opendevreview | Amy Marrich proposed openstack/election master: Adding a campaigning period for TC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/856350 | 00:18 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Amy Marrich proposed openstack/election master: Adding a campaigning period for TC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/856350 | 01:39 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding a campaigning period for TC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/856350 | 03:37 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Grzegorz Grasza candidacy for Barbican https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/856295 | 03:37 |
frickler | seems gtema submitted their PTL candidacy for zed instead of a, and it got merged and noone noticed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/855313 | 07:20 |
frickler | I was confused when I saw that SDK is still lacking a candidate | 07:21 |
ttx | Zed forever! | 07:27 |
*** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|afk | 08:08 | |
*** frenzy_friday is now known as frenzyfriday|afk | 09:09 | |
*** pojadhav|afk is now known as pojadhav | 09:29 | |
*** frenzyfriday|afk is now known as frenzyfriday | 09:54 | |
*** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 12:56 | |
spotz | I asked gtema to redo the patch so it's official but it'll be fine | 13:42 |
opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/election master: Put Artem Goncharov candidacy (SDK) to the correct cycle https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/856526 | 13:56 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Put Artem Goncharov candidacy (SDK) to the correct cycle https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/856526 | 14:25 |
slaweq | tc-members: ping, meeting in 5 minutes | 14:55 |
rosmaita | thanks! | 14:58 |
slaweq | #startmeeting tc | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Thu Sep 8 15:00:11 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'tc' | 15:00 |
slaweq | #topic Roll call | 15:00 |
slaweq | o/ | 15:00 |
dansmith | o/ | 15:00 |
knikolla | o/ | 15:00 |
dmendiza[m] | \o | 15:00 |
rosmaita | o/ | 15:00 |
jungleboyj | o/ | 15:00 |
slaweq | gmann: and arne_wiebalck will not attend today's meeting | 15:01 |
slaweq | so I guess we are waiting for spotz and diablo_rojo | 15:02 |
slaweq | ok, I think we can start as we have quorum alread | 15:03 |
slaweq | spotz: and diablo_rojo will maybe join later | 15:03 |
slaweq | today's agenda #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee | 15:03 |
slaweq | #topic Follow up on past action items | 15:04 |
noonedeadpunk | o/ | 15:04 |
spotz | here | 15:04 |
slaweq | there are 4 items on the list from last week but all assigned to gmann | 15:04 |
slaweq | welcome noonedeadpunk and spotz :) | 15:04 |
jungleboyj | \o/ | 15:05 |
slaweq | so I guess we can skip that section as gmann is not here and move on to the next topic today | 15:05 |
slaweq | I will just add all of those for gmann for next week, to not forget | 15:05 |
slaweq | #action gmann to add community-wide goal productivity and how to make work fast in PTG etherpas | 15:05 |
slaweq | #action gmann to add and invite SIG I18 chair/members to TC+ Leader interaction session | 15:05 |
slaweq | #action gmann to check with PTG organizer about 17-19 UTC slot booking | 15:06 |
slaweq | #action gmann to book operator hours slot and ask PTL to choose them | 15:06 |
dansmith | I think nova has done that now right? | 15:06 |
slaweq | #topic Gate health check | 15:06 |
fungi | nova and cinder both have, yes | 15:06 |
dansmith | cool | 15:06 |
jungleboyj | Excellent. | 15:07 |
dansmith | slaweq: I don't have anything for gate health this week | 15:07 |
slaweq | thx | 15:07 |
dansmith | FF went pretty well in terms of gate perf I think | 15:07 |
*** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|out | 15:07 | |
slaweq | I know that with new oslo.db 12.1.0 neutron's functional tests are broken | 15:07 |
slaweq | but we have fix in review already | 15:07 |
slaweq | and also some UT jobs with that oslo.db version is failing intermittently | 15:08 |
slaweq | dansmith: yes, I didn't saw any big stress in the gate during the FF week | 15:08 |
jungleboyj | That is good news! | 15:09 |
slaweq | regarding rechecks stats, new data is on #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary | 15:09 |
slaweq | but it looks generally good | 15:09 |
slaweq | I don't see any major problems there really | 15:09 |
slaweq | anything else regarding gate for today or can we move on? | 15:10 |
slaweq | ok, lets move on | 15:11 |
slaweq | #topic Checks on Zed cycle tracker | 15:11 |
slaweq | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker | 15:11 |
slaweq | any updates about it? | 15:12 |
rosmaita | i have a question about item #2 | 15:12 |
rosmaita | it looks like the openstack-specs guidelines have already been moved into a "real" repo | 15:13 |
rosmaita | https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.log/latest/user/guidelines.html | 15:13 |
rosmaita | that page is basically the old spec revised a bit | 15:13 |
rosmaita | so my question is, should we have this thing live in oslo.log, or do we want to have something in the project guide? | 15:14 |
jungleboyj | I wouldn't think we would want to duplicate. | 15:15 |
rosmaita | it seems to make sense in oslo.log as a place people will look | 15:15 |
jungleboyj | Maybe provide a link to it? | 15:15 |
knikolla | i think it makes sense in oslo.log | 15:15 |
jungleboyj | rosmaita: ++ | 15:15 |
slaweq | yeah, I agree that oslo.log is good place for that | 15:16 |
noonedeadpunk | +1 oslo.log is where I'd start looking, but linking is important as well | 15:16 |
slaweq | easier to find probably then openstack-specs | 15:16 |
rosmaita | ok, then i will put up a patch to the spec saying where the real page is now, and also update the wiki with a link to oslo.log | 15:16 |
rosmaita | right, in the specs repo you are never sure how accurate/up-to-date it is | 15:16 |
rosmaita | ok, thanks | 15:16 |
jungleboyj | Yeah. That sounds like a good plan to me. | 15:17 |
slaweq | any other updates? | 15:17 |
jungleboyj | Unfortunately ... no. | 15:17 |
slaweq | ok, so I think that we can move on to the next topic | 15:18 |
slaweq | #topic 2023.1 cycle PTG Planning | 15:18 |
slaweq | TC + Leaders interaction sessions | 15:18 |
slaweq | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-leaders-interaction-2023-1 | 15:18 |
slaweq | not many topics on the list so far | 15:19 |
slaweq | TC PTG etherpad | 15:20 |
slaweq | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023-1-ptg | 15:20 |
slaweq | also, here there are no many topics added so far | 15:21 |
slaweq | if You have any topics, please add them to the etherpads | 15:21 |
slaweq | about operator hours I think we should wait for gmann to be back | 15:22 |
slaweq | as he had to book time slots for it | 15:22 |
slaweq | anything You want to discuss regarding to the PTG planning today? | 15:22 |
slaweq | I guess that this means "no" :) | 15:23 |
slaweq | #topic 2023.1 cycle Technical Election | 15:23 |
slaweq | spotz: any updates on that topic? | 15:24 |
spotz | We will have a few seats the TC needs to appoint as far as PTLs | 15:24 |
spotz | As we are having voting we put in a patch to have campaigning until Monday for the TC nominations to have a chance to campaign, folks to be able to opt-in to CIVS and for us to get everything setup | 15:25 |
fungi | i didn't pay close attention, but have communications included reminders where/how interested voters can opt into receiving ballots? | 15:26 |
fungi | it's been probably a year since we last needed to do that, and memories are short | 15:26 |
spotz | That hasn't gone out yet fungi, when I sent the noms closed email I didn't know Ian had done anything on the CIVS side | 15:26 |
spotz | pulling a list please hold | 15:27 |
spotz | Ok so OpenStackSDK fors have a nomination but they submitted under Zed vs Antelope so we have that straitghened out | 15:27 |
spotz | Barbican had a late merged nom but made the deadline on the nom | 15:28 |
knikolla | I think this step can be done independently of setting CIVS up, I can respond to the email spotz sent directing people to how to opt in to receiving mail from CIVS | 15:28 |
spotz | Keystone and Zun will need to be appointed from TC but do have volunteers | 15:28 |
fungi | well, the voter opt-ins have to be done before voter addresses are uploaded to civs, since that's the point at which it decides whether to send ballots to them | 15:28 |
spotz | Swift said they were sending one but not received | 15:29 |
spotz | Masakari has a volunteer | 15:29 |
spotz | I think that's everyone | 15:29 |
spotz | NO PTL elections needed | 15:29 |
jungleboyj | I thought there were two candidates for Ironic. | 15:29 |
spotz | We have 6 folks running for TC's 4 seats so will have an election | 15:29 |
slaweq | even for Ironic? I think I saw in Your email that Ironic will have election | 15:30 |
spotz | ooh let me look | 15:30 |
jungleboyj | :-) | 15:30 |
noonedeadpunk | I can recall also venus not having PTL that needs to appointed? | 15:31 |
spotz | Oh ok Ironic will have an election! | 15:31 |
spotz | noonedeadpunk: We need a volunteer before we can appoint:) | 15:31 |
jungleboyj | I thought I saw that. | 15:32 |
spotz | Zun and Keystone didn't have patches in the time frame but did nominate, Masakari volunteered so we have people to appoint | 15:32 |
knikolla | sent email about opting in to CIVS. | 15:34 |
spotz | Thanks knikolla | 15:34 |
spotz | I pinged Ian in the elctions channel about Ironic:) | 15:34 |
spotz | So that's where we are on the election. | 15:35 |
slaweq | thx spotz and knikolla for an updates | 15:37 |
slaweq | with that I think we can move to the last topic for today, which is | 15:37 |
slaweq | #topic Open Reviews | 15:37 |
jungleboyj | *drumroll* | 15:37 |
slaweq | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open | 15:37 |
slaweq | jungleboyj: :D | 15:38 |
slaweq | please check patches on that list and review if You didn't yet :) | 15:38 |
slaweq | especially https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854375 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/855276 | 15:39 |
slaweq | and that's all for today :) | 15:39 |
slaweq | I can give You 20 minutes back | 15:39 |
slaweq | thx for attending the meeting and see You online | 15:39 |
jungleboyj | slaweq: Thanks for running things! | 15:39 |
slaweq | #endmeeting | 15:39 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Thu Sep 8 15:39:51 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:39 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-09-08-15.00.html | 15:39 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-09-08-15.00.txt | 15:39 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-09-08-15.00.log.html | 15:39 |
slaweq | jungleboyj: yw :) | 15:39 |
spotz | Thanks! | 15:40 |
jungleboyj | Nice CIVS does tell you if you have already activated. | 15:41 |
fungi | interestingly, it did not seem to think i had done so (though i have now, of course) | 15:47 |
fungi | i wonder if i did at some point in the past and they expire them after a while, or something | 15:48 |
spotz | Yeah cause you always use the same email | 15:51 |
fungi | i do indeed do that, yes | 15:52 |
spotz | So expiration makes the most sense:) | 15:55 |
fungi | well, the other possibility is that we never had an actual election i was part of the electorate for after that mechanism was put into place, so i never bothered | 15:55 |
*** gibi is now known as gibi_off | 16:16 | |
jungleboyj | It is a mystery. :-) | 16:18 |
fungi | yeah, i vaguely recall we had one cycle with no polls at all, and one with only a poll for ptl of a team i wasn't a contributor to, so i probably just never got around to opting in | 16:19 |
*** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 21:13 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!