Wednesday, 2023-06-14

rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed nfvinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for nfvsig-openvswitch2.17-release  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/nfvinfo/+/4885400:07
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed nfvinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for nfvsig-openvswitch3.1-release  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/nfvinfo/+/4851900:07
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed rdoinfo master: Bump rdoinfo antelope tags to latest upper-constraints  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4887400:20
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for antelope-9s-release  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4879100:24
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for zed-9s-release  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4872000:29
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed deps/python-croniter c9s-bobcat-rdo: Update to 1.3.14  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/deps/python-croniter/+/4887500:30
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed deps/python-simplejson c9s-bobcat-rdo: Update to 3.19.1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/deps/python-simplejson/+/4887600:30
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed rdoinfo master: Promote CBS tags update for yoga-9s-release  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4872100:31
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed deps/python-croniter c9s-bobcat-rdo: Update to 1.3.14  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/deps/python-croniter/+/4887506:12
rdogerritMerged deps/python-simplejson c9s-bobcat-rdo: Update to 3.19.1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/deps/python-simplejson/+/4887606:22
rdogerritMerged deps/python-croniter c9s-bobcat-rdo: Update to 1.3.14  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/deps/python-croniter/+/4887506:48
*** elvira2 is now known as elvira07:59
ncuxonow that tripleo is deprecated and no longer maintained, I can't find documentation on how to install rdo for production08:23
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: Replace zuul-worker with zuul user  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4874608:36
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: Move dpa jobs to cs9 nodeset  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4879208:37
opendevreviewAlfredo Moralejo proposed x/packstack master: DNM test with latest modules from puppetfile  https://review.opendev.org/c/x/packstack/+/88604908:59
rdogerritMerged rdoinfo master: Bump rdoinfo antelope tags to latest upper-constraints  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4887408:59
rdogerritrdo-trunk rdo-trunk proposed openstack/neutron-lib-distgit antelope-rdo: python-neutron-lib-3.4.1-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/neutron-lib-distgit/+/4887709:02
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdoinfo master: Revert "Pin puppet-stdlib to last promoted commit"  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4849209:08
opendevreviewAlfredo Moralejo proposed x/packstack master: Namespace ensure_packages in stdlib puppet module  https://review.opendev.org/c/x/packstack/+/88607009:09
amoralejjcapitao[m], ^ i think we will need more fixes for puppet-stdlib09:09
jcapitao[m]yeah I think so but wasn't sure09:10
amoralejpuppet pipeline jobs are failing and i think it's using puppetfile09:11
jcapitao[m]since https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-firewall/commit/c3ecad6fbc622dd8d0bc14522aaf3c32227d0e48 in master09:13
jcapitao[m]and Namespacing was introduced in stdlib v9.0.0 according to https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-firewall/commit/14bc5140cbbfbe9093540a6d9b0de2c8f569365309:14
jcapitao[m]amoralej: we'll have to pin puppet-firewall I guess09:15
jcapitao[m]until we'll be able to unping stdlib09:15
amoralejv9.0.0 contains the namespacing?09:15
amoralejo thought it was post-9.0.009:15
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: Replace zuul-worker with zuul user  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4874609:16
jcapitao[m]amoralej: since 9.0.0 https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-stdlib/releases09:20
jcapitao[m]https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-stdlib/pull/135609:20
amoralejright09:30
amoralejso, what's the issue with puppet-firewall? it does not support 9.0.0 or it requires 9.0.0?09:31
jcapitao[m]it require stdlib >=9.0.009:38
amoralejwe'll need to pin then09:40
amoralejhttps://review.opendev.org/c/x/packstack/+/886049 is passing ....09:42
amoralejdunno why09:42
amoralejhttps://github.com/redhat-openstack/packstack/blob/master/Puppetfile#L147-L14909:44
amoralejit prints a warning for ensure_packages but does not fail09:45
amoralej[1;33mWarning: This function is deprecated, please use stdlib::ensure_packages instead. at ["/var/tmp/packstack/62e231a33b5d4e4ba6494ece6f00a431/modules/packstack/manifests/mariadb.pp", 16]:["/var/tmp/packstack/62e231a33b5d4e4ba6494ece6f00a431/manifests/173.231.255.104_controller.pp", 18]09:45
amoralejactually, we can check the warnings to find all the changes we need from stdlib09:46
opendevreviewAlfredo Moralejo proposed x/packstack master: Namespace ensure_packages and merge in stdlib puppet module  https://review.opendev.org/c/x/packstack/+/88607010:01
rdogerritKarolina Kula proposed rdo-infra/releng master: [WIP] New script for upgrading spec files  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/releng/+/4887110:04
amoralejjcapitao[m], anyway, we probably will need to pin stdlib in packstack in puppetfile to 8.6.0 as in p-o-i10:07
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: Replace zuul-worker with zuul user  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4874610:07
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: Move dpa jobs to cs9 nodeset  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4879210:08
jcapitao[m]ah10:11
jcapitao[m]so it's passing packstack CI10:13
jcapitao[m]as it pull latest stdlib10:13
jcapitao[m]but failing in weirdo jobs as it consumes stdlib RPM10:14
jcapitao[m]which is pinned10:14
amoralejbut that does not make sense10:15
amoraleji mean, why fails with rpm if it's pinned?10:15
amoralejit should be the opposite10:15
amoralejactually i wonder if it's actually deploying them from puppetfile10:16
amoralejwe are using weirdo option -e enable_puppet_modules_rpm=false10:17
amoraleji'm not sure that's relevant in packstack jobs, tbh10:17
jcapitao[m]right, enable_puppet_modules_rpm is not used in ansible-role-weirdo-packstack10:21
jcapitao[m]it's used by ansible-role-weirdo-puppet-openstack10:22
amoralejthen, i don't understand why fails with rpm and not in upstream ...10:24
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: [WIP] [DNM] Early attempt to create new adoption job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4887810:32
jcapitao[m]amoralej: what I understand is that we install from source in upstream jobs10:33
jcapitao[m]INSTALL_FROM_SOURCE=true spotted in https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_f19/886049/1/check/packstack-centos9s-integration-scenario001/f19f13f/job-output.txt10:33
jcapitao[m]and we install from RPM in weirdo job as per https://github.com/rdo-infra/ansible-role-weirdo-packstack/blob/master/defaults/main.yml#L2210:34
amoralejyes10:34
amoralejso, that's my point10:34
amoralejshouldn't it fail when deploying from code?10:34
amoralejas it points to puppet-stdlib main branch10:34
amoralejand why it fails from rpm if we are installing puppet-stdling-8.5.1...10:35
amoralej?10:35
jcapitao[m]yes10:35
amoralejit's the opposite that i would expect10:35
jcapitao[m]yes for the former10:35
jcapitao[m]for the latter, we have pin stdlib to <9.0.0 but puppet-firewall which is pulling master requires stdlib>=9.0.010:37
amoralejah! got it now10:38
amoraleji misunderstood the issue10:39
amoralejso, actually should not merge my reviews10:39
amoralejuntil we can unpin10:40
amoraleji misread the error, actually10:40
amoralejok, let's push the pin to puppet-firewall10:40
jcapitao[m]back to the former, the only reason it didn't fail it's because it looks like it's fixed now10:40
jcapitao[m]https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/48492/510:40
jcapitao[m]we can unpin stdlib10:41
amoralejgood https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-openstack-integration/+/885931 is also passing10:42
amoralejwhich updates to 9.0.010:42
jcapitao[m]nice, it all makes sense now10:43
amoralejyep, sorry for the noise10:43
amoraleji misunderstood the issue in first place10:43
jcapitao[m]no worries I was a bit lost earlier tbh10:44
amoralejmerging the unpin10:47
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: [WIP] [DNM] Early attempt to create new adoption job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4887810:48
rdogerritMerged rdoinfo master: Revert "Pin puppet-stdlib to last promoted commit"  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/4849210:53
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: [WIP] [DNM] Early attempt to create new adoption job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4887810:57
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch10:58
rdogerritMerged openstack/neutron-lib-distgit antelope-rdo: python-neutron-lib-3.4.1-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/neutron-lib-distgit/+/4887711:02
rdogerritMerged openstack/neutron-distgit yoga-rdo: openstack-neutron-20.3.1-1  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/neutron-distgit/+/4885811:11
rdogerritMerged rdo-jobs master: Rename dpa job to centos-9-standalone-to-crc-data-plane-adoption  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4886711:51
rdogerritMarios Andreou proposed rdo-jobs master: Fixes log collection for data plane adoption jobs  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4885211:51
rdogerritMerged rdo-jobs master: Fixes log collection for data plane adoption jobs  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4885212:01
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: Replace zuul-worker with zuul user  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4874612:34
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: Move dpa jobs to cs9 nodeset  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4879212:36
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: [WIP] [DNM] Early attempt to create new adoption job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4887812:47
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej12:53
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: [WIP] [DNM] Early attempt to create new adoption job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4887813:16
rdogerritMerged config master: Re-add github-check to data-plane-adoption project after job rename  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/4887013:19
amoralejkarolinku[m], jcapitao[m] i've left some comments and questions in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/releng/+/48871 wrt implementation details of migration to pyproject-rpms-macros. I think we can use that review to discuss specific implementation details for the migration13:21
jcapitao[m]ack13:23
* jcapitao[m] reading the comments13:23
karolinku[m]for those which are resolved - I already fix and will upload soon13:24
amoralejgood13:28
amoralejdid i forget to ask for volunteers to chair in the last meeting?13:44
karolinku[m]yes;) I can take it13:45
amoralejthanks!13:45
rdogerritKarolina Kula proposed rdo-infra/releng master: [WIP] New script for upgrading spec files  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/releng/+/4887113:45
karolinku[m]it's a meeting time! add you topics to agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/RDO-Meeting14:00
karolinku[m]#startmeeting RDO meeting - 2023-06-1414:01
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed Jun 14 14:01:07 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is karolinku[m]. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:01
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'rdo_meeting___2023_06_14'14:01
amoralejo/14:01
karolinku[m]# topic roll call14:01
karolinku[m]#topic roll call14:01
karolinku[m]#chair amoralej14:02
opendevmeetCurrent chairs: amoralej karolinku[m]14:02
jcapitao[m]o/14:02
karolinku[m]#chair jcapitao14:02
opendevmeetWarning: Nick not in channel: jcapitao14:02
opendevmeetCurrent chairs: amoralej jcapitao karolinku[m]14:02
evallesp_#chair evallesp14:03
evallesp_#chair evallesp_14:03
karolinku[m]hello evallesp_!14:04
karolinku[m]#chair evallesp_14:04
opendevmeetWarning: Nick not in channel: evallesp_14:04
opendevmeetCurrent chairs: amoralej evallesp_ jcapitao karolinku[m]14:04
evallespI had two sessions, please try without the "_"14:05
karolinku[m]#chair jcapitao[m] evallesp14:05
opendevmeetCurrent chairs: amoralej evallesp evallesp_ jcapitao jcapitao[m] karolinku[m]14:05
karolinku[m]ok, lets move to first topic14:07
karolinku[m]#topic spec upgrade script - update14:07
karolinku[m]#link https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/releng/+/4887114:08
karolinku[m]so, the scirpt needs some minor adjustments, but main func are implemented, its ready for a review14:08
amoralejgood14:08
amoraleji'll check, there is some regex black magic that i need to check :)14:09
karolinku[m]maybe I should provide some comments for that14:09
karolinku[m]I will add it14:09
jcapitao[m]thanks14:10
jcapitao[m]so we can start to the migration ?14:10
amoraleji also think we can add some more automate replacements as for replacing sphinx-build or stestr by macros as in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/glance-distgit/+/46574/4/openstack-glance.spec14:11
amoraleji'll comment in the script14:11
karolinku[m]what needs to me worked in the scirpt: fixing %files and %check14:11
rdogerritAlfredo Moralejo proposed rdo-jobs master: Create two non-voting jobs to compare requires and BRs from latest trunk  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4836514:12
jcapitao[m]ah yes sorry14:12
karolinku[m]I will work on it more tomorrow, then on Friday and Monday im on DevConf14:13
amoralejkarolinku[m], do you mind if we take it over during those days?14:13
amoraleji mean, on friday and monday14:14
jcapitao[m]I was wondering whether or not we should list the files (i.e rpm -qlp) at the end of your jobs amoralej 14:14
amoralejif needed14:14
amoralejmmmm14:14
amoralejso comparing list of files, right?14:14
jcapitao[m]I usually do it when migrating Fedora openstack-sig pkgs SPECs14:15
amoralejsimilar to compare-deps you mean?14:15
jcapitao[m]yes14:15
amoralejok, lgtm14:15
amoralejwill you create a new job for it ?14:15
jcapitao[m]to ensure we don't miss nothing or to spot suspicious changes14:15
amoralejor prefer to do it as part of one of the new compare ones?14:15
jcapitao[m]mmmh maybe as part of one of them14:16
amoralejif we do it as part of one of them, we need to make very clear why the job fails14:17
jcapitao[m]right14:18
jcapitao[m]so another job then14:18
amoralejso, you can send a patch on top of https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/48365 adding or modifying14:18
jcapitao[m]ok I'll propose PS14:18
amoralejtbh, i'm not sure, from one side, a new job means building the package again...14:18
amoralejjcapitao[m], no, let's keep it in a separated review14:19
amoralejnot a new PS14:19
karolinku[m]#topic jobs to compare requires and BRs from latest trunk14:19
jcapitao[m]ah sorry14:19
jcapitao[m]yes on top of your patch14:19
amoralejso it's easier to review14:19
jcapitao[m]ok14:19
jcapitao[m]yeah14:19
karolinku[m]#link  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/48365 14:19
amoraleji've prepared a new etherpad for coordination once we start implementing it btw https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/pyproject-macros-coordination14:20
karolinku[m]sorry, any action planned wrt CI jobs?14:20
amoralejjcapitao[m] will implement file list comparison for rpms before and after the patch in a ci job14:21
karolinku[m]#action jcapitao[m] will implement file list comparison for rpms before and after the patch in a ci job14:22
jcapitao[m]ack for the etherpad14:24
jcapitao[m]could we give priority on client ?14:24
jcapitao[m]as I'll have to build them on EPEL9 soon 14:25
amoralejok14:26
amoralejbut note these specs are for bobcat so we will not update fedora specs up to bobcat GA14:26
amoralejor you planned to push it before that?14:26
jcapitao[m]I think I will have to sync before bobcat GA, to avoid doing twice the job (i.e rebasing patch)14:29
jcapitao[m]but not sure yet14:29
jcapitao[m]it depends on how fast the required dep lands on EPEL914:29
jcapitao[m]so no worries for now14:30
amoralejbut we can't backport this to antelope14:31
amoraleji mean, we shouldn't14:31
jcapitao[m]mmh14:33
jcapitao[m]you mean antelope version of clients in Fedora ? 14:33
amoralejyes14:34
amoralejso, what i mean is that, if we want these patches to be pushed to fedora14:34
amoralejwe usually sync from last released branches in RDO14:35
jcapitao[m]ah14:35
jcapitao[m]why shouldn't we ?14:35
jcapitao[m]yes14:35
amoralejactually, the idea of moving pyproject to bobcat was to not affect antelope, i'd say this is a too big change to do post-ga14:36
amoralejstable branches should be stable :)14:36
jcapitao[m]right14:37
jcapitao[m]let's not overcomplicate the sync process14:37
jcapitao[m]I'll wait for bobcat GA to use pyproject macros on EPEL ;)14:38
amoralejthe other option would be to backport this change to antelope versions in fedora only, not rdo14:38
amoralejbut i don't know if that's worthy tbh14:39
amoralejas you said, that'd complicate the sync process14:39
jcapitao[m]no let's not do it, we have other more important tasks14:40
amoralejwe can figure out as we go, anyway14:40
jcapitao[m]right, it'll be a long run :)14:42
amoralej236 packages long :)14:44
karolinku[m]236/314:44
amoralejanyway i think we should prioritize libs and clients14:44
amoralejyep :)14:44
ncuxois there a production deployment documentation for rdo for openstack antilope14:44
amoralejncuxo, unfortunately not14:46
ncuxoso rdo is not meant for production use?14:46
amoralejncuxo, we are in a meeting now, would you mind to continue this discussion a bit later ?14:48
ncuxosure14:48
amoralejthanks14:48
amoralejso, are we done with this topic?14:50
karolinku[m]#topic openfloor14:50
jcapitao[m]I think so 14:50
amoralejevallesp, may we merge https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/c/DLRN/+/28584 ? we need it for the new jobs for pyproject macros14:51
evallespI think so14:51
evallespdoes it make sense to merge it right now?14:51
evallespmerging14:51
amoralejyes, i think it shouldn't hurt14:52
amoraleji hope i will not break your other reviews :)14:52
jcapitao[m]👍️14:52
evallesp:)14:53
jcapitao[m]:D14:53
jcapitao[m]speaking of breaking CI14:53
jcapitao[m]https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/c/software-factory/sf-infra/+/2858714:53
amoralej\o/14:54
jcapitao[m]it's merged, if you notice something suspect on CI14:54
amoraleji'll send a patch to upstream devstack to remove my workaround of wget+rpm14:54
amoralejthe change is applied now?14:55
jcapitao[m]yes I checked14:56
amoralejnice14:56
jcapitao[m]where are the FIPS enabled jobs ?14:56
amoralejthere are fips enabled job in neutron and in tripleo14:56
amoralejin neutron it uses devstack and it's in experimental and periodic pipelines14:57
amoraleji'll test it with experimental14:57
jcapitao[m]okk14:57
jcapitao[m]could you point to me the link after rechecking the job please ?14:58
amoralejsure14:59
jcapitao[m]thanks14:59
jcapitao[m]just last topic to bring15:00
jcapitao[m]I just remembered sorry15:00
jcapitao[m]Fedora is rebuilding on py3.1215:00
jcapitao[m]they want to ship f39 with py3.1215:00
amoralejdo we have ftbfs issues?15:01
jcapitao[m]if we spot failures during the rebuild, we'll have to propose changes upstream15:01
jcapitao[m]not yet15:01
amoralejwrt fips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/884279 is the dnm review we used to test devstack last time15:01
amoralejneutron-ovs-tempest-fips job is centos15:02
* amoralej crosses fingers for 3.1215:02
jcapitao[m]thanks15:02
jcapitao[m]yeah hopefully 15:02
amoraleji've seen some packages already reported successful builds, let's see15:03
jcapitao[m]yup15:03
jcapitao[m]that's it from me15:03
amoralejnothing else from my side15:07
karolinku[m]sorry, we are ahaead of time15:08
karolinku[m]last thing15:08
karolinku[m]#topic next chair15:08
jcapitao[m]I can take it15:08
karolinku[m]#action jcapitao[m] is chairing next week15:08
karolinku[m]#endmeeting15:09
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed Jun 14 15:09:05 2023 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:09
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2023_06_14/2023/rdo_meeting___2023_06_14.2023-06-14-14.01.html15:09
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2023_06_14/2023/rdo_meeting___2023_06_14.2023-06-14-14.01.txt15:09
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2023_06_14/2023/rdo_meeting___2023_06_14.2023-06-14-14.01.log.html15:09
jcapitao[m]thanks karolinku !15:09
amoralejthanks karolinku[m] !15:10
rdogerritMerged rdo-jobs master: Replace zuul-worker with zuul user  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4874615:10
rdogerritMerged rdo-jobs master: Move dpa jobs to cs9 nodeset  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4879215:10
amoralejncuxo, so, the current situation from deployment tools and RDO is that, probably the best option with antelope for production environment is OpenStack-Ansible or using custom puppet manifest based on puppet-openstack modules15:12
amoralejwrt OSA, we actually are not testing it in RDO infra yet so we are not publishing it in our website but it should support deployment with binary packages with RDO, with certain limitations as per osa team feedback15:13
amoralejhttps://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible/2023.1/ has some information about it15:14
amoralejnote that RDO itself does not (and has never) develop a production ready deployment tools but relied on other existing projects which use RDO packages for deployment15:16
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-jobs master: WIP Add weirdo openstack-ansible scenario001  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4876115:17
amoralejtalking about it :)15:17
jcapitao[m]:)15:17
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: [WIP] [DNM] Early attempt to create new adoption job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4887815:17
amoralejjcapitao[m], karolinku[m] wrt %pyproject_save_files i'm not sure if the complexity of automating it is worthy tbh15:19
ncuxoamoralej: OSA doesn't support selinux, and since rdo is the upstream for redhat openshift I've assumed that you guys will 15:21
amoralejas it does not always use the same python module macro and also will need to implement the -f %{pyproject_files} in the right subpackage and also removing the sitelib lines in the %files and license15:21
amoralejncuxo, i guess you mean upstream for redhat openstack15:21
amoralejthere is wip project to deploy openstack on openshift using rdo in https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/15:22
amoralejbut that's still wip, not production ready at this point15:22
amoralejsaid this, the idea of "production ready" can be different for each organization15:23
ncuxoyeah I want openshift on openstack not the other way around 15:23
jcapitao[m]amoralej: yeah, it doesn't bring much value15:26
jcapitao[m]but for consistency it might be good15:26
amoralejit will support also openshift on top of that openstack, iiuc15:26
jcapitao[m]if we keep it as-is, we should sed "s/egg/dist/'15:26
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: [WIP] [DNM] Early attempt to create new adoption job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4887815:46
rdogerritJoan Francesc Gilabert proposed rdo-jobs master: [WIP] [DNM] Early attempt to create new adoption job  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/4887816:15
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-infra/ansible-role-weirdo-logs master: DNM Add OSA logs dir  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ansible-role-weirdo-logs/+/4888116:20
rdogerritJoel Capitao proposed rdo-infra/weirdo master: WIP Add openstack ansible test  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/weirdo/+/4876016:21
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off17:10

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!