*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau | 07:30 | |
yasufum | hi, tacker team | 08:01 |
---|---|---|
manpreetk | hi | 08:01 |
masaki-ueno | hello | 08:01 |
w-juso | hello | 08:01 |
hirofumi-noguchi | hello | 08:02 |
yasufum | #startmeeting tacker | 08:03 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Aug 3 08:03:20 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is yasufum. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 08:03 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 08:03 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'tacker' | 08:03 |
masazumi_ota | hi | 08:03 |
h_asahina | hi | 08:04 |
yasufum | hi | 08:04 |
yasufum | let’s start today’s meeting. | 08:05 |
yasufum | We have two topics on etherpad. | 08:05 |
yasufum | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting | 08:05 |
yasufum | Can we start from w-juso? | 08:06 |
w-juso | ok | 08:06 |
yasufum | #topic About FT for multi-tenant support | 08:06 |
w-juso | I updated FT of notification, at etherpad L21-27 | 08:07 |
w-juso | Please check its. | 08:07 |
w-juso | I consider how to test of FT with we discuss previous meeting. | 08:09 |
w-juso | There is no judgment function to send, therefore I think of making a decision on the receiving of notification. | 08:11 |
w-juso | then, I have one concern. | 08:11 |
w-juso | how to decide that it hasn't received any notification. | 08:13 |
w-juso | one way, there is a method of set timestamp | 08:15 |
w-juso | but, depending on the performance, misjudgment may occur. | 08:16 |
w-juso | I would like your comments on these methods, thank you. | 08:17 |
yasufum | thanks | 08:18 |
yasufum | any comment? | 08:18 |
yasufum | I’d confirm the meaning of ‘timestamp’ and ‘misjudgement’. | 08:22 |
w-juso | This method, the test succeeds if no Notifications are received. | 08:24 |
w-juso | therefore, I think that there is a possibility of success even when the test code is not working. | 08:25 |
yasufum | Are you talking about misjudgement? | 08:30 |
w-juso | sorry, yes | 08:30 |
w-juso | about timestamp | 08:30 |
w-juso | I understand that reciver server check its own log to confirm that it has received the notification. | 08:32 |
w-juso | notificaiton server will check its own log after a certain time, then haven't received any notifications. | 08:34 |
w-juso | In this method, this certain time is timestamp. | 08:35 |
w-juso | Currently, this decision is not implemented. | 08:35 |
yasufum | I might be feasible, but not sure actually. | 08:42 |
yasufum | I’m not clear your whole test senario, so I don’t understand it’s best way. | 08:43 |
yasufum | I appreciate if anyone have a suggestion for w-juso. | 08:45 |
yasufum | w-juso: Why don’t you add about your test implementation on your spec to get opinion from team? | 08:51 |
yasufum | It might be something difficult to give advice only understanding from current spec and notes on etherpad. | 08:52 |
yasufum | What do you think? | 08:52 |
w-juso | thanks for your suggestion. ok, I'll update the spec and add the information detail. | 08:54 |
yasufum | It’s OK to continue this discussion on tacker’s IRC channel or openstack discussion ML or so. | 08:55 |
yasufum | I’ll respond to you. | 08:55 |
w-juso | thanks your support. | 08:56 |
yasufum | If no more comment, go to the next topic. | 08:57 |
yasufum | ueha: Can you share your topic? | 08:57 |
yasufum | just asking to review? | 08:57 |
yasufum | Umm… he is not here, and an excuse for his absence is noted on etherpad :) | 09:01 |
yasufum | Please help reviewing for his patch | 09:02 |
yasufum | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/800588 | 09:02 |
yasufum | Is there any asking for review? | 09:03 |
yasufum | or topic or suggestion? | 09:04 |
hirofumi-noguchi | Can I share just information related to my match? | 09:05 |
yasufum | sure | 09:06 |
hirofumi-noguchi | Today, we uploaded a patch for v2 LCM API to gerrit as WIP. | 09:06 |
hirofumi-noguchi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/803295 | 09:06 |
hirofumi-noguchi | Though the main code has already been developed, details are being created. | 09:07 |
hirofumi-noguchi | We will split the patch into small pieces and updating them as soon as possible. | 09:07 |
hirofumi-noguchi | Please wait for reviewing it. | 09:07 |
hirofumi-noguchi | Thank you for your patience. | 09:07 |
hirofumi-noguchi | that's all from my side. | 09:08 |
yasufum | I’ll wait for your update. Thanks. | 09:08 |
yasufum | It seems done all for today. | 09:09 |
yasufum | Thank you for joining. Bye. | 09:10 |
yasufum | #endmeeting | 09:11 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Aug 3 09:11:11 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 09:11 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tacker/2021/tacker.2021-08-03-08.03.html | 09:11 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tacker/2021/tacker.2021-08-03-08.03.txt | 09:11 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tacker/2021/tacker.2021-08-03-08.03.log.html | 09:11 |
masaki-ueno | bye | 09:11 |
w-juso | thanks, bye | 09:11 |
hirofumi-noguchi | thanks, bye | 09:12 |
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk | 16:13 | |
*** oneswig is now known as oneswig_ | 20:56 | |
oneswig_ | #startmeeting scientific-sig | 21:00 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Aug 3 21:00:24 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is oneswig_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 21:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 21:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'scientific_sig' | 21:00 |
oneswig_ | it worked :-) | 21:00 |
martial | hello friends | 21:04 |
oneswig_ | Hi martial | 21:04 |
oneswig_ | #chair martial | 21:04 |
opendevmeet | Current chairs: martial oneswig_ | 21:04 |
oneswig_ | I was just reading through the pain points etherpad, quite a bit of follow-up from the issues gathered. | 21:05 |
oneswig_ | #link pain points etherpad https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination | 21:05 |
martial | any key revelations? | 21:07 |
oneswig_ | Well, there's a few follow up requests for elaboration/clarification on Nova, Cinder and OSC. The other services have gone without a response so far | 21:08 |
oneswig_ | I hope the exercise has been useful. I think the feedback has to help in some ways | 21:12 |
martial | well it helped to get this started at least :) | 21:13 |
martial | On SC21 I am unclear that there will be a BoF, I do not seem to have received much followup | 21:14 |
oneswig_ | I'm still not sure where we'll be in the UK. Since we last discussed this, we've gone off on our own unique trajectory - very high case counts, very low deaths. The case counts aren't going to help with any easing of travel restrictions though. | 21:16 |
martial | unless I get people talking I will cancel the BoF soon (we have until Friday) ... remote participation works too | 21:18 |
martial | gotta go in a couple of minutes, sorry | 21:18 |
oneswig_ | No problem. It's late here, I don't have much more to add. | 21:18 |
oneswig_ | If you don't need confirmation on in-person vs virtual, I'm in. | 21:19 |
martial | look at slack, I posted what I need, they say they "prefer" in person but will understand if remote | 21:20 |
martial | apologies, need to jump | 21:20 |
oneswig_ | OK thanks martial! | 21:21 |
oneswig_ | I'm on vacation next week btw | 21:21 |
oneswig_ | #endmeeting | 21:21 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Aug 3 21:21:11 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 21:21 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/scientific_sig/2021/scientific_sig.2021-08-03-21.00.html | 21:21 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/scientific_sig/2021/scientific_sig.2021-08-03-21.00.txt | 21:21 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/scientific_sig/2021/scientific_sig.2021-08-03-21.00.log.html | 21:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!