| *** ralonsoh_ is now known as ralonsoh | 07:40 | |
| opendevreview | Wenping Song proposed openstack/election master: Adding songwenping candidacy for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/940850 | 07:53 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Axel Vanzaghi proposed openstack/election master: Adding Axel Vanzaghi candidacy for Mistral https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/940859 | 08:53 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Render election schedule to releases properly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/940173 | 09:20 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Clarify preference on election official neutrality https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/934908 | 09:20 |
| -opendevstatus- NOTICE: nominations for the OpenStack PTL and TC positions are now open, for details see https://governance.openstack.org/election/ | 16:09 | |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: 2025.2: Add Michal Nasiadka candidacy for Kolla https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/939935 | 16:49 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding songwenping candidacy for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/940850 | 16:50 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding René Ribaud candidacy for Nova 2025.2 PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/940822 | 16:53 |
| opendevreview | Omer Schwartz proposed openstack/election master: Adding Omer Schwartz for Designate 2025.2 PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/940899 | 17:47 |
| fungi | i now have control of https://launchpad.net/~freezer-drivers , who needed to be added to it? | 17:56 |
| gouthamr | noonedeadpunk ^ | 17:59 |
| gouthamr | noonedeadpunk: also need to know if you folks plan on using https://launchpad.net/freezer-web-ui | 18:00 |
| gouthamr | the maintainer there is now set to "openstack-administrators" | 18:00 |
| gouthamr | fungi: don't know if you can reset the "driver" there? | 18:01 |
| gouthamr | ruinedyourlife tells me we could: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/820667 | 18:02 |
| * gouthamr lol at the username | 18:02 | |
| fungi | yeah, just did | 18:02 |
| gouthamr | perfect, ty fungi | 18:02 |
| fungi | i've also now made it "part of: openstack" | 18:04 |
| fungi | maintainer, driver and part-of are consistent between freezer and freezer-web-ui now | 18:05 |
| gouthamr | i suspect https://launchpad.net/~alsotoes and https://launchpad.net/~noonedeadpunk should replace everyone on the "freezer-drivers" team | 18:05 |
| fungi | i'll add the two of them to freezer-drivers as team administrators, and they can do the rest of what needs doing (including removing prior members if deemed necessary) | 18:06 |
| gouthamr | the https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/freezer-core,members needs a similar cleanup | 18:06 |
| gouthamr | fungi: good stuff, ty | 18:06 |
| fungi | okay, they're both freezer-drivers admins in lp now | 18:07 |
| fungi | and they're both already in freezer-core on gerrit, so should be able to do any cleanup they like there as well | 18:08 |
| fungi | let me know if you think of anything else you need me to do for this | 18:09 |
| gouthamr | ++ nothing from my end, glad to see it resolved quickly :) | 18:09 |
| gmann | tc-members: important announcement in case anyone missed it https://lists.openinfra.org/archives/list/foundation@lists.openinfra.org/thread/3B7OWPRXB4KD2DVX7SYYSHYYRNCKVV46/ | 18:46 |
| -opendevstatus- NOTICE: The Gerrit service on review.opendev.org will be offline momentarily while we upgrade for a new jeepyb feature and switch our database container image source repository | 18:52 | |
| gmann | as mentioned in fqa, though there will not be any change project governances, TC etc but feel free to ask question on ML or attend scheduled meeting if any | 18:55 |
| gouthamr | ++ | 18:55 |
| fungi | yes, please if you reply, do so to the thread on the foundation ml, not to my post on openstack-discuss | 18:57 |
| gouthamr | eh, i saw that you'd set the reply-to headers | 18:57 |
| fungi | i tried to make it so that anyone replying to my post on openstack-discuss would only reply to the foundation ml, but apparently gmail likes to ignore that | 18:57 |
| gouthamr | i wanted to preserve the thread in both places, did i mess up? :) | 18:57 |
| fungi | well, just trying to avoid ending up with two divergent discussions on separate mailing lists | 18:58 |
| gmann | I added this topic in TC meeting agenda also but happy to answer the queries if it comes up here and before meeting | 18:58 |
| fungi | better to avoid cross-posting messages between multiple mailing lists | 18:58 |
| clarkb | ya the problem is that as hard as you try to preserve the thread in both plces if you have discussions in two places they will veer off in different directions | 18:59 |
| fungi | when i do this in the future i'll try to be more clear and say something like "please don't reply to this post, only to the one on the other list..." | 19:01 |
| gouthamr | if folks respond to your post, i think it'll thread properly in both places still.. | 19:02 |
| gouthamr | i don't know how many subscribers are there on foundation-discuss, but im definitely interested to get the discussion going in openstack-discuss | 19:03 |
| fungi | unfortunately it didn't, i had to use list owner superpowers to attach your reply on the foundation ml, it ended up not including the in-reply-to reference from my prior post in the references header | 19:03 |
| gouthamr | OHHH | 19:03 |
| fungi | so landed on the foundation ml as a separate thread | 19:03 |
| fungi | that's what iw as saying about gmail sort of thumbing their noses at e-mail rfcs | 19:04 |
| gouthamr | thanks and apologies then.. would you have to fix the follow ups too? should anyone else respond liek i did? | 19:05 |
| fungi | yeah, i'll post something on the openstack-discuss thread asking people to not reply to it | 19:05 |
| gouthamr | thanks! | 19:06 |
| fungi | some mail clients treat the reply-to/mail-followup-to/in-reply-to/references headers correctly, but apparently gmail doesn't (they have their own threading algorithm and seem to omit things other mail clients expect) | 19:15 |
| fungi | it does seem to have included the earlier references entry, but i guess that on its own was insufficient for mailman to identify it as part of the other thread | 19:20 |
| fungi | anyway, i can continue to manually attach messages to the main thread if it becomes necessary | 19:20 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!