Wednesday, 2015-09-02

*** sballe has quit IRC00:46
*** TravT_ has joined #openstack-searchlight02:50
*** TravT has quit IRC02:51
*** TravT_ has quit IRC03:27
*** TravT has joined #openstack-searchlight03:28
openstackgerritSteve McLellan proposed openstack/searchlight: Allow indexing of single type or index  https://review.openstack.org/21075904:34
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-searchlight05:31
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC05:36
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-searchlight05:50
openstackgerritEndre Karlson proposed openstack/searchlight: Add Designate plugin.  https://review.openstack.org/19909910:47
ekarlsoTravT:  ^10:48
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2412:08
*** david-lyle has quit IRC12:27
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-searchlight12:28
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa12:45
openstackgerritLakshmi N Sampath proposed openstack/searchlight: WIP - Functional Tests for Searchlight  https://review.openstack.org/21758013:24
openstackgerritMerged openstack/searchlight: Fix Glance Indexing after Notification  https://review.openstack.org/21933113:32
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC14:01
nikhil_ksjmc7: oops, just saw your msg. I'm not sure on the image members notification, may be it's getting missed in the domain somewhere. However, I would like to check your commit to see if there's any gotcha; it may be that notifications aren't expected for members for there wasn't any use case for such. may be image-members were to be considered as a separate entity like images, though it can be debatable. billing doesn't need members so far.14:06
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-searchlight14:09
*** mugsie has quit IRC14:10
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-searchlight14:11
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-searchlight14:21
*** TravT has quit IRC14:31
*** TravT has joined #openstack-searchlight14:31
sjmc7nikhil_k - i suspect it's the latter, that there was never a use case for it14:32
nikhil_kyeah :=/14:33
sjmc7billing's not the only use case for notifications (even aside from what we're doing) so i don't think it'd be unreasonable to add it14:34
sjmc7image members are also considered a separate entity14:34
nikhil_kthey can be14:34
nikhil_kbut they depend on images to exist14:34
sjmc7i mean in terms of the codebase14:35
nikhil_kumm, yeah. it'r sorta tangled14:35
nikhil_kdb schema is different, but the pile up of query isn't14:35
nikhil_kand there are cross checks for members on images14:35
sjmc7in any event, we're not going to get notifications for them14:35
nikhil_kyes14:36
nikhil_kI mean no :)14:36
*** TravT_ has joined #openstack-searchlight14:37
*** TravT has quit IRC14:37
sjmc7nikhil_k - i'm guessing it's too late in the cycle to add now, but is there any reason you can see why we wouldn't be able to add notificaitons on member changes early in M ?14:46
nikhil_ksjmc7: I think that would be quite possible14:46
sjmc7ok. if only i'd found this out a couple of weeks ago!14:47
nikhil_ksjmc7: I am planning to propose pre-approved specs for M so we can have this in that bunch14:47
nikhil_ksjmc7: haha, yeah!14:47
sjmc7is there anywhere i can add this as an ask, or have you already done so?14:49
nikhil_ksjmc7: I haven't. Think a spec is the best place14:52
nikhil_ksjmc7: also, it won't be hurting anyone else (most prop) so relatively easier to get thru14:53
sjmc7yeah, it doesn't seem too controversial14:53
TravT_nikhil_k, any chance it could be considered a bug?  Missing notifications?  maybe a long shot, but then possible in L?14:55
*** TravT_ is now known as TravT14:56
nikhil_kTravT: may be :)14:58
nikhil_kTravT: there's been some debate around it. we are considering short specs (3 liner ones) for changes like such but process is still not in place. I guess we will have to see how it affects others.14:59
TravTIt is just that without membership data, we can't do the queries right.15:00
TravTand horizon uses the membership data when displaying.15:00
nikhil_kTravT: ah I see15:00
nikhil_kTravT: I think we could be able to work this out. rc period is till oct 9 so seems possible15:01
sjmc7i can file a bug now?15:02
sjmc7in glance, and we can get a patch up today15:03
TravTWell, I guess we could ask for FFE as well if this isn't considered a bug.15:03
nikhil_kTravT: yeah, but I have one already and it will have to go to ML for FFE.15:04
TravTSo, how about we start with a bug and if sjmc7 has a patch up15:04
nikhil_ksjmc7: surely!15:04
nikhil_kTravT: sounds like a plan15:04
nikhil_kI meant baby steps15:05
sjmc7ok, gimme a sec. are we looking for a notification specific to image members? or to send an image update notification when they change?15:07
sjmc7the former seems more consistent with other parts of glace15:07
TravTwell, from our standpoint there are two things that affect us.15:08
TravT1) when an image member accepts membership15:08
sjmc7wait, this is already there15:08
TravT2) when an image member is removed15:08
sjmc7https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/144145315:08
openstackLaunchpad bug 1441453 in Glance "Image members CRUD doesn't generate notifications which will impact Catalog Index service by not having latest changes to Image memberships" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Lakshmi N Sampath (lakshmi-sampath)15:08
sjmc7from april15:09
nikhil_klakshmiS: ^15:09
nikhil_k:D15:09
lakshmiSforgot :)15:09
TravTsays you already have it in progress?15:09
TravTJust need to change the title to say Searchlight15:10
lakshmiSit probably slipped.15:10
sjmc7TravT - yeah. i meant from glance's perspective, it probably makes more sense to send a notification specific to the image membership rather than the image itself15:10
openstackgerritMerged openstack/searchlight: Add nova instances plugin  https://review.openstack.org/19885215:10
sjmc7if you do have a patch for it, we can hopefully get it reviewed in L15:10
lakshmiSi remember there was some issue with the way image members were coded in the layered approach of glance which was preventing it to send a notification15:10
lakshmiSI will check that out again15:11
sjmc7it looks like the gateway's just missing a proxy to send a notification15:11
TravTekarlso: are you around?15:12
TravTnova - woot!15:12
lakshmiSsjmc7: it wasn't the straightforward as images or namespaces. I should have that code somewhere.15:12
TravTekarlso: mugsie: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199099/ now has a merge conflict because of nova.  I think it will be in setup.cfg and requirements.txt15:13
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC15:25
*** TravT_ has joined #openstack-searchlight16:05
*** TravT has quit IRC16:06
*** TravT has joined #openstack-searchlight16:19
*** TravT_ has quit IRC16:22
*** TravT has quit IRC16:26
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-searchlight16:29
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC16:32
*** TravT has joined #openstack-searchlight16:39
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-searchlight16:42
*** TravT_ has joined #openstack-searchlight16:47
*** TravT has quit IRC16:49
*** GB21 has quit IRC16:49
ekarlsoTravT_: omg :p16:51
TravT_ekarlso: :S  yay for merge conflicts16:53
*** TravT_ is now known as TravT16:54
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC17:21
sjmc7TravT - wondering if i should put up a patch for the image member notifications; lakshmi didn't seem too confident of finding a patch from 6 months ago :)18:21
TravTi can't see why it would hurt18:21
sjmc7i guess it'd be enough to send a notification with image-id, tenant-id18:22
sjmc7though maybe more useful to have all the members for the image18:23
TravTI think sending all members would be better, if we can get it.18:26
TravTi am headed out to lunch18:26
TravTbbiab18:26
*** TravT has quit IRC19:24
*** TravT has joined #openstack-searchlight19:25
*** TravT has quit IRC19:41
*** TravT has joined #openstack-searchlight19:45
*** TravT has quit IRC19:49
*** TravT has joined #openstack-searchlight19:58
*** sballe has joined #openstack-searchlight22:19
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2422:23
*** TravT has quit IRC23:12

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!