| *** mhen_ is now known as mhen | 02:42 | |
| jbernard | #startmeeting cinder | 15:00 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Nov 6 15:00:31 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 15:00 |
| jbernard | #topic roll call | 15:00 |
| jbernard | o/ | 15:00 |
| Luzi | o/ | 15:00 |
| jbernard | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-epoxy-meetings | 15:01 |
| msaravan | Hi | 15:01 |
| rosmaita | o/ | 15:01 |
| jungleboyj | o/ | 15:01 |
| Sai | o/ | 15:02 |
| sp-bmilanov | o/ | 15:02 |
| gireesh | hi | 15:03 |
| jbernard | welcome everyone, just a couple more minutes to collect everyone | 15:03 |
| jbernard | (sorry for the time mistake) | 15:04 |
| jbernard | ok | 15:07 |
| jbernard | #topic announcements | 15:07 |
| jbernard | first, i appologize for the time issue | 15:08 |
| jbernard | im curious if anyone objects to moving it to 15UTC | 15:08 |
| whoami-rajat | hi | 15:08 |
| jbernard | if there is a conflict, i can try to make a few changes on my side | 15:08 |
| sp-bmilanov | no worries jbernard! so that would be +1 from what we have right now in the calendar? | 15:09 |
| jbernard | exactly | 15:09 |
| jbernard | my time moved back 1 hour last weekend and i failed to realize the rest of the world isn't on my schedule ;) | 15:09 |
| Luzi | moving it is unfortunate for us from europe | 15:10 |
| jbernard | Luzi: ack | 15:10 |
| jbernard | ok, let me try to make some adjustments here | 15:10 |
| manudinesh | Hi All, I had requested for comments on this bug# https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2084117 and had added it in cinder_bs agenda link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting [on Oct 16th] Guess that etherpad is no more actively used. Request you to please take it on priority and share your comments, Thanks | 15:10 |
| jbernard | it's certainly easier for me to do that and to impose a time change on everyone else | 15:10 |
| jbernard | manudinesh: hold onto that until the open discussion section | 15:11 |
| jbernard | manudinesh: we're in the annoucments at the moment | 15:11 |
| manudinesh | sorry... | 15:11 |
| jbernard | manudinesh: no worries | 15:11 |
| jbernard | so, for clarity, we're keeping the 14:00 UTC meeting time on wednesdays | 15:11 |
| jbernard | continuing next week | 15:12 |
| jbernard | time issue resolved | 15:12 |
| jbernard | moving one | 15:12 |
| jbernard | s/one/on | 15:13 |
| jbernard | i posted a summary of our ptg content to the list | 15:13 |
| jbernard | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/G4DMPLHQFCI4K2HMYAIMCL7DF3TMX7B6/ | 15:13 |
| jbernard | i think that captures most of it, without details, just an overview | 15:13 |
| jbernard | i need to fix the wiki version, if you think i've missed something let me know | 15:14 |
| jbernard | next, we have a release update | 15:14 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: do you want to take this one? | 15:14 |
| rosmaita | sure | 15:14 |
| jungleboyj | jbernard: Do you have videos for me to post? | 15:14 |
| jbernard | jungleboyj: yes! | 15:14 |
| rosmaita | not much to say ... we're releasing a final cinder and os-brick from Antelope (probably tomorrow) | 15:15 |
| jbernard | #action jbernard to get videos to jay for posting | 15:15 |
| rosmaita | and Antelope will go to Unmaintained and stable/2023.1 will be deleted shortly after | 15:15 |
| rosmaita | last thing: i'm willing to continue as release person for epoxy, but will be happy to teach anyone else who's interested how to do it and take ove | 15:16 |
| rosmaita | *over | 15:16 |
| rosmaita | that's all from me | 15:16 |
| jungleboyj | jbernard: ++ | 15:16 |
| jbernard | would anyone like to volunteer to be release liason? | 15:16 |
| jbernard | there is virtually zero prestige or recognition, however you /will/ have my eternal gratitude :) | 15:17 |
| jbernard | *crickets* | 15:18 |
| jbernard | :) | 15:18 |
| jungleboyj | :-) | 15:18 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: looks like you're our release liason! | 15:18 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: congrats! | 15:18 |
| jungleboyj | Can't even offer beers at the next event as we don't get together anymore. | 15:18 |
| rosmaita | :D | 15:18 |
| jbernard | one day... | 15:19 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: Thank you for your compliance. ;-) | 15:19 |
| rosmaita | i will celebrate with a virtual beer | 15:19 |
| jbernard | lol | 15:19 |
| jbernard | just make sure you get the hashes right first ;) | 15:19 |
| jungleboyj | lol | 15:19 |
| jbernard | id like to quickly hijack topics and ask a related question: | 15:20 |
| jbernard | do we want to consider merging the unmaintained cores with cinder cores, as I belive Ironic has done? | 15:20 |
| jbernard | i would still be very reluctant to make use of that power, as I don't want to make a mistake, but it's not fun redirecting folks the way we do | 15:21 |
| jbernard | does anyone have a opinion on this? | 15:22 |
| jbernard | does anyone have any, even mild, objections? | 15:22 |
| rosmaita | well, the point of unmaintained was that the project has no responsibility | 15:23 |
| jungleboyj | I think we already have a notable about of overlap there. | 15:23 |
| jungleboyj | Oh, unmaintained, not stable. | 15:23 |
| jungleboyj | Nevermind. | 15:23 |
| rosmaita | my objection was that i don't know that we want to be responsible for reviewing victoria through antelope, in addition to the stuff we're actually supposed to be reviewing | 15:24 |
| rosmaita | but any cinder core could volunteer to be an unmaintained core, if they would like to | 15:25 |
| jbernard | that's a very fair point, especially considering our current review bandwidth | 15:25 |
| rosmaita | and any cinder community member could volunteer as well | 15:25 |
| rosmaita | i think the requirements to be an unmaintained core are still being developed | 15:26 |
| jbernard | ok, lets leave it then, we can always revisit if the situation changes | 15:26 |
| jbernard | #topic volume backup bug | 15:26 |
| jbernard | mhen, Luzi: that's you | 15:27 |
| jbernard | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2086683 | 15:27 |
| Luzi | yeah mhen found this bug | 15:27 |
| jbernard | oy, that's not awesome :/ | 15:27 |
| Luzi | when there is no volume backup service configured, it is still possible to create a volume backup | 15:28 |
| Luzi | that will end up in error state of course | 15:28 |
| Luzi | and non-admin users are not able to delete this resource | 15:28 |
| Luzi | we wanted to make you aware of this. | 15:29 |
| jbernard | thanks | 15:29 |
| Luzi | unfortunately i cannot tell any more than that - mhen should be there soon, but he has a conflicting meeting | 15:29 |
| Luzi | it would be nice to catch this on API level | 15:30 |
| jbernard | whoami-rajat: ^ i would think the api should fail if the necessary service is non-existant | 15:30 |
| rosmaita | looks like we don't do any kind of testing of backups when the service is disabled or absent | 15:30 |
| jbernard | our voting jobs have it enabled, i guess it makes some sense that we haven't seen this | 15:31 |
| Luzi | mhen is now here, and i need to go - if there are any questions | 15:32 |
| mhen | o/ | 15:32 |
| jbernard | mhen: heya | 15:32 |
| jbernard | we need a sanity check in the api logic | 15:33 |
| jbernard | i think the report is clear, so everything needed to work on this one is present | 15:35 |
| jbernard | #topic multi-transport protocol volume driver support | 15:35 |
| jbernard | sp-bmilanov: | 15:35 |
| jbernard | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/847536 | 15:35 |
| mhen | I think checks like these need to be used in more places: https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/75b478b7819168a301ec8927a4a4113b000587de/cinder/backup/api.py#L155-L167 | 15:35 |
| sp-bmilanov | ah, hi, was just going to say that I have to go soon, but the short version is that there are cases where we would like to handle both iSCSI and the StorPool block protocol with one driver | 15:36 |
| jbernard | mhen: i made a note in the etherpad | 15:37 |
| jbernard | mhen: agree | 15:37 |
| sp-bmilanov | in setups where there are hypervisors connect by different protocols, but they'd want the same volume | 15:37 |
| sp-bmilanov | there might be a way to do this currently, but I couldn't figure it out, and I suspect that would be a change in the core to allow drivers to do this properly | 15:38 |
| jbernard | sp-bmilanov: in the call to attach(), is the metadata needed to determine which of possible protocols to use present? | 15:39 |
| sp-bmilanov | I need to double check, but it should | 15:40 |
| sp-bmilanov | (for reference, the proposed change currently does this in cinder, not os-brick: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/847536) | 15:41 |
| sp-bmilanov | sorry, I have to go, can I add this topic for next week as well? | 15:41 |
| jbernard | sure | 15:41 |
| sp-bmilanov | thanks! | 15:42 |
| jbernard | #topic review requests | 15:43 |
| jbernard | Luzi has a cople for volume type metadata | 15:43 |
| jbernard | this is important for epoxy: | 15:43 |
| jbernard | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/918316 | 15:43 |
| jbernard | and | 15:43 |
| jbernard | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/928794 | 15:43 |
| rosmaita | btw, epoxy milestone 1 is next week | 15:44 |
| jbernard | good grief | 15:44 |
| jbernard | hitachi has one | 15:45 |
| jbernard | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/892616 | 15:45 |
| jbernard | we agreed at the ptg to pin mypy | 15:45 |
| jbernard | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/932636 | 15:45 |
| jbernard | and there's a netapp bug | 15:46 |
| jbernard | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2084117 | 15:46 |
| jbernard | which isn't a code review, but rather a bug comment request | 15:46 |
| jbernard | manudinesh: ^ do you have more to add for that one? | 15:46 |
| jbernard | #topic open discussion | 15:48 |
| manudinesh | We downloaded it from official site and tested and faced this error...wanted to know from NetApp Cinder team if there is fix coming on these lines | 15:48 |
| jbernard | im not sure if anyone is watching from netapp, but im reasonably certain they will see and respond to this one | 15:50 |
| manudinesh | VM deployment fails if it is vSCSI based connectivity group but VM deploys are successful for NPIV based connection ... | 15:50 |
| manudinesh | sure jbernard, Thank you .. | 15:50 |
| jbernard | manudinesh: ill add it to next week's agenda too | 15:51 |
| manudinesh | Thank you | 15:51 |
| jbernard | anything else? | 15:52 |
| rosmaita | looks like the requirements-check job is suddenly failing on all patches | 15:53 |
| jbernard | fun | 15:53 |
| rosmaita | not our fault ... looks like an issue with ubuntu-noble | 15:53 |
| jbernard | ok | 15:54 |
| jbernard | thanks everyone, see you next week at the normal 14:00 time | 15:54 |
| jbernard | #endmeeting | 15:54 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Nov 6 15:54:24 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:54 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2024/cinder.2024-11-06-15.00.html | 15:54 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2024/cinder.2024-11-06-15.00.txt | 15:54 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2024/cinder.2024-11-06-15.00.log.html | 15:54 |
| jungleboyj | Thank you! | 15:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!