Thursday, 2015-09-24

*** nikhil has quit IRC02:06
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-searchlight04:01
*** nikhil has quit IRC05:51
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-searchlight05:51
*** nikhil has quit IRC07:51
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-searchlight07:51
*** nikhil_ has joined #openstack-searchlight07:58
*** nikhil_ is now known as Guest5195107:59
*** nikhil has quit IRC08:03
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-searchlight08:44
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-searchlight08:56
*** GB21 has quit IRC10:58
*** sballe has joined #openstack-searchlight11:31
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC12:27
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-searchlight12:30
*** Guest51951 is now known as nikhil13:56
openstackgerritSteve McLellan proposed openstack/searchlight: More efficient result filtering  https://review.openstack.org/20768214:40
sjmc7lakshmiS - addressed your comment on 207682 ^14:41
sjmc7TravT - were you able to run endre's session patch ok? want to check it's not something in my config that's messed up14:42
TravTsjmc7: i didn't try it... was seeing if ekarlso had a response to you first.14:43
TravTi will try it out after meeting.14:43
TravTi'm running through faceting rbac right now14:43
sjmc7lakshmiS - still not sure why i'm getting errors from the metadef update tests. i'll debug it after the meeting14:50
lakshmiSsjmc7: sure. let me know if its not your environment. since it works on zuul and my env, i am guessing its not the code14:54
sjmc7zuul's not running them14:55
sjmc7or at least, the testr log says they're skipped14:55
lakshmiSah right. lets check with travis then14:55
sjmc7what version of elasticsearch are you using?14:55
sjmc7those tests all use scripting, which i'm suspicious of14:56
lakshmiS1.7.214:58
lakshmiS"lucene_version" : "4.10.4"14:58
TravTCourtesy Searchlight meeting reminder in #openstack-meeting-4: lakshmiS, mclaren, nikhil_k, rosmaita, sigmavirus24, TravT, krykowski, david-lyle, wokuma, kragniz, sjmc7, ekarlso15:00
TravTsjmc7:16:30
TravTfor nova server facets16:30
sjmc7yessir16:30
TravTwould it be possible to get the options for flavor id and image id?16:30
sjmc7absolutely16:30
sjmc7but they will just be IDs16:30
TravTwell, that's better than nothing, i think.16:31
sjmc7while i'm at it... should we store them as image_id and flavor_id?16:31
sjmc7are we ever going to denormalize it?16:31
sjmc7they're nested, as a hangover from when it was denormalized16:31
TravTi haven't looked any more at that, but i have been wondering if there is a way to setup a parent child relationship with a nested doc over to the image or flavor16:32
sjmc7i don't thikn that's a good idea16:32
sjmc7it makes sense for designate16:32
TravTwait16:33
TravTthat won't work because m to m16:33
sjmc7that's not what the relationship is here16:33
sjmc7right16:33
TravTif we just get the ids, then we can do client side query to get the other data (at least images - we don't have flavors yet).16:33
sjmc7sure16:34
sjmc7i could add flavors! :)16:34
TravTmakes for a much nicer search experience, that's for sure.16:34
sjmc7a parent child MIGHT make sense for flavors16:34
sjmc7ok.. i'm going to change them to flavor_id and image_id, and i'll add facet terms for them16:35
TravTwell wait a second on that.16:35
TravTif you go to image_id then the structure doesn't match nova API results16:36
TravTi'm not sure image.id has another problem..16:36
sjmc7hmm.. ok16:36
TravTwith nested, then we could consider in the future doing searchlight side merging at some point..16:36
*** sballe has quit IRC16:36
sjmc7yep. ok, will leave them16:37
sjmc7facet terms coming right up16:37
TravTBTW, all my rbac testing succeeded on the facets patch16:39
sjmc7i'm sure i'll break it with this change :)16:39
TravTwell, i'm thinking of pushing the current through16:39
TravTand then you could change to add the extra terms16:39
sjmc7spoilsport16:39
TravTin follow on patch16:39
sjmc7yeah, ok16:39
sjmc7then i'll be able to test it or something16:39
TravTok, i added comments on to that patch for additional facet option ideas.16:48
openstackgerritMerged openstack/searchlight: Add faceting  https://review.openstack.org/22238816:51
openstackgerritTravis Tripp proposed openstack/searchlight: More efficient result filtering  https://review.openstack.org/20768217:10
sjmc7TravT - do i need to look at 207682 again? something went in underneath it?17:20
sjmc7i thought i checked it against designate17:20
sjmc7i get the same error. one moment please17:24
sjmc7grr17:24
openstackgerritSteve McLellan proposed openstack/searchlight: More efficient result filtering  https://review.openstack.org/20768217:25
sjmc7sorry17:25
sjmc7TravT - about removing created/updated from facets, you want that in this patch?17:31
openstackgerritLakshmi N Sampath proposed openstack/searchlight: Functional Tests for Searchlight Tests added     - Initial Load     - API     - Event Listener  https://review.openstack.org/21758017:33
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC17:42
TravTsjmc7: i don't know what do you think?17:44
sjmc7don't see any harm with it17:45
sjmc7looks like the functional tests may have been a problem with elasticsearch config17:45
sjmc7so at least i've not got gremlins17:45
TravTit would be nice to see the created normalized in facets as well.17:46
TravTbecause right now i'm not filtering those out on client side17:46
TravTso i end up with both created and created_at17:46
TravTwhen showing available facets17:46
sjmc7sure. i can filter them out; each plugin knows whether it's doing it17:47
ekarlsoello18:08
ekarlsoI just got home TravT ...18:08
ekarlsobeen in the land of mugsie and kiall18:08
ekarlso:P18:08
TravTfun!18:09
TravTso that session patch18:10
TravTsteve had a question on it18:10
TravTi haven't tried it yet, was waiting to see your response on it18:10
openstackgerritSteve McLellan proposed openstack/searchlight: Standardize created_at, updated_at  https://review.openstack.org/22652418:11
sjmc7TravT ^ removed facets for server.created, server.updated18:11
TravTsjmc7: cool, will pull it now18:12
sjmc7will do the image id, flavor id facet terms very shortly, need to eat18:13
TravTok, on the bottom of the original facet patch, i mentioned others that i think we'll want.18:15
sjmc7ok. back in 20 minutes18:15
TravTk, i'll likely be out to lunch when you get back.18:15
ekarlsouhm, sjmc7 have you tested that glanceclient works with it ?18:31
ekarlsoI wont look at it until tmrw but18:31
sjmc7with what, ekarlso?18:48
sjmc7the session patch?18:48
sjmc7no - i got stuck with an error from nova18:49
sjmc7glanceclient 1.0 will work with sessions, don't think earlier versions do18:49
ekarlsosjmc7: I remember jamielennox saying something about it not working properly in the glance chan earlier ?18:52
sjmc7ah.. that's not one of the ten places i'm watching right now18:52
sjmc7your patch doesn't rely on it for glance client anyway, so i think we're ok18:53
ekarlsosjmc7: ?19:16
sjmc7yo19:17
ekarlsosjmc7: what is your comment about ? :p19:28
sjmc7err, don't know. the time lag's too much for me :)  testing the config patch now - i think i'm missing a configuration option19:28
sjmc7i was!19:37
*** nikhil has quit IRC19:58
*** TravT has quit IRC22:24
openstackgerritBrad Pokorny proposed openstack/searchlight: Fix typos in documentation  https://review.openstack.org/22758323:16
openstackgerritMerged openstack/searchlight: Fix typos in documentation  https://review.openstack.org/22758323:25
*** TravT has joined #openstack-searchlight23:44
*** TravT_ has joined #openstack-searchlight23:54
*** TravT has quit IRC23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!