mnasiadka | ttx: that was the case last time as well - see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/926980 - since these are very trivial patches (just remove and add some setup.cfg entries) - we could do the same | 05:45 |
---|---|---|
ttx | mnasiadka: ack | 08:11 |
frickler | release-team: not sure if the test-release failures will also affect actual releases. please check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/940105 anyway | 08:23 |
* frickler is going afk for 2h now but will possibly self-approve after that | 08:24 | |
*** tosky_ is now known as tosky | 08:53 | |
opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/releases master: pbr 6.2.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/940118 | 10:30 |
frickler | stephenfin: iiuc there was planned to be a b1 release first? see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/938505 . still pending PTL feedback, though | 10:33 |
frickler | release-team: checking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/938510/1 so we are prepared for the above would also be nice | 10:34 |
opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/releases master: [zun] Transition 2023.1 Antelope kuryr* to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/939950 | 10:45 |
frickler | ^^ I wasn't sure whether to do all the team updates in one patch, but then why not? | 10:48 |
stephenfin | frickler: Ah, I had not seen that | 10:56 |
frickler | seems the validation is failing only for eom branches here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/939950 so do we keep them with the old team or does someone want to fix the validation? | 13:10 |
*** tosky is now known as Guest6863 | 13:19 | |
*** tosky_ is now known as tosky | 13:19 | |
elodilles | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Jan 24 14:00:06 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is elodilles. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:00 |
elodilles | Ping list: release-team armstrong | 14:00 |
elodilles | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/epoxy-relmgt-tracking | 14:00 |
elodilles | we are at line 215 | 14:00 |
elodilles | o/ | 14:01 |
ttx | o/ | 14:01 |
armstrong | o/ | 14:01 |
frickler | \o | 14:02 |
elodilles | let's start! | 14:02 |
elodilles | #topic Review task completion | 14:02 |
elodilles | ' Generate a list of intermediary-released service deliverables that have not done a release in this cycle yet (ttx)' | 14:02 |
elodilles | i see a list of deliverables here: | 14:02 |
elodilles | horizon | 14:03 |
elodilles | bifrost ironic-inspector ironic-prometheus-exporter ironic-python-agent-builder ironic-ui networking-baremetal networking-generic-switch | 14:03 |
elodilles | release-test, requirements | 14:03 |
elodilles | swift | 14:03 |
elodilles | --- | 14:03 |
frickler | requirements doesn't do any releases at all? that one got me confused | 14:03 |
elodilles | well, release-test and requirements repos are just 'noise' | 14:04 |
ttx | yeah, definitely not thing we'd change the release model of | 14:04 |
elodilles | we don't require any release from those repos | 14:04 |
elodilles | what about the others? | 14:05 |
ttx | i think those are pretty classic, no need to suggest a switch | 14:06 |
ttx | horizon is the only one we could ask about | 14:06 |
ttx | since they used to be cycle-with-rc and switched | 14:06 |
elodilles | yeah i remember some of these appear on this list time to time | 14:07 |
ttx | so we could ask them if they still want the ability to release multiple times in a cycle | 14:07 |
ttx | ironic and Swift we had that discussion multiple times already | 14:07 |
elodilles | yepp | 14:07 |
ttx | no need to reignite it | 14:07 |
elodilles | +1 | 14:07 |
ttx | but yes, we could ask for Horizon | 14:08 |
elodilles | let's do that then | 14:08 |
ttx | I'll add an action towards that in the tracker | 14:08 |
elodilles | thanks o/ | 14:08 |
elodilles | cool | 14:09 |
elodilles | next task then: | 14:09 |
elodilles | ' Once https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/938938 is done:' | 14:09 |
elodilles | Merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/938780 (all) | 14:09 |
elodilles | Add Freezer back to OpenStack map (ttx) | 14:09 |
elodilles | as far as I can see the governance patch is not yet merged :/ | 14:09 |
ttx | yeah, so we should push it back | 14:10 |
ttx | I'll copy it over to next weeks | 14:10 |
elodilles | ACK, thanks again | 14:10 |
elodilles | that's all then about this topic | 14:10 |
elodilles | #topic Assign R-8 week tasks | 14:11 |
ttx | al set! | 14:11 |
ttx | all* | 14:11 |
elodilles | \o/ | 14:11 |
elodilles | #topic Review weekly countdown email | 14:12 |
elodilles | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:12 |
elodilles | so the question is whether we want to send it at all | 14:13 |
elodilles | 1st part is about the release model change (above discussed task) | 14:13 |
ttx | yeah... we could skip it | 14:13 |
elodilles | or just advertise 2025.2 Flamingo release schedule proposal patch | 14:14 |
elodilles | ttx: did you have the time to think about the schedule patch? | 14:14 |
elodilles | should we advertise that to PTLs? | 14:14 |
elodilles | and ML? | 14:14 |
ttx | yeah I think it works, so we should ask people on the list to review it | 14:15 |
ttx | but probably a specific thread rather than release countdown | 14:15 |
elodilles | ok, i was thinking about here in the release countdown, but you are right | 14:15 |
elodilles | #action elod to send mail about 2025.2 Flamingo release schedule proposal patch | 14:16 |
elodilles | i'll send it after the meeting | 14:16 |
elodilles | and skip the release countdown mail then | 14:16 |
frickler | +1 | 14:17 |
elodilles | #topic Open Discussion | 14:17 |
elodilles | anything to discuss? | 14:17 |
fungi | i didn't have anything | 14:17 |
frickler | couple of things I mentioned earlier | 14:17 |
frickler | seems the validation is failing only for eom branches here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/939950 so do we keep them with the old team or does someone want to fix the validation? | 14:17 |
elodilles | awww | 14:18 |
frickler | checking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/938510/1 so we are prepared for the pbr beta release | 14:18 |
elodilles | let's keep them the old team for EOM branches | 14:18 |
elodilles | i don't want to rewrite history anyway... :S | 14:18 |
frickler | also the ensure-twine fix for noble needs more work https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-jobs/+/940074 | 14:19 |
ttx | approved 938510 | 14:19 |
ttx | maybe wait until monday to approve the PBR release though | 14:19 |
frickler | ok, so I'll amend 939950 again, then | 14:19 |
frickler | the pbr patch is still waiting for PTL feedback anyway? at least it was earlier today | 14:20 |
elodilles | yep, let's keep it open until monday | 14:20 |
elodilles | #action approve PBR beta release patch on early Monday | 14:21 |
frickler | I would have hoped to be able to revert 2023.1 to eom today, but we're not there yet. or do we want to re-revert another cycle next week? | 14:21 |
elodilles | is this OK ^^^ ? | 14:21 |
frickler | I think that's fine, yes | 14:22 |
ttx | ack | 14:22 |
ttx | works for me | 14:22 |
elodilles | frickler: meh, let's just wait and try to finalize things for 2023.1 asap next week :/ | 14:22 |
elodilles | i imagined this as a quick, one shot merge of stack of patches within some hours, but obviously i was too optimistic | 14:23 |
frickler | yes, too many skeletons in the closet ;) | 14:24 |
frickler | anyway, that's it from me I guess | 14:24 |
elodilles | ACK | 14:24 |
elodilles | thanks for bringing these up frickler ! | 14:25 |
elodilles | anything else? | 14:25 |
elodilles | silence indicates me that we don't have other things to discuss :) | 14:26 |
elodilles | so thanks everyone for participating | 14:26 |
elodilles | #endmeeting | 14:26 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Jan 24 14:26:44 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:26 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-01-24-14.00.html | 14:26 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-01-24-14.00.txt | 14:26 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-01-24-14.00.log.html | 14:26 |
ttx | Thanks elodilles | 14:26 |
elodilles | np :) | 14:26 |
opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/releases master: [zun] Transition 2023.1 Antelope kuryr* to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/939950 | 14:29 |
frickler | ^^ so that now only touches those where releases may still happen, hope that passes tests now | 14:30 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Allow pre-releases for independent deliverables https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/938510 | 14:34 |
elodilles | frickler: thanks, +2'd ! | 14:47 |
frickler | ttx: do you still have a moment to check ^^? else I'd just self-approve to unblock noonedeadpunk | 14:51 |
ttx | yes | 14:56 |
ttx | done | 14:56 |
frickler | thx | 14:56 |
noonedeadpunk | thanks for the reminder, smth still was failing in ours patch, except kuryr | 14:58 |
noonedeadpunk | frickler: if you around - your review of https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22release_osa%22+status:open would be also helpful :) | 15:08 |
frickler | done, thx for the reminder, kind of forgot about those due to the other troubles | 15:25 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible Dalmatian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/939688 | 15:36 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible for Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/939689 | 15:59 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible for Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/939690 | 15:59 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [zun] Transition 2023.1 Antelope kuryr* to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/939950 | 15:59 |
gmann | frickler: need your feedback on the release DPL model https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/939486 | 19:55 |
opendevreview | Ian Y. Choi proposed openstack/releases master: Add dates for 2025.2/"F" elections https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/939927 | 22:22 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!