opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/governance master: Show TC and SIG repos in projects page https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/918488 | 00:28 |
---|---|---|
*** dasm is now known as Guest7895 | 00:38 | |
opendevreview | Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/project-team-guide master: Add info about recheck comments with "unrelated failure" info https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-team-guide/+/914065 | 07:11 |
*** whoami-rajat_ is now known as whoami-rajat | 14:07 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 15:11 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 15:32 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 15:52 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 16:53 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 17:01 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 17:27 | |
fungi | https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.html#timeline states "A new project must become an active OpenStack project before the third OpenStack coordinated release after the project has entered Emerging Technology status." which for skyline would have been before caracal. was there discussion of that situation resulting in a decision not to | 17:33 |
fungi | retire it yet? | 17:33 |
fungi | or did having that discussion slip through the cracks? | 17:34 |
gmann | I think TC has not checked its state yet, once we checks its current state and whether it met the new project requirements then we can take any decision | 17:35 |
gmann | it will be good to add it in for next meeting agenda or in tracker so that we have dedicated member}s to finish it. | 17:36 |
gmann | we discussed about it a few times but no one has taken the task and check it state. | 17:37 |
fungi | yeah, if i'm reading the policy correctly, the tc is a cycle past due for making a decision on skyline (either to retire or explicitly defer for another cycle) | 17:37 |
gmann | yes, you are right. TC is a cycle past on this activity. | 17:38 |
fungi | also it doesn't seem like the skyline maintainers have come to the tc to indicate they're ready to be a full project | 17:38 |
fungi | or to let the tc know they want more time. which is concerning, but maybe they don't realize they should do so | 17:39 |
gmann | true | 17:39 |
gmann | if project is not approaching at least TC should do to have a clear state in our doc. | 17:41 |
frickler | there was some discussion in january and JayF had some contact with the team https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2024-01-23.log.html#t2024-01-23T18:07:02 but no followup at the PTG afaict | 17:46 |
fungi | okay so it did sort of get started at least | 17:47 |
frickler | then there was the missed PTL election and late appointment | 17:47 |
gmann | I have added it in 2024.2 tracker so that we can track it https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2024.2-tracker#L133 | 17:48 |
gmann | no assignee yet but that is something gouthamr can check with tc-members if anyone volunteer to do so | 17:48 |
fungi | awesome, thanks! | 17:48 |
frickler | not sure when and how the TC would need to formalize the "let's wait and see how it develops" | 17:49 |
fungi | agreed, there should probably be some formal way to declare that decision, other than implicitly through indecision | 17:50 |
* gouthamr reads backlog now | 18:50 | |
gouthamr | there's nothing on https://ptg.opendev.org/ to indicate if skyline folks met at this PTG | 18:51 |
gouthamr | but we had some more context from wu_wenxiang_ on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/915108 | 18:52 |
gouthamr | there's quite some project activity https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%5Eopenstack/skyline.* | 18:54 |
gouthamr | ty for adding the checks to the tracker gmann | 18:56 |
spotz[m] | There weren't many groups at this past PTG | 19:10 |
gouthamr | true; not a requirement.. but, i was hoping to see them start regular meetings, like the rest of us.. that isn't a thing either: https://meetings.opendev.org/ .. it is a small-ish team: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Skyline#Getting_in_Touch | 19:58 |
frickler | well, not much different than a lot of other teams these days. actually better than some of them ;) | 20:14 |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 23:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!