Wednesday, 2024-05-15

puckHopefully publiccloud-sig folks check in here before/during the meeting. Apologies, can't make today's meeting, I have a school related event to attend.04:20
fkrpuck: today's meeting is moved to real life :) we're meeting at the OpenInfra Day in Berlin04:41
puckAh ha, even more reason that I won't be there!05:16
songwenping_fkr: the large scale meeting moved to next week08:53
songwenping_?08:53
ttxsongwenping_: no, starting in 4 min08:56
songwenping_ttx:cool08:57
ttx#startmeeting large_scale_sig09:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed May 15 09:00:45 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.09:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.09:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'large_scale_sig'09:00
ttxping amorin 09:00
ttxI think Felix mentioned he would not be able to make it today09:01
ttx#topic Rollcall09:01
ttxsongwenping_: welcome!09:01
songwenping_ttx: thanks09:02
ttxWhile we wait for others to join, could you introduce yourself? What are you working on? Why are you interested in the large scale SIG?09:02
songwenping_i am Cyborg PTL :)09:03
ttxYou told me you were interested in helpign with the Large Scale doc, especially the performance side09:04
songwenping_my company Inspur recently have some optimization on large scale test.09:04
songwenping_and we want contribute it to the Large Scale doc.09:05
ttxLooks like amorin missed the meeting reminder and it will just be the two of us today. The others will catch up reading the meeting logs09:05
ttx#topic Large Scale doc09:06
ttxLet's discuss in more details what you want to optimize on the docs side09:06
ttx#link  https://docs.openstack.org/large-scale09:06
ttxsongwenping_: Do you think that would fit in the existing pages, or we would create somethign specific around performance?09:07
songwenping_i am not sure, first i will tell you some results.09:09
ttxyes please!09:09
ttxsongwenping_: can you share the results now?09:11
songwenping_please wait09:12
songwenping_a few seconds.09:12
songwenping_we support 3000 compute nodes in one aggregate and Concurrent create 3000 vms and the success rate is 100%.09:13
ttxsounds pretty good to me09:15
songwenping_the current record is 1000 compute nodes?09:16
ttxI don;t think we really have a record, but we certainly discouraged larger aggregates as you'd get delays / failures09:17
ttxMaybe the right approach you should write a document describing all your findings, and then we can discuss how to best integrate it in the doc09:19
ttxOne approach might be to integrate it into existign documents, another approach would be to create a separate "performance" specific document09:19
songwenping_this is our actual use case.09:20
ttxBut it's hard to choose between the two approaches until we see the doc, so maybe that's the first step09:20
ttxWhen ready you can post it to the openstack-discuss mailing-list with the [largescale-sig] prefix so that we atre sure to see it09:21
ttxare*09:21
ttxand then we'll read it and discuss how to integrate it at the next meeting?09:22
songwenping_i prefer to create a seperate doc as it's easy to review.09:22
ttxOK, the format is up to you (could be etherpad, could be proposed Gerrit change against large-scale git repo, could be email...). Just let us know by email when ready :)09:23
songwenping_sure, i will post the the mail first.09:24
ttxPerfect09:24
ttxI want amorin and felix.huettner 's eyes on it before we get too far in discussing where to integrate it09:24
ttxThey are the experts, I just play one on Mastodon09:25
ttxsongwenping_: anything you'd like to add?09:25
songwenping_haha, nothing else.09:25
ttxAlright. I skipped the discussion about the the next OpenInfra Live episode since we are missing other members of the SIG09:26
ttx#topic Next meeting(s)09:27
ttxWith our new schedule the next meeting will be on IRC at 9:00 UTC on June 1909:27
ttxsongwenping_: I'm assuming you will be able to post your doc for review before then?09:28
songwenping_no problem09:28
ttx#action songwenping_ to post his performance findings doc for review ahead of next meeting09:28
ttxPerfect!09:28
ttx#info next meeting will be on IRC at 9:00 UTC on June 1909:29
ttx#topic Open discussion09:29
ttxAnything else to discuss? Sorry we did not get more people today, there is usually at least 3 of us :)09:29
ttxOK, if nothing else, we'll close early. Thanks songwenping_ for joining and sharing your findings!09:31
ttx#endmeeting09:31
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed May 15 09:31:45 2024 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)09:31
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/large_scale_sig/2024/large_scale_sig.2024-05-15-09.00.html09:31
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/large_scale_sig/2024/large_scale_sig.2024-05-15-09.00.txt09:31
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/large_scale_sig/2024/large_scale_sig.2024-05-15-09.00.log.html09:31
songwenping_thanks ttx09:31
ttxsongwenping_: see you next meeting!09:31
songwenping_byebye09:32
andrewbogott_Hm now that the neutron cli has been removed, is there a new way to do the equivalent of "neutron l3-agent-list-hosting-router"?  I've been searching through the 'openstack network' options but with no luck so far.14:58
andrewbogott_Answering my own question, the answer seems to be: openstack network agent list --agent-type l3 --router  <id> --long15:13
andrewbogott_now I wonder what else has been hiding behind --long15:14

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!