Tuesday, 2022-07-19

opendevreviewrenliang proposed openstack/neutron master: Update the Ethernet card information  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84892905:48
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej06:23
opendevreviewFernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/xena: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85027907:11
opendevreviewFernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/yoga: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028007:11
opendevreviewFernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/wallaby: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028107:12
opendevreviewFernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/victoria: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028207:12
*** tkajinam is now known as Guest543507:14
opendevreviewFernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/ussuri: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028307:15
opendevreviewFernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/ussuri: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028307:28
opendevreviewFernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/ussuri: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028307:28
opendevreviewFernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/victoria: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028207:30
*** Guest5435 is now known as tkajinam07:36
lajoskatonanoonedeadpunk: Hi, regarding vpnaas branch EOL process and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/84316708:20
opendevreviewFernando Royo proposed openstack/networking-ovn stable/train: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-ovn/+/85029308:20
lajoskatonanoonedeadpunk: you wrote in review that you are interested in maintaining Victoria for vpnaas, I push a new patch to remove victoria from the 843167 , is that ok?08:21
opendevreviewSlawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/neutron master: Remove linuxbridge mech driver from the ovs based jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/85029909:04
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/wallaby: Improve enabled_provider_drivers default in devstack  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/84965809:12
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/neutron stable/wallaby: ovn: Wait for northd in functional tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84967509:15
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/neutron stable/wallaby: functional: Add debug messages around OVN services  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/85003909:16
MichielPiscaer[m]How can I transfer the owner ship of a network to a other project?09:29
MichielPiscaer[m]The goals is so that that project can create rbac rules to share the network with other projects.09:45
lajoskatonaMichielPiscaer[m]: Hi, RBAC policies not the thing you are looking for? https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/index.html?expanded=create-rbac-policy-detail#rbac-policies ?09:54
MichielPiscaer[m]yes, but to do that the user who wants to share the network with a other project, needs to be "owner" of the project.09:55
lajoskatonaMichielPiscaer[m]: yes10:01
MichielPiscaer[m]But currently the network is created on the wrong project, so the users that are responsible to share that network are not able to. That is why I ask is it possible to transfer the owner of the network?10:03
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/victoria: Improve enabled_provider_drivers default in devstack  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/84965910:32
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ovn-octavia-provider master: Drop lower-constraints.txt and its testing  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/84009110:35
opendevreviewLajos Katona proposed openstack/neutron stable/train: DNM: check train  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/85033011:23
ralonsohlajoskatona, I don't know what changed recently11:30
ralonsohbut webtest is required for taap testing11:30
ralonsohand it is not installed11:31
ralonsohI'll push a patch to add it in the test-requirements11:31
ralonsohhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tap-as-a-service/+/69803511:31
lajoskatonaralonsoh: not just for taas but nearly for all stadiums11:33
ralonsohlajoskatona, I think this is because this is on the Neutron test FW11:34
ralonsohbut this is installed only in Neutron tests because it calls test-requiremtns11:34
ralonsohhowever other projects won't call test-requirements from neutron11:35
lajoskatonaralonsoh: the strange is that webtest is in Neutron test-req.txt11:35
ralonsohyes11:35
ralonsohbut when other project installs Neutron, don't use neutron's test-req11:35
lajoskatonaralonsoh: I think that perhaps the way zuul installs neutron for these jobs is changed11:35
lajoskatonabut perhaps it just worked accidentally previously and some test image changed11:36
ralonsohI think so11:36
ralonsohI think we can include it in neutron requirements.txt11:36
ralonsohwith a note11:36
ralonsohwhat do you think?11:36
ralonsohor change all projects to include that in rest-req11:37
ralonsohBTW: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/198211011:37
opendevreviewLuis Tomas Bolivar proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider master: Ensure members without subnet belong to VIP subnet or fail  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/84969111:39
ralonsohlajoskatona, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84870611:41
ralonsohpecan dropped this requirement11:41
lajoskatonaralonsoh: I prefer to have it in test-req,txt, and not add it to normal requirements11:42
ralonsohlajoskatona, so we'll need to add it to all other projects11:42
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/tap-as-a-service master: Add WebTest as dependency for testing  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tap-as-a-service/+/85033411:45
opendevreviewLajos Katona proposed openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Tests: fix requirements for unit tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/85033511:56
lajoskatonaralonsoh: thanks, I started to push for other stadiums which seems to fail with this: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:add_webtest_dep11:57
opendevreviewKarthik S proposed openstack/neutron master: WIP: Add min bandwidth support to ml2-ovn  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84229211:58
opendevreviewLajos Katona proposed openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Tests: fix requirements for unit tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/85033512:02
opendevreviewLajos Katona proposed openstack/networking-odl master: Tests: fix requirements for unit tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-odl/+/85033812:04
opendevreviewBernard Cafarelli proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/victoria: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028212:06
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch12:08
opendevreviewLajos Katona proposed openstack/networking-bgpvpn master: Tests: fix requirements for unit tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/+/85033912:14
opendevreviewLajos Katona proposed openstack/networking-bagpipe master: Tests: fix requirements for unit tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bagpipe/+/85034012:15
bcafarellajoskatona: anything you suspect broken in train? (I saw https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/850330 )12:39
lajoskatonabcafarel: yeah, elodilles mentioned that devstack is pobably broken12:41
bcafarel:(12:41
lajoskatonabcafarel: but after ussuri unit test jobs are timeout12:42
* bcafarel prepares to scratch down "everything OK in stable land" line for CI meeting12:42
lajoskatonabcafarel: I prepared for a hot boring day, and see what we have for this week :-)12:43
bcafarelahah12:44
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron stable/xena: [OVN] Sync QoS policies  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84603112:45
elodillesbcafarel: i had a quick look at the neutron unittest job timeouts and saw that it started to timeout ~1 week ago (July 12th stable-periodic) + tried to compare the pip freeze results of July 11th + July 12th stable job logs, but did not find any difference :S12:54
elodillesbcafarel: so it's interesting what changed around that time that could cause some kind of a race condition in unit tests :S12:55
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/networking-bagpipe master: Use Linux Bridge experimental flag  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bagpipe/+/85034812:55
bcafarelelodilles: maybe kernel or some system package change? these are fun to track down12:56
elodillesbcafarel: i fear it is due to something like that :(12:58
elodillesabout the train devstack issue: the error logs for that is like this: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/cc2e51f47bdd40b98603c2159b3db63e/log/job-output.txt#2670-267112:59
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej13:00
elodillesjob tries to apt install python3-yaml, and during the process it gets timeout after 2.5 hrs... :/13:00
bcafarelyeah definitely looks like something down in system13:03
bcafareleven a slow mirror is not enough to delay for more than 2h13:04
elodillesand it's always during python3-yaml and the last line is the 'Processing triggers for libc-bin'13:06
kevkoHi neutron team, please could you review this very tiny patch from frickler ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-dynamic-routing/+/849178 , it's regular bug which can't be fixed in very simple way ..13:08
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/ussuri: Improve enabled_provider_drivers default in devstack  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/84966013:24
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm|ruck13:31
lajoskatonakevko: looks ok, so we started to vote on it13:57
lajoskatona#startmeeting networking14:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue Jul 19 14:00:18 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is lajoskatona. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'networking'14:00
mlavalleo/14:00
lajoskatonaHi14:00
obondarevhi14:00
isabekhi!14:00
slaweqhi14:01
bcafarelo/14:01
haleyb_hi14:01
*** haleyb_ is now known as haleyb14:02
lajoskatonaI think we can start now14:02
lajoskatona#topic Announcements14:02
ralonsohhi14:02
lajoskatonathe usual Zed schedule: https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html14:02
lajoskatonaelodilles sent a nice mail for the comming weeks schedule:14:02
lajoskatona[release] Release countdown for week R-11, Jul 18 - 22: (#link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-July/029583.html)14:02
lajoskatonaand was also kind to do a summary at end of the mail for lazy PTLs:14:03
lajoskatonaNon-client library freeze: August 26th, 2022 (R-6 week)14:03
lajoskatonaClient library freeze: September 1st, 2022 (R-5 week)14:03
lajoskatonaZed-3 milestone: September 1st, 2022 (R-5 week)14:03
lajoskatonaso we are close to the final weeks of the Zed cycle14:03
slaweqtime flies14:04
lajoskatonasad but true :-)14:04
lajoskatonaRelated topic: Spec reviews please!14:04
lajoskatonahttps://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/neutron-specs+status:open+-age:1week14:04
lajoskatonathere are some older specs also, but without much change14:05
lajoskatonathis list should give the active reviews14:05
slaweq++14:06
lajoskatonaAs this cycle goes we can vote for the name of the next one:14:07
lajoskatonahttps://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-July/029608.html14:07
lajoskatonathis morning the antelope was the winner, but I like better anteater as ants are nearly bugs....14:07
ykarelo/14:07
slaweqLOL14:08
slaweqI voted for antelope - sorry :)14:09
lajoskatonaAnd even the PTG is comming, so I got a mail from Kendall about "Operator Engagement at the PTG"14:09
amotokivoting is still open. let's vote :-)14:09
bcafarelpoor anteater14:10
lajoskatonaamotoki: thanks, yes the voting is open till tomorow perhaps14:10
lajoskatonaso for the PTG the organizers expect us (me) to collect some answer for these questions:14:11
lajoskatonaWhat do you want to hear from operators about at the PTG?14:11
lajoskatonaWhat topics are already on your agenda?14:11
lajoskatonaWhat are your goals for the Columbus PTG?14:11
lajoskatonaIf there was an extra day (Friday, October 21 of Operator sessions), would contributors from your team be interested in participating?14:12
lajoskatonaso if you have some time please think on these questions14:12
slaweqregarding last question, I'm definitely interested14:12
mlavallehow do we submit ansers?14:13
slaweqmaybe You can create e.g. etherpad where everyone can answer to those questions14:13
mlavalleyeah, etherpad is a good idea14:13
lajoskatonaslaweq: yes, thats good idea14:13
lajoskatonaperhaps I open the usual PTG planning pad, and we can add this topic to that14:13
slaweq++14:14
mlavalleyes14:14
lajoskatonaby the way who is planning to go to Colombus PTG?14:15
lajoskatonaWith rubasov (and elodilles) we started the organization, but it is summer time so slooooowwww everything14:15
slaweqIf I will be able to, I definitely want to go14:15
lajoskatonaI mean organization for travel14:15
lajoskatonaslaweq: +114:16
slaweqbut nothing is decided internally yet AFAIK14:16
mlavallesame here14:16
ralonsohsame here14:16
mlavallewhat are the dates?14:16
ralonsoh16-21 Oct14:16
ralonsoh17-20, to be precise14:16
lajoskatonayeah we are waiting for approval also14:16
lajoskatonaralonsoh: +1, thanks14:17
* mlavalle will bring this up during my next 1 on 114:17
lajoskatonaok, that's all for announcements from me14:17
lajoskatona#topic Community Goals14:18
lajoskatonaActually I just would like to ask perhaps slaweq if he has some time for next meeting for example to give a quick summary what we supposed to do with rbac14:19
slaweqsure14:19
slaweqI can do it even now if You want14:20
lajoskatonaslaweq: thanks, if you can that would be cool14:20
lajoskatonasorry for not warning before14:20
slaweqbasically there is proposal to change goal slightly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/84741814:20
lajoskatonayeah Iread it before the meeting and I realised that something is happening14:20
slaweqwe will need to do (again) some changes in Neutron to remove "scope=['system']" from everywhere and have only scope "project" available14:21
slaweqbut I didn't propose patches yet as I want to have this change approved and merged first14:21
lajoskatonaslaweq: +114:21
lajoskatonaand if I understand well we keep also the "old" admin ?14:21
slaweqtl;dr it's because we realized during last summit, that operators don't really need system_scope users (for now at least), it can be confusing for them and it is causing a lot of problems14:22
slaweqyes, so we will keep an "old" admin14:22
slaweqand we will have project_member and project_reader14:22
amotokiyes, the latest proposal is to introduce well-defined personas (as roles) only14:22
lajoskatonaslaweq, amotoki: thanks14:23
slaweqand later we will have "project_manager" which will be kind of the same thing as "project_admin" in the current approach14:23
mlavalleso we over-engineered vs what the community needed14:23
slaweqmlavalle: kind of14:23
slaweqat least as a first step of the goal14:23
slaweqsystem scope personas is good idea but maybe for future, not now14:23
slaweqso that's basically all regarding S-RBAC14:24
slaweqany questions/comments?14:24
lajoskatonaslaweq: thanks for the summary14:24
mlavalleare we having to restore any of the functionality that the community really needs?14:24
slaweqmlavalle: I'm not sure I understand Your questions14:25
mlavalleOr is it just a matter of not merging or removing not needed stuff?14:25
slaweqwe will need to change things which are already merged14:25
slaweqas we were one of the projects who already implemented system scope personas some time ago14:25
slaweqbut we never switched to use them as default14:26
mlavallethat answers my question14:26
mlavalledeployers won't see a gap on what they need14:26
slaweqit's on my radar and I will do it but when new direction will be approved14:26
mlavalleit's just that new stuff was never adopted14:26
slaweqyes14:27
lajoskatonaok, thanks for the quick recap on what's happenning with the sRBAC14:29
lajoskatona#topic Bugs14:29
lajoskatonaReport from jlibosva: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-July/029618.html14:29
lajoskatonaI would like to highlight one from the 2:14:30
lajoskatonaSome jobs broken post pyroute2 update to 0.7.1 (#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1981963 )14:30
slaweqyeah, I saw it today14:31
ralonsohwe need https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/85029514:31
slaweqit seems that dvr jobs and functional job are broken due to that14:31
lajoskatonait is due to recent pyroute2 release, and there are 2 isssues opened on pyroute214:31
ralonsohtomorrow we'll have 0.7.2 and I'll push a requirements patch to bump to this new version14:31
lajoskatonaralonsoh: thanks14:32
mlavalle++14:32
lajoskatonaslaweq: and octavia is also broken due to this version of pyroute214:32
slaweqthx ralonsoh and gthiemonge for fixes in pyroute214:33
ykarelbut seems we using upper-constraints everywhere in neutron, right?14:33
ykarelasking if https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/850295 needed to unblock something or just to get it block so it doesn't get pulled where upper constraints is not used14:34
ralonsohyes, we do14:34
ralonsohto fix octavia14:34
ralonsohand prevent neutron from pulling a borken version14:34
ralonsohbroken*14:34
ykarelokk ok got it14:34
ykarellikely octavia is not using u-c in some jobs14:34
ralonsoh(that's something that needs to be checked, for sure)14:35
johnsomI would be surprised if there are Octavia jobs not using upper-constraints (other than those intended to test with master branches). 14:36
ykarelor i think requirements-check job is that which can be impacted14:37
lajoskatonaI think we can move on if there is no more questions for the bugs14:39
ykarel+114:39
lajoskatonaThis week obondarev is the deputy and next week isabek will be.14:39
obondarevon it14:39
isabeko/14:39
lajoskatonaobondarev, isabek: thanks14:39
lajoskatona#topic On Demand Agenda14:40
lajoskatonaDo you have anything which we can discuss?14:40
slaweqnothing from me14:40
lajoskatonaif nothing we can close the meeting14:41
lajoskatona#endmeeting14:41
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue Jul 19 14:41:57 2022 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:41
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2022/networking.2022-07-19-14.00.html14:41
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2022/networking.2022-07-19-14.00.txt14:41
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2022/networking.2022-07-19-14.00.log.html14:41
lajoskatonaBye14:42
mlavalleo/14:42
ralonsohbye14:42
amotokio/14:42
isabekbye14:42
haleybo/14:42
bcafarelo/14:42
obondarevo/14:42
slaweqo/14:42
ykarelo/14:49
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/neutron master: QoS minimum bandwidth documentation: OVN backend  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84971514:58
slaweq#startmeeting neutron_ci15:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue Jul 19 15:00:55 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ci'15:00
slaweqCI meeting is on jiitsi this week15:01
ralonsohhi15:01
slaweq#link https://meetpad.opendev.org/neutron-ci-meetings15:01
lajoskatonao/15:01
bcafarelelodilles: so train neutron UT pass https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/62f6624091e94027820fd76f2c92ed55 but grenade had similar issue (stein then?)15:01
slaweqGrafana dashboard: https://grafana.opendev.org/d/f913631585/neutron-failure-rate?orgId=115:02
slaweq#topic Actions from previous meetings15:02
slaweq    slaweq to fix functiona/fullstack failures on centos 9 stream: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/197632315:02
slaweq#action slaweq to fix functiona/fullstack failures on centos 9 stream: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/197632315:02
slaweq#action slaweq to move fedora periodic job to centos9 stream15:02
slaweqralonsoh to try using sudo as root_helper in functional tests15:02
ralonsohobondarev, try other web browser15:04
slaweq#topic Stable branches15:04
obondarevralonsoh: ack15:04
mlavalleobondarev: I had the same issue several time. I eneded up installing the app in my cell phone and it works perfectly15:04
mlavalleobondarev: try the app15:06
obondarevmlavalle: yep, thanks, don't wait anyway :)15:07
mlavalleobondarev: jitsi meet is its name (ate least in Android)15:07
slaweq#action lajoskatona to open LP bugs related to the stable branches timeouts15:08
slaweq#topic Stadium projects15:08
lajoskatonatopic: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug%252F198211015:10
ralonsohhttps://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug%252F198211015:10
ralonsohsorry, repeated15:10
slaweq#topic Grafana15:12
slaweq#topic Periodic15:17
slaweqhttps://zuul.openstack.org/build/09d0c023b0054a37bd03fbd6ecddd39415:18
slaweq#action mlavalle to report issue with propose-translation-update job and investigate that issue15:18
ykarelslaweq, mlavalle it's broken as python3 venv is not installed15:18
ykareli tried to share over meeting but seems audio is lost15:19
slaweqhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/85029915:19
bcafarelykarel: I did not hear you indeed15:20
ykarelslaweq, mlavalle basically https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/84624815:20
ykarelso need to fix it in other role likely ensure-python15:21
slaweq#endmeeting15:21
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue Jul 19 15:21:22 2022 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:21
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2022/neutron_ci.2022-07-19-15.00.html15:21
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2022/neutron_ci.2022-07-19-15.00.txt15:21
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2022/neutron_ci.2022-07-19-15.00.log.html15:21
ykarelbcafarel, thanks for confirmation15:22
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/tap-as-a-service master: Add WebTest as dependency for testing  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tap-as-a-service/+/85033415:25
bcafarelykarel: with jitsi flatpak I have sound working fine here (though it tends to overheat the CPU), or android app15:29
ykarelbcafarel, don't know what's wrong with it, as sometime it's work fine15:30
opendevreviewLajos Katona proposed openstack/neutron stable/ussuri: DNM: check ussuri  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/85039115:41
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/tap-as-a-service master: Add WebTest as dependency for testing  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tap-as-a-service/+/85033415:42
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Tests: fix requirements for unit tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/85033515:42
opendevreviewMerged openstack/networking-bgpvpn master: Tests: fix requirements for unit tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/+/85033915:43
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/networking-bagpipe master: Tests: fix requirements for unit tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-bagpipe/+/85034015:45
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off15:46
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron stable/wallaby: ovn: Wait for northd in functional tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84967515:47
opendevreviewMerged openstack/neutron master: Remove linuxbridge mech driver from the ovs based jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/85029915:47
opendevreviewSharon Koech proposed openstack/neutron master: Network Cascade Deletion Extension  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84977616:00
opendevreviewLajos Katona proposed openstack/networking-odl master: Tests: fix requirements for unit tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-odl/+/85033816:45
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/xena: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85027916:47
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/wallaby: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028116:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/ussuri: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028316:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/victoria: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028216:52
elodillesbcafarel: maybe stein has the devstack issue too but i guess there are no patches against stein so we don't see the failure there17:17
opendevreviewMerged openstack/networking-ovn stable/train: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-ovn/+/85029317:27
*** dasm|ruck is now known as dasm|off17:48
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ovn-octavia-provider stable/yoga: Fix IPv6 member delete on batch operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/85028019:59
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: ovs: improve log message when ofport is not configured  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/85014720:00
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: ovs: add fdb_entries details to the logs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/85022620:00
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: ovs: make vlanmanager to handle more vlan mapping per network  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/83947920:00
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: ovs: use a local vlan per network/segmentation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84041520:00
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: dhcp/rpc: retrieve network details with segments  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84041620:00
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: utils: add option to generate dhcp device id per segmentation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84041720:00
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: ml2/mech: bind port on segment that subnet belongs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84041820:00
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: dhcp: make device manager to clean only not used devices  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84041920:00
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: dhcp: add/use cleanup stale devices API  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84042020:00
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: dhcp: support multiple segmentations per network  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84042120:00
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: db: add segment_index to the unique constraint  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84145920:00
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/neutron master: segment: enable multisegments support for host  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/84183820:00
opendevreviewMiguel Lavalle proposed openstack/neutron stable/wallaby: [ovn][metadata] Remove metadata readiness mechanism  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/85043023:08

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!