sean-k-mooney | gmaan: frickler im not 100% certine but to make grenade pass we may either need to pin the verion of setuptool uses for upgradeing form epoxy or fix the pyproject.toml/setuptoosl issues on stable before master | 00:42 |
---|---|---|
sean-k-mooney | well that or modify grenade | 00:44 |
sean-k-mooney | it looks like for watcher it did complete properloy on teh inital devstack run | 00:45 |
sean-k-mooney | but laster we see this r 29 20:42:58.962652 np0040581585 devstack@watcher-api.service[80622]: failed to open python file /opt/stack/data/venv/bin/watcher-api-wsgi | 00:45 |
sean-k-mooney | whic on master shoudl now be using the module based inport not the script | 00:46 |
sean-k-mooney | so we need to update the systemd service files to use the new way | 00:46 |
sean-k-mooney | or the uwsig config im not sure which | 00:46 |
sean-k-mooney | have other project figured that part out? | 00:47 |
sean-k-mooney | i have the mater jobs passign https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/buildset/3f25469118ff4084a10ece674be67bee so its jst grenade that i still need to fix. the release notes failure i think are new error due to the recent requirements bump that droped 3.9 | 00:48 |
sean-k-mooney | so those are valid warnign i can go fix | 00:48 |
sean-k-mooney | am i right in thinking the correct way to deal with this is to implement a grenade plugin as part of watchers devstack plugin | 00:51 |
sean-k-mooney | to handel converting the api configuration? | 00:51 |
sean-k-mooney | https://opendev.org/openstack/grenade/src/branch/master/PLUGINS.rst | 00:52 |
sean-k-mooney | like this https://github.com/openstack/barbican/blob/9f1f1c66a841ab8150e8c1c1bdb529f190086c2f/devstack/upgrade/upgrade.sh ? | 00:55 |
sean-k-mooney | hum i guess watcher has a grenade plugin alrady https://github.com/openstack/watcher/blob/master/devstack/upgrade/upgrade.sh so i would just need to tweak this instead | 00:58 |
*** mhen_ is now known as mhen | 01:12 | |
opendevreview | yatin proposed openstack/devstack master: [rhel9 distros] Install uwsgi from source https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/948511 | 05:47 |
*** elodille1 is now known as elodilles | 10:11 | |
opendevreview | James Parker proposed openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Update build exception when using unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/947855 | 14:48 |
gmaan | sean-k-mooney: which greande job failing ? | 15:42 |
sean-k-mooney | the on on the watcher repo ill get the link to the patch | 15:48 |
sean-k-mooney | gmaan: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/948502 | 15:49 |
gmaan | sean-k-mooney: k, will check | 15:50 |
sean-k-mooney | wait | 15:50 |
sean-k-mooney | greade passed? oh this was the backport | 15:50 |
sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/948438 | 15:50 |
sean-k-mooney | so it fails on master | 15:50 |
sean-k-mooney | gmaan: i see 2 ways to fix it backport the pyproject.toml stuff to epoxy or modify the job on master to account for the change in how the wsgi script wroks | 15:57 |
gmaan | sean-k-mooney: yeah, I think backport is ok and once 948502 is merged then master grenade should be green | 16:11 |
sean-k-mooney | i can add a depends on to the master veriosn but i need to aslo fix the release notes | 16:13 |
sean-k-mooney | ill do that later today and see if it passes. | 16:14 |
gmaan | yeah, depends-on will work | 16:15 |
opendevreview | yatin proposed openstack/devstack master: Fix cert detection with custom PYTHON3_VERSION https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/948558 | 16:22 |
gmaan | #startmeeting qa | 18:00 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Apr 30 18:00:21 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gmaan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 18:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 18:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'qa' | 18:00 |
gmaan | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours | 18:00 |
gmaan | today agenda ^^ | 18:00 |
gmaan | I will wait for a min to start the agenda, if anyone have any topic other than usual agenda, feel free to add in open discussion | 18:01 |
gmaan | #topic Priority Items progress | 18:02 |
gmaan | I have not prepared the priority item for 2025.2 cycle, I will prepare something before next meeting. | 18:03 |
gmaan | #topic Gate Status / Fix Checks | 18:03 |
gmaan | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) | 18:03 |
gmaan | there is one change which is waiting for gibi reply. nothing else on this | 18:04 |
gmaan | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/939825 | 18:04 |
gmaan | #topic Changes with Review-Priority == +1 | 18:04 |
gmaan | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) | 18:04 |
gmaan | three change with review priority, let me check | 18:04 |
gmaan | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/915978 | 18:05 |
gmaan | this has been done in other changes so I removed the RP from it | 18:06 |
gmaan | I think I cannot reset priority but anyways we do not have any action on this for now | 18:07 |
gmaan | other my service role job change, which I need to test more and mainly results of experimental pipeline testin | 18:07 |
fungi | i can use gerrit admin privs to delete specific votes if needed | 18:07 |
gmaan | fungi: I think it is fine. if no answer form author or so then I will ask to reset | 18:08 |
fungi | no problem, just feel free to ask if you ever need it | 18:08 |
gmaan | sure, thanks | 18:08 |
gmaan | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/944600 | 18:08 |
gmaan | this ^^, I will check after meeting | 18:08 |
gmaan | #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks | 18:09 |
gmaan | Periodic stable full | 18:09 |
gmaan | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?pipeline=periodic-stable&job_name=tempest-full-2023-2&job_name=tempest-full-2024-1&job_name=tempest-full-2024-2 | 18:09 |
gmaan | all green but I need to add stable/2025.1 job there | 18:09 |
gmaan | #action gmann to update the periodic/stable jobs list with stable/2025.1 jobs | 18:10 |
gmaan | Periodic stable slow | 18:10 |
gmaan | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-slow-2024-2&job_name=tempest-slow-2024-1&job_name=tempest-slow-2023-2 | 18:10 |
gmaan | all green but same here. need to add stable/2025.1 job | 18:11 |
gmaan | Periodic extra tests | 18:11 |
gmaan | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-2024-2-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-2024-1-extra-tests&job_name=tempest-full-2023-2-extra-tests | 18:11 |
gmaan | all green | 18:11 |
gmaan | Periodic master | 18:11 |
gmaan | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic | 18:11 |
gmaan | a few jobs failing | 18:11 |
gmaan | tempest-full-oslo-master even oslo.utils master testing jobs are failing, discussion in oslo channel for that | 18:12 |
gmaan | tempest-full-centos-9-stream - failing consistently | 18:12 |
gmaan | The conflict is caused by: | 18:13 |
gmaan | taskflow 5.12.0 depends on networkx>=2.1.0 | 18:13 |
gmaan | The user requested (constraint) networkx===3.4.2 | 18:13 |
gmaan | seems constraints are ok here, maybe mirror issue? | 18:14 |
gmaan | it is failing since yesterday | 18:14 |
gmaan | I will check it later what exactly changed since yesterday | 18:15 |
gmaan | tempest-full-test-account-no-admin-py3 - this is failing with known bug in neutron rule:create_network | 18:16 |
gmaan | I did not get time to look into it | 18:16 |
gmaan | will try something end of this week or early next week | 18:16 |
gmaan | #topic Distros check: | 18:17 |
gmaan | Centos 9 | 18:17 |
gmaan | tempest-full-centos-9-stream failing with same reason ^^ mentioned above | 18:17 |
gmaan | Debian | 18:17 |
gmaan | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bookworm&skip=0 | 18:18 |
gmaan | green | 18:18 |
gmaan | Rocky | 18:18 |
gmaan | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx | 18:18 |
gmaan | devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx also failing with same constraint conflict happening in centos 9 job | 18:19 |
gmaan | I will debug it after meeting | 18:20 |
gmaan | nothing in 'Open Discussion' | 18:20 |
gmaan | om that case, let's close the meeting | 18:20 |
gmaan | #endmeeting | 18:20 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Apr 30 18:20:35 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 18:20 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2025/qa.2025-04-30-18.00.html | 18:20 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2025/qa.2025-04-30-18.00.txt | 18:20 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2025/qa.2025-04-30-18.00.log.html | 18:20 |
frickler | gmaan: reqs dropped py39 from u-c. we can either dump all cs9 based stuff or fiddle something with stable/2025.1 for a while possibly | 18:40 |
gmaan | frickler: i see, we have devstack-platform-centos-9-stream job running on stable/2025.1. let's not run those jobs until they are upgraded to cs10 | 18:48 |
gmaan | I am not sure whom to contact for that but I will send it on ML in case anyone have plan to migrate those | 18:49 |
opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Skip running c9s jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/948578 | 19:35 |
opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/devstack stable/2025.1: Skip running c9s and rocky job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/948579 | 19:35 |
gmaan | frickler: ^^ | 19:36 |
gmaan | Also, I found this for cs10 support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/937251 | 19:37 |
frickler | gmaan: yes, but see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/937251/comments/80105a9d_68618411 , I don't think it makes much sense to add support in devstack unless we can also test it | 19:43 |
clarkb | gmaan: we do not have centos 10 stream test nodes because centos 10 stream ( and rhel 10 and rockylinux 10) all require x86-64-v3 level of hardware | 19:43 |
clarkb | and not all of our clouds can support it. I think Two clouds are thought to not support it (rax-classix and one other I don't remember). | 19:44 |
clarkb | Then on top of that centos 10 stream (rhel 10 etc) dropped support for networking config via config files and everything has to done with network manager | 19:44 |
frickler | that, plus glean and dib need patches | 19:44 |
clarkb | there is a change up to add support to glean for that | 19:44 |
clarkb | yup | 19:44 |
clarkb | but basically the hardware support issue has made it tough for the testing of dib and glean beacuse the tests for those chagnes also need to have sufficient hardware to run the test centos 10 stream | 19:45 |
clarkb | now that you are at red hat you might be able to help push that along :) | 19:45 |
gmaan | i see | 19:45 |
opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Add hypervisors API 2.88 microversion schema https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/948490 | 20:03 |
opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/devstack master: Stop running c9s and rocky jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/948592 | 21:25 |
opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Add hypervisors API 2.88 microversion schema https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/948490 | 21:34 |
opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Add hypervisors API 2.88 microversion schema https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/948490 | 22:23 |
opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Add hypervisors API 2.88 microversion schema https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/948490 | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!