Wednesday, 2025-03-05

*** mhen_ is now known as mhen02:53
jbernard#startmeeting cinder14:01
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed Mar  5 14:01:12 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:01
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'cinder'14:01
jbernard#topic roll call14:01
jbernardo/14:01
sfernandhi14:01
msaravanHi 14:01
jbernard#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-epoxy-meetings14:01
rosmaitao/14:01
jungleboyjo/14:01
simondodsleyo/14:01
akawaio/14:01
Luzio/14:02
toskyo/14:02
jbernardwelcome everyone14:05
jbernardwe are fast approaching the release of epoxy14:05
jbernardmany patches have merged, but there is still quite a bit to do14:05
jbernardif you have review cycles, that is definately the best way to help out this week14:06
jbernardi think it's possible for a freeze exception for the image encryption patch14:06
jbernard#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/92629814:06
jbernardbut additional reviews are needed14:06
jbernard#topic state of os-brick ci14:07
jbernardi think rajat is away right now14:08
jbernardbut he raises a valid point on the state of CI for os-brick (and likely the others, including cinder)14:08
simondodsleyWe discussed os-brick on 3rd party about a year ago and we made it mandatory for new drivers to check os-brick, but we didn't mandate it for existing CIs14:09
simondodsleymaybe that mandate should be issued14:09
jbernardyeah, i think that it's important to push for healthy CI reporting14:10
rosmaitayes, it's really a self-protection thing, because the cinder CIs only use released os-brick ... if you want to know if something will break you early, you need to check brick pre-release14:10
jbernardit's an important way for use to have confidence in the quality of our patches taken as a whole14:10
jbernardso i think we (mostly likely me :) ) need some kind of audit to determine the current state of CIs, which ones are reporting and not, and which ones are providing results that can be trusted14:11
jbernardonce we have that understanding, the next question would be how to address the deficit14:12
simondodsleyrelated to this the Pure CI is struggling to report the location of the logs since we upgraded to SoftwareFactory and a newer version of Zuul. Does anyone who maintains a CI that is reporting the URL correctly have time to discuss, offline, your Zuul config?14:12
rosmaitasimondodsley: is it a consistent incorrectness, i.e., can you leave a note on the meeting agenda telling reviewers how to find the log from the incorrect url?14:16
simondodsleyrosmaita: it is cnsisttent. The incorrect URL points to our internal log location, rather than the uploaded public location. They are very different14:17
rosmaitaok14:17
jbernard#action jbernard to do (or coordinate) a CI audit to determine current state14:20
jbernard#topic open discussion14:20
jbernardthat's all for defined topics, we can use the remaining time for whatever is needed14:21
jbernardSimon has several patches up that need another core review14:21
rosmaitajbernard: i don't know if jungleboyj has any time, but he was always the best at doing the CI audits14:21
jungleboyjLol. 14:22
rosmaitamaybe he can help you out14:22
simondodsleyisn't there a report that runs to show CI status? Seem to remember that14:22
jungleboyjsimondodsley:  Yes.14:22
jbernard#action jungleboyj to do a full and comprehensive audit of CIs, including TPS reports.14:22
jungleboyjLet me see if that is still out there.14:22
jbernard:)14:22
rosmaitayes, the can't have it both ways thing14:22
jungleboyjhttp://cinderstats.ivehearditbothways.com/cireport.txt14:23
jbernardwasn't that a sean thing?14:23
jungleboyjYeah, Sean's system looks like it is still running.14:23
simondodsleyyes - but it only covers cinder, not os-brick14:23
rosmaitai wonder how smcginnis is set for free time?14:23
jungleboyjI can say that my free time is extremely limited right now.14:24
simondodsleythat report fails to show Pure even though it is reporting well. Must be a confg thing14:24
jbernardfor the F release cycle, i plan to spend some time cleaning out the set of oldest reviews lingering in gerrit, i can add this to that set14:25
jbernardim back, my machine crashed14:32
jbernardi dont see anything in my backlog, should we end things for today?14:33
jungleboyjWorks for me.  It went quiet when you dropped.14:34
jbernardok, sounds good to me14:34
jbernardthank you everyone14:34
jbernard#endmeeting14:34
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed Mar  5 14:34:50 2025 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:34
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-03-05-14.01.html14:34
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-03-05-14.01.txt14:34
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-03-05-14.01.log.html14:34
jungleboyjThank you!14:34

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!