| jrosser | good morning | 08:34 |
|---|---|---|
| noonedeadpunk | o/ | 08:40 |
| noonedeadpunk | octavia looks waaaay better now btw: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia/+/868462 | 08:41 |
| noonedeadpunk | but taking a while.... | 08:42 |
| jrosser | yeah, i did wonder if we needed to backport the tempest concurrency patch for the upgrade jobs | 08:43 |
| jrosser | but somehow we don't collect /etc for upgrade jobs so it's not possible to see how it ends up in the config file | 08:43 |
| noonedeadpunk | /root/workplace/etc you meant I guess... | 08:49 |
| noonedeadpunk | but yes | 08:49 |
| noonedeadpunk | might be | 08:49 |
| jrosser | well i was looking for the user_variables and things in here https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/efa2b66d6d0f453e928c2b1d6fe11d88/logs | 08:54 |
| jrosser | i'm sure we looked at this before tbh | 08:54 |
| noonedeadpunk | ah! | 08:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | ok, yes | 08:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | true | 08:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | btw. folks discovered today, that after upgrade to 22.04 haproxy does not log to journalctl anymore | 08:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | with `[ALERT] (2432049) : sendmsg()/writev() failed in logger #1: Permission denied (errno=13)` | 08:59 |
| andrewbonney | Where are you getting that message? We seem to have journal logging working fine | 09:00 |
| jrosser | yeah i just looked at ours and it's right there in the journal ok | 09:00 |
| noonedeadpunk | chown haproxy:haproxy /var/lib/haproxy/dev/log fixes it | 09:03 |
| noonedeadpunk | somehow, it was root:root for me.... | 09:03 |
| jrosser | ours is `srw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 Jan 31 13:24 /var/lib/haproxy/dev/log` | 09:03 |
| noonedeadpunk | mine srwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Feb 8 15:59 /var/lib/haproxy/dev/log | 09:04 |
| noonedeadpunk | huh | 09:04 |
| jrosser | unrelatedly rsyslog journal is just tons of error messages on this haproxy box | 09:07 |
| jrosser | ` action 'action-3-builtin:omfile' suspended (module 'builtin:omfile'), retry 0. There should be messages before this one giving the reason for suspension. [v8.2112.0 try https://www.rsyslog.com/e/2007 ]` | 09:08 |
| jrosser | `action 'action-3-builtin:omfile' resumed (module 'builtin:omfile') [v8.2112.0 try https://www.rsyslog.com/e/2359 ]` | 09:08 |
| noonedeadpunk | huh, and chmod +w doesn't work... | 09:10 |
| jrosser | thats a chroot isnt it | 09:17 |
| jrosser | i wonder what creates that file, and if this is all perhaps umask related or something | 09:17 |
| jrosser | because there is likley some stuff done by haproxy when it starts as root (like enter the chroot and setup $stuff) then it drops priviledges and continues as haproxy user | 09:18 |
| noonedeadpunk | systemctl stop systemd-journald-dev-log.socket; rm /run/systemd/journal/dev-log; systemctl start systemctl stop systemd-journald-dev-log.socket does the trick and socket created with proper permissions | 09:18 |
| noonedeadpunk | So it's smth that messes up in our system with perms.... | 09:18 |
| *** tosky_ is now known as tosky | 09:48 | |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Replace voting jobs with Rocky Linux https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/908892 | 10:54 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Add VPNaaS OVN support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/908341 | 10:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Add role for provisioning default variables for install methods https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/908179 | 11:29 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari stable/2023.2: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari/+/903073 | 11:57 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila stable/2023.2: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/903072 | 11:57 |
| jrosser | noonedeadpunk: there are now two cirros versions we setup after this patch https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/commit/f25f81ebd1fd43e5c797bcda6845026bf209c346 | 12:05 |
| jrosser | how does tempest choose which to use? | 12:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | ah...... | 12:07 |
| noonedeadpunk | so, one should be set for alternate image | 12:08 |
| noonedeadpunk | https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/src/branch/master/templates/tempest.conf.j2#L75-L76 | 12:08 |
| noonedeadpunk | and we set it like this: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/src/branch/master/tasks/tempest_resources.yml#L247-L249 | 12:09 |
| jrosser | yeah i just saw | 12:09 |
| noonedeadpunk | I guess we used same image to save some time.... | 12:09 |
| jrosser | having to rely on the ordering in the response there | 12:09 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah, I don't like that much, but it's used to be like that for a while now... | 12:10 |
| noonedeadpunk | oh | 12:10 |
| noonedeadpunk | I probably missed that order can be different from time to time.... | 12:10 |
| noonedeadpunk | Doesn't make difference for CI, but otherwise... | 12:11 |
| jrosser | it was in my mind that perhaps some test failures are due to using one or the other image | 12:11 |
| noonedeadpunk | it actually can be.... | 12:11 |
| noonedeadpunk | as I do recall some issues related to cirros 0.6 | 12:12 |
| jrosser | i updated the capi patch etherpad a bit https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/osa-capi | 12:23 |
| jrosser | there are some small things that are easy to review | 12:24 |
| jrosser | final outstanding thing is to not run the tempest role and create the public network somewhere else | 12:24 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/2023.2: Always distribute qemu config file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/908265 | 13:32 |
| *** Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000 | 13:42 | |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add Octavia OVN provider to required repos https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/908292 | 14:04 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove galera_client from required projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/908324 | 14:04 |
| noonedeadpunk | Ok | 14:07 |
| noonedeadpunk | I guess it's time to fight some bugs?:) | 14:07 |
| mgariepy | sure but your doodle said in an hour :P | 14:12 |
| noonedeadpunk | oh, lol, ok | 14:15 |
| mgariepy | haha :) | 14:16 |
| noonedeadpunk | yes, right, in an hour | 14:16 |
| noonedeadpunk | Then will go and grab some lunch :D | 14:16 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client master: Don't load systemd parent service for object cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client/+/908782 | 14:28 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client stable/2023.2: Don't load systemd parent service for object cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client/+/908809 | 14:29 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client stable/2023.1: Don't load systemd parent service for object cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client/+/908810 | 14:29 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Fix nova device_spec to support multiple values https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/907969 | 14:37 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/2023.2: Fix nova device_spec to support multiple values https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/908811 | 14:47 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/2023.1: Fix nova device_spec to support multiple values https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/908812 | 14:47 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd master: Use OriginalName instead of Name in systemd.link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/907527 | 14:54 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd stable/2023.2: Use OriginalName instead of Name in systemd.link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/908813 | 14:57 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd stable/2023.1: Use OriginalName instead of Name in systemd.link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/908814 | 14:57 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd stable/zed: Use OriginalName instead of Name in systemd.link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/908815 | 14:58 |
| noonedeadpunk | #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting | 15:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Feb 13 15:01:31 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:01 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:01 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' | 15:01 |
| mgariepy | hey ! | 15:01 |
| jrosser | o/ hello | 15:01 |
| damiandabrowski | hi! | 15:01 |
| noonedeadpunk | Well, since our bug fighting day co-located with our regular meeting - let's combine these 2 things I guess? | 15:01 |
| noonedeadpunk | But before that we have 1 thing to discuss I guess | 15:02 |
| noonedeadpunk | As you might seen, unmaintained/yoga branch was created as part of the new process by TC | 15:02 |
| NeilHanlon | o/ | 15:03 |
| noonedeadpunk | right now kinda nobody have permissions there | 15:03 |
| noonedeadpunk | So idea by TC was that unmaintained branches are "maintained" by separate group of individuals if they want to | 15:03 |
| noonedeadpunk | But probably it makes sense to add just osa-core group to osa-unmaintained-cores? | 15:04 |
| NeilHanlon | that makes sense to me | 15:05 |
| NeilHanlon | if the time comes that we have people really wanting to take care of those and we (current cores) don't want to, we can reevaluate ;) | 15:05 |
| mgariepy | to me as well. | 15:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | Why it was not done by default, is because some teams feel too accountable and resopnsible when they're assigned somewhere as cores | 15:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | so if we don't have cultural issues for being "responsible" for unmaintained/* I will propose to combine these 2 for now | 15:06 |
| noonedeadpunk | ok | 15:06 |
| jrosser | sounds ok | 15:06 |
| damiandabrowski | +1 | 15:06 |
| noonedeadpunk | #agreed to assign current cores to unmaintained cores | 15:07 |
| noonedeadpunk | ok, great | 15:07 |
| noonedeadpunk | does anybody want to raise smth before bug triage starts? | 15:07 |
| noonedeadpunk | (except that it's time to tag 28.1.0) | 15:08 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Add role to do common setup tasks for lxc containers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/900529 | 15:08 |
| noonedeadpunk | #topic bug triage | 15:09 |
| noonedeadpunk | So, I guess we might want to go through bugs based on their last update date | 15:09 |
| noonedeadpunk | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bugs?orderby=-date_last_updated&start=0 | 15:09 |
| noonedeadpunk | And probably we can split between pages and then beginning/end of the page? | 15:10 |
| NeilHanlon | sounds good | 15:10 |
| mgariepy | there are a lot of them :) haha | 15:11 |
| noonedeadpunk | Yeah, but we potentially can start from older ones, saying pre-2020 | 15:11 |
| noonedeadpunk | or starting 2020 | 15:12 |
| noonedeadpunk | There's extreme chance to just close them with Fix released | 15:12 |
| noonedeadpunk | or Won't fix because it's about smth we've re-worked havily lately | 15:12 |
| noonedeadpunk | If not sure about anything - just throw link here and let's have short discussion | 15:13 |
| noonedeadpunk | or.. we can have an etherpad | 15:13 |
| noonedeadpunk | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/osa-feb-2024-bug-triage | 15:13 |
| noonedeadpunk | so we can organize/record better | 15:14 |
| noonedeadpunk | the ones we're not sure about | 15:15 |
| jrosser | so things that are obviously out of date we can just deal with without discussing? or shall we record everything there? | 15:15 |
| noonedeadpunk | no-no, jsut record what we are unsure about | 15:16 |
| noonedeadpunk | as old =! invalid in some cases | 15:16 |
| noonedeadpunk | Like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_networkd/+/908815 was good example of 5yo buld... | 15:16 |
| noonedeadpunk | *bug | 15:16 |
| noonedeadpunk | no need to record everything | 15:17 |
| mgariepy | some have patches but lp wasn't updated to fix released. | 15:17 |
| noonedeadpunk | yup | 15:17 |
| noonedeadpunk | plenty of Rocky issues actually | 15:21 |
| noonedeadpunk | just for the record - we've started with 265 bugs | 15:22 |
| damiandabrowski | how can we avoid verifying same bug report multiple times? | 15:33 |
| damiandabrowski | for ex. person A looks at a bug report and decides that there's no update required. | 15:33 |
| noonedeadpunk | Let's split efforts by pages? | 15:34 |
| damiandabrowski | how to avoid person B spending time on this bug report? | 15:34 |
| * noonedeadpunk trying to find away to configure bugs per page | 15:34 | |
| noonedeadpunk | but there're 4 pages... | 15:35 |
| noonedeadpunk | So you can say - working on page # from beggining/end | 15:35 |
| damiandabrowski | but pages are dynamic :D if you mark few bugs with "fix released" and refresh page, you'll get different output | 15:36 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah.... | 15:37 |
| noonedeadpunk | I know. | 15:37 |
| noonedeadpunk | I don't have good answer unfortunatelly. | 15:40 |
| noonedeadpunk | So if you have an idea it's always welcome | 15:41 |
| damiandabrowski | no, i also don't see any good solution :/ | 15:44 |
| damiandabrowski | i'll start from the top of this page: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bugs?orderby=-importance&memo=75&start=75 | 15:44 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic master: Fix a typo in pxe_redfish definition https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic/+/906353 | 15:50 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts master: Place sysctl options to it's own file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/908912 | 15:56 |
| NeilHanlon | bit distracted fixing some networking things here, but should be able to help out more in a few minutes | 15:58 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove tempest concurrency exception for Octavia AIO https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/908831 | 16:03 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Fix formatting issue for SPICE HAProxy httpcheck https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/908746 | 16:28 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova stable/2023.1: Always distribute qemu config file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/908266 | 16:29 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/2023.2: Fix formatting issue for SPICE HAProxy httpcheck https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/908922 | 16:30 |
| mgariepy | back to deprecated.. https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/commit/a9d1ec844d24fcc3ddea7c030eff4cd6c414d23d | 17:19 |
| jrosser | do we need to end the meeting? | 17:40 |
| noonedeadpunk | oh, yes | 17:42 |
| noonedeadpunk | #endmeeting | 17:42 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Feb 13 17:42:52 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 17:42 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2024/openstack_ansible_meeting.2024-02-13-15.01.html | 17:42 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2024/openstack_ansible_meeting.2024-02-13-15.01.txt | 17:42 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2024/openstack_ansible_meeting.2024-02-13-15.01.log.html | 17:42 |
| jrosser | well i mainly did weeding out invalid / ancient / already fixed bugs | 17:44 |
| jrosser | and we are down to 174 now | 17:45 |
| mgariepy | that's a good progress i think. | 17:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | We closed almost 100 of that | 17:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | *them | 17:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | which is really great | 17:45 |
| noonedeadpunk | but quite some actions points in etherpad | 17:46 |
| noonedeadpunk | One of most tought questions is what to do with ceph-ansible though | 17:46 |
| noonedeadpunk | Like we've talked about forking/simplifying it one day... | 17:46 |
| noonedeadpunk | But no idea if there're still audience for that | 17:46 |
| mgariepy | i think ppl will notice when they will check for an upgrade. | 17:48 |
| mgariepy | i didn't saw it before today .. | 17:48 |
| mgariepy | lunch time for me | 17:48 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah, we raised it couple of times.... | 17:48 |
| noonedeadpunk | I think Jonathan spotted first | 17:49 |
| jrosser | we already had a fork anyway as getting things merged upstream was pretty tough https://github.com/bbc/ceph-ansible/commits/main/ | 17:50 |
| noonedeadpunk | are you planning to accept PRs if anything?:) | 17:51 |
| jrosser | why not :) | 17:51 |
| noonedeadpunk | damiandabrowski: your thoughts as active ceph-ansible user? | 17:52 |
| jrosser | but we really dont look at the testing or anything, thats another matter | 17:52 |
| jrosser | fork != maintainer | 17:53 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah | 17:53 |
| noonedeadpunk | as CI is likely quite heavy | 17:54 |
| damiandabrowski | i'm not sure what to think about it yet :/ i need more time | 17:54 |
| spatel | I am having strange issue, after reboot nova-* service nova-novncproxy stopped working.. :( | 18:02 |
| spatel | console not showing anything.. | 18:02 |
| spatel | nothing changed so far | 18:02 |
| noonedeadpunk | could be that certificate has changed if novnc is using tls? | 18:02 |
| spatel | I am not running anything in TLS | 18:03 |
| spatel | all simple http | 18:03 |
| spatel | logs also not telling anything | 18:03 |
| spatel | what ports nova-novnc use ? | 18:04 |
| spatel | what ports nova-novnc use on compute nodes so I can run tcpdump | 18:04 |
| noonedeadpunk | um, so on computes it's a range of ports, you can get vnc port/address from virsh dumpxml for instance | 18:05 |
| spatel | INFO nova.console.websocketproxy [None req-b4721407-b6e4-4072-adb6-01a7c8f2becb - - - - - -] handler exception: Origin header protocol does not match this host. | 18:05 |
| spatel | <graphics type='vnc' port='5920' autoport='yes' listen='192.168.8.18'> | 18:07 |
| noonedeadpunk | basically you should be able to connect with any VNC client given you have network access :) | 18:08 |
| spatel | I need token or auth right? | 18:08 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove unused variable https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/908778 | 18:09 |
| spatel | I did virsh console <instance> and it showing console but my vnc crap not working | 18:10 |
| spatel | all I am getting this error - https://paste.opendev.org/show/bckMBQazDPx9wq0h7J2p/ | 18:11 |
| spatel | Not sure its error or not :) | 18:11 |
| noonedeadpunk | and the compute is up in compute service list? | 18:13 |
| noonedeadpunk | and you're running Antelope? | 18:13 |
| spatel | Yes everything up and running I am on 2023.1 release | 18:14 |
| spatel | I can able to create new vms and everything looks green | 18:14 |
| noonedeadpunk | `Origin header protocol does not match this host.` is kinda weird... | 18:14 |
| noonedeadpunk | spatel: question - have you tried to live migrate VM? | 18:14 |
| spatel | Yes I did | 18:15 |
| spatel | But only 2 vms not all | 18:15 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah, just 1 would be enough to confirm | 18:15 |
| spatel | I am having issue with all 100 vms | 18:15 |
| noonedeadpunk | as in case of change of auth scheme instance migration might be needed to recover console | 18:15 |
| spatel | what is the relation with live-migrate and vnc ? | 18:16 |
| noonedeadpunk | and did console worked after migration? | 18:16 |
| noonedeadpunk | https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/src/branch/master/defaults/main.yml#L334-L339 | 18:16 |
| spatel | everything was working 2 hour ago.. | 18:16 |
| spatel | I made cpu_allocation_ration and restart all compute service and boom console stopped working :( | 18:16 |
| noonedeadpunk | so you've explicitly disabled `nova_qemu_vnc_tls`? | 18:17 |
| spatel | I am running kolla not osa :) | 18:18 |
| spatel | https://paste.opendev.org/show/bTiIvDwQ60KpwhWZ5vlR/ | 18:18 |
| noonedeadpunk | ah, well | 18:18 |
| spatel | I hate TLS so always keep disable | 18:19 |
| noonedeadpunk | I guess it's wrong channel then lol | 18:19 |
| spatel | lol.. but this is not deployment issue.. thought if you guys know about any bug or something else | 18:20 |
| noonedeadpunk | we had that behaviour only once - when were enabling TLS for VNC | 18:20 |
| noonedeadpunk | never happened otherwise | 18:20 |
| spatel | what is the way to debug this crap :( | 18:21 |
| noonedeadpunk | and then yes -restarting nova-compute would break instance console until you migrate it out | 18:21 |
| noonedeadpunk | and after live migration console was revived | 18:21 |
| spatel | But I just live-migrate single vm not 100s :) | 18:23 |
| spatel | just single vm can create entire cloud VNC? | 18:23 |
| noonedeadpunk | and console worked after migration for it? | 18:23 |
| spatel | before live migrate everything work working..( Its hard to know this happened because of live migrate or I made change in nova for cpu overcommit and restart services) | 18:24 |
| spatel | I don't know what event cause this issue.. | 18:24 |
| spatel | I have restarted all the service again but same issue | 18:24 |
| spatel | let me google handler exception: Origin header protocol does not match this host and understand error | 18:25 |
| mgariepy | hmm wtf ?https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/draft/ | 19:14 |
| NeilHanlon | lol wat | 19:15 |
| mgariepy | really not sure where that page points to haha | 19:18 |
| noonedeadpunk | whaaaaat | 19:55 |
| noonedeadpunk | yeah, that's really very weird. | 19:56 |
| noonedeadpunk | I assume, this can be actually somewhere on openstack-manuals | 19:57 |
| noonedeadpunk | ie there's some redirect for ironic: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-manuals/src/branch/master/www/.htaccess#L275 | 19:59 |
| noonedeadpunk | and... it;'s totally in a sitemap | 20:00 |
| noonedeadpunk | https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-manuals/src/branch/master/www/static/sitemap.xml#L266307 | 20:00 |
| mgariepy | digging old bugs makes us discover stuff. | 20:04 |
| noonedeadpunk | yup | 20:04 |
| mgariepy | documentation is always out of sync. | 20:04 |
| noonedeadpunk | sometimes I'd rather not know about it... But it's great eventually | 20:04 |
| noonedeadpunk | Yeah, but docs is not everything that has been discovered I guess | 20:05 |
| noonedeadpunk | but yeah, huge chunk | 20:05 |
| mgariepy | yep | 20:05 |
| mgariepy | https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1803347 | 20:08 |
| mgariepy | lol | 20:08 |
| noonedeadpunk | lol | 20:09 |
| noonedeadpunk | I do recall how it was created | 20:09 |
| noonedeadpunk | IIRC it was made during PTG | 20:09 |
| noonedeadpunk | Likely - Berlin 2018 | 20:09 |
| mgariepy | i'll close it. | 20:09 |
| mgariepy | unless you tell me not to close it haha | 20:10 |
| noonedeadpunk | I think we kinda fixed it partially | 20:10 |
| noonedeadpunk | Idea there was about br-vxlan and br-storage | 20:10 |
| noonedeadpunk | which are really not needed on computes | 20:10 |
| mgariepy | no ? | 20:11 |
| noonedeadpunk | interfaces are, but not bridges | 20:11 |
| noonedeadpunk | like no sense to have br-vxlan which will be added to ovs bridge? | 20:11 |
| noonedeadpunk | but I think we've already mentioned in couple of places that these can be interfaces, not really bridges... | 20:13 |
| noonedeadpunk | so you probably should feel free to close indeed | 20:13 |
| spatel | noonedeadpunk here is the error and not sure what is wrong :( - https://paste.opendev.org/show/baZjIpTcibpksgajegav/ | 20:15 |
| spatel | I can directly connect VNC server with vnc client from desktop | 20:16 |
| noonedeadpunk | no idea, rly | 20:21 |
| noonedeadpunk | sounds like hostname issue or smth like that | 20:21 |
| jrosser | or the scheme is wrong http vs https compared to what the server things it is doingg | 20:27 |
| jrosser | or even vnc:// vs http(s):// | 20:28 |
| spatel | hmm but everything was working before. This is not something just deployed | 20:48 |
| spatel | I am totally clueless here :( | 20:49 |
| spatel | Damn! problem solved | 21:09 |
| spatel | novncproxy_base_url = | 21:09 |
| spatel | feels like we did change this in past but didn't cook into ansible override | 21:09 |
| spatel | re-run playbook knock them out | 21:09 |
| spatel | after 8 month what a mess | 21:09 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!