| gmann | rosmaita: ack | 01:51 |
|---|---|---|
| gmann | it means we should finalize the new release cadence name ASAP before projects start more documentation on it | 01:52 |
| gmann | I still think SLURP is best choice here, as no name satisfy all the criteria/members | 01:54 |
| gmann | spotz_: arne_wiebalck ^^ i know you both objected on this but if that is not so strong objection then should we go with this? or any idea you have? | 01:55 |
| gmann | but we should conclude it very first thing in next week. | 01:57 |
| *** prometheanfire is now known as Guest0 | 06:30 | |
| arne_wiebalck | gmann: The suggestion is to tag/mark/name the OpenStack releases between which upgrades are possible while skipping releases in between as a "OpenStack SLURP" releases? Blame my (most likely non-existing :-) German humor, but for me that sounds a little as if we do not take the naming of these releases very seriously ... I would prefer sth more neutral such as "OpenStack SLU" release (in analogy with "Ubuntu LTS" | 13:58 |
| arne_wiebalck | releases), for instance. Maybe I just have to get used to the name ... so if all of you agree that SLURP will not give the above impression, disregard my objection :) | 13:58 |
| *** Guest0 is now known as prometheanfire | 15:46 | |
| spotz | gmann arne_wiebalckUeah I like SLU better then SLURP | 17:14 |
| fungi | we can always appeas both, by having skip-level upgrade (SLU) releases, which follow the skip-level upgrade release process (SLURP). the former is used in designating the releases, while the latter is a term for the process documentation | 18:27 |
| fungi | er, appease | 18:27 |
| fungi | though i also think we do need to remember to keep a bit of "fun" in openstack. if it's all serious all the time, that loses a bit of the project's friendly and enjoyable character | 18:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!