| *** mhen_ is now known as mhen | 01:08 | |
| jbernard | #startmeeting ciner | 14:01 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Jun 11 14:01:35 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:01 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:01 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'ciner' | 14:01 |
| jbernard | #topic roll call | 14:01 |
| jbernard | o/ | 14:02 |
| agalica | o/ | 14:02 |
| Luzi | o/ | 14:02 |
| mhen | o/ | 14:02 |
| hvlcchao1 | o/ | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | o/ | 14:04 |
| jbernard | hello everyone, thanks for joining | 14:07 |
| jbernard | #topic annoucements | 14:07 |
| jbernard | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-flamingo-meetings | 14:07 |
| jbernard | really quickly, here's our schedule for flamingo | 14:08 |
| jbernard | #link https://releases.openstack.org/flamingo/schedule.html | 14:08 |
| jbernard | I have registered us for the PTG in october | 14:09 |
| jbernard | #link https://ptg.openinfra.org | 14:09 |
| jbernard | it will be the week of october 27 | 14:09 |
| Sai | o/ | 14:09 |
| harsh_ | o/ | 14:09 |
| jbernard | you're supposed to "buy" a ticket as an individual, but it's 0 USD, i think they do this for counting purposes | 14:10 |
| jbernard | we will have a midcycle this summer, I'll try to nail down a time and schedule for that soon | 14:11 |
| jbernard | that's all for general status | 14:12 |
| jbernard | mhen: what's happening with pipeline failures? | 14:12 |
| jbernard | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/926298 | 14:13 |
| mhen | hi | 14:13 |
| mhen | as agreed on in https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-02-19-14.01.log.html#l-79 I repeatedly triggered Zuul runs on the image encryption patchset for Cinder and observed the 3rd party pipelines to discern consistently failing ones from occasionally succeeding ones | 14:13 |
| mhen | my results so far: | 14:13 |
| mhen | failed once and not reacting to rechecks: HPE Nimble Storage CI, HPMSA CI | 14:13 |
| mhen | failing only occasionally (at least one success): Pure Storage Third-Party CI, StorPool OpenStack CI | 14:13 |
| mhen | failing consistently (so far): NetApp-CI | 14:13 |
| mhen | (any others are more or less consistently succeeding so far) | 14:14 |
| mhen | it seems not all 3rd party CIs are reacting to a "recheck", HPE Nimble and HPMSA only show up once across all rechecks | 14:14 |
| mhen | some (NetApp) don't seem to react to *every* recheck but have seen more often than once | 14:15 |
| jbernard | interesting | 14:15 |
| mhen | I'm not sure how I should proceed from here | 14:17 |
| jbernard | mhen: zuul currently fails on integrated storage? | 14:17 |
| jbernard | (tempest) | 14:17 |
| mhen | right, "tempest-integrated-storage-ubuntu-jammy" does seem to fail consistently too but is not part of the 3rd party CIs, it's another topic | 14:18 |
| jbernard | mhen: do you know if that failure is related to the changes in the patch? | 14:19 |
| mhen | that one (Zuul) is a timeout in cinder-backup as far as I can tell and seems unrelated | 14:20 |
| mhen | oh and I made a wrong statement | 14:20 |
| mhen | the "tempest-integrated-storage-ubuntu-jammy" does not fail consistently | 14:20 |
| jbernard | mhen: for 3rd party ci, thank you for reporting those results, i will reach out to folks to try to improve the responses and reporting consistency (that's not something you need to worry about) | 14:20 |
| mhen | there is a run where it succeeded | 14:20 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: ^ do you happen to know if that test is failing elsewhere? | 14:21 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: didn't we have a logstash thing that we could query for this kind of thing? | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | not off the top of my head | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tempest-integrated-storage-ubuntu-jammy&skip=0 | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | looks like it's mostly passing | 14:23 |
| jbernard | yeah | 14:23 |
| jbernard | mhen: the next step is to make zuul happy, other reviewers are almost certain to wait if zuul yields a -1 | 14:25 |
| mhen | should I continue triggering regular rechecks then? | 14:25 |
| jbernard | mhen: how often does it fail in your earlier experiements? | 14:26 |
| mhen | can't really tell as I have been focusing on the 3rd party CIs mostly, so I have no data on that Zuul one | 14:27 |
| rosmaita | slightly off-topic, cinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-lio-barbican is failing consistently on stable/2025.1 | 14:27 |
| rosmaita | melwitt has a fix posted, but it hasn't merged yet: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/barbican/+/949096 | 14:28 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: i noticed that too | 14:28 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: it's failing the gate, is help needed? | 14:28 |
| rosmaita | her patch keeps hitting an octavia test failure | 14:28 |
| jbernard | i think the clear takeaway is that we're doing way too much testing :) | 14:30 |
| jbernard | mhen: recheck, and see if it fails again, and in the same way, i would be curious | 14:30 |
| jbernard | mhen: test volume boot test has historically been a difficult one | 14:30 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: we're going to need that if we want to do backports, that will block everything before 2025.1 as well | 14:32 |
| jbernard | request timeouts are my favorite | 14:33 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: is it possible for me to do anything to raise awareness, or are we just waiting? | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | not sure about the older branches, they might be ok | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | would be helpful to get an octavia person to take a look | 14:35 |
| jbernard | do we know any octavia persons? | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | thoctavia-v2-dsvm-tls-barbican is also failing in master | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | mjohnson used to be PTL | 14:37 |
| jbernard | ok, ill see if i can get someone to take a look after the meeting | 14:38 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: thanks for bringing that up | 14:38 |
| rosmaita | np | 14:38 |
| jbernard | we have at least one new driver that's ready for review, VAST: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/939005 | 14:40 |
| jbernard | #topic open discussion | 14:41 |
| harsh_ | Hello.. I have a query regarding the blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/ibm-svf-volumegroup | 14:41 |
| harsh_ | This was created long back but we were unable to submit the reviews for this feature due to organizational changes. | 14:42 |
| harsh_ | but now we have the code reviews ready and would like to know how to get this approved for Flamingo release. | 14:42 |
| harsh_ | Also, this blueprint was created when i was using my old ID (haailani@in.ibm.com) but now i have migrated to a new ID (harsh.ailani@ibm.com). So i would like to know i can change the "assignee" of this blueprint to my new ID so that i can update the description for it ? | 14:42 |
| harsh_ | please let me know how to proceed in this situation :) | 14:43 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: did you require blueprints for driver features when you were PTL? just curious about precedent | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | yes, mainly just for awareness to prioritize reviews before M3 | 14:46 |
| rosmaita | or whenever the driver feature freeze is | 14:46 |
| jbernard | ok, im not sure ive adequately adhered to that, but i can update this one | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | harsh_: looks like launchpad uses your Launchpad ID ... maybe you can edit your profile? | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | https://launchpad.net/~haailani | 14:47 |
| jbernard | harsh_: check the assignee, it should be fixed now | 14:48 |
| harsh_ | rosmaita: it requires me to login with that ID but i don't have the access to that email anymore. hence i can't access the profile to edit it. | 14:49 |
| rosmaita | bummer | 14:49 |
| harsh_ | jbernard: thanks, its updated now with my new ID. | 14:49 |
| harsh_ | I am getting the option for 2025.1 as the series goal for the blueprint. should i select that? | 14:51 |
| jbernard | harsh_: oh, i need to do some launchpad curation, ill get that sorted | 14:51 |
| harsh_ | sure. thanks. | 14:51 |
| jbernard | #action jbernard to update lp and fixup harsh's blueprint | 14:52 |
| jbernard | #action jbernard to contact octavia about failing melwitt patch (blocking stable/2025.1) | 14:52 |
| harsh_ | for the upcoming driver features, do we need to create the blueprints? or a spec? or both ? | 14:52 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: ^ i think at least a bp for tracking, if im understanding the process correctly, no? | 14:53 |
| rosmaita | yes | 14:53 |
| harsh_ | Great ! thanks for the info :) I would be creating 2 more blueprints in a few days :D | 14:54 |
| jbernard | harsh_: ok, i need to update the series goals, so hold for that | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | sounds good ... i thought we had this written down somewhere, but i can't find it | 14:55 |
| harsh_ | yup, will wait | 14:55 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: i dont' have anything related in my personal notes, if you find it let me know | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | ok | 14:55 |
| jbernard | thanks | 14:56 |
| jbernard | 4 minutes remain, anything else needing attention? | 14:56 |
| jbernard | thank you everyone, have a good rest of your day! | 14:59 |
| jbernard | #endmeeting | 14:59 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Jun 11 14:59:38 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:59 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/ciner/2025/ciner.2025-06-11-14.01.html | 14:59 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/ciner/2025/ciner.2025-06-11-14.01.txt | 14:59 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/ciner/2025/ciner.2025-06-11-14.01.log.html | 14:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!