| strigazi | jakeyip: mnasiadka: are you around? | 08:00 |
|---|---|---|
| mnasiadka | I'm here | 08:00 |
| mnasiadka | but sick, so my brain might be somewhere else ;-) | 08:00 |
| strigazi | ah, sorry to here that, I hope that you get better fast | 08:01 |
| mnasiadka | yeah, getting better every day | 08:02 |
| strigazi | Apologies for skipping the meeting the past weeks, we do some internal reshuffling. In the coming weeks I'll join (apart from kubecon EU) to put things back on track | 08:03 |
| strigazi | Since jake is not here let's skip and try to have some input for next week? | 08:04 |
| strigazi | From my side I'm cleaning all reviews I have | 08:04 |
| mnasiadka | I'll probably be off next week | 08:05 |
| strigazi | ok, I'll sync with jake | 08:05 |
| mnasiadka | I'll try to update the devstack guide so it matches current reality | 08:07 |
| strigazi | thanks | 08:08 |
| strigazi | I think it has become simpler | 08:09 |
| jakeyip | I'm here | 08:12 |
| jakeyip | are we doing the meeting early or? :) | 08:13 |
| strigazi | ah!, UTC :) | 08:13 |
| opendevreview | Spyros Trigazis proposed openstack/magnum stable/xena: Fix errors caused by cryptography>=35.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/839346 | 08:15 |
| jakeyip | do we need this? upper-constraints in xena seems to be 3.4.8 https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/xena/upper-constraints.txt#L191 | 08:19 |
| jakeyip | only in yoga it is >=35.0.0 https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/yoga/upper-constraints.txt#L198 | 08:19 |
| jakeyip | any idea why this backport was proposed? | 08:20 |
| strigazi | https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos9-xena/component/common/ca/79/ca792b9b2bcaeb5f275f3ab8672e5a14092df223_e644063c/build.log | 08:22 |
| strigazi | jakeyip: ^^ | 08:23 |
| jakeyip | ah thanks I missed the second part of the commit commend | 08:26 |
| jakeyip | chuck topics into https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/magnum-weekly-meeting if you have any | 08:35 |
| strigazi | jakeyip: do you want to run the meeting? I can do it but until 9:30 UTC | 08:55 |
| jakeyip | I can try, please guide me | 08:58 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/magnum master: devstack: Create only public endpoint https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/837258 | 08:59 |
| strigazi | jakeyip: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/magnum-weekly-meeting-charing I usually have a text docs with command I frequently use | 08:59 |
| jakeyip | thanks | 09:00 |
| strigazi | jakeyip: all available commands are explained at the like in the end https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ChairaMeeting | 09:00 |
| strigazi | *link | 09:00 |
| jakeyip | #startmeeting magnum | 09:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Apr 27 09:01:01 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jakeyip. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 09:01 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 09:01 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'magnum' | 09:01 |
| jakeyip | #topic Roll Call | 09:01 |
| strigazi | o/ | 09:01 |
| jakeyip | o/ | 09:01 |
| jakeyip | mnasiadka ? | 09:03 |
| mnasiadka | o/ | 09:03 |
| jakeyip | Thanks for joining the meeting | 09:03 |
| strigazi | btw, you don't have to loop over all topics if nothing is to be reported | 09:04 |
| jakeyip | Agenda: | 09:04 |
| jakeyip | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/magnum-weekly-meetingn | 09:04 |
| jakeyip | jakeyip to change magnum/api/validation.py#L259-L260 to not allow mesos as a coe option | 09:05 |
| jakeyip | this is done | 09:05 |
| gbialas | O/ | 09:05 |
| jakeyip | there are a few more follow up for dropping mesos drivers, any updates? | 09:06 |
| strigazi | no, I will take care of them this week | 09:06 |
| jakeyip | thanks | 09:06 |
| jakeyip | #action strigazi to comment on 821213: Drop mesos driver | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/821213 , 803780: Drop bay and baymodel from controllers | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/803780 , 803629: Drop bay and baymodel | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-magnumclient/+/803629 | 09:07 |
| jakeyip | next: | 09:07 |
| jakeyip | gbialas: to squash the three OVN patches into one | 09:08 |
| gbialas | jakeyip: afaik mnasiadka was handling this. | 09:09 |
| gbialas | I know it was my action point, but he took this :) | 09:09 |
| mnasiadka | I never got to this point, so do this gbialas ASAP ;) | 09:10 |
| gbialas | ok:) | 09:10 |
| mnasiadka | (spent some time fixing devstack to do my task properly) | 09:10 |
| jakeyip | :) thanks | 09:10 |
| jakeyip | #action gbialas: to squash the three OVN patches into one https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/764444 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/765309 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/767119 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/773923 | 09:11 |
| jakeyip | next | 09:11 |
| jakeyip | mnasiadka: to follow up kubernetes conformance for Yoga https://www.cncf.io/certification/software-conformance/ | 09:11 |
| mnasiadka | Yes, did the deploy and tests, but then wanted to do the same on devstack (not Kolla-Ansible Yoga deployment) | 09:11 |
| mnasiadka | And found myself in a very bad place :) | 09:11 |
| mnasiadka | It's better now, so I'll pick it up again and finish this off properly. | 09:12 |
| mnasiadka | btw - after https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-keystoneclient/+/675870 landed - Magnum will probably always use public Keystone endpoint (don't know if it's a bad thing though) | 09:12 |
| mnasiadka | Before that patch - it used admin endpoint (which does not exist in devstack) | 09:12 |
| jakeyip | thanks, I understand devstack is a struggle, I am for the idea that we should prune / fix up the wiki aggressively | 09:13 |
| strigazi | mnasiadka: (it's a bad thing) | 09:13 |
| mnasiadka | strigazi: I'll propose a patch to get it configurable on our side | 09:13 |
| jakeyip | will trust only work with admin endpoint? | 09:13 |
| mnasiadka | our = Magnum | 09:14 |
| strigazi | magnum and heat accounts are very powerful and they should talk to an admin endpoint | 09:14 |
| strigazi | for devstack, it does matter much | 09:14 |
| mnasiadka | strigazi: but keystone v2 does not guarantee/require an admin endpoint | 09:14 |
| mnasiadka | and some deployment projects are just removing it | 09:14 |
| mnasiadka | ups | 09:14 |
| mnasiadka | v3 | 09:14 |
| strigazi | we can support both admin and public and let deployers pick what they want I guess | 09:15 |
| mnasiadka | so I think we should default to admin, but make it configurable so deployment project/user can set it to internal? | 09:15 |
| strigazi | yeap | 09:15 |
| mnasiadka | or public, yeah | 09:15 |
| mnasiadka | I'll do it as part of devstack cleanup (+docs obviously) | 09:15 |
| jakeyip | #action mnasiadka to check out implications of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-keystoneclient/+/675870 and possibly endpoint type configurable | 09:17 |
| jakeyip | next: CAPI driver | 09:17 |
| mnasiadka | I'll nudge Stig later today asking what's the plan - and update etherpad... | 09:18 |
| jakeyip | mnasiadka / gbialas any news? | 09:18 |
| mnasiadka | I don't think it has much traction in our company now | 09:18 |
| jakeyip | ok, let us know | 09:19 |
| jakeyip | strigazi: I didn't follow CAPI topic much, do you have anything to add to that? | 09:20 |
| strigazi | jakeyip: no, I have heard from many that they want to do it but due to it's intrusiveness plans are stale. Same here | 09:20 |
| strigazi | we really want it but it will be a very big change | 09:21 |
| jakeyip | any WIP on your side doing this? | 09:21 |
| strigazi | we don't have anything, most of our focus is the move of all addons to containers | 09:22 |
| strigazi | managed by a single helm chart | 09:22 |
| jakeyip | ok we will revisit this | 09:22 |
| jakeyip | next: propose of mnasiadka for Core | 09:23 |
| strigazi | done :) | 09:23 |
| mnasiadka | thanks :) | 09:24 |
| jakeyip | nice, welcome mnasiadka, thanks for your great work | 09:24 |
| jakeyip | next: docs update, especially wiki | 09:24 |
| mnasiadka | we should remove the wiki contents - wiki.openstack.org is unmaintained and is going to be removed sooner or later | 09:25 |
| strigazi | +1 | 09:25 |
| jakeyip | where will we put docs? | 09:25 |
| strigazi | https://opendev.org/openstack/magnum/src/branch/master/doc | 09:27 |
| mnasiadka | yes, that's the obvious place | 09:27 |
| jakeyip | ok, as long as that is the consenses, we shall move away from wiki | 09:28 |
| jakeyip | #action jakeyip move docs away from wiki into https://opendev.org/openstack/magnum/src/branch/master/doc | 09:30 |
| jakeyip | I have questions about 'Compatibility Matrix'. FCOS 35 tripped a few people up | 09:30 |
| jakeyip | p.s. link to compatibility matrix on wiki https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Magnum | 09:31 |
| jakeyip | probably we should document supported fcos version? maybe also drop everything train and below? | 09:31 |
| strigazi | +1 | 09:33 |
| jakeyip | ok so correct me if I am wrong. Yoga - fcos35, Xena - fcos31. I am going off magnum/devstack/plugin.sh | 09:34 |
| jakeyip | Any other topics? | 09:35 |
| strigazi | (I have to jump out thanks jakeyip for running the meeting) | 09:35 |
| jakeyip | thanks strigazi for joining | 09:35 |
| jakeyip | mnasiadka / gbialas anything you want to bring up? | 09:36 |
| mnasiadka | gbialas is working on getting Prometheus properly working after latest chart bump (some of Kubernetes services metrics endpoints are only listening on 127.0.0.1 and unreachable) | 09:37 |
| mnasiadka | and I think that's it ;-) | 09:38 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/magnum stable/wallaby: Fix errors caused by cryptography>=35.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/839185 | 09:38 |
| jakeyip | ok | 09:38 |
| gbialas | I am thinking of compatibility matrix for k8s tag | 09:38 |
| gbialas | But I don't have nothing particular in my mind right now. | 09:39 |
| jakeyip | is this the kube_tag on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Magnum or something else? | 09:39 |
| gbialas | Yes. | 09:39 |
| jakeyip | ok. we will move it and update it :) | 09:40 |
| jakeyip | I will | 09:40 |
| gbialas | I think we are supportin to wide range on k8s taks | 09:40 |
| gbialas | I think we are supportng to wide kube_tags versions range for one release. | 09:41 |
| gbialas | I will try to come with some proposal regarding this to next meeting. | 09:43 |
| jakeyip | ok. I think yoga default is 1.23 | 09:44 |
| jakeyip | let's put it on next week's agenda | 09:44 |
| jakeyip | anything else? | 09:44 |
| gbialas | Nothing from my side | 09:45 |
| jakeyip | thanks for joining the meeting | 09:45 |
| jakeyip | #endmeeting | 09:45 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Apr 27 09:45:16 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 09:45 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/magnum/2022/magnum.2022-04-27-09.01.html | 09:45 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/magnum/2022/magnum.2022-04-27-09.01.txt | 09:45 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/magnum/2022/magnum.2022-04-27-09.01.log.html | 09:45 |
| jakeyip | ok, off topic, who is going to kubecon eu? :) | 09:45 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/magnum stable/xena: Fix errors caused by cryptography>=35.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/839346 | 09:48 |
| mnasiadka | jakeyip: not really, but going to openinfra in Berlin | 09:51 |
| jakeyip | OK, unfortunately I'm not going to Berlin but Nectar will have 3 people there. Enjoy :) | 09:52 |
| opendevreview | Jake Yip proposed openstack/magnum master: Drop mesos documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/839556 | 14:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!