Tuesday, 2023-10-10

* fungi is around14:01
spotz[m]Sorry got tied up outside let's get started14:03
spotz[m]#startmeeting diversity_wg14:03
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue Oct 10 14:03:59 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is spotz[m]. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:04
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:04
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'diversity_wg'14:04
spotz[m]#chair fungi14:04
opendevmeetCurrent chairs: fungi spotz[m]14:04
spotz[m]Ok we discussed yesterday just working on the wiki and website. At the PTG the topic I was going to bring up is the leadership shadowing14:04
spotz[m]How did you want to go ahead with that here?14:05
fungioh, sure14:07
fungiwe could skim the wiki page and make some quick notes in the meeting log as to what needs updating with the content there14:08
fungiin preparation for copying that content to a more permanent page on openinfra.dev14:08
fungiso basically we only want content that is accurate and doesn't change often14:09
fungi#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Diversity existing wiki page14:09
fungiprobably the charter can go straight over14:10
fungimailing list signup link that's there will end up being a redirect in a couple of days, so we should probably use the updated one14:10
fungimentioning meetings should probably become a link to https://meetings.opendev.org/#Diversity_Working_Group_Meeting14:11
fungithat way if we change times or anything, we won't need to update the openinfra.dev page14:11
fungiand of course add a prominent link to the diversity survey14:13
fungireviewing the charter text, it is slightly dated, for example "The working group will collaborate with the TC, User committee..."14:14
spotz[m]Yeah to be honest that's the only place I ever update it, not sure how old the meeting time on the wiki is:)14:14
fungialso "The programs recommended by this working group will apply to the Board, OpenStack Foundation, Technical Committee, PTLs, Developers and the entire OpenStack Community."14:14
spotz[m]Do we want to do this with Info? Or just type it? I know I found a typo already:)14:15
fungiis this charter a formal document that the board needs to approve changes to the wording of?14:15
fungii can review the meeting log after the fact and make updates to the wiki page in preparation, when we're ready for that to happen14:15
funginot sure #info tags for every little detail is warranted14:16
spotz[m]I don't think so, we can definitely fix organizer and organiser just so they match:) But we do need to update with a note the foundation name change14:16
fungiright, also updating for the wg's broader remit beyond just the openstack project14:16
spotz[m]Other than the name change and note the charter is the same14:17
spotz[m]Yeah good call hadn't gotten that far yet14:17
spotz[m]Let me make a quick ether[ad that might be the best way14:17
fungioh, yep we can do it that way14:18
spotz[m]https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/diwgwikirevamp14:19
spotz[m]I cut and pasted the whole page over:)14:19
fungithat works14:20
spotz[m]Only bad part is everything I'm changing is the same color as the cut and paste. I'm going to bold them so you can find them14:21
fungiyou can clear the authorship colors before you start editing14:21
fungior selectively clear the color on the parts you haven't edited14:21
fungii've cleaned up everything we noted besides the charter text14:24
fungiand i added a section for the diversity survey but it needs a bit of prose, i just added the url so we don't forget what it is14:26
spotz[m]I just worked on the charter give it a read14:27
fungithanks, reviewing14:27
fungido we need to say "the OpenStack(now Open Infrastructure) Foundation" or can it just be "Open Infrastructure Foundation" instead?14:28
fungithe sentence is in present tense, so the past name is probably irrelevant14:29
spotz[m]I didn't know if we wanted to keep the OpenStack for historical reasons14:29
fungimy feeling is that we should adjust the charter to say what we think it should say, and then find out if the board needs to approve the update in which case we can make a redlined version showing what the edits were (easy to do from the diff in the wiki revision history)14:30
spotz[m]It's alittle early to ping Julia to ask14:31
fungii wonder about "will apply to the Board, Open Infrastructure Foundation, Project Leadership, Developers, and all members of the OpenInfra Project Communities"14:32
fungiin particular, "Open Infrastructure Foundation" already covers some of those14:33
fungilike, if it applies to the foundation as a whole (that is, the entirety of the foundation's membership) then that includes the board of directors14:33
spotz[m]It used to say technical committee and PTLs so tried to make it more general 14:33
spotz[m]Foundation being mentioned was there just OpenStack14:33
fungimaybe something more like "will apply to the board of directors, foundation members, project leaders, contributors, and their associated communities"?14:35
spotz[m]Oh much better!!!!14:36
fungicould probably even drop the "will" as the recommended programs already do apply14:36
fungiwe could drop "will" from a lot of places to keep it in the present tense14:36
fungii think the original charter was written from the perspective of forming a not-yet-existent wg14:37
funginow that it exists, we do these things, we don't merely plan to do them in the future14:37
spotz[m]Ok14:38
fungii did a pass over the middle two paragraphs to switch them to present tense14:42
fungimy best guess is that, as this is a board chartered wg, the charter comes from the board and so they'll need to vote on the changes in wording for it, but maybe that can get on the agenda for the november meeting14:44
spotz[m]Ok and I put in your rewording14:44
fungifor the meeting, maybe we should generalize the prose there some more? problem with listing any details around scheduling in the content is that we need to update it in two places (and getting updates done to the foundation website will usually be slow and easily forgotten)14:47
spotz[m]I think we did pretty good:)14:47
fungii agree!14:48
spotz[m]Ok I added some stuff for the survey. I put in about the tools as I didn't want folks to think any issues were CoC type things14:52
spotz[m]Or had to be CoC type things14:52
fungithanks!14:56
fungii've got to get ready to switch to a conference call, but this was an excellent use of our time, i think14:57
spotz[m]I totally agree, enjoy your call I have an hour until my next meeting14:58
fungiwe need a followup task to check with our esteemed board chair on what process is needed around updating the charter with our proposed wording, i guess?14:58
spotz[m]I can check with her within the hour:)14:58
fungi(specifically whether it needs to be brought to the board for a vote)14:58
fungithanks!!!14:58
fungienjoy your meetingless hour14:59
spotz[m]#endmeeting15:00
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue Oct 10 15:00:19 2023 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:00
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/diversity_wg/2023/diversity_wg.2023-10-10-14.03.html15:00
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/diversity_wg/2023/diversity_wg.2023-10-10-14.03.txt15:00
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/diversity_wg/2023/diversity_wg.2023-10-10-14.03.log.html15:00
spotz[m]I'll let you know what she comes back with15:00
fungiexcellent15:01
spotz[m]She thinks at the least we should present it next meeting and see what lawyers say:)15:08
fungik15:27
fungisounds good15:28
spotz[m]fungi should I send the redlined version or a a cleaned up one?16:34
fungispotz[m]: i would ask TheJulia for her preference16:35
* TheJulia appears in a transporter halo and steps off the transporter pad16:36
TheJuliaThat is a tough one... redline folks will just look for the diff, the whole is likely more meaningful16:37
TheJuliaso maybe "why not both?"16:37
spotz[m]Ok I'll cut and paste them both in the email. I'll put the cleaner copy on top16:40
TheJulia++16:40
spotz[m]TheJulia: what are your thoughts on just updating the name to Open Infrastructure or this  the Board of Directors of the OpenStack(now Open Infrastructure) Foundation (“Board”) 16:41
TheJuliaWe're using a DBA, so OpenInfra Foundation would be ideal and we can kind of move past the original name16:42
spotz[m]Ok 16:42
spotz[m]It's not red but strike through but good enough:)16:50
TheJulia:)16:57
fungispotz[m]: in the edited version sent to the board ml, a "will" that was crossed out on the etherpad ended up in your version. probably not a big deal if we clean that up later?17:07
spotz[m]I would think not:)17:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!