Thursday, 2019-09-12

*** adriant has quit IRC00:11
*** lbragstad_ has joined #openstack-tc00:12
*** lbragstad has quit IRC00:14
*** markvoelker has quit IRC00:29
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc00:29
*** adriant has joined #openstack-tc00:42
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc00:48
*** markvoelker has quit IRC01:03
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc01:04
*** dklyle has quit IRC01:42
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-tc01:42
*** david-lyle has quit IRC01:46
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc01:47
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC02:02
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc02:17
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC03:06
*** KeithMnemonic has quit IRC04:04
*** ricolin has quit IRC04:27
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-tc04:46
*** markvoelker has quit IRC04:48
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-tc05:20
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc06:06
*** markvoelker has quit IRC06:11
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc06:41
*** ricolin has quit IRC06:59
*** spsurya has joined #openstack-tc07:07
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc07:18
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc07:57
*** e0ne has quit IRC08:08
asettleo/08:09
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc08:16
*** markvoelker has quit IRC08:20
*** sapd1 has quit IRC08:44
*** jaosorior has quit IRC08:45
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc09:07
*** e0ne has quit IRC09:15
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-tc09:16
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc09:19
*** e0ne has quit IRC09:21
*** lpetrut has quit IRC09:23
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-tc09:24
openstackgerritThierry Carrez proposed openstack/governance master: Gradually reduce TC membership to 9 members  https://review.opendev.org/68126609:28
*** ricolin has quit IRC09:37
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc09:39
*** lpetrut has quit IRC10:17
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-tc10:19
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc10:26
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:32
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-tc10:32
*** jaosorior has quit IRC11:31
njohnstono/11:56
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc12:01
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc12:13
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC12:24
*** lbragstad_ has quit IRC12:25
*** njohnston has quit IRC12:27
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-tc12:28
*** iurygregory has joined #openstack-tc12:30
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-tc12:43
*** e0ne has quit IRC12:44
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc12:44
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc12:48
*** mriedem has quit IRC12:54
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-tc13:00
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc13:20
*** Luzi has quit IRC13:28
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc13:39
*** markvoelker has quit IRC13:40
ricolino/13:42
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc13:42
*** KeithMnemonic has joined #openstack-tc13:53
*** lbragstad has quit IRC14:19
*** mriedem has quit IRC14:23
*** camelCaser has quit IRC14:27
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-tc14:32
ricolinfungi, do you think it's reasonable to add new tags to openstack-discussion like [sigs], [projects], etc?14:35
*** camelCaser has joined #openstack-tc14:36
fungiricolin: if you can describe what they should be used for, propose a patch to add them to https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/open-community.html#mailing-lists14:37
fungiright now we mention using tags for specific projects and sigs14:37
fungiwhat would a [sigs] or [projects] tag be used for?14:38
fungialso, how would [projects] differ from [dev]?14:38
ricolinfungi, will write that patch after I'm send the ML out, just wondering who else might need that as you might know, I'm working on SIG guideline, and I would really like to give notice for all sigs, tc and uc without using [all] here14:39
ricolinIn [projects] case, I guess we do can use [dev] instead14:40
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc14:49
fungifor matters of general sig governance you could consider using [meta-sig] since the meta sig oversees all the other sigs14:49
ricolinfungi, yeah, I'm using [tc][uc][meta-sig] for now14:51
*** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-tc14:57
evrardjpo/15:01
mnasero/15:01
ricolino/15:02
mnaserhttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PVG-TC-PTG15:03
mnaserany tc-members update their status of "going vs maybe"15:03
* zaneb is still going15:04
zanebgot a visa and everything15:04
mnaserneat, congrats15:04
mnasersingle or multiple entry?15:04
zanebsingle15:04
ricolinzaneb, super15:04
* mnaser is still trying to get that multiple entry and keeps getting singles15:04
fungii'll be there to keep a tc alumnus seat warm15:04
fungitc emeritus? ;)15:04
mnaser14 hours in a plane is starting to settle in though15:05
*** weshay is now known as weshay_passport15:05
* smcginnis will join fungi in the corner15:05
fungiwe can heckle the poor saps who took our place15:05
zanebmnaser: this one will be 16 hours for me. should be interesting15:05
mnaseri dont understand how its longer to you but the earth is weird15:05
fungiin my case i save nearly us$1k on airfare by driving to an airport 4 hours away instead of one only 2 hours away15:06
zanebgreat circle distance15:06
mnaserwhat i never understand is15:06
mnasermost flight to the us: ~$700ish15:06
mnaserflight to china... also ~$700ish15:07
zanebhave done 14.5 hours before (on an A380). it was not _too_ terrible15:07
mnaser(and direct too -- so thats nice)15:07
fungiyeah, i can get round-trip between raleigh and shanghai for ~us$800 but norfolk and shanghai is ~us$180015:07
fungion the same airline15:07
fungiconnecting through the same hub15:07
fungiand the connecting flight is nowhere near the difference15:08
fungiairlines are strange15:08
mnaseron a super seperate note15:09
mnaserhow does everyone here manage to deal with the sheer amount of email volume that our mailing list generates15:10
asettleFilterssssssss15:10
fungii use mutt15:10
asettleBased on tags15:10
mugsiefilters15:10
mnaserfilters are nice but i feel like i'm missing out on certain things if i filter only on certain tags15:10
mugsieoh, I filter on recipt, and then scan folders for titles of emails15:10
fungii also personally ingest several times the volume of e-mail that comes from openstack-discuss, as well as moderate it and about a dozen other mailing lists15:10
asettle^^ what mugsie said15:10
asettleAw mate we're email twins15:11
mnaseroh and also15:11
mnaseri found this really interesting discussion15:11
mnaserhttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-September/009125.html15:11
fungimutt is great for things like deleting all messages in a thread with a single keypress, or hiding all future messages for a thread you know you're never going to care about (though i rarely do that)15:11
mugsieI use fastmail, which supports seive filters - http://paste.openstack.org/show/775425/15:11
mugsiethen thunderbird + threaded view, sorted by date15:12
fungibut yes, i also operate my own personal mta and use exim .forward file filters to sort and bucket via dozens of different rules15:12
mnaserhmm ok, mute is actually a good idea15:12
mnasermute is gmail's "i dont care about this anymore" feature15:13
mugsiehttps://imgur.com/a/Af81OFg is the outcome for me15:13
evrardjpI have fastmail and evolution, I have sieve filters too, and I regroup based on interest with subject title15:13
evrardjpI just have admitted the fact I can't follow everything15:14
mugsie^ this15:14
fungii should say, i operate an mta and imap server for my address. that does provide me with a lot of extra flexibility. but then again i've been running mailservers in a professional capacity for decades now15:14
mugsieyeah, I decided the opportunity lost (for me) was to high to run it myself, and fastmail makes a pretty good job of it15:15
evrardjpfungi: I have the impression dealing with spammers or wrongly configured other servers is a fulltime job. You're awesome.15:15
mnaseri think mute instead of archive is a really good idea15:16
*** spsurya has quit IRC15:16
mnasercause one of the things is i archive a conversation and then it keeps going so i have to go back and forth again on it15:16
fungioh, with my addresses everywhere across the internet ~99.9% of what i receive is spam, but i have a well-tuned spamassassin and clamav rig set up to reject messages over-threshold at receipt time15:16
fungiit's fairly low-maintenance since it's mainly just my mailboxes15:16
evrardjpI have a tendency to practice inbox 0, and I love deleting. So mute is equal to delete for me.15:17
fungii do think if we eventually set up the mailman-nntp bridge we keep talking about, i'm likely to switch to using a usenet newsreader instead of an e-mail client for our lists15:17
evrardjpHow can I buy a fungi hosted service? :D15:17
fungievrardjp: sounds like you already do?15:17
* smcginnis misses nntp15:17
evrardjp:D15:17
fungievrardjp: or something equivalent anyway15:18
fungii just flat out don't trust other people with my e-mail delivery15:18
evrardjpI can understand that15:18
zanebmugsie: that filtering looks interesting. I had to give up on tracking Gerrit notifications some time in 2015 :/15:18
fungii'm a bit of a control freak, i guess15:18
evrardjpor careful15:18
evrardjpzaneb: yeah that too.15:18
fungizaneb: mugsie: yeah, i actually have filters set to discard the bulk of gerrit notifications and only deliver ones with human comments in them15:19
smcginnisI used to run my own qmail server until my internet provider decided they weren't actually just providing me internet and blocked certain things "for my own good".15:19
*** njohnston has quit IRC15:19
evrardjpI tried at some point to have some specific rules in gerrit when owner:self or something like that, then I ... stopped for many projects.15:19
evrardjpsmcginnis: is it only port 25?15:19
smcginnisThat and other nefarious ports.15:19
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-tc15:19
evrardjpI have asked to deblock me, so I can now host 443, but 25 and 80 are still blocked on my provider15:20
fungismcginnis: indeed, i pay for a vm in a service provider. also because hosting a mailserver with no guarantee of a static ip address from my residential broadband provider is pain15:20
evrardjpfungi: I want to discuss this with you in more details about long term management, like updates and all! :)15:20
zanebbtw I sought out some clarifications on that email about people rewriting their own versions of OpenStack services behind the same API15:22
fungievrardjp: sure, happy to go into more detail at any time15:23
zanebapparently the rumours are:15:23
zanebsomebody rewrote a "core service" in Java because it was a performance bottleneck15:23
evrardjpzaneb: I obviously missed that email.15:23
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC15:23
zanebreportedly someone else rewrote "almost all" of the core services in an unknown language15:24
mugsierecently?15:24
mugsiein days gone by, yes15:24
zanebno names (or dates) were provided15:24
mugsiebut that hasn't been something I heard of in a long time15:24
zanebso unfortunately this is not actionable afaict15:24
zanebwe could think about adding a user survey question next year though?15:25
evrardjpzaneb: what would that question be?15:25
evrardjpabout performance?15:25
*** lpetrut has quit IRC15:25
mugsie"have you broken the terms of the trademark program"?15:25
* ttx joins late15:25
evrardjphahah15:25
zanebmugsie: there's no suggestion that anybody is doing this and using the OpenStack Powered trademark AIUI15:26
evrardjpI think that would be a bigger deal15:26
zanebevrardjp: "Have you rewritten any of OpenStack yourself from scratch and if so what were you thinking?"15:26
evrardjpand we would all know and discuss about it for at least 5 months15:26
mugsieif they advertise it as anything other than "openstack compatible APIs" they broke the terms15:26
ttxQuick call for forum topics, as the deadline is soon15:27
zanebmugsie: I don't think we need to discuss that, since nobody is suggesting that it is happening15:27
ttxWe'll likely have to file the contents of our etherpads soon15:27
mugsieyeah, true zaneb15:27
ttxdiablo_rojo and our TC reps on the selection committee should know15:28
ttx"rewriting in Java for performance" sounds suspicious15:28
ttxunless they also get rid of, say RabbitMQ15:28
zanebsounds suspiciously like HP Cloud's authz thing, but who knows15:29
mugsiettx: not all the cores (and the ones that make a lot of impact as it turns out) use RMQ15:29
mugsieHP Clouds control services fits that description, as does the thing RAX had for a while15:30
mugsiebut both of those are long gone15:30
* mnaser has been reading about NATS15:31
mugsieits interesting15:31
mnaserhttps://nats-io.github.io/docs/developer/concepts/subjects.html + https://nats-io.github.io/docs/developer/concepts/pubsub.html + https://nats-io.github.io/docs/developer/concepts/reqreply.html15:31
mugsiehonestly a lot of our RMQ traffic could be done via HTTP15:32
ttxmnaser: where is our Forum topics etherpad? Can't find it (again)15:32
mugsienova-api -> single compute traffic over HTTP opens a lot of possibilities, and removes a reliablity issue15:32
ttxhttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PVG-TC-PTG15:32
ttxis for PTG15:33
mnaserttx: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PVG-TC-brainstorming15:33
ttxthx15:33
ttxOne more week to submit topics so we should ramp up submissions15:33
ttxtc-members: crunch time to suggest forum topic sessions ^15:34
evrardjpmugsie: hasn't jaypipes proposed to use grpc in one of his posts?15:34
evrardjpthanks ttx15:34
mugsieyeah, but that was more of a distributed libvirt than a nova replacement15:34
mnaserthis seems like a good tc-level topic15:35
mnaseras a forum session15:35
mnaserthat can involve other operators/etc?15:35
mugsieyeah, it would15:35
smcginnisevrardjp: grpc is so last year. Now you need to rewrite in rsocket.15:36
evrardjpsmcginnis: my bad.15:36
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc15:36
mugsieas long as it supports IP over Avian Carrier, it should be fine ;P15:37
zaneb"NATS core offers an at most once quality of service." I'm out15:37
evrardjpsmcginnis: https://media.giphy.com/media/1Qdp4trljSkY8/giphy.gif15:37
smcginnisevrardjp: :)15:37
fungimugsie: "openstack compatible" is a protected trademark, and per previous discussion it doesn't look like it's intended to cover alternative replacement services which mimic openstack apis, it's about being able to claim that your software interacts correctly with the apis provided by "openstack powered[tm]" services15:38
fungiyour software or hardware, i should say15:39
fungiit looks like it was for clients and out-of-tree drivers15:39
fungibased on the wording of the trademark policy for it15:39
*** cdent has joined #openstack-tc15:39
zanebindeed, there's no trademark program for openstack-like APIs15:40
smcginnisThe only reference I found to anything implying it wasn't OK to reimplement OpenStack but have it API compatible was an old refstack page.15:43
mugsiethe trademark program (with the designate code sections) was intended to stop things like HP Clouds keystone re-write afaik15:43
mugsiedesignated code*15:43
ttxyes the famous mandatory sections15:44
mugsiee.g https://opendev.org/openstack/interop/src/branch/master/2019.06.json#L3495-L3562 is the code in keystone that *must* be run by the product getting certified15:46
ttxbut then it is a honor system I think -- we only check API responses15:48
mugsieit is15:48
ricolinmnaser, FYI as action promised in meeting, just send ML out and ask feedbacks for SIG guideline http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-September/009315.html15:53
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc16:02
*** ricolin has quit IRC16:03
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc16:04
*** ricolin has quit IRC16:05
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:08
*** jeremyfreudberg has quit IRC16:48
*** weshay_passport is now known as weshay16:57
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc17:29
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC17:38
*** markvoelker has quit IRC17:45
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc17:46
*** lbragstad has quit IRC18:07
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc18:07
*** iurygregory has quit IRC18:19
*** njohnston is now known as njohnston|lunch18:28
*** mriedem is now known as mriedem_afk18:39
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC18:40
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc18:40
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC18:50
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc18:52
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC18:58
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc19:03
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc19:32
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC19:43
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc19:44
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC19:49
*** njohnston|lunch is now known as njohnston19:59
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:03
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc20:04
*** markvoelker has quit IRC20:11
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc20:11
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-tc20:30
openstackgerritTom Barron proposed openstack/governance master: Add Designate investment opportunity for 2019  https://review.opendev.org/68192420:32
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc20:37
*** markvoelker has quit IRC20:37
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc20:39
*** mriedem_afk is now known as mriedem20:39
*** lpetrut has quit IRC20:46
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC21:01
*** zaneb has quit IRC21:25
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-tc21:25
*** e0ne has quit IRC21:32
*** markvoelker has quit IRC21:32
*** lbragstad has quit IRC21:33
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc21:50
*** weshay is now known as weshay|ruck22:04
*** markvoelker has quit IRC22:32
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc22:40
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc22:41
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-tc22:46
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC22:51
*** markvoelker has quit IRC22:51
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc23:04
*** mriedem is now known as mriedem_afk23:08
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC23:26
*** cdent has quit IRC23:31

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!