Wednesday, 2015-10-21

« Tuesday, 2015-10-20 Index Thursday, 2015-10-22 »
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-zaqar00:16
*** achanda has quit IRC00:23
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar00:26
*** Qiming has quit IRC00:31
mdnadeemvkmc : hello00:42
vkmcmdnadeem, hey!00:42
mdnadeemvkmc:Regarding bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/zaqar/+bug/1503997,00:45
openstackLaunchpad bug 1503997 in zaqar " Creating a pool or flavor with an existing name should through an Exception" [Medium,Confirmed] - Assigned to MD NADEEM (mail2nadeem92)00:45
mdnadeemvkmc: I need to check compatibility with v2 only or for v1.1 also00:45
mdnadeemAs when i run tox test unit test case fails for v1.100:46
mdnadeemvkmc: Have a look at error : http://paste.openstack.org/show/476938/00:47
*** pt_15 has quit IRC00:58
*** boris-42 has quit IRC00:58
mdnadeemvkmc, ryansb : i can not open https://ehterpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-zaqar-on-horizon-and-misc, It shows "Server not found". Please check and let me know if it is working at your site?01:18
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-zaqar01:21
*** itisha has quit IRC01:31
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-zaqar02:30
*** achanda has quit IRC02:53
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar02:56
*** achanda has quit IRC02:57
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar03:01
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC03:01
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar03:04
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC03:06
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar03:21
*** inteq has quit IRC03:26
*** inteq has joined #openstack-zaqar03:41
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar04:27
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC04:27
*** achanda has quit IRC04:32
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar04:35
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar04:44
flaper87o/04:52
flaper87yoooooooooooooo04:52
flaper87how are you all doing?04:52
flaper87sorry, I've been away for a bit04:53
flaper87but things are settling and I'll get back to my pending things in Zaqar04:53
flaper87Meantime, you all rock04:53
vkmcyou better have poptarts for us04:54
vkmcor we won't ever forgive you04:54
mdnadeemflaper87:vkmc:  Is there any activity plan for zaqar team on last day of summit ?05:04
vkmchttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-zaqar-on-horizon-and-misc <- correct url05:05
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC05:05
mdnadeemvkmc: Thanks :), I think we need to correct it the URL at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Mitaka/Etherpads#Zaqar05:11
vkmcoh yes05:11
vkmccan you update it?05:11
mdnadeem* let me correct it05:11
mdnadeemvkmc: yah, sure :)05:11
vkmcthanks05:12
vkmc:D05:12
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar05:12
mdnadeemvkmc: Is there any plan for zaqar team like meetup on last day of summit?05:14
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC05:16
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-zaqar05:16
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC05:17
*** flwang has joined #openstack-zaqar05:23
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar05:23
flaper87mdnadeem: there's. Most of us will be around an we should organize something05:25
flaper87there are quite some things that could be tackled05:25
*** flwang has quit IRC05:27
mdnadeemflaper87: It will be nice if we can create a group on  some mobile application(like whatsup), Such that every one will notify for  some random discussion or get together05:31
mdnadeemflaper87: what you think?05:32
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC05:44
flaper87mdnadeem: there's one on wechat05:46
flaper87what's your wechat user?05:46
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar05:47
mdnadeemI have not yet, I will create and let you know soon.05:47
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC05:47
*** flwang has joined #openstack-zaqar05:57
*** flwang has quit IRC05:58
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar06:01
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC06:05
*** flwang has joined #openstack-zaqar06:07
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar06:08
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC06:09
*** flwang has quit IRC06:11
*** flwang has joined #openstack-zaqar06:11
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar06:12
*** flwang has quit IRC06:21
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC06:21
*** flwang has joined #openstack-zaqar06:24
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar06:25
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC06:26
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar06:29
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC06:39
*** inteq has quit IRC06:53
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar06:54
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC07:05
*** flwang has quit IRC07:06
*** inteq has joined #openstack-zaqar07:07
*** achanda has quit IRC08:10
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar08:13
*** achanda has quit IRC08:15
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar08:20
*** achanda has quit IRC08:48
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC09:01
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-zaqar09:01
*** akanksha_ has joined #openstack-zaqar09:07
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar09:30
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC09:31
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-zaqar09:31
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-zaqar09:43
*** cpallares has quit IRC10:27
*** vkmc has quit IRC10:29
*** flaper87 has quit IRC10:29
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-zaqar10:35
*** flaper87 has quit IRC10:35
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-zaqar10:35
*** cpallares has joined #openstack-zaqar10:35
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-zaqar10:35
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar10:36
*** achanda has quit IRC10:37
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC10:39
mdnadeemthreve : hi10:43
mdnadeemtherve: hi10:43
*** Qiming has quit IRC10:45
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar10:49
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC11:20
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-zaqar11:33
*** Qiming has quit IRC11:35
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC11:38
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-zaqar11:46
*** khushbu has quit IRC11:49
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-zaqar11:53
*** khushbu has quit IRC11:55
openstackgerritMD NADEEM proposed openstack/zaqar: Create api through PoolNameExist exception for duplicate pool name  https://review.openstack.org/23800611:55
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar11:58
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC12:02
mdnadeemvkmc: Please have a look at  https://review.openstack.org/238006, and let me know if i suppose to change it for API v1.1 ? or it is fine for v2 only?12:05
vkmcmdnadeem, checking it12:06
vkmcthanks12:06
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar12:06
mdnadeemvkmc: np , and thank you so much to give your valuable time for new beginners like me :)12:10
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC12:16
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-zaqar12:16
*** itisha has joined #openstack-zaqar12:22
mdnadeemvkmc: going out with friends for dinner, i will check you reply, when get back to home. Thanks :)12:23
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC12:37
*** boris-42 has quit IRC12:38
Eva-imdnadeem: I thought you are not beginner, you're so active in zaqar =)12:53
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-zaqar12:58
*** khushbu has quit IRC13:04
*** khushbu_ has joined #openstack-zaqar13:07
*** sriram has joined #openstack-zaqar13:09
*** venkat_ has joined #openstack-zaqar13:27
venkat_Hi therve.. ryansb..13:28
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-zaqar13:29
thervemdnadeem, Hi13:30
thervevenkat_, Hi13:30
venkat_therve, I created a pool with 100 weight and started creating queues. But how I can come to know which pool it used for a particular queue ?13:30
vkmcEva-i, btw, I could reproduce what you said13:30
vkmcEva-i, running test per class doesn't work13:30
thervevenkat_, I don't know.13:31
venkat_oh ok.. anybody has any inputs for my question ?13:31
ryansbvenkat_: morning (or not, depending on your tz)13:34
ryansbso your question is how to see what pool a queue is assigned to?13:34
venkat_ryansb, yes13:34
angvpEva-i: vkmc how's the command again?13:37
vkmcangvp, tox -e py34 --  '(MongodbFlavorsTest)'13:37
vkmcthat should run MongodbFlavorTest class tests13:37
vkmcand for some reason it passes without running them13:37
ryansbI believe in the v2 API you can do a GET against the flavor13:38
ryansband that will have the association of the pool->flavor13:38
ryansband you can see what flavor a queue is13:38
ryansbvenkat_: ^13:38
Eva-ivkmc: wait a sec13:38
angvpvkmc: looking the tox file you have this python setup.py testr --slowest --testr-args='--concurrency 1 {posargs}' on testenv command13:39
Eva-ivkmc: I tried these commands http://paste.openstack.org/show/1i5OJCj5YVPT3mtGvEuC/13:40
angvplet's see13:40
vkmcEva-i, yeah, I tried those too13:40
vkmcrunning tox -epy34 zaqar.tests.unit.storage.test_impl_mongodb works, but is not the same13:41
venkat_ryansb, we can get details of association between pool group and flavor. But my question is when I have created multiple pools with different weights. And then I started creating queues. Now how I can come to know which queue is associated to which pool ?13:41
ryansbyeah, so you'd look at which flavor the queue is associated with13:42
*** ametts has joined #openstack-zaqar13:42
ryansbthen you can see what pool the flavor is on13:42
ryansbI think. This may be a flaper question13:42
Eva-ivkmc: I suppose this test is skipped13:42
flaper87note that the flavor is associated to a pool group13:42
Eva-ivkmc: it's just tox is too quiet =)13:42
flaper87which means the queue can go to any pool13:42
flaper87there's no way to have that info from the API13:43
flaper87I guess it'd be great to have from a management perspective13:43
flaper87That info is stored in the Catalog, which is internal to Zaqar13:43
Eva-ivkmc: http://paste.openstack.org/show/lJOd9MTSIDWEtgNKvuNS/ here I tried to execute test by a different way. And it told me the test is skipped.13:43
*** pt_15 has joined #openstack-zaqar13:44
vkmcI see13:44
flaper87ryansb: venkat_ read above :)13:44
venkat_flaper, when we get the information about queue.. will it show the flavor details ? I didn't see any such in API v1.1 doc..13:46
ryansbflaper87++ thanks13:46
flaper87venkat_: the queue metadata contains the flavor it's using. To get the flavor details you need to get the flavor info, which will show the capabilities it supports but not the pools13:47
Eva-ivkmc: so I guess problem solved13:47
flaper87venkat_: why do you need this? Monitoring? Ops?13:47
flaper87venkat_: I think it's useful but it'd probably be better handled in a more specific way13:47
vkmcEva-i, hmm not really, mongodb tests shouldn't be skipped, for some reason it's not setting up the environment13:48
angvpEva-i: what if you run the tox command with -vvv is still quiet?13:48
flaper87now that we have policies, we can handle these things in a more granular way13:48
venkat_flaper, monitor and to debug cases13:48
flaper87venkat_: yeah, so, if you have access to the box, I'd recommend you to check zaqar logs. You should find the info there. This is not the ideal/final solution but we can work on a better one now13:48
flaper87venkat_: want to propose a spec?13:49
flaper87Eva-i: what issues are you having?13:49
* flaper87 got late to the party13:49
venkat_flaper, no13:50
flaper87venkat_: :(13:50
Eva-iflaper87: just trying to perform a particular test class, usually some of these commands work: http://paste.openstack.org/show/1i5OJCj5YVPT3mtGvEuC/13:51
venkat_flaper, can you provide me details for attending weekly meetings ?13:51
Eva-iflaper87: http://paste.openstack.org/show/lJOd9MTSIDWEtgNKvuNS/ here I tried to execute test by a different way. And it told me the test is skipped, because no running mongodb is detected13:51
flaper87venkat_: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Zaqar13:51
flaper87Eva-i: are you using tox?13:52
Eva-iflaper87: my mongodb is running, maybe I should set ZAQAR_TEST_MONGODB somewhere13:52
flaper87Eva-i: export ZAQAR_TEST_MONGODB=113:52
flaper87that should be enough13:52
flaper87but13:52
flaper87why aren't you using tox ?13:52
Eva-iflaper87: I use tox, tox is just too quiet, so I used different way of running test. Then vmkc suggested to run with "tox -vvv". I'm gonna try it.13:54
flaper87Eva-i: mmh, what do you mean w/ too quite ?13:54
flaper87quiet*13:54
*** mpanetta has joined #openstack-zaqar13:55
angvpnot getting the skipping tests part13:55
*** malini has joined #openstack-zaqar13:55
Eva-iflaper87: when I tried to perform test via tox, tox just say "congratulations", but not actually performing test.13:55
venkat_flaper, I saw http response code "204 No Content" when a user tries to create same pool & queue names.. but actually as per http spec.. "409 Conflict" is correct one13:55
venkat_flaper, can I fix them ?13:55
angvpEva-i: i think they were performed, put some verbose to check13:56
flaper87venkat_: it's a conflict if you consider those fields as unique. In Zaqar, we don't. These resources are considered lazy and such conflicts are considered no-op, hence the 20413:56
flaper87Eva-i: you probably had the wrong filter, I saw you were using `tox -epy34 -- SomethingHere`13:57
Eva-ivkmc: here's the output with -vvv: http://paste.openstack.org/show/t6MfaaaTkNfxGPuzXfJ8/13:58
Eva-iflaper87: please teach me how to do it right13:58
flaper87Eva-i: what test do you want to run?13:59
Eva-iflaper87: this one: zaqar.tests.unit.storage.test_impl_mongodb.MongodbFlavorsTest13:59
vkmcflaper87, she is following testr guide, or the guide is wrong or we have a bug14:00
vkmchttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Testr#How_can_I_run_just_one_test.3F_Just_some_tests.3F14:00
flaper87Eva-i: try: `tox -r -epy27 -- MongodbFlavorsTest`14:00
flaper87or py34 if you want py3414:01
venkat_flaper, but 2xx series is used for Success & 4xx series used for client error. In this case, client user gives existing pool or queue name and zaqar has to update client with 409 error so that client can correct!14:01
Eva-iflaper87: vkmc: please wait while I'm checking my environment14:01
flaper87venkat_: but there's no error there. That's my point. I agree in other scenarios that is considered an error. In Zaqar, it's a noop and there's nothing wrong with requesting the creation of a queue twice because that ends up in a noop14:02
flaper87ryansb: what's your take on ^ ?14:02
flaper87great, arch doesn't have py34 anymore14:02
flaper87T_T14:02
flaper87aur to the rescue14:03
Eva-iflaper87: my wsgi transport in zaqar's config is bound to the local network IP. Maybe tox requires zaqar wsgi to be bound to localhost?14:04
vkmcEva-i, flaper87, running tox -r -epy27 -- MongodbFlavorsTest works for me, tox -r -epy34 -- MongodbFlavorsTest has the same behaviour14:04
vkmc(i.e. skips the tests)14:04
flaper87Eva-i: no no, please, try the last command I gave you. That's the right one14:04
flaper87vkmc: wait, py34 skips and py27 works?14:04
Eva-ialright14:04
vkmcflaper87, yup14:04
flaper87that means the test is not py34 compatible and it's failing to load it14:05
vkmcindeed14:05
flaper87open a shell, try to import the test module and see where it fails14:05
ryansbflaper87: I think in this case you can do a '201 created' when the queue is new14:05
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar14:05
ryansbthen do 202 accepted when a queue exists already14:05
vkmcEva-i,  ^ can you do that? great job catching that bug14:05
flaper87ryansb: a-ha! that probably makes even more sense14:06
venkat_flaper, I do agree that there is nothing wrong with requesting the creation of a queue twice but I am not sure why we need to allow this scenario. In most of the cases, this type of scenario should not be allowed otherwise if some functionality created when queue or pool was new and later if again tried it may corrupt the existing things w.r.to pool or queue.14:06
flaper87venkat_: it doesn't corrupt the data because it's a no-op14:06
venkat_flaper, ok.. then 202 is good in this case14:07
flaper87nothing happens in the server, Zaqar just ignores the requests and replies with: "we've got your back"14:07
ryansbyeah, and 202 has the semantic of "the request has been accepted, and may or may not be acted on"14:07
flaper87ryansb: ++14:07
ryansbwhich is exactly right in this case14:07
flaper87now, the real problem is that this is a breaking change14:07
flaper87:(14:07
ryansbhttp://httpstatus.es/20214:07
ryansboh, dang :(14:08
flaper87and we can't just do it and expect people to be happy14:08
flaper87:(14:08
ryansbso what's the behavior now?14:08
flaper8720414:08
venkat_204 No Content14:08
*** achanda has quit IRC14:09
therveThat sounds about right14:09
Eva-iflaper87: vkmc: can confirm this behavior14:09
venkat_It says - The server successfully processed the request. This is correct when zaqar server processed the request but here pool or queue already exist and zaqar doesn't do anything.. 204 is not good14:10
Eva-iflaper87: vkmc: in py27 environment test runs, in py34 environment test skipped14:10
flaper87Eva-i: ok, we now need to figure out why14:10
flaper87Eva-i: I'd recommend trying to import the module and see what the error is. It's weird that this is not being reported in tox14:11
flaper87s/in/by/14:11
ryansbI think 204 is also reasonable, since the semantics of 204 are "we processed it, but the client SHOULD NOT change its view of the item"14:11
Eva-iDamn, I'm really good at detecting bugs  =)14:11
vkmcEva-i, you are :D :D14:11
flaper87ryansb: FWIW, that was our reasoning when we picked 20414:11
ryansbflaper87: venkat_ so I don't think there's enough of an improvement in switching from 204 to 20214:12
flaper87I don't think it's bad14:12
ryansbboth semantics are valid for the use case IMO, so it's not worth the API change14:12
ryansbstability++14:12
* flaper87 throws a stable party14:12
vkmceverything is a good reason to throw a party14:13
vkmcgood thinking flaper8714:13
venkat_hmm14:13
Eva-iflaper87: "import the module"... what do you mean and how it will help to find error?14:14
*** khushbu_ has quit IRC14:14
ryansbEva-i: import the python file containing the test14:14
ryansbso you can see if/why it fails14:14
flaper87Eva-i: import zaqar.tests.unit.storage.test_impl_mongodb14:15
Eva-iflaper87: ryansb: alright14:15
venkat_flaper, ryansb.. we used 409 for existing items to rename using create calls in squid etc14:16
*** csoukup has joined #openstack-zaqar14:16
Eva-iflaper87: ryansb: hmm... no errors http://paste.openstack.org/show/3gUlp1h1sQEIHt1FbMsG/14:16
flaper87Eva-i: o.014:17
flaper87Eva-i: Python 2.7.6 (default, Jun 22 2015, 17:58:13)14:17
flaper87:P14:17
Eva-iaw wait14:17
Eva-iyes, my bad14:17
flaper87you gotta import it w/ py3414:17
* flaper87 gives Eva-i a gummy bear14:17
Eva-ihere, now with python 3.4 http://paste.openstack.org/show/lZuSmPJKQpP1hqvP6DbQ/14:19
Eva-ithe error14:19
flaper87Eva-i: ah, you'll have to create a virtual environment for py34 for this to work14:20
flaper87you can use tox's14:20
flaper87source .tox/py34/bin/activate14:20
ryansbor source .tox/py34/bin/activate14:20
ryansbbah, too slow14:21
flaper87ryansb: BAM!14:21
flaper87:P14:21
Eva-iusing tox 34 environment: http://paste.openstack.org/show/vAJWQ8Tw0us7CVGumGIs/14:23
ryansbou need to 'import zaqar.tests.unit.storage.test_impl_mongodb'14:23
ryansb*you14:23
Eva-iryansb: yes, sorry14:24
Eva-iryansb: flaper87: now imported without errors14:24
venkat_flaper, I am seeing "201 Created" for existing flavor names. Why zaqar not responding with 204 (as expected) ?14:29
venkat_Is this a bug here ? if it is then we need to fix it.14:31
vkmcvenkat_, there is a bug yeah, mdnadeem is working on that14:31
*** njohnston is now known as nate_gone14:32
*** vkmc is now known as vkmc-afk14:34
*** nate_gone is now known as njohnston14:34
Eva-iryansb: flaper87: should I create a bug report for this strange behavior?14:39
ryansbprobably14:39
therveEva-i, What's happening? We're not running all the tests in tox for 3.4?14:50
Eva-itherve: yes14:50
therveEva-i, That's to be expected, we don't expose the same env variables14:50
therveEva-i, try http://paste.openstack.org/show/477027/14:51
*** malini1 has joined #openstack-zaqar14:55
*** malini has quit IRC14:57
Eva-itherve: yes, now it works14:58
Eva-itherve: why not expose same env variables?14:59
therveEva-i, We forgot I presume15:01
Eva-itherve: okay, so I'm reporting a bug15:03
*** mpanetta has quit IRC15:07
*** dynarro has joined #openstack-zaqar15:12
*** mpanetta has joined #openstack-zaqar15:18
Eva-iplease confirm the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zaqar/+bug/150851915:27
openstackLaunchpad bug 1508519 in zaqar "Some tests are not performed under py34 environment" [Undecided,New]15:27
*** venkat_ has quit IRC15:29
Eva-itherve: I'd be glad to propose a change, if you don't mind of course, since it was your solution15:32
therveEva-i, Please do!15:32
Eva-itherve: okay! =)15:33
*** JAHoagie has joined #openstack-zaqar15:42
*** vkmc-afk is now known as vkmc16:01
*** vkmc has quit IRC16:01
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-zaqar16:01
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-zaqar16:05
*** Qiming has quit IRC16:11
exploreshaifalivkmc, what exactly I am suppose to present in Zaqar UI session?16:11
exploreshaifalifirst its current status16:12
exploreshaifalithen future plan?16:12
exploreshaifalianyting else?16:12
vkmcexploreshaifali, exactly yes16:12
*** inteq has quit IRC16:12
vkmcexploreshaifali, the design sessions are for other devs to give feedback about a  certain topic that will be tackled in the following cycle16:13
vkmcso... you can say that currently zaqar has no UI16:13
vkmcand the plans for the next cycle would be to implement it16:13
vkmcstarting by... say, UI for queues and messages16:13
vkmcand also for pools16:13
vkmchow the UI is going to look like and why16:13
exploreshaifaliok!16:13
exploreshaifaliThanks :)16:13
vkmcwhen other endpoints are going to be added16:13
vkmcetc16:14
vkmcnp16:14
exploreshaifalicooool!16:14
exploreshaifali:D16:14
vkmcexploreshaifali, if you want prepare some slides or some schedule in an etherpad16:16
vkmcand I can help you review16:16
akanksha_Hey, vkmc. Can I talk to you about the alternative projects?  Remember we had been discussing about Zaqar UI. Last round it was also proposed as a project if I remember correctly. Is this a good time to discuss it?16:16
exploreshaifaliAwesome! vkmc I will ping you once I complete that part :)16:17
exploreshaifaliakanksha_, umm... I am not sure if Zaqar-UI is proposed as project idea for Outreachy but main problem will be if Mentor for this project is availabe or not16:18
akanksha_exploreshaifali : I know its not.16:22
akanksha_But I was hoping it might be.16:22
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs16:22
exploreshaifaliakanksha_, for zaqar ui someone from horizon can mentor16:25
exploreshaifalibut again we are not sure if someone is wiling to16:25
akanksha_Hmm, are you going to be working on it?16:27
akanksha_Like maybe in the future?16:27
*** dynarro has quit IRC16:27
akanksha_I'd like to help out. Outreachy/No Outreachy :P16:27
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar16:28
exploreshaifaliakanksha_, sure sure sure16:28
exploreshaifaliThank you so much16:28
exploreshaifaliI am preparing whole plan for it16:28
exploreshaifaliby that time you can read https://github.com/openstack/designate-dashboard/blob/master/README.rst16:28
exploreshaifaliwe will need to do something similar16:29
akanksha_Yeah I saw. Thats why I thought I would ask :) Lemme look!16:29
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk16:32
*** c_soukup has joined #openstack-zaqar16:34
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC16:38
*** csoukup has quit IRC16:38
*** mpanetta has quit IRC16:46
*** mpanetta has joined #openstack-zaqar16:49
*** zigo_ has quit IRC16:59
*** zigo has joined #openstack-zaqar17:00
*** malini1 has quit IRC17:05
*** malini has joined #openstack-zaqar17:27
*** njohnston is now known as nate_gone17:34
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-zaqar17:40
*** nate_gone is now known as njohnston17:45
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC17:53
*** mpanetta has quit IRC18:19
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-zaqar18:31
*** mpanetta has joined #openstack-zaqar18:39
*** achanda has quit IRC19:16
*** fifieldt_ has joined #openstack-zaqar19:26
*** fifieldt has quit IRC19:29
*** malini has quit IRC19:44
*** JAHoagie has quit IRC19:59
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-zaqar20:08
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus20:08
*** JAHoagie has joined #openstack-zaqar20:09
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar20:16
*** achanda has quit IRC20:22
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs20:24
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk20:37
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar20:42
*** achanda has quit IRC20:46
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs20:47
*** achanda has joined #openstack-zaqar20:57
*** achanda has quit IRC21:10
*** sriram has quit IRC21:32
*** JAHoagie has quit IRC21:35
*** JAHoagie has joined #openstack-zaqar21:40
*** mpanetta has quit IRC22:00
*** c_soukup has quit IRC22:09
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk22:23
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs22:26
*** ametts has quit IRC22:31
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk22:44
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs22:45
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk23:35
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC23:38
*** Qiming has joined #openstack-zaqar23:39
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs23:41
« Tuesday, 2015-10-20 Index Thursday, 2015-10-22 »

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!