| gmann | gibi: stephenfin any plan to cut intermediate release for placement ? that will unblock converting the oslo warnings to error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.policy/+/801929 | 00:18 |
|---|---|---|
| *** bhagyashris__ is now known as bhagyashris | 04:41 | |
| gibi | gmann: intermediate release from oslo.policy? | 07:05 |
| bauzas | good morning folks | 07:17 |
| bauzas | gibi: saw your email about the CI issue | 07:18 |
| bauzas | gibi: thanks for following it | 07:19 |
| gibi | bauzas: good morning | 07:29 |
| gibi | bauzas: it was a full gate block for nova, so it needed to be resolved | 07:29 |
| bauzas | that's what I saw | 07:29 |
| bauzas | but the fix is merged, right? | 07:29 |
| bauzas | oh, a new email :) | 07:30 |
| gibi | yepp gtema fixed it while we slept | 07:30 |
| *** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau | 07:35 | |
| gibi | sean-k-mooney: when you are up, melwitt holds her +A on the PR re-parenting patch waiting for your re-review. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/784020 | 07:44 |
| gibi | sean-k-mooney: so if you have time then a quick look would be appreciated | 07:44 |
| opendevreview | Felix Huettner proposed openstack/nova master: Fix duplicate BDMs in compute manager https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/801990 | 08:48 |
| opendevreview | Christian Rohmann proposed openstack/placement master: Fix SQL query counting the number of individual consumers having allocations by only selecting the aggregated consumer_id column. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/801419 | 09:27 |
| sean-k-mooney | gibi: a sorry about that was not looking at irc. ill be away for then next 30 mins but ill get it when im back | 10:50 |
| gibi | sean-k-mooney: thanks! | 10:50 |
| sean-k-mooney | ok you successfully nerd sniped me i did the review so +1 ok now ill be away for 30 mins :) | 11:06 |
| gibi | sean-k-mooney: thanks a lot | 11:07 |
| opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add functional test for duplicate bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802011 | 11:50 |
| *** mgoddard- is now known as mgoddard | 12:18 | |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: can you prioritiese reviewing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/797428/2 i would like to see if we can get that landed this week so we can start backporting it | 12:28 |
| bauzas | ack | 12:28 |
| bauzas | hmpf, a os-vif change | 12:29 |
| bauzas | I'll try | 12:29 |
| sean-k-mooney | we were waitign for it a nova one | 12:29 |
| sean-k-mooney | its fixing a bug i had in my patch that always delectas pluging to os-vif for ovs | 12:29 |
| sean-k-mooney | we were waitign for that pacth to pass ci before mergeing the proceeding patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/797142/1 since we wanted to merge them at the same time | 12:31 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I trusted you as I said in the comment : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/797428 | 12:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | thanks i was adding you since your revied the preceeding patch | 12:39 |
| sean-k-mooney | mind adding +w to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/797142 as well | 12:39 |
| opendevreview | Felix Huettner proposed openstack/nova master: Fix duplicate BDMs in compute manager https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/801990 | 12:39 |
| sean-k-mooney | * pinging you | 12:43 |
| opendevreview | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate support for floppy drives in 'Xena' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802022 | 12:53 |
| opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for bug 1937375 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802011 | 13:18 |
| opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Avoid duplicate BDMs during reserve_block_device_name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/801990 | 13:18 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Speed up 'servers' API tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778732 | 13:43 |
| *** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk | 14:13 | |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Remove redundant service version check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768195 | 14:29 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Use correct microversion for server group tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768196 | 14:29 |
| stephenfin | Yo, anyone care to look at these two scheduler-related functional tests? bauzas perhaps? https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22scheduler-filter-tests%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 14:30 |
| gibi | stephenfin: I will try before my vacation | 14:31 |
| bauzas | sure, I can try to look | 14:31 |
| gibi | stephenfin: one nit in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/754115/1/nova/tests/functional/test_scheduler.py#104 | 14:39 |
| bauzas | stephenfin: you misses a few tests | 14:48 |
| bauzas | but thanks for the fish | 14:48 |
| sean-k-mooney | is it me or does this debug log not make sense https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/instance.py#L1032-L1033 | 14:49 |
| sean-k-mooney | if we take the else branch we are not applying any migration context | 14:50 |
| sean-k-mooney | let alone one that does not belog to this instance | 14:50 |
| gibi | stephenfin: also one more nit in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/754116/1 | 14:53 |
| gibi | sean-k-mooney: I guess it try to say that no migration context is set on the instance | 14:54 |
| sean-k-mooney | right that would make sense | 14:54 |
| sean-k-mooney | i might submit a 2 liner patch to adress that | 14:55 |
| gibi | :) | 14:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | the code is form 6 years ago so its possibel that the function signiture has changeed and it was possibel before or something like that and the message just never got fixed | 14:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | re reading it i can see the interpertation you are suggesting just looking at it in the nova logs it looks odd | 14:57 |
| gibi | I looked at the blame for that reason but I don't see signature changes | 14:57 |
| stephenfin | bauzas: RE: your comment here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/754116/1/nova/tests/functional/test_scheduler.py#150, is that a thing? | 15:04 |
| stephenfin | the code says no | 15:05 |
| stephenfin | I don't see us stripping the prefix from the metadata properties | 15:05 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Migrate Instance Between Projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/802034 | 15:05 |
| bauzas | did I miss to provide the URL ? my bad | 15:05 |
| bauzas | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/3508263f236ea6003a76661b9e657ded4d46b413/nova/scheduler/filters/aggregate_instance_extra_specs.py#L55-L58 | 15:05 |
| bauzas | stephenfin: this both doesn't verify keys with not the prefix, but also strips the key if the prefix is right | 15:06 |
| stephenfin | it does that for the flavor though | 15:06 |
| stephenfin | not the aggregate | 15:06 |
| bauzas | oh, whoops, you're absolutely right | 15:07 |
| stephenfin | I don't want to test the unprefixed variant since that behavior is deprecated and would be rejected with recent microversions | 15:07 |
| bauzas | it's a flavor key, not a metadata extra spec | 15:07 |
| stephenfin | yeah | 15:07 |
| bauzas | stephenfin: ah | 15:07 |
| bauzas | did we deprecated non-prefixed keys ? | 15:08 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: we did i think | 15:08 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: ut the filter still check them | 15:08 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Migrate Instance Between Projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/802034 | 15:08 |
| stephenfin | sort of | 15:08 |
| stephenfin | the docs tell you not to use them, but there's no in-code warning | 15:09 |
| bauzas | my brain fucked somehow | 15:09 |
| sean-k-mooney | we deprecated it because you cant use the aggret extra specs filter and compute capablities filter at the same time if you use unprefixed keys | 15:09 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: sure, I remember why we have this prefix | 15:09 |
| bauzas | but I thought we only *documented* to use it if you were using both filters | 15:09 |
| bauzas | not if you were only using one | 15:09 |
| stephenfin | Multiple values can be given, as a comma-separated list. For backward compatibility, also works with non-scoped specifications; this action is highly discouraged because it conflicts with ComputeCapabilitiesFilter filter when you enable both filters. | 15:09 |
| stephenfin | from way back in Mitaka https://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/config-reference/compute/scheduler.html | 15:10 |
| stephenfin | "highly discouraged" is pretty strong :) | 15:10 |
| bauzas | okay, so this is docs | 15:10 |
| stephenfin | I can add the tests if you really want them though? | 15:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | yes but with the intorctution of the flavor vlaidation it should be even more discuraged | 15:10 |
| bauzas | the problem is that I know more ops that use this filter than the computecaps one | 15:10 |
| bauzas | as the computecapabilities one is pretty useless now we have traits | 15:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: it can do thing tratis cant | 15:11 |
| bauzas | stephenfin: as you wish, I won't both | 15:11 |
| bauzas | bother | 15:11 |
| bauzas | stephenfin: you added code, you proved me I was wrong | 15:11 |
| bauzas | so that's a good start | 15:11 |
| stephenfin | well I've done it now | 15:12 |
| stephenfin | so you're getting the tests | 15:12 |
| stephenfin | and you'll be happy with them | 15:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | for what its worth i suggest we require custom: as a prefix when we were adding the flavor extra spec validation | 15:12 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add tests for 'AggregateImagePropertiesIsolation' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/754115 | 15:12 |
| opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add tests for 'AggregateInstanceExtraSpecsFilter' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/754116 | 15:12 |
| stephenfin | gibi, bauzas: comments addressed ^ | 15:12 |
| bauzas | stephenfin: looking again, then | 15:13 |
| stephenfin | I'm pretty sure I had a fairly thorough reworking of the scheduler filter docs at some point. I wonder if that merged? | 15:14 |
| * stephenfin looks | 15:14 | |
| stephenfin | nope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/773645 | 15:14 |
| gibi | I'm +2 on both test patch. thanks stephenfin | 15:16 |
| stephenfin | thank you | 15:16 |
| bauzas | sent to the gate, then | 15:17 |
| bauzas | .... and, given this, folks, \o | 15:17 |
| gibi | bauzas: o/, please remember I'm off next week, and the meeting chair is your :D | 15:17 |
| sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: there are a few patches before that can it be pulled forward or should we try and merge the others first | 15:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | the docs patch that is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/773645 | 15:19 |
| stephenfin | I'd say the latter. The docs changes assume the filter scheduler is the only one left, which requires the preceding changes | 15:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack ok ill start form the bottom so | 15:19 |
| bauzas | gibi: oh, I remember this, but I haven't said "good vacations" to you :p | 15:20 |
| bauzas | gibi: fwiw, I'll be on PTO between Aug 9 and Aug 30 | 15:21 |
| bauzas | ... just before end of Xena-3 :) | 15:21 |
| gibi | bauzas: thanks | 15:22 |
| *** akekane_ is now known as abhishekk | 15:40 | |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support move ops with extended resource request https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800087 | 16:06 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [func test] refactor interface attach with qos https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800088 | 16:06 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support interaface attach / detach with new resource request format https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800089 | 16:07 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [func test] move unshelve test to the proper place https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/793621 | 16:10 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support boot with extended resource request https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800086 | 16:41 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support move ops with extended resource request https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800087 | 16:41 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [func test] refactor interface attach with qos https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800088 | 16:43 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support interaface attach / detach with new resource request format https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800089 | 16:45 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [func test] move unshelve test to the proper place https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/793621 | 16:46 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: WIP support extended res req in heal port allocation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802060 | 16:48 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support move ops with extended resource request https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800087 | 17:27 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [func test] refactor interface attach with qos https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800088 | 17:28 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support interaface attach / detach with new resource request format https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800089 | 17:30 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [func test] move unshelve test to the proper place https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/793621 | 17:30 |
| * gibi leaves for a week of vacation | 17:30 | |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: WIP support extended res req in heal port allocation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802060 | 17:32 |
| gmann | gibi: ah I thought placement is in cycle-with-intermediary model but it is cycle-with-rc so need to wait for rc release. | 17:45 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Migrate Instance Between Projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/802034 | 17:47 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Migrate Instance Between Projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/802034 | 17:48 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Migrate Instance Between Projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/802034 | 17:50 |
| gmann | gibi: stephenfin in that case we will release placement in rc1 right? which is after oslo feature freeze. with that we have to wait for one more cycle to get https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.policy/+/801929 in oslo.policy ? | 17:57 |
| gmann | I think that is how we handle such situation ? | 17:57 |
| sean-k-mooney | to do a release of placement yes we wait until m3 and then can release a release candiate for placmeent | 18:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | even if placment was cycle with intermediary it woudl not affect the oslo patch really | 18:01 |
| sean-k-mooney | gmann: why do you think it would? | 18:01 |
| gmann | sean-k-mooney: we have to release placement first in pypi for fix done for proposed interface changes in oslo | 18:02 |
| gmann | otherwise placement in pypi fail with the latest oslo release which include the interface change | 18:02 |
| sean-k-mooney | wotn we have the same issue with nova | 18:03 |
| sean-k-mooney | or keystone | 18:03 |
| sean-k-mooney | or any other project that are part of the integrated release | 18:03 |
| gmann | technically yes but placement is used from pypi in nova tests so it block gate itself | 18:03 |
| sean-k-mooney | we wont be able to increase upper constirting on master | 18:03 |
| sean-k-mooney | you mena placment lib is used | 18:04 |
| sean-k-mooney | i dont think we use placement directly | 18:04 |
| gmann | if any using repo we use form pypi in gate testing then it would let oslo change merge itself, like placement | 18:04 |
| sean-k-mooney | the placment fixture shoudl be in placment-lib | 18:04 |
| sean-k-mooney | even if placment was release with intermiday it would not be correct to do a release in this case | 18:06 |
| gmann | its in nova fixture | 18:06 |
| gmann | no, with intermediate release model we can release new version of placement anytime in release where code moved to new interface from oslo | 18:07 |
| gmann | so oslo gate would not complain | 18:07 |
| sean-k-mooney | gmann: we coudl but we should not | 18:07 |
| sean-k-mooney | it is like release nova early | 18:08 |
| gmann | :) yeah. i am not saying we should change release model | 18:08 |
| sean-k-mooney | gmann: we can merge the oslo change but pin the oslo verion until after xena | 18:09 |
| gmann | I am saying with rc release model, we have to wait lib changing interface for at least one cycle. | 18:09 |
| sean-k-mooney | but that could cause other isseu | 18:09 |
| gmann | we cannot merge until we change the usage of placement form master not from pypi | 18:09 |
| sean-k-mooney | gmann: right i am saying the right thing to do would be to wait regardless | 18:09 |
| gmann | yes, at least 1 cycle | 18:09 |
| sean-k-mooney | the other way is to not chnage the interface | 18:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | and to support both in parallel | 18:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | deprecating the old behavior | 18:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | so add a new parmater to rule default | 18:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | e.g. deprecated_rule_action=warn|raise | 18:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | have that parmater default to warn | 18:11 |
| gmann | its after deprecation things not fresh change, warn->error | 18:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | then next cycle change it to raise | 18:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | no this is a fresh change | 18:12 |
| sean-k-mooney | you care chanign the behavior of oslo_policy | 18:13 |
| gmann | no | 18:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | so tha tdeprecation become an error | 18:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | yes that is the api change | 18:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.policy/+/801929/2/oslo_policy/policy.py#1243 | 18:13 |
| gmann | it is, already deprecated in previous cycle and this cycle changing warning to error | 18:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | no | 18:13 |
| sean-k-mooney | the policy rule is | 18:14 |
| sean-k-mooney | but here we are changing the behavior of the RuleDefault class | 18:14 |
| sean-k-mooney | the fact a project policy rule is deprecated does not mean the RuleDefault class usage is deprecated | 18:14 |
| sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.policy/+/801929 is a new oslo.polify feature | 18:15 |
| sean-k-mooney | which is a breaking change | 18:15 |
| sean-k-mooney | so this need a oslo.policy major viersion bump since its not a additive change | 18:15 |
| gmann | yes, major version bump | 18:16 |
| sean-k-mooney | you can make it an addtivie chagne rather simply though | 18:16 |
| sean-k-mooney | add a new parmater to the contructor of RuleDefault | 18:16 |
| gmann | we did that in past via warning, not I am proposing to do a breaking change and remove the old ay | 18:16 |
| gmann | *now I | 18:17 |
| sean-k-mooney | right i am saying that is not a valid stragy | 18:17 |
| gmann | humm, so keep supporting old way always? | 18:17 |
| gmann | and keep warnings also? | 18:17 |
| sean-k-mooney | no you need to wait until all or most of your users have adapted to the new api | 18:18 |
| gmann | we introduced warning becasue we want usage to mvoe to new way right | 18:18 |
| sean-k-mooney | when was the warnign intoduced | 18:18 |
| gmann | sean-k-mooney: I did https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22fix-oslo-policy-warnings%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 18:18 |
| gmann | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-July/023646.html | 18:18 |
| sean-k-mooney | basically i dont think you shoudl do this type of change late in the cycle | 18:18 |
| gmann | ^^ has all the details | 18:18 |
| gmann | we cannot do in this cycle, we have to wait for next cycle due to dependencies | 18:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | i guess the issue is just the unit tests | 18:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | can you show me where in nova we are importign placment | 18:19 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Migrate Instance Between Projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/802034 | 18:19 |
| gmann | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/functional/fixtures.py#L17 | 18:19 |
| gmann | sean-k-mooney: ^^ | 18:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | placement is not in our test requirements | 18:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | im trying to figure out where it is listed | 18:20 |
| sean-k-mooney | here https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/tox.ini#L97 | 18:20 |
| gmann | yes | 18:21 |
| sean-k-mooney | we should not be importing the fixtuer the way we currently are | 18:21 |
| sean-k-mooney | ... ok | 18:22 |
| sean-k-mooney | that explians it we still have not create placment-lib | 18:22 |
| sean-k-mooney | gmann: we were ment to move the fixture and other common code in a placement-lib repo cycle or two ago | 18:23 |
| sean-k-mooney | looks like that never happened | 18:23 |
| gmann | yeah | 18:23 |
| sean-k-mooney | it was to aovid a direct import of placment so we could release the lib ahead of the main release and avoid this | 18:24 |
| sean-k-mooney | this is kind of tricky | 18:25 |
| sean-k-mooney | the best way to adress this would be to pin the oslo.plolicy version in nova func test until after placment is released | 18:26 |
| sean-k-mooney | which i think we could do with oslo.policy<=${last version without error} here https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/tox.ini#L96 | 18:27 |
| gmann | we should not actually, and keep testing with latest oslo otherwise we can get more surprise. | 18:28 |
| gmann | either moving placement fixture to lib side or do like current way 'wait for 1 cycle in oslo side' | 18:28 |
| sean-k-mooney | well the other way is to deploy placment form master | 18:28 |
| sean-k-mooney | on master | 18:28 |
| gmann | yeah that too work | 18:29 |
| sean-k-mooney | we coudl replace openstack-placement>=1.0.0 with -e git+https://opendev.org/openstack/placement.git@master#egg=placement | 18:29 |
| sean-k-mooney | ok lets pick this up next weeks and see if thre is a way forward | 18:31 |
| gmann | actually we should keep testing with released placement and if we want we can do with master version also so that we test both way. | 18:35 |
| gmann | for oslo, I feel (from other usage also with pypi released version) is to wait for next cycle. This cycle I fixed almost all the usage in once they are released with oslo version supporting both way then 2, in next cycle remvoe old style in oslo | 18:36 |
| gmann | that is best way to introduced the breaking change or major version bumo | 18:36 |
| gmann | bump | 18:36 |
| gmann | doing both in one cycle can break or mixup the things | 18:37 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Migrate Instance Between Projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/802034 | 19:17 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Migrate Instance Between Projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/802034 | 19:59 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Migrate Instance Between Projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/802034 | 20:12 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: Add support for RP re-parenting and orphaning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/784020 | 20:22 |
| opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/placement master: Add consumer_types migration, database and object changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/669170 | 20:35 |
| opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/placement master: Microversion 1.38: API support for consumer types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/679441 | 20:35 |
| opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/placement master: Switch ConsumerType to use an AttributeCache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/679486 | 20:35 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Migrate Instance Between Projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/802034 | 20:36 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Migrate Instance Between Projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/802034 | 20:52 |
| opendevreview | Samuel proposed openstack/nova master: Add REST and compute APIs to migrate instances between projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/801377 | 21:11 |
| opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802133 | 21:53 |
| opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802133 | 21:57 |
| opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802133 | 23:02 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!