Thursday, 2021-11-25

*** pojadhav|afk is now known as pojadhav05:45
*** tkajinam is now known as Guest674106:15
opendevreviewMark Goddard proposed openstack/governance master: Add ansible-collection-kolla repo to Kolla project  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/81933114:46
gmanntc-members: meeting time15:00
gmann#startmeeting tc15:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Thu Nov 25 15:00:10 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'tc'15:00
gmann#topic Roll call15:00
gmanno/15:00
strigazio/15:00
belmoreirao/15:00
* strigazi saw the agenda and joined15:00
gmannUSA folks (4 TC ) are on Thanksgiving holiday15:00
gmannstrigazi: hi15:00
ricolino/15:00
gmannseems only 3 TC. 15:02
yoctozeptoo/15:02
yoctozeptoseems 415:02
gmann+115:02
gmannlet's start15:03
gmann#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Agenda_Suggestions15:03
gmanntoday agenda ^^15:03
spotzo/15:03
gmann#topic Follow up on past action items15:04
spotzAnd apparentlly I need to update my calendar for an hour earlier15:04
gmannspotz: +115:04
gmannone action item from previous meeting15:04
gmanngmann, ricolin_ to schedule adhoc meeting for pain point discussions15:04
belmoreiraspotz :)15:04
gmannricolin: did you find some slot for this ?15:05
mnaserPartial 5 :)15:05
* mnaser joining in from 37000 ft15:05
gmann+1, mnaser :)15:05
ricolingmann, didn't schedule any meeting, I though we gonna use TC meeting for it?15:05
gmannricolin: yeah, initially we planned that but doing in a adhoc special meeting like we did for RBAC can be more productive 15:06
gmannwhat you say?15:06
belmoreira+115:06
ricolinokay, let's schedule some time next week15:06
gmann+1, next week works fine. thanks15:07
gmannI will keep it open till then15:08
gmann#action ricolin_ to schedule adhoc meeting for pain point discussions15:08
gmann#topic Gate health check15:08
belmoreirait would be good if we involve the PTLs. A doodle with the TC members and PTLs would be great15:08
gmannbelmoreira: +1. that will be great15:08
gmannin RBAC also we did same and having more member from community along with TC were very helpful 15:09
gmannon gate health 15:10
gmannI saw one failure occurring in few projects not other (not sure why).  sphinx error ni SQLAlchemy1.4.27 - TypeDecorator15:11
gmannthis one, #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/818652/115:11
gmannI have not debugged much on this whether it is issue on  SQLAlchemy side or in our code doc string 15:12
gmannif anyone knows about it please let us know. it is happening in tacker, heat, keystone afaik 15:12
gmannother thing is zuul config error 15:13
gmannFixing Zuul config error in OpenStack15:13
gmannyou might have seen email from clarkb #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-November/025797.html15:14
gmannI have created a etherpad to track this for openstack  #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zuul-config-error-openstack15:14
gmannso that we fix it and do not forget. I will help on this sometime next week but if any other TC would like to help fixing those will be great15:14
gmannyoctozepto: does this solve all kolla error or you need to fix few more #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/79820515:15
yoctozeptogmann: we are EOLing the old branches15:15
yoctozeptoI updated the etherpad15:16
gmannyoctozepto: perfect, thanks 15:17
gmannyoctozepto: please add patch link also. 15:17
yoctozeptoyeah, looking for it15:17
gmannthanks 15:18
gmannany other thing to discuss on Gate health ?15:18
spotznot me15:18
gmann#topic Updates on community-wide goal15:18
gmannRBAC goal15:19
gmann#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/81515815:19
gmannwe discussed more bits around domain admin requirement in Yoga or not. lbragstad has uploaded the latest version15:19
gmanndansmith: and I are more involved in the same discussion so kind of co-authors. it will be great if other tc-members can have a look into that and vote15:20
gmannwe have to merge it ASAP as yoga milestone-1 is already passed 15:20
mnaserI have to admit the contents seem very intense15:21
mnaserAnd to be honest I trust in you and da smith so I may be tbh giving a RC+2 that’s delegated based on my trust in the folks who’ve worked on it15:21
mnaserSo I don’t hold things up too much15:21
spotzI'll give it a read through llater though I've been following the discussions in channel15:22
gmannthanks 15:22
gmannother proposed goal is 'Proposed community goal for FIPS compatibility and compliance'15:23
gmann#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/81658715:23
gmannI did not get chance to review, will try to do sometime next week15:23
gmann#topic Magnum project health15:24
mnaserYeah nothing on that in terms of knowledge or context15:25
mnaserOkay so about that subject15:25
strigaziI would appreciate some context and why I was not contacted before15:25
strigaziOr invited to this meeting for example15:25
gmannsure15:26
mnaserstrigazi: sorry, I tried to ping on irc but no response — but the situation as I saw it was that I believe you are the only active core for magnum15:26
mnaserFeilong and brtrkr (sp?) both left their orgs and said magnum is not a focus at their new employment15:27
mnaserHongbin doesn’t seem to have been doing any reviews lately which kinda leaves things up for you only15:27
mnaserAnd even then I guess there’s not enough cores to merge things to start with15:27
gmann#link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fmagnum15:28
gmannopen reviews in magnum15:28
mnaserfwiw, this wasn’t a meeting to start taking action but more of raise awareness inside tc and try to see what action items we come up with (ie someone reach out to spyros) — rather than “let’s fix it”15:28
strigaziWouldn't a better approach be to ping me if I need help? via the mailing list?15:28
mnaserThat would be a productive action item of this exact discussion :)15:28
gmannstrigazi: I think idea here was who all are active. and now we have more clarity that you are only one there15:29
gmannI think ML is best way to contact then IRC ? that also work fine15:29
mnaserThis was put here because I brought it up and this was a good time for the tc to be around and know that situation for us to figure out a plan15:29
mnaserSorry if it came off as trying to do things behind you or anything. It’s just an early stage discussion.15:29
strigaziI am one core, but we are 4-5 ppl dedicated to magnum at CERN15:30
gmannstrigazi: with one core, do you still have require 2 core for merging any patch or just one ?15:30
mnaserI understand15:30
mnasergmann read my mind :)15:31
strigaziWe require one, best practice 215:31
strigaziAt this state we can move fwd with one I guess15:31
strigaziIf that's ok with you as well15:32
mnaserI’m in no position for this but I’d suggest adding other cores15:32
strigaziI keep in mind to get a +1 from reviewers outisde CERN as well15:32
spotzIf there are more people working on it are any of them possible cores?15:32
strigaziJake Yip has enough knowledge15:33
mnaserThere are a few contributors I’ve seen pushing in +1s15:33
strigaziand they are active15:33
gmannyeah, if there are more people interested and eligible, having more core will help15:33
strigaziI can ask around15:33
strigaziand report in 2-3 weeks15:33
gmanngreat. 15:34
mnaserI do think strigazi is the best core when it comes to knowledge and understanding of project but doesn’t hurt to have a few more in case you’re off or anything like that15:34
spotzThere might even be people who do +1s from outside CERN who would be thrilled to be asked15:34
gmannmnaser: agree15:34
spotz+215:35
strigazispotz: at the moment I know only jake yip well enough and can vouch for them15:35
spotzstrigazi: Ok it's a start for sure to get you help15:35
gmannlet's wait for strigazi checks on more core and meanwhile it is all fine on strigazi plan to do one core (which is you) merging things15:36
ricolinstrigazi, maybe Catalyst Cloud will be interested to send another person into community?15:36
mnaseryeah if single core merge is ok, then it’s not that much of an issue15:36
strigaziricolin: they said they'll be in touch when they have someone15:36
ricolinstrigazi, got it15:36
mnaserbut I was concerned is there’s not even enough cores to merge things if there was a 2 +2 rule15:36
gmannyeah15:37
gmannthis stats two core only #link https://github.com/openstack/magnum/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst15:37
mnaser Anyways, I appreciate your work strigazi — I didn’t raise this because I didn’t think you weren’t contributing or doing your stuff — but it was more since there wasn’t as much people to help15:37
strigazigmann: is the best practice15:37
strigazigmann: the link you shared15:38
strigazimnaser: no worries15:38
mnaserSorry if it came off weird, but we’d probably actually have started to send an ML message as an action to the discussion once the tc was made aware15:38
gmannstrigazi: yeah, actually many new people might be checking that but anyways plan of chekcing new core possibility sounds good 15:38
strigazilet's do like this then, since there is interest, I can do a reviews/clean up of the backlog and looks for cores15:39
strigazilet's do like this then, since there is interest, I can do reviews and a clean up of the backlog and look for cores15:39
gmann+1, sounds good15:39
mnaseryeah — we’re doing a big push for magnum here to try and make the experience more smooth with the edge cases so we’ll be submitting quite a few things here and there15:40
spotz+115:40
belmoreira+115:40
mnaser(and while they’re all up streamed I feel bad running locks patches — since the community won’t benefit it out of the box and might get a bad taste)15:40
mnaserThanks for that though strigazi — much appreciated15:40
mnaserand if you need to reach the tc I hear one of them is next door :P15:41
gmannstrigazi: really appreciate your updates/plan and taking charge of project again as PTL too.  15:41
gmann+1. anything else on this topic ?15:41
strigazimnaser: :) he works from home today otherwise literally next door15:41
* strigazi waves to belmoreira from the office15:42
belmoreirastrigazi thanks for joining the meeting15:42
mnaserI feel like that’s a good productive wrap up on the topic15:42
yoctozeptoindeed15:42
gmannagree. thanks belmoreira also. 15:42
strigazimnaser: if you want discuss a bigger push on magnum, we could do it in the ML or storyboard :)15:43
mnaserstrigazi: will do :)15:43
tobias-urdingreat to see the topic was covered and some more clarity spread around it15:43
tobias-urdin:)15:43
gmann#topic Adjutant need PTLs and maintainers15:44
gmannAdjutant till need maintainer or PTL15:44
gmannthis is last I heard on ML  #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-November/025786.html15:44
mnaserI think there’s as someone from Verisign15:44
mnaserWho was waiting fir a sort of approval or something15:44
gmannBraden, Albert, yeah15:44
gmannyeah, I will get in touch with them and check the status. meanwhile I will keep it in agenda 15:45
gmann#topic Pain Point targeting15:46
gmannthis we already discussed to start discussion as adhoc meeting sometime next week15:46
gmannricolin: belmoreira anything else you would like to cover today ?15:46
gmannon this topic15:46
ricolinnot from me15:46
belmoreiralooking forward for the meeting15:47
gmanncool15:47
gmann#topic Open Reviews15:47
gmann#link https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open15:47
gmann8 open reviews15:47
gmannRBAC, FIPs we already talked about15:48
gmannthis is goal cleanup as per new structure, appreciate the review on this #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/81884515:48
gmannfor kolla repo, mnaser can you check this project-config patch #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/81932615:49
spotzAll links open to look at later15:49
gmannspotz: thanks 15:49
gmannI think that is all from me today. anything else from anyone 15:50
gmannnext meeting will be on Dec 2nd video call. 15:50
spotzLooks like tentatively there will be an OPS Meetup the Friday after Summiit hosted at Deutsche Telekon15:51
gmannspotz: in June 2022 summit right?15:51
belmoreirathat's great!15:52
spotzgmann: Yeah on 6/10 the Friday15:52
gmannok, sounds great.15:52
gmannand Thanks to everyone on Thanksgiving day! and safe flight to mnaser (thanks for joining from 37000 feet :))15:53
gmannlet's close for today15:53
mnaserThanks guys. Take care :)15:53
belmoreirathank you all15:53
gmann#endmeeting15:53
opendevmeetMeeting ended Thu Nov 25 15:53:49 2021 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:53
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-11-25-15.00.html15:53
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-11-25-15.00.txt15:53
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-11-25-15.00.log.html15:53
spotzSafe travels mnaser. Happy thanksgiving all. Gonna go ride before we pig out:)15:53
gmannspotz: wow. have a nice one15:54
yoctozeptothanks gmann15:55
opendevreviewGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Select secure and consistent RBAC as a community-wide goal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/81881716:57
opendevreviewGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Move completed goals into the completed directory  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/81884517:17

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!