| gmann | tc-members: this is ready to review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/839880 | 01:46 |
|---|---|---|
| gmann | ade_lee: 1 last comment on FIPS goal, rest all looks good to me, thanks for updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/838601/2/goals/proposed/fips.rst#67 | 01:54 |
| opendevreview | Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/governance master: Add project stats check tool https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/810037 | 08:30 |
| opendevreview | Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/governance master: Add project stats check tool https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/810037 | 09:30 |
| opendevreview | Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/governance master: Update potential triggers to consider dropping of the project https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/840856 | 09:30 |
| *** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|break | 11:58 | |
| *** pojadhav|break is now known as pojadhav | 12:29 | |
| *** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|afk | 13:57 | |
| opendevreview | Ade Lee proposed openstack/governance master: Update milestones for FIPS goal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/838601 | 14:28 |
| ade_lee | gmann, updated ^^ | 14:28 |
| gmann | ade_lee: thanks, lgtm. tc-members: please review this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/838601 | 14:34 |
| slaweq | gmann: ade_lee done | 14:38 |
| slaweq | I found two typos there but I don't think You need to respin it just for those typos | 14:38 |
| slaweq | :) | 14:38 |
| gmann | slaweq: thanks, ade_lee can fix that while moving to selected goal | 14:39 |
| gmann | tc-members: need one more vote in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/840351 | 14:39 |
| ade_lee | slaweq, gmann thanks - will do | 14:39 |
| gmann | ade_lee: approved also. once that is merged you can propose that to selected goal. | 14:40 |
| ade_lee | gmann, ack - will do - thanks | 14:42 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/governance master: Update milestones for FIPS goal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/838601 | 14:52 |
| slaweq | gmann and other tc-members: if You will have few minutes, I today updated a bit ricolin's patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/810037 and proposed another one on top of it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/840856 | 14:56 |
| slaweq | please take a look at it :) | 14:56 |
| gmann | slaweq: thanks, will do | 14:57 |
| slaweq | gmann: thx a lot | 14:57 |
| opendevreview | Ade Lee proposed openstack/governance master: Move FIPS goal from proposed to selected. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/840920 | 14:58 |
| ade_lee | gmann, slaweq ^^ | 14:58 |
| gmann | ade_lee: +1 | 14:58 |
| slaweq | +1 | 14:59 |
| knikolla | there's a person on the scientific-sig asking if we have any idea where the 2023 summit will be (at least region-wise since they need to submit travel requests for next years budget already). | 15:08 |
| gmann | knikolla: I do not think that is planned but aprice can answer it if she has any info ^^ | 15:09 |
| smcginnis | knikolla: Last I heard it was still going to follow the pattern of being in North America. | 15:23 |
| aprice | knikolla: we are planning for it to be in North America | 15:23 |
| aprice | hoping to have something to announce in the next few weeks | 15:23 |
| knikolla | aprice, smcginnis, gmann thank you :) | 15:25 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/governance master: Adding gmann to oslo tact-sig liaison https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/840351 | 16:06 |
| gmann | dansmith: rosmaita : for tick/tock release note, can you help me to recall the yesterday discussion. We agreed on just copying the deprecated/upgrade/removed-things releasenotes from tock -> tick and not everything. and we will see how it goes when we do it? Another things is that upgrade checks are important things to check during tick upgrade. | 17:29 |
| dansmith | gmann: tbh I'm not really sure that we specifically agreed on anything that concrete, but maybe rosmaita had a different opinion | 17:31 |
| dansmith | I think we generally agree that there should be an easy link at the top of the renos to the previous release and recommend that skip-level upgraders read it | 17:31 |
| dansmith | I was a bit burned by that point in the meeting so I might be missing some other point of agreement | 17:33 |
| gmann | ok, that is also fine and operator knows in release notes what are important things to note while upgrade so they can just refer deprecated/upgrade notes instead of complete release notes. | 17:33 |
| dansmith | my opinion is still that some human-level review of the previous $tock release notes for things that should be copied through is a good idea | 17:34 |
| dansmith | gmann: looking at a random set of renos to base my opinion on: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/nova/victoria.html#relnotes-22-0-0-stable-victoria-upgrade-notes | 17:35 |
| gmann | dansmith: and copy you mean just link or cope the text? | 17:36 |
| dansmith | the first several in there about scope_type and policy might have been irrelevant by xena (I can't remember) | 17:36 |
| dansmith | gmann: I think very critical upgrade/removal things should probably be copied into either the same section, or the prelude | 17:37 |
| gmann | ok but that is main concern from rosmaita | 17:37 |
| dansmith | the latter might be enough.. "reminder that X has now been removed, check the previous renos upgrade section for details" | 17:37 |
| gmann | I think let's discuss it in next meeting or so | 17:37 |
| gmann | I was writing summary so thought of asking before writing something different. | 17:38 |
| gmann | sorry yesterday I was lost on the name things during this discussion, hope we will get out of those name horror show soon. | 17:38 |
| dansmith | yep, same | 17:38 |
| dansmith | I'm also losing the will to care, so maybe we should just do whatever rosmaita wants on renos | 17:39 |
| gmann | let's discuss and conclude in next meeting | 17:40 |
| gmann | tc-members: this is ready for review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/840363 | 18:30 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Update documentation to try DPL model for leaderless projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/840363 | 19:07 |
| rosmaita | gmann: dansmith: no need to look now, but for next week's discussion: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/840996 | 22:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!