*** TravT has quit IRC16:00
SergeyLukjanovttx, hi, one of FFEs (HDP 2.2/2.3 moved to Mitaka, the other one will be moved if not merged today), good progress on approving bug fixes as well16:10
*** bswartz has quit IRC16:14
*** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office16:24
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: Release of python-neutronclient 3.1.0  https://review.openstack.org/22567316:24
*** TravT has quit IRC16:28
dhellmannmestery: since I cut your stable branch yesterday, if there are things in 3.1.0 you need in a 3.0.x release, you'll need to either backport them or we'll need to get delete and recreate the branch16:33
dhellmannmestery: let me know if you want the branch recreated from 3.1.0 instead of 3.0.016:36
mesterydhellmann: It would be ideal to have it recreated from 3.1.0 if it's not too much trouble.16:42
mesterySorry for the hassle dhellmann16:42
*** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office16:42
dhellmannmestery: ok, I'll do that16:43
dhellmannthingee: (sorry, wrong room before) see my comments about the version # for os-brick on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226074/116:44
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: import manila-ui history  https://review.openstack.org/22641416:44
*** david-lyle has quit IRC16:46
dhellmannmestery: done, with gitreview update in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226424/16:53
mesterydhellmann: Thanks!16:53
openstackgerritDavanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/releases: release openstackclient 1.7.0  https://review.openstack.org/22612017:03
dhellmanndims: I'm chatting with stevemar about that one17:04
openstackgerritSteve Martinelli proposed openstack/releases: release openstackclient 1.7.0  https://review.openstack.org/22612017:06
thingeedhellmann: ack, will get back to it in 3017:07
dimsdhellmann: ack :)17:08
dhellmannthingee: ack17:08
dhellmanndims: even after the merge that was the wrong sha, afaict17:08
dimsaha!17:10
dimsdhellmann: looks good now17:14
dhellmanndims: yep, do you want to handle that release or shall I?17:15
dimsdhellmann: please go ahead17:15
dhellmanndims: ok, on it17:15
dimsthanks dhellmann17:15
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: release openstackclient 1.7.0  https://review.openstack.org/22612017:19
*** dims has quit IRC17:31
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:32
dhellmanndims, ttx, lifeless : https://review.openstack.org/22643917:32
SlickNikttx / dhellmann: ping17:38
dhellmannSlickNik: hi17:38
SlickNikdhellmann: Just wanted to give a quick update on https://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/liberty-rc117:38
SlickNikWe've got 5 bugs still in progress, but on track to merge soon either today or tomorrow.17:39
dhellmannok17:40
dhellmannSlickNik: I made a note of that in the tracking document for when ttx is back online17:40
SlickNikdhellmann: Awesome thank you!17:41
openstackgerritKiall Mac Innes proposed openstack/releases: Release python-designateclient 1.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/22644617:45
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: provide a better error message when a team is not found  https://review.openstack.org/22605117:48
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: Report all unreleased library changes  https://review.openstack.org/19122017:48
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: change Oslo to oslo  https://review.openstack.org/22605217:48
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: add a tool to compare the constraints file with existing releases  https://review.openstack.org/22523017:48
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: remove duplicate function title  https://review.openstack.org/22601817:48
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: add a consistent topic to all .gitreview updates  https://review.openstack.org/22601717:48
openstackgerritMonty Taylor proposed openstack/releases: Minor bugfix needed by the bifrost team  https://review.openstack.org/22646317:52
*** mriedem has quit IRC17:52
*** mriedem1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:53
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: Release python-designateclient 1.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/22644617:55
lifelessdhellmann: I am confused by these updates18:13
lifelessdhellmann: why aren't they raising the minimums18:13
thingeedhellmann: I looked at the patch, looks like it was just updating the readme file https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226074/118:19
thingeedhellmann: wrt to os-brick 0.4.118:19
dimsdhellmann: the review for os-client-config well is going well (i added a depends-on to the python-openstackclient upper-constraints) - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225363/18:23
thingeettx: waiting on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225891/3 for rc1 cinder cut, thanks18:27
thingeettx: in gate now18:27
morgandhellmann, ttx: mitaka marker for RC1 in keystone in gate18:27
morganerm18:27
morganmerged18:27
morgan:)18:27
morganthingee: ^518:27
thingeedhellmann: oh you too, waiting on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225891/3 for cinder rc118:28
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:35
bswartzttx: merged https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226323/18:35
bswartzttx: are we good to unfreeze now and start merging mitaka stuff?18:36
dhellmannlifeless: at this point nothing should be requiring these versions of the libs, right?18:42
dhellmannI mean, they include new features that users of the cloud need, but the other components don't use18:42
ttxbswartz: yes! You can merge anything after that open-mitaka one.18:42
ttxbswartz: I'lkl catch up and tag RC1 / create branch on previous commit18:42
dhellmannthingee: for os-brick, there's still the requirement update18:43
dhellmanndims: ack18:44
lifelessdhellmann: I'm confused then18:44
lifelessdhellmann :)18:45
lifelessdhellmann: but thats ok18:45
dhellmannlifeless: do you disagree with the approach?18:45
lifelessdhellmann: I don't know. I need to noodle on it I think18:46
lifelessI've +A'd them18:46
dhellmannlifeless: ok, I've been updating constraints for every release and updating mins only when something needs a new feature in a release18:47
lifelessso in principle you shouldn't need to update constraints at all, the bot will do that - but not when there is something broken (which the os-c-c thing has been18:49
lifelessdhellmann: can you rebase your incrementals on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226182/3 ?18:50
dimslifeless: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225363/ run is almost finished, watching zuul now18:50
dims(the os-c-c thing)18:51
dhellmannlifeless: yeah, and right now (during this period of the release) I want to control what constraint updates we take carefully, and ensure that our releases are actually included. it was easier to do that by submitting them by hand.18:51
thingeedhellmann: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226500/118:52
dhellmannlifeless: I do not know for sure we want all of the changes in that bot-provided patch this close to the release date18:52
flaper87dhellmann: is a release of oslo.messaging for juno planned?18:52
flaper87dhellmann: I meant to say, proposed18:52
dimsflaper87: i havent' looked at stable/ stuff18:52
lifelessdhellmann: why not?18:52
flaper87dims: http://logs.openstack.org/38/226338/1/check/gate-glance-python26/2747ead/console.html18:52
flaper87dims: we need one, the update g-r landed for juno and the PyYAML 3.11 release is breaking juno because oslo.messaging juno is not caped18:53
dhellmannlifeless: not all projects have their tests run on requirements change proposals18:54
dimsflaper87: is there a rush? last time i touched something, broke master/grenade for a day18:54
flaper87dims: there's, it's blocking a CVE fix from landing18:54
flaper87dims: :(18:55
lifelessdhellmann: :/ sadface, ok I'll pull it out. This seems like adding debt and risk to me though.18:55
flaper87I'm here to help18:55
lifelessdhellmann: We're meant to add more reverse-tests to requirements if we don't have enough representative coverage18:55
dhellmannlifeless: right, we'll get there, but right now it's a risk, and we're in requirements freeze, and so I wasn't sure we wanted to bump all of those up18:56
lifelessdhellmann: so IMO we do - requirements freeze is about distributions not having to play catchup, and constraints is independent of that18:56
lifelessdhellmann: but, you're the one on the coal face today, so I'm happy to respect that18:57
dimsflaper87: same bug as this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/148873718:57
openstackLaunchpad bug 1488737 in oslo.messaging "Uncapped *requirements.txt in stable/juno" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Tony Breeds (o-tony)18:57
*** fungi has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:58
flaper87dims: looks like it. So, I checked stable/juno and the g-r update landed. https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/commit/01a789313dcf5c1eb652c2df53ce955d6bb38fd618:58
fungiheyhey kids!18:58
flaper87dims: AFAICT, we need to release it18:58
* fungi will lurk in here from now on18:59
dimshey fungi welcome :)18:59
flaper87fungi: sup'!18:59
dhellmannwelcome, fungi!18:59
fungilifeless shamed me into yet another channel buffer ;)18:59
dimsflaper87: want to log a openstack/releases review for it?18:59
flaper87dims: now that we're both on the same page, yes!18:59
lifelessfungi: we had no infra fol here at all :)18:59
dhellmannfungi: one day soon I hope to have 15 consecutive minutes to chat with you about what we need to do to finish automating releases. think we might align our schedules before the summit for that?18:59
lifelessoh sorry I lied18:59
flaper87lifeless: lies are bad!19:00
flaper87>.>19:00
lifelessWe had SergeyLukjanov and jhesketh, but no usa's19:00
dhellmannlifeless: we know where the rest of them live ;-)19:00
fungidhellmann: sure thing19:00
SergeyLukjanovlifeless, I'm in Bay Area for the next two weeks19:00
dhellmannfungi: today is not that day, but I'll try to find a few options for time and see if we can block something out19:00
lifelessSergeyLukjanov: lol ok ok :)19:01
SergeyLukjanov(just fast response :) )19:01
fungidhellmann: agreed. today is meetings upon meetings for pretty much all of us19:01
flaper87dhellmann: mmh, there seems to be a release for that hash already19:02
flaper87ops, dims ^19:02
lifelessdhellmann: fungi: cool - I want to separately but relatedly get dvsm runs of the changed releases on releases proposals19:04
flaper87dims: it may be something else installing PyYAML 3.1119:04
dims:) haha19:04
* flaper87 is in CVE freakout mode19:04
dhellmannlifeless: ?19:06
fungilifeless: i think i understand what that combination of words was supposed to mean, but i'll seek clarification soon19:06
lifelessdhellmann: e.g. a proposal to release oslo.messaging could run dvsm with the proposed version built locally from that hash19:07
dhellmannah, yes, that could be interesting. OTOH, that test will have been run against the oslo.messaging patch being tagged as it was landing, so is it redundant?19:08
lifelessdhellmann: if it was, we wouldn't break ourselves so often :)19:08
dhellmannlifeless: when was the last time a release broke dsvm and not unit tests? is that still happening?19:09
lifelessdhellmann: os-client-config is currently in that state19:09
dhellmanndoes it have those jobs defined?19:09
dimsdhellmann: lifeless: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225363/ is ready (os-c-c)19:10
dhellmanndims: +219:11
lifelessdhellmann: I don't know19:12
lifelessdhellmann: but I recall a different one a few weeks back (also caught by constraints)19:12
dhellmannlifeless: I don't see them in zuul's config19:12
dhellmannI'm not arguing it's a bad idea, just that we ought to be able to catch the problems earlier19:13
lifelessI think its worth discussing19:14
lifelessfor a long time I was told 'we can't test tags'19:14
dhellmannI pinged mordred in #openstack-sdk19:14
lifelessseems to me we can with this mechanism19:14
dhellmannyeah, this fixes that19:14
dhellmannlike I said, I'm not opposed, just making sure we're putting the optimization in the right place. figuring out how to make the job test the right thing would be less complicated if it was attached closer to the source than the releases repo19:15
thingeedhellmann: about to head to lunch. let me know if you need anything else.19:16
dhellmannthingee: yeah, you still need to make that 0.5.019:17
dhellmannthingee: there were dependency changes, in addition to the thing that turned out to be just the readme update19:17
thingeedhellmann: got it, sorry didn't know that warranted that bump19:17
dhellmannthingee: yeah, there is some discussion of whether that's needed going on now, but for consistency I want to stick with the current rules through this release19:18
openstackgerritMike Perez proposed openstack/releases: os-brick release 0.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/22607419:18
thingeedhellmann: done ^ also requirements change updated19:19
thingeedhellmann: https://review.openstack.org/22650019:20
dhellmannthingee: ok, I'll wait for those tests to pass and try to do the release before the TC meeting19:20
thingeedhellmann: thank you19:20
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: os-brick release 0.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/22607419:26
*** bdemers has quit IRC19:29
*** bdemers has joined #openstack-relmgr-office19:30
*** wshao has quit IRC19:30
dimsdhellmann: anything else i can help with?19:31
dhellmanndims: I have the os-brick release in hand, but you could check if there are others ready to go19:32
dimsdhellmann: picking up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226463/19:35
gordcttx: dhellmann: we're currently dealing with some gate issues so i wasn't able to merge the items i wanted today. ok to defer till tomorrow?19:36
ttxgordc: sure no problem19:36
dhellmanngordc: defer which? ceilometer?19:36
openstackgerritDavanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/releases: Minor bugfix for os-client-config - needed by the bifrost team  https://review.openstack.org/22646319:37
gordcdhellmann: right. hitting a perfect storm right in ceilometer for some reason.19:37
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: handle unicode characters in commit messages  https://review.openstack.org/22651819:38
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: show the command used to build the release notes  https://review.openstack.org/22651919:38
dhellmanngordc: ok19:38
gordcnone of the patches are critical but i just want to see if we can resolve the gate before deferring.19:40
ttxok, cutting branch for manila now19:41
bswartzttx: thanks -- need anything else from me?19:41
ttxbswartz: nope, all good unless we decide to do a RC2 between now and release19:42
bswartzyes and I know how that goes19:42
ttxhehe19:42
ttxSergeyLukjanov: ping me if around19:44
dimsdhellmann: took care of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226463/ - don't see anything else i can pick up19:45
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: Minor bugfix for os-client-config - needed by the bifrost team  https://review.openstack.org/22646319:46
dhellmanndims: is there a constraints update for that?19:46
dimswas going to update the one we already ad19:46
dimshad19:46
dhellmanndims: ++19:50
jrollso judging by this patch, is the status quo going to be major version bump per cycle? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226340/1/setup.cfg19:54
dhellmannjroll: that's what most projects have asked for so far19:57
jrolldhellmann: interesting19:57
lifelessI thought the plan was to remove the lines in M19:58
lifelessand just manage from git ?19:58
jrollI have no clue19:58
jrollI'm just going to do 4.x until we break something19:59
SergeyLukjanovttx, pong20:08
*** bdemers has quit IRC20:09
*** bdemers has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:09
ttxSergeyLukjanov: in meeting, will ping later20:14
SergeyLukjanovttx, ack20:15
*** gordc has quit IRC20:17
*** wshao has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:28
*** wshao has quit IRC20:32
*** TravT has quit IRC20:45
*** bswartz has quit IRC20:49
dimsdhellmann: i want to split this into two - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226439/21:10
dimscould be something screwy about neutron client21:11
stevebakerttx, dhellmann: heat is ready for an rc1 as of 2e68b9c08159462f79fa60ee27464b87373af15321:14
ttxstevebaker: cool, let me propose an open-mitaka commit21:16
ttxstevebaker: https://review.openstack.org/22655821:18
ttxI'll cut RC1 and the release branch from the commit just before that21:18
stevebakerttx: ok, I'll just go ahead and approve that21:18
ttxyep, I'll pick it up tomortrow morning. Once it merges, you can consider yourself unfrozen and in Mitaka21:18
ttxSergeyLukjanov: here now21:19
* stevebaker 's last act as Liberty PTL21:19
ttxstevebaker: indeed21:19
ttxstevebaker: though in theory you're still on the hook for future RCs21:19
stevebakeri jest21:19
ttxSergeyLukjanov: I'll probably be gone when you read this. Yesterday you said you would make a call before end of day on that last FFE, I see it's still on the list. Is it still on ?21:28
ttxGiven your high bug count, I think if it's not completed yet ( or patch in flight) it should be deferred21:28
openstackgerritMerged openstack/reno: Change ignore-errors to ignore_errors  https://review.openstack.org/22583021:32
*** bdemers has quit IRC21:39
SergeyLukjanovttx, one BP is already on Mitaka, the another one should be merged by the EOD; re bugs - let's have an RC by the end of week and defer other bugs21:45
ttxSergeyLukjanov: ok, so the last one should be in by EOD, great21:45
SergeyLukjanovttx, if it will not - I'll defer to M21:46
ttxack21:46
SergeyLukjanovttx, I'm trying to analyse the root cause for such number of bugs21:47
SergeyLukjanovso far, I think it's related to decreased review throghput in late Aug / Sept21:47
*** mriedem1 has quit IRC21:48
*** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:50
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:53
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/reno: move design docs out of readme  https://review.openstack.org/22657121:58
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/reno: add better usage instructions  https://review.openstack.org/22657221:58
*** wshao has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:58
*** wshao has quit IRC22:04
*** wshao has joined #openstack-relmgr-office22:11
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/reno: add better usage instructions  https://review.openstack.org/22657222:32
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/reno: add documentation for the sphinx extension  https://review.openstack.org/22658422:32
*** wshao has quit IRC22:56
SergeyLukjanovdhellmann, I'm now review your chain of CRs to releases and are you ok with approving them or you'd like someone else to review? (for the CRs with existing +2s)22:56
dimsSergeyLukjanov: you mean these? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack-infra/release-tools,n,z23:10
SergeyLukjanovdims, yup23:10
dimsSergeyLukjanov: +1 to get those in23:10
* dims does not have karma23:11
dimsSergeyLukjanov: will you be around on the week of the 5th oct? i'll visit that week23:12
SergeyLukjanovdims, I'll be in Mountain View till Oct 523:12
SergeyLukjanov(inclusively)23:12
dimsah cool. see you on 5th :)23:12
SergeyLukjanovcool :)23:13
openstackgerritMerged openstack-infra/release-tools: automatically submit constraints updates for new releases  https://review.openstack.org/20168223:16
lifelessoh, I didn't see that on. Its going to fail23:16
lifelessbecause of the mirror races23:17
openstackgerritMerged openstack-infra/release-tools: add special case for django-openstack-auth  https://review.openstack.org/22518023:17
openstackgerritMerged openstack-infra/release-tools: Show output of zuul-cloner  https://review.openstack.org/22522923:17
*** dims has quit IRC23:18
tonybdims, flaper87: I think that https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1488737 can be closed as https://review.openstack.org/#/c/223895/ has done the required release.23:52
openstackLaunchpad bug 1488737 in oslo.messaging "Uncapped *requirements.txt in stable/juno" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Tony Breeds (o-tony)23:52
tonybdims, flaper87: not sure why it didn't happen automagically23:52
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office23:54
*** dims has quit IRC23:55
*** Guest18166 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office23:55
lifelesstonyb: btw fungi is looking into when we can kill juno of23:57
lifelessoff23:57
tonyblifeless: Oh cool.23:57
tonyblifeless: I'd still /really/ like to get it to the point it can be installed befoer we kill it.23:57
tonyblifeless: it seems like that would be nice of us :)23:58
lifelesstonyb: GLWT23:58
lifelesstonyb: by which I mean - sure, but diminishing returns are getting more diminishing as days go by23:59
tonyblifeless: thanks :)23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!