| *** jkf has joined #openstack-barbican | 00:08 | |
| *** nkinder has joined #openstack-barbican | 00:09 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 00:11 | |
| *** igueths has joined #openstack-barbican | 00:16 | |
| *** igueths has quit IRC | 00:22 | |
| *** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 00:23 | |
| *** bdpayne has quit IRC | 00:34 | |
| *** alee has joined #openstack-barbican | 00:37 | |
| *** jkf has quit IRC | 00:43 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 00:51 | |
| *** jaosorior has quit IRC | 01:02 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican | 01:04 | |
| *** crc32 has quit IRC | 01:11 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 01:13 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 01:42 | |
| *** kfox1111 has quit IRC | 01:42 | |
| *** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican | 01:48 | |
| openstackgerrit | Steve Heyman proposed openstack/barbican: Let functional tests run with older tempest https://review.openstack.org/161014 | 01:52 |
|---|---|---|
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 01:59 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 02:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | Steve Heyman proposed openstack/barbican: Let functional tests run with older tempest https://review.openstack.org/161014 | 02:17 |
| *** igueths has joined #openstack-barbican | 02:23 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 02:33 | |
| *** kebray has quit IRC | 02:34 | |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 02:37 | |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 02:52 | |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 02:55 | |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 02:56 | |
| *** SheenaG1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 02:56 | |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 02:57 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 03:13 | |
| *** SheenaG1 has quit IRC | 03:23 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 03:29 | |
| *** SheenaG1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 03:30 | |
| *** SheenaG1 has quit IRC | 03:33 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 03:52 | |
| *** SheenaG1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 04:15 | |
| *** SheenaG1 has quit IRC | 04:24 | |
| *** kgriffs|afk has quit IRC | 04:28 | |
| *** kgriffs|afk has joined #openstack-barbican | 04:37 | |
| *** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 04:37 | |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 04:44 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 04:46 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-barbican | 04:52 | |
| *** reaperhulk has quit IRC | 04:54 | |
| *** jillysciarilly has quit IRC | 04:55 | |
| *** reaperhulk has joined #openstack-barbican | 05:04 | |
| *** jillysciarilly has joined #openstack-barbican | 05:04 | |
| *** igueths has quit IRC | 05:27 | |
| *** woodster_ has quit IRC | 05:30 | |
| *** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away | 05:32 | |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-barbican | 05:35 | |
| *** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican | 05:50 | |
| *** kebray has quit IRC | 05:50 | |
| *** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican | 05:53 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/barbican: Imported Translations from Transifex https://review.openstack.org/161105 | 06:07 |
| *** lbragstad has quit IRC | 06:08 | |
| *** lbragstad has joined #openstack-barbican | 06:10 | |
| *** woodster_ has joined #openstack-barbican | 06:10 | |
| *** lbragstad has quit IRC | 06:19 | |
| *** lbragstad has joined #openstack-barbican | 06:22 | |
| *** alee has quit IRC | 06:54 | |
| *** alee has joined #openstack-barbican | 07:07 | |
| *** lbragstad has quit IRC | 07:08 | |
| *** david-lyle_afk has joined #openstack-barbican | 07:33 | |
| *** kebray has quit IRC | 07:37 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 07:49 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-barbican | 07:49 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 08:20 | |
| *** woodster_ has quit IRC | 08:20 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: Zuul check queue stuck due to reboot maintenance window at one of our cloud providers - no need to recheck changes at the moment, they won't move forward. | 08:29 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "Zuul check queue stuck due to reboot maintenance window at one of our cloud providers - no need to recheck changes at the moment, they won't move forward." | 08:29 | |
| *** jaosorior has joined #openstack-barbican | 09:01 | |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:27 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:27 | |
| *** alee has quit IRC | 15:33 | |
| *** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck | 15:34 | |
| *** jorge_munoz has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:37 | |
| *** igueths has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:39 | |
| openstackgerrit | Everardo Padilla Saca proposed openstack/barbican: Add missing python requierements for tests https://review.openstack.org/161279 | 15:51 |
| *** xaeth is now known as xaeth_afk | 15:56 | |
| *** lbragstad has joined #openstack-barbican | 15:56 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/barbican: Let functional tests run with older tempest https://review.openstack.org/161014 | 16:02 |
| *** xaeth_afk is now known as xaeth | 16:05 | |
| *** rellerreller has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
| *** kfox1111 has joined #openstack-barbican | 16:22 | |
| kfox1111 | morning. | 16:22 |
| igueths | kfox1111: Morning. | 16:23 |
| kfox1111 | Anyone else have a chance to look at the vm integration spec? It would be really nice to have more reviewers before Thursday. | 16:27 |
| openstackgerrit | Thomas Dinkjian proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: Adds positive orders functional tests https://review.openstack.org/158454 | 16:27 |
| *** igueths has quit IRC | 16:31 | |
| *** igueths has joined #openstack-barbican | 16:34 | |
| openstackgerrit | Everardo Padilla Saca proposed openstack/barbican: Add missing python requirements for tests https://review.openstack.org/161279 | 16:39 |
| *** igueths has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
| *** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 16:58 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 16:59 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 17:03 | |
| *** atiwari has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | greghaynes proposed openstack/barbican: Create snakeoil certificate plugin https://review.openstack.org/140575 | 17:06 |
| *** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 17:10 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: Issue solved, gate slowly digesting accumulated changes | 17:14 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 17:14 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/barbican: Imported Translations from Transifex https://review.openstack.org/161105 | 17:15 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/barbican: Fixed Binary Encoding to Secret Stores https://review.openstack.org/157410 | 17:19 |
| *** rellerreller has joined #openstack-barbican | 17:25 | |
| *** jkf has joined #openstack-barbican | 17:31 | |
| arunkant | alee, there? | 17:32 |
| woodster_ | hockeynut, is there a functional test that verifies client's can't spoof the X-Project-Id header when Keystone auth is enabled on Barbican? | 17:34 |
| woodster_ | tdink, sorry forgot to add you to above ^^^ | 17:35 |
| woodster_ | hockeynut, tdink, I thought we had a that test in there at one time, but didn't see it in the functional tests | 17:36 |
| *** kfarr has joined #openstack-barbican | 17:37 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican | 17:47 | |
| *** xaeth is now known as xaeth_afk | 17:59 | |
| *** bdpayne has joined #openstack-barbican | 18:08 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 18:27 | |
| *** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 18:45 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
| *** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 18:55 | |
| *** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 18:58 | |
| arunkant | alee, woodster_, question on per secret ACL 1) How container ACL applies to secrets associated with it? Does secrets associated with that container has same ACL as container ACL? If one of container's secret has ACL defined, then how ACL is dervied for that secret? is it union or what ever ACL that secret has? | 19:11 |
| arunkant | 2) Did not find anything in spec, about update of existing ACL on a secret/ container. Is partial ACL update allowed (via PATCH)? | 19:13 |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "Barbican Kilo Mid-Cycle Sprint Feb. 16-18, Austin, TX. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/BarbicanKiloSprint" | 19:15 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-barbican | 19:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/castellan: Updating HACKING.rst https://review.openstack.org/160009 | 19:24 |
| jaosorior | redrobot: ping | 19:25 |
| *** igueths has joined #openstack-barbican | 19:47 | |
| igueths | Hi all. | 19:47 |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 19:47 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 19:48 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 19:51 | |
| openstackgerrit | Juan Antonio Osorio Robles proposed openstack/barbican: Support X-Project-Id coming from the request headers https://review.openstack.org/161377 | 19:51 |
| jaosorior | igueths: hey man | 19:52 |
| *** rm_mobile has joined #openstack-barbican | 19:52 | |
| igueths | jaosorior: How goes it today? | 19:53 |
| jaosorior | igueths: aaah, pretty good man, you? | 19:53 |
| *** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 19:54 | |
| igueths | jaosorior: Not too bad, just writing up a unit test and hoping that nothing is going to complain too loudly about indents with dict value assignment and such, although I'm trying to conform to what's already present...Rather a slow process though. | 19:56 |
| reaperhulk | igueths: the tox job (tox -e pep8) will run flake8+hacking against your code to tell if you if it conforms to the style requirements in the gate | 19:58 |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 19:59 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-barbican | 20:01 | |
| igueths | reaperhulk: Good to know...Thanks! | 20:01 |
| *** igueths has quit IRC | 20:02 | |
| reaperhulk | redrobot: the IRC topic somehow got changed back to the old midcycle topic | 20:02 |
| *** igueths has joined #openstack-barbican | 20:03 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
| *** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 20:06 | |
| elmiko | hey barbicaneers, is it possible to use the barbicanclient with a v2 keystone Session object? | 20:09 |
| elmiko | (just trying to make sure i have all the bases covered) | 20:09 |
| jaosorior | elmiko: yup | 20:09 |
| elmiko | hmm | 20:09 |
| elmiko | jaosorior: when i try to make a session object like the first example here http://docs.openstack.org/developer/python-keystoneclient/using-sessions.html i get errors when making the barbican client | 20:10 |
| jaosorior | mind pasting the errors? | 20:10 |
| elmiko | sure | 20:11 |
| elmiko | hmm, maybe i have a pbkac error. let me try one more time | 20:13 |
| *** igueths has quit IRC | 20:13 | |
| elmiko | jaosorior: http://paste.openstack.org/show/188061/ | 20:14 |
| elmiko | top part is my code, bottom is the error | 20:14 |
| elmiko | fyi, if i use the v3 keystone endpoint and uncomment the domains, it works | 20:15 |
| jaosorior | well | 20:15 |
| jaosorior | you use a v3 plugin | 20:15 |
| jaosorior | with a v2 endpoint | 20:15 |
| elmiko | i thought that was odd too, but i was following the example from the keystoneclient docs. maybe it's an error | 20:15 |
| jaosorior | identity.v3.Password(**passwd_kwargs) -> v3 plugin | 20:16 |
| elmiko | yea | 20:16 |
| jaosorior | yeah | 20:16 |
| jaosorior | looks weird to me | 20:16 |
| jaosorior | :/ have never tried that | 20:16 |
| elmiko | look at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/python-keystoneclient/using-sessions.html | 20:16 |
| jaosorior | yeah, I saw that documentation you sent | 20:16 |
| jaosorior | that's...weird | 20:16 |
| jaosorior | morgainfainberg: are you around? | 20:16 |
| elmiko | i'll give it a quick try with v2 | 20:17 |
| *** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 20:17 | |
| *** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 20:17 | |
| jaosorior | or lbragstad | 20:17 |
| lbragstad | o/ | 20:18 |
| jaosorior | lbragstad: hey man, is the documentation OK? seems that there is a v2.0 endpoint being used in a v3 plugin. as mentioned here: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/python-keystoneclient/using-sessions.html and that causes an error that elmiko posted here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/188061/ so... we are a bit confused | 20:19 |
| elmiko | i think it's a bug in the docs, i was able to make a barbicanclient if i use keystoneclient.auth.identity.v2.Password | 20:20 |
| jaosorior | elmiko: alright | 20:21 |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 20:21 | |
| elmiko | i'll make a bug report | 20:22 |
| elmiko | jaosorior: thanks for the help =) | 20:22 |
| lbragstad | elmiko: jaosorior that does look like the docs are out of date | 20:22 |
| elmiko | lbragstad: thanks, i'll post a bug report | 20:23 |
| lbragstad | elmiko: thanks, I'll pass this along to jamielennox|away | 20:23 |
| jaosorior | lbragstad: thanks man | 20:24 |
| lbragstad | jaosorior: no problem, elmiko feel free to ping me the bug report whenever you have the chance to open it | 20:24 |
| elmiko | lbragstad: will do | 20:25 |
| *** igueths has joined #openstack-barbican | 20:27 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 20:29 | |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-barbican | 20:30 | |
| *** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 20:39 | |
| *** rellerreller has quit IRC | 20:39 | |
| elmiko | lbragstad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+bug/1428309 | 20:43 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1428309 in python-keystoneclient "[DOC] error on "Using Sessions" page in example code" [Undecided,New] | 20:43 |
| lbragstad | elmiko: thank you sir | 20:43 |
| elmiko | lbragstad: glad to help | 20:44 |
| *** rm_mobile has quit IRC | 20:44 | |
| *** kebray has joined #openstack-barbican | 20:46 | |
| *** kebray has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
| openstackgerrit | Igor Gueths proposed openstack/barbican: Ensure that external secret refs cannot be added to containers or otherwise. https://review.openstack.org/161417 | 20:55 |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 20:55 | |
| igueths | Here goes take 1... | 20:56 |
| *** jkf has quit IRC | 20:58 | |
| SheenaG1 | igueths: I thought you were out until tomorrow? | 20:59 |
| igueths | SheenaG1: I'm on a bus back to SA. | 21:01 |
| igueths | SheenaG1: And yeah while that's technically true, I wanted to get this out before I got way too involved with other stuff and ran out of time /again/ | 21:02 |
| SheenaG1 | igueths: ah okay | 21:02 |
| *** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 21:03 | |
| woodster_ | igueths, nice, gotta check it out | 21:06 |
| *** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 21:08 | |
| jaosorior | hahaha igueths, I just read the URL that you set up for testing: http://kegeratorsarecool.com | 21:09 |
| igueths | jaosorior: Lol | 21:09 |
| igueths | In other news, nice blog post I'm currently reading about attacks against old crusty export ciphers http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2015/03/attack-of-week-freak-or-factoring-nsa.html | 21:10 |
| jaosorior | igueths: Though I'm not entirely sure what the value for CONF.host_ref is when running the unit tests | 21:10 |
| jaosorior | igueths: perhaps you should mock the host_ref | 21:12 |
| igueths | jaosorior: When test calling utils.hostname_for_refs it appears to be whatever is configured as the FQDN. | 21:12 |
| jaosorior | for testing purposes | 21:12 |
| woodster_ | arunkant, alee, the per secret idea was intended to be simple for Kilo, so no complex logic between secrets and containers | 21:16 |
| jaosorior | woodster_, arunkant: still waiting for legal to tell me if I'll be able to help there.... | 21:17 |
| jaosorior | how much time is there to implement that? | 21:17 |
| woodster_ | igueths, you can use 'set_override(key, value)' to override configuration for testing...see line #40 as an example: https://github.com/openstack/barbican/blob/master/barbican/tests/database_utils.py#L40 | 21:19 |
| arunkant | woodster_, Okay..so container ACL does not extend to its associated secrets ? Then container ACL seems of very limited benefit. | 21:19 |
| woodster_ | jaosorior do you mean per secret ACL? | 21:19 |
| jaosorior | woodster_: yup | 21:19 |
| woodster_ | arunkant, that's correct, but we were trying to scope down for Kilo. I'll add this to the Liberty etherpad though | 21:20 |
| igueths | jaosorior: I'll look into the mocking thing, although for the record following is the current default: | 21:21 |
| woodster_ | jaosorior, awesome! | 21:21 |
| igueths | igueths@holly:~/rackspace/git/openstack-barbican/barbican/common$ python -i validators.py | 21:21 |
| igueths | >>> print CONF.host_href | 21:21 |
| igueths | http://localhost:9311 | 21:21 |
| igueths | woodster_: Thanks will check it out! | 21:21 |
| jaosorior | woodster_: uh... well, I asked legal if I can help with that blueprint, but I still get no reply, that's why I asked, how much time is there to implement that? | 21:22 |
| arunkant | woodster_, Okay..what about the partial update of ACL . does it need to be supported? | 21:22 |
| woodster_ | igueths, were you able to find tooling to let you see the in-line comments folks put in gerrit reviews? | 21:23 |
| arunkant | woodster_, adding new users in ACL list for a given operation? | 21:23 |
| woodster_ | arunkant, alee: I believe we discussed that a complete update of the white list (a true PUT) would be sufficient for Kilo | 21:25 |
| igueths | woodster_: Haven't gotten a chance to check out the cli stuff yet, although looking at my own CR in the web UI I just might be able to make it work. It's hard to tell because my focus tends to jump all over the place for some reason, although once I'm able to start reading again from top to bottom things are pretty clear at that point. | 21:26 |
| arunkant | woddster_, okay..did not see in spec ..that was trying to confirm..thanks | 21:26 |
| woodster_ | igueths, yeah there is some power javascript foo working on that page. I can't cut/paste into it either which is annoying. | 21:27 |
| woodster_ | arunkant, were you thinking of doing working for that spec too? | 21:27 |
| igueths | woodster_: So what part of my testing were you thinking could benefit from doing the set_override thing? | 21:27 |
| woodster_ | igueths, I was thinking you wanted to set the value of host_ref to a specific value | 21:28 |
| arunkant | woodster_, As discussed with alee last week. Yes I am working on its impl | 21:28 |
| igueths | woodster_: I don't think so in this instance anyway, at present what I'm trying to do is make sure that the validation method will throw exception.SecretRefValidationErrorException if an secret_ref is found that doesn't match the configured value. | 21:30 |
| woodster_ | arunkant, are you also working on the quota support changes? | 21:40 |
| woodster_ | igueths, I gave you your first -1...manly tweaking though, so don't fret! | 21:40 |
| arunkant | woodster, no. Venkat (tsv) is working on it | 21:40 |
| woodster_ | igueths, this is like virtual hazing | 21:41 |
| woodster_ | arunkant, ha, sorry that's right | 21:41 |
| woodster_ | arunkant, too many things going on right now | 21:42 |
| openstackgerrit | John Vrbanac proposed openstack/barbican: Fixing race-condition for order processing in workers https://review.openstack.org/161431 | 21:43 |
| igueths | woodster_: Hahaha ok | 21:43 |
| *** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-barbican | 21:44 | |
| igueths | woodster_: So if I'm reading your comment correctly just refactor the wording a bit? | 21:46 |
| woodster_ | arunkant, jaosorior, good to get traction on the per secret stuff. | 21:46 |
| woodster_ | igueths, yeah I'd prefer that...I didn't want folks to think that was a security vulnerabilty. We are really just wanting to do a thorough validation of the input data. | 21:47 |
| igueths | woodster_: Yeah wasn't trying to get it to read like one.../me will fix that. | 21:48 |
| woodster_ | jaosorior are you looking for something juicy to sink your virtual teeth into? | 21:48 |
| jaosorior | woodster_: what's up? | 21:50 |
| *** lisaclark1 has quit IRC | 21:58 | |
| openstackgerrit | Igor Gueths proposed openstack/barbican: Ensure that external secret refs cannot be added to containers or otherwise. https://review.openstack.org/161417 | 22:00 |
| *** crc32 has joined #openstack-barbican | 22:01 | |
| *** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk | 22:06 | |
| openstackgerrit | Thomas Dinkjian proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: First set of negative secrets tests. https://review.openstack.org/161442 | 22:09 |
| *** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs | 22:12 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
| *** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox | 22:14 | |
| woodster_ | jaosorior, well, we did have this 'high' bp that no one is working on: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/barbican/+spec/data-remove-tenant-secret-assoc | 22:16 |
| jaosorior | woodster_: That sounds like it's refactoring work, so that could actually work out without having to go through the whole process | 22:17 |
| igueths | Hm doesn't seem possible to stream Gerrit comments to a terminal... | 22:18 |
| woodster_ | jaosorior, yep. It would require an alembic file to though :) | 22:19 |
| woodster_ | igueths, so are you able to resolve any of those comments individually at least? | 22:19 |
| jaosorior | woodster_: Usually that stuff is just fine | 22:20 |
| jaosorior | woodster_: Is there a deadline I should take into account? | 22:20 |
| woodster_ | redrobot, would it be ok for jaosorior to get this ^^^ done by the Kilo release? | 22:23 |
| openstackgerrit | Thomas Dinkjian proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: First set of negative secrets tests. https://review.openstack.org/161442 | 22:24 |
| igueths | woodster_: I'm still trying to get to where I can see them. | 22:25 |
| *** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck | 22:26 | |
| woodster_ | igueths, so this view is a flat list of comments per line of code, but that is annoying to go back and forth to code to see the lines affected | 22:27 |
| woodster_ | jaosorior, maybe take a look at the blueprint and see if it is somthing you could finish in the time remaining for Kilo? | 22:28 |
| jaosorior | woodster_: how much time was there? | 22:29 |
| woodster_ | igueths, you might also try to change the 'diff view'...go to 'settings' and then 'preferences'. | 22:29 |
| igueths | woodster_: Ah ok...I'll play around with that and see what I can get. | 22:29 |
| woodster_ | jaosorior, well the feature freeze is the 19th...would that be too little time? | 22:30 |
| jaosorior | woodster_: yeah... specially cause I'll be on vacations next week | 22:31 |
| jaosorior | On Friday I fly to Madrid | 22:32 |
| woodster_ | jaosorior, yeah I'm out next week as well | 22:33 |
| woodster_ | jaosorior, so that leaves you with a couple of days though :) | 22:33 |
| jaosorior | Of nobody have it by then. Then it could happen | 22:34 |
| woodster_ | jaosorior, one approach is to put up a CR that does the refactor work only (no alembic). Then someone else could make a dependent CR to that one that does the alembic stuff? | 22:34 |
| woodster_ | igueths, I tried to copy/paste that page into a gist, but it strips out the comments | 22:36 |
| igueths | Well shit. | 22:36 |
| jaosorior | Would also be nice if pepper could review this today https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157068/ that way I could do the client and documentation CRs tomorrow | 22:37 |
| igueths | Going to play around with the keyboard shortcuts...Maybe there's something there I can use. | 22:37 |
| woodster_ | igueths, so that unified view didn't help? | 22:38 |
| jaosorior | And thus, finish that blueprint | 22:38 |
| igueths | woodster_: I haven't tried that yet. | 22:38 |
| woodster_ | igueths, you can also change your view to an 'old view'...might strip off some of the fancy that is mucking up your reader? | 22:40 |
| igueths | woodster_: Possibly. | 22:41 |
| woodster_ | igueths: check out https://gist.github.com/jfwood/fdafc883fecdc599cbe0 | 22:47 |
| woodster_ | igueths...so that is what we see on the diff page (i added square brackets and user names for the comments). Comments are usually referring to the lines right above them. | 22:48 |
| woodster_ | hockeynut, tdink are you there? | 22:50 |
| *** jkf has joined #openstack-barbican | 22:53 | |
| jaosorior | People, not pepper | 22:54 |
| woodster_ | reaperhulk, redrobot, can you review this CR?: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157068/ | 22:55 |
| woodster_ | jvrbanac: ^^^? | 22:55 |
| *** crc32 has quit IRC | 22:55 | |
| *** paul_glass has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
| *** SheenaG1 has quit IRC | 23:04 | |
| openstackgerrit | Douglas Mendizábal proposed openstack/python-barbicanclient: WIP: Fix devstack gate https://review.openstack.org/161466 | 23:09 |
| openstackgerrit | Igor Gueths proposed openstack/barbican: Ensure that external secret refs cannot be added to containers or otherwise. https://review.openstack.org/161417 | 23:15 |
| elmiko | is there a known issue with using barbicanclient.client.Client.secrets.list ? | 23:30 |
| *** crc32 has joined #openstack-barbican | 23:33 | |
| elmiko | nvm, pbkac | 23:35 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/barbican: Enable secret decrypt through 'payload' resource https://review.openstack.org/157068 | 23:39 |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-barbican | 23:42 | |
| openstackgerrit | John Vrbanac proposed openstack/barbican: Creating indexes for foreign keys https://review.openstack.org/161481 | 23:43 |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 23:46 | |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-barbican | 23:46 | |
| reaperhulk | ^-- this is important and people should review it (it's a pretty easy review) | 23:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!