| ianychoi | Thank you @gouthamr and slaweq too! | 00:08 |
|---|---|---|
| ianychoi | Results announced via https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/AJSBNOUYXN7LDYCV2MZIPKZSSHLIERVN/ | 00:08 |
| ianychoi | Me and slaweq will follow-up patches to governance and election repo. Meanwhile, as an election official, I encourage discussions during tc campaign period: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/JG5LVK7YUOE3TFH3JB3Y5KG3VZNSNNW7/ | 00:10 |
| ianychoi | (Since no votings would happen, it would be easier for election officials, while I feel a little bit sad) | 00:10 |
| slaweq | thx ianychoi for sending emails and finishing nomination period | 05:02 |
| frickler | to me it sounds wrong to have a campaigning period when there will be no election, what's the use of it? shouldn't it be canceled in this case? | 05:50 |
| slaweq | frickler I agree that it seems kind of useless | 08:18 |
| ianychoi | I think elaborating into “removing campaign period” would be better. | 09:49 |
| ianychoi | Honestly, campaign period worked by several ago, while it has not worked for recent several release cycles. | 09:49 |
| ianychoi | Maybe would it be worth to discuss via tc meeting? | 09:52 |
| slaweq | or during the ptg | 10:14 |
| fungi | if you get rid of the cmpaigning period entirely, just remember to leave at least a few days between close of nominations and start of polls so that election officials have time to configure and check polls, generate and cross-check voter rolls, deal with last-minute bugs in tooling, and so on | 13:08 |
| * gouthamr is not in favor of removing it - but is open to discussing this with the wider group | 17:23 | |
| gouthamr | would we still tag the governance repo, despite not having elections? | 17:32 |
| fungi | up to you, it's mainly to indicate the state of the governance repo used to determine which teams and deliverables were official at the time the election was held, which acs were valid, and so on. ideally the tag would have been used to determine which teams are participating at all but that would need tagging between the ac merge deadline and start of nominations | 17:35 |
| gouthamr | i'll tag it for consistency | 17:39 |
| gouthamr | seeing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/829419 | 17:39 |
| gouthamr | thanks fungi | 17:40 |
| gmann | frickler: ianychoi slaweq on campaign period when no election, in past (if I remember correctly ) we concluded the election early and not waiting for campaign period | 17:45 |
| gouthamr | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/942388 | 17:48 |
| opendevreview | Hao Wang proposed openstack/election master: Add Hao Wang candidancy for Zaqar PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/942390 | 17:59 |
| ianychoi | gmann: For 2023.2 election, we encouraged campaign period like https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-February/032241.html and https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-February/032442.html but I agree that election officials can submit election result patch(es) early | 20:07 |
| fungi | i've got an editorial content deadline of tomorrow for the february edition of the openinfra newsletter going out next week, but if we think the election will be officially concluded (announcing the names) sometime early next week i can likely insert a placeholder and update it just prior to publication | 20:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!