| bauzas | folks, the PTG summary email was sent yesterday, if I made any mistake, lemme know | 08:27 |
|---|---|---|
| gibi | bauzas: I left a question you might be interested in in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810220/9/nova/compute/manager.py#1436 | 08:40 |
| gibi | bauzas: about the PTG mail, did we agreed changing the OWNER trait name from OWNER_CYBORG to OWNED_BY_CYBORG? I don't remember' | 08:40 |
| bauzas | gibi: ah, no worries | 08:41 |
| bauzas | I don't want to bikeshed about the naming | 08:41 |
| bauzas | if we want to use 'OWNER_project', OK, that said I'll provide a comment for it | 08:41 |
| gibi | bauzas: I think the name was OWNER_project before the PTG but your mail now suggest otherwise and I don't know that this change is intentional or not | 08:42 |
| bauzas | gibi: the etherpad says "OWNER_CYBORG" | 08:45 |
| bauzas | gibi: my summary was for operations explaining about what we discussed, but the name is not an issue | 08:45 |
| jkulik | bauzas: thank you very much for the summary. very helpful | 08:45 |
| gibi | bauzas: OK, so that was just an honest mistak in your mail. I will reply sortly to fix that | 08:47 |
| bauzas | k | 08:47 |
| gibi | bauzas: can I get a quick approval on the re proposed pps spec? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/814531 I also refreshed the remaining implementation patch which is only the nova-manage support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802060/17 | 09:00 |
| gibi | and I have a related bugfix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811396 | 09:01 |
| bauzas | gibi: I could diff but I trust, what's the diff between the xena and the yoga specs ? | 09:02 |
| bauzas | trust you* | 09:02 |
| gibi | bauzas: the main change is that from upgrade perspective we dont need to care about the older nova newer neutron case | 09:05 |
| gibi | as nova merged the support for the new api extension in xena while neutron did not merged the api extension in yoga | 09:05 |
| gibi | so the nova xena - neutron yoga case does not need special handling any more | 09:06 |
| gibi | but it really only impacts the neutron impl | 09:06 |
| gibi | as now they don't need to make the extension optional | 09:06 |
| bauzas | yup, that's what I see | 09:06 |
| gibi | that what I remember :) | 09:07 |
| gibi | since xena M3 I had also time to propose a set of tempest test for the pps feature so I'm pretty confident it works | 09:08 |
| gibi | if you are interested https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open+topic:bp/qos-minimum-guaranteed-packet-rate | 09:09 |
| gibi | gmann: when you are up, to be able to move forward with the pps feature in neutron, we need to land the tempest test adaptation for the new API extension. So this is ready https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/805637 but it needs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/809168/ first. If you have time I appreaciate some review on the tempest side | 09:12 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose QoS minimum guaranteed packet rate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/814531 | 09:45 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up allocations left by evacuation when deleting service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778696 | 10:23 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up allocations left by evacuation when deleting service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778696 | 10:26 |
| *** tosky_ is now known as tosky | 11:25 | |
| *** Guest3656 is now known as redrobot | 13:03 | |
| opendevreview | Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: Log error msg when delete resource provider failed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/815498 | 13:12 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add a WA flag waiting for vif-plugged event during reboot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/813419 | 13:13 |
| *** lbragstad6 is now known as lbragstad | 13:28 | |
| gmann | gibi: sure, will review after my breakfast. | 13:46 |
| gibi | gmann: thanks! | 13:47 |
| * bauzas goes into bug scrubbing in LP | 14:00 | |
| bauzas | what a joy, 30 new bugs | 14:00 |
| bauzas | +17 | 14:00 |
| gibi | somebody was busy reporting bugs why we had the PTG | 14:01 |
| bauzas | gibi: can you please help me on this one ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1948776 | 15:16 |
| bauzas | looks to me legit | 15:17 |
| sean-k-mooney | im not sure that is a bug so much as an oversite | 15:18 |
| sean-k-mooney | it will be a notificaiton object chnage if we start sending it right | 15:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | so it wont be backporatable | 15:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | but the locked state could be included going forward | 15:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | it cannot be added to queens or even xena at this point however | 15:20 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: gibi i triaged that as whishlist and remove the nonstandard tags does that work for ye https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1948776 | 15:22 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: cool, thanks | 15:23 |
| gibi | bauzas, sean-k-mooney: thank I agree with your assesments | 15:25 |
| * gibi kicks hit irc notifications as he missed this ping | 15:26 | |
| opendevreview | Gustavo Santos proposed openstack/nova master: Reattach mdevs to guest on resume https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/815373 | 15:26 |
| bauzas | reminder : nova meeting in 10 mins here | 15:50 |
| bauzas | #startmeeting nova | 16:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Oct 26 16:00:02 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | 16:00 |
| gibi | o/ | 16:00 |
| bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | 16:00 |
| bauzas | hola everyone, nice to see your virtual faces ;) | 16:00 |
| * bauzas wonders how many of us are jetlagged | 16:00 | |
| elodilles | o/ | 16:01 |
| bauzas | wow, not everyone at the same time :) | 16:02 |
| gibi | maybe the rest of us had enough last week D: | 16:03 |
| bauzas | :) | 16:03 |
| bauzas | ok, then let's start :) | 16:03 |
| bauzas | hopefully, it would be a small meeting :) | 16:04 |
| bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | 16:04 |
| bauzas | One Critical bug | 16:04 |
| bauzas | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1947687 | 16:04 |
| * bauzas doesn't really know why he triaged it as Critical | 16:04 | |
| gibi | it is a gate bug | 16:04 |
| gibi | but it does not hit us in every run | 16:04 |
| bauzas | maybe because it was a gate bug, yes | 16:04 |
| gibi | I agree to decrease this to High | 16:04 |
| bauzas | yeah | 16:05 |
| gibi | I have not seen it recently | 16:05 |
| bauzas | ok done | 16:05 |
| bauzas | gibi: maybe we could see whether logstash still works for this one | 16:05 |
| gibi | bauzas: yeas a signture would be nice | 16:05 |
| bauzas | gibi: can you test this and provide the logstash link ? | 16:06 |
| gibi | sure | 16:06 |
| * gibi took a note | 16:06 | |
| bauzas | thanks++ | 16:06 |
| bauzas | okay, moved to High | 16:06 |
| bauzas | anything to discuss about it now ? | 16:06 |
| gibi | - | 16:06 |
| bauzas | k | 16:06 |
| bauzas | #link 24 new untriaged bugs (+6 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New | 16:07 |
| bauzas | I triaged 6 or 7 | 16:07 |
| bauzas | (already, I mean) | 16:07 |
| bauzas | I'll continue to triage a few of them tomorrow | 16:07 |
| bauzas | but in case some contributors want to triage too, I'd be happy | 16:08 |
| bauzas | for the moment, that's fine | 16:08 |
| gibi | yeah I feel the pressure but still have other pressors | 16:08 |
| bauzas | yeah, no urgency | 16:08 |
| bauzas | gibi: I wasn't thinking about you | 16:08 |
| gibi | I know | 16:08 |
| gibi | still I feel responsible :) | 16:09 |
| bauzas | but in case some contributors want to be better knowing about Nova, they can do this | 16:09 |
| bauzas | anyway | 16:09 |
| bauzas | moving now | 16:09 |
| bauzas | 32 open stories in Storyboard for Placement # link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement | 16:09 |
| bauzas | ^ this is new | 16:09 |
| gibi | ohh a new one | 16:09 |
| gibi | :) | 16:09 |
| bauzas | as we agreed on the PTG to verify them | 16:09 |
| bauzas | next week, I'll tell how many new stories we have | 16:10 |
| bauzas | that said, with SB, I don't know whether it's a feature request or a bug | 16:10 |
| gibi | we can start tagging them | 16:10 |
| gibi | to differentiate | 16:10 |
| bauzas | yeah... or moving to LP :p | 16:10 |
| gibi | tagging is easier :D | 16:11 |
| bauzas | I said I'll look at some script | 16:11 |
| bauzas | let's not discuss this one now | 16:11 |
| bauzas | as we don't have a lot of folks | 16:11 |
| bauzas | but, yeah, maybe next week, we'll see what folks prefer | 16:11 |
| gibi | sire | 16:12 |
| gibi | sure | 16:12 |
| bauzas | #topic Gate status | 16:12 |
| bauzas | Nova gate bugs #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure | 16:12 |
| bauzas | we already discussed one | 16:12 |
| bauzas | nothing new, AFAIK | 16:12 |
| bauzas | we fixed one during the PTG IIRC | 16:12 |
| bauzas | Placement periodic job status #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly | 16:13 |
| bauzas | this goes well this time ^ | 16:13 |
| gibi | I have two gate fixers | 16:13 |
| bauzas | the placement-nova-tox-functional-py38 job now works | 16:13 |
| bauzas | gibi: loved | 16:13 |
| gibi | 1) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/814036 | 16:13 |
| gibi | this is ready to land | 16:14 |
| gibi | 2) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/814735 | 16:14 |
| gibi | this I will respin to add better commit message based on melwitt's findings and probably a poison to avoid breaking this again | 16:14 |
| bauzas | oh thanks for both | 16:14 |
| bauzas | I'll review them tomorrow morning | 16:14 |
| gibi | melwitt: btw, thanks you helped a lot understanding what is happening | 16:14 |
| * kashyap waves hi, while distracted and hungry | 16:14 | |
| * gibi waves back | 16:15 | |
| kashyap | Err, wrong channel | 16:15 |
| kashyap | But the hi still stands :) | 16:15 |
| * gibi rolls back the waves | 16:15 | |
| kashyap | Haha, no | 16:15 |
| gibi | :) | 16:16 |
| bauzas | kashyap: you're still in the nova channel :p | 16:16 |
| bauzas | welcome on the nova meeting :p | 16:16 |
| gibi | and of course you are welcome here :) | 16:16 |
| bauzas | moving fast | 16:16 |
| kashyap | bauzas: Yeah, I had the scrollback a bit up at the bug triage part | 16:16 |
| bauzas | #topic PTG summary | 16:16 |
| bauzas | I wrote a summary and gibi nitpicked it :p | 16:16 |
| bauzas | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025534.html | 16:16 |
| gibi | bauzas: thanks for the summary and sorry for nitpicking :D | 16:17 |
| bauzas | at least I know that people read my summary :p | 16:17 |
| gibi | at least you know that somebody read it :D | 16:17 |
| bauzas | that, yeah | 16:17 |
| gibi | :D | 16:17 |
| bauzas | I could have made jokes in the summary to keep people continuing to read it | 16:17 |
| bauzas | nothing here to tell about the PTG besides the summary ? | 16:18 |
| kashyap | I have a small "info" for the open topics | 16:18 |
| gibi | bauzas: nothing from me for the PTG | 16:18 |
| bauzas | my only concern about the agreements we made is that we don't have a lot of owners for ACTION items | 16:18 |
| gibi | yeah, I think you should try to ask for owners | 16:19 |
| gibi | maybe a reply to the mail | 16:19 |
| bauzas | next PTG, we should try to ensure that when we set an agreement, we have an ACTION item and an owner | 16:19 |
| gibi | I will talk to brinzhang about the OWNER things but he seems to be off | 16:19 |
| gibi | I hope he can take the nova side of that too, but if not then I will write the spec | 16:20 |
| bauzas | gibi: good call, I could ask by email but I wouldn't be surprised if nobody steps up :) | 16:20 |
| gibi | I mean the OWNER trait thingy :D | 16:20 |
| gibi | I won't be the owner of everything :D | 16:20 |
| bauzas | gibi: or the OWNED_BY you rather mean ? | 16:20 |
| bauzas | heh, see how an adjective is better :p | 16:20 |
| gibi | :D | 16:20 |
| bauzas | no confusion at all | 16:21 |
| bauzas | anyway, was kidding | 16:21 |
| gibi | sure :D | 16:21 |
| bauzas | don't wanna talk about the sky color | 16:21 |
| bauzas | #topic Release Planning | 16:21 |
| bauzas | just a reminder | 16:21 |
| bauzas | Yoga-1 is due Nova 18th #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-1 | 16:21 |
| gibi | just 3 weeks | 16:21 |
| gibi | sh*t | 16:22 |
| bauzas | kashyap: I haven't forgotten you, will ping you when we're at open discussion topic | 16:22 |
| bauzas | gibi: YUUUUP | 16:22 |
| * gibi tries to remember where he put the cloning machine | 16:22 | |
| sean-k-mooney | time flys | 16:22 |
| bauzas | and /me needs to propose Nov 16th for spec review day at the next meeting | 16:22 |
| bauzas | gibi: I tried using the cloning machine, buy my clones don't wanna work on IT | 16:23 |
| bauzas | this is sad | 16:23 |
| bauzas | let's move one | 16:23 |
| bauzas | on* even | 16:23 |
| bauzas | #topic Review priorities | 16:23 |
| bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | 16:23 |
| bauzas | I know we agreed on changing a few things | 16:24 |
| gibi | I've reviewed some and marked some | 16:24 |
| bauzas | I'll work on a doc change this week if I have time | 16:24 |
| bauzas | gibi: I need to jump on my owns sooner than later | 16:24 |
| gibi | bauzas: this has momentum now https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/815373 so I suggest to start with that | 16:24 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: once I'm done with proposing the doc change, feel free to write a dependent patch for the ACL thingies | 16:25 |
| gibi | sorry wrong link | 16:25 |
| bauzas | hah | 16:25 |
| bauzas | was wondering why you were proposing this one | 16:25 |
| gibi | the other mdev https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810220 | 16:25 |
| gibi | I think there are issues to discuss there ^^ | 16:25 |
| gibi | I will check the mdev + resume soon too | 16:26 |
| bauzas | ki | 16:26 |
| bauzas | bk | 16:26 |
| bauzas | gibi: yeah, I was thinking about it when reviewing | 16:26 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: sure we did it the otherway around the last time i kind of feel like gating the docs change on the porject config one is more correct but it really dose not matter | 16:26 |
| bauzas | gibi: we need to test it with devstack | 16:26 |
| bauzas | I'm not sure all the services are up and the RT running | 16:26 |
| bauzas | when we call the methods | 16:26 |
| bauzas | but this needs me looking at the code first before I reply | 16:27 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: the only way to test the mdev stuff in devstack is if we can use the fake mdev kernel modules | 16:27 |
| gibi | bauzas: no before driver.init_host we should not call other driver methods and defintely there is no RT populated as we dont know about our nodes from the hypervisor | 16:27 |
| sean-k-mooney | unless you mean just manually and not in ci | 16:27 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: or use my own env... :) | 16:27 |
| bauzas | well, provided I'm able to create a devstack env | 16:27 |
| bauzas | which I failed with rhel 8.2 | 16:28 |
| bauzas | but meh | 16:28 |
| bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | 16:28 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: now that we have generic mdev support it might want to see if we can support the dummy kernel moduels at some point | 16:28 |
| bauzas | elodilles: floor is yours | 16:28 |
| elodilles | from xena till train the gates are not blocked | 16:28 |
| kashyap | bauzas: On a phone call :-( Will come back here; it's not super urgent | 16:28 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: agreed | 16:28 |
| kashyap | bauzas: In short, it's this one: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025500.html | 16:28 |
| elodilles | stein and older stable branches are blocked, needs the setuptools pinning patch to unblock: https://review.opendev.org/q/I26b2a14e0b91c0ab77299c3e4fbed5f7916fe8cf | 16:28 |
| kashyap | And it's resolved now. | 16:28 |
| elodilles | Ussuri Extended Maintenance transition is in two weeks (Nov 12) | 16:29 |
| kashyap | (The resolution: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025527.html) | 16:29 |
| elodilles | we might not need another release on ussuri before the transition, as there are not that many patch merged since the last release from early October | 16:29 |
| elodilles | (the list of open and unreleased patches anyway: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-ussuri-em ) | 16:29 |
| elodilles | that's it ^^^ | 16:30 |
| gibi | elodilles: when you say not many, you mean zero bugfix? | 16:30 |
| bauzas | elodilles: if you feel we need to do some reviewing efforts before EM, let me know | 16:30 |
| elodilles | gibi: i mean 1 or 2 bugfix :) | 16:30 |
| sean-k-mooney | elodilles: ack i might try to rebase and submit the libvirt os-vif deleagtion patchs | 16:30 |
| sean-k-mooney | before ussuri em if there is another release | 16:30 |
| gibi | elodilles: hm if there are real fixes there then I might make sense to release them before we EM | 16:30 |
| gibi | s/I/it/ | 16:31 |
| bauzas | agreed with gibi | 16:31 |
| elodilles | yes, it makes sense to release, | 16:31 |
| elodilles | though we shouldn't hurry with merging things if we are not sure that it won't cause any regression | 16:31 |
| elodilles | as this will be the *final* release | 16:32 |
| bauzas | elodilles: I'm a bit busy tomorrow as I promised many things but I'd appreciate if you could chase me and a couple of other cores about reviews either Thursday or next week | 16:32 |
| elodilles | bauzas: sure, | 16:33 |
| elodilles | there are some bug fixes that needs a 2nd +2 | 16:33 |
| elodilles | but if anyone see any other bugfix that would be good to merge, then let us know | 16:34 |
| bauzas | cool | 16:34 |
| bauzas | #topic Sub/related team Highlights | 16:34 |
| bauzas | lyarwood is still on PTO | 16:35 |
| bauzas | so I'll skip this part and I don't think we need to discuss about libvirt by now | 16:35 |
| bauzas | #topic Open discussion | 16:35 |
| bauzas | #agreed Reminder : The Asian-friendly meeting is now cancelled due to lack of presence. | 16:35 |
| bauzas | so we won't run a meeting on Nov 4th | 16:35 |
| bauzas | I'll send an email accordingly | 16:36 |
| bauzas | just a personal note, I'll be on company PTO on Friday 29th and Nov 1st is bank holiday in France | 16:36 |
| bauzas | so don't expect me between Thursday EOB and Tuesday | 16:37 |
| bauzas | we have one item that was written in the wiki | 16:37 |
| bauzas | add Support volumes backed by VStorageObject -> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-fcd and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/808791 | 16:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | yes so as far as i can tell i think they implemented the feature in cinder and likely the out of tree driver | 16:38 |
| bauzas | not sure the proposer is around | 16:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | now they are looking to add support in the intree one | 16:38 |
| bauzas | I don't know his IRC nick | 16:38 |
| bauzas | so I can't ping him | 16:39 |
| gibi | looking at the patch the change is confined in the vmware driver | 16:39 |
| sean-k-mooney | ya so i reviewed this and to me this si a feature not a bug so i assed them to raise this in this meeting | 16:39 |
| gibi | so I think it is OK as a specless bp | 16:40 |
| sean-k-mooney | im infavor of just proceeding with this as a speckless bp | 16:40 |
| bauzas | OK, we don't have a lof of people around | 16:40 |
| sean-k-mooney | its not a bug so it should not be backported but as i mentioned above i stonly suspect this was implemente din the out of tree driver and they are just closing the gap | 16:40 |
| bauzas | but we can make it a specless BP | 16:40 |
| bauzas | do people agree ? | 16:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | yep | 16:41 |
| bauzas | #agreed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-fcd approved as a specless blueprint | 16:41 |
| gibi | yep | 16:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | the cinder feature was completed 4 years ago by the way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/521213/ | 16:42 |
| bauzas | (/me can't remember how to formally approve BPs in Launchpad but that's something I'll sort out after this meeting) | 16:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | that one already is | 16:42 |
| bauzas | I just did | 16:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | ah | 16:43 |
| bauzas | direction and definitions are now approved | 16:43 |
| bauzas | but nevermind, will figure it out or will hassle gibi | 16:43 |
| sean-k-mooney | you likely shoudl set the serise goal to yoga too | 16:43 |
| gibi | bauzas: set approver, series goal, and maybe milestone target | 16:43 |
| gibi | bauzas: you can also set implementation status as we have a patch already | 16:43 |
| sean-k-mooney | right it should be in need_review | 16:44 |
| bauzas | ok, done | 16:44 |
| bauzas | anyway | 16:45 |
| bauzas | kashyap: are you done chatting ? you said you had a thing to discuss | 16:45 |
| kashyap | bauzas: Yes, here | 16:45 |
| bauzas | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025500.html | 16:45 |
| kashyap | bauzas: Sorry for "talking over" earlier | 16:45 |
| bauzas | is this^ more a FYI ? | 16:46 |
| kashyap | Yep | 16:46 |
| kashyap | bauzas: In short: DevStack now defults to "Nehalem" CPU model for reasons outlined there. | 16:46 |
| bauzas | kashyap: devstack/rhel you mean ? | 16:46 |
| kashyap | No | 16:46 |
| kashyap | DevStack upstream | 16:46 |
| kashyap | I worked w/ Clark to get the patch merged in DevStack | 16:47 |
| bauzas | I mean, devstack all distros or only upstream devstack with rhel ? | 16:47 |
| kashyap | For all. | 16:47 |
| bauzas | ack | 16:47 |
| sean-k-mooney | for all on x86 | 16:47 |
| kashyap | Everything is summarized and resolved in that thread. | 16:47 |
| kashyap | Yes, x86 is "implied architecture", when we don't name an arch :) | 16:48 |
| bauzas | okay, do we need further actions, like documenting it ? | 16:48 |
| bauzas | in our relnotes or in the install docs ? | 16:48 |
| sean-k-mooney | no we dont need to document anythign in nova | 16:49 |
| kashyap | Yep; nothing needs documentation in Nova | 16:49 |
| bauzas | my confusion comes from the fact we changed default for all distros, not only rhel | 16:49 |
| sean-k-mooney | rhel have documented there new compilation target already in a blog | 16:49 |
| kashyap | bauzas: No further action; just an FYI here ... if anyone in case notices "why is DevStack giving me Nehalem by default" | 16:49 |
| kashyap | Yep; linked to in the post to the upstream list | 16:49 |
| bauzas | kashyap: little chances that people notice this change by looking at our meeting minutes, honestly | 16:50 |
| bauzas | but okay, noted. | 16:50 |
| kashyap | bauzas: I've notified the Whitebox / CI folks to change their scripts too | 16:50 |
| kashyap | So, the right parties are notified. I'm not expecting anyone to read these minutes here :) | 16:50 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: well honestly its a better default then qemu64 and its so old at this poitn everythign supprots it | 16:50 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: which is basicaly why it was done for all | 16:51 |
| kashyap | bauzas: The change is a better default too. Yes. (Besides solving the switch to a new x86 baseline) | 16:51 |
| sean-k-mooney | the jobs also might get slictly faster as a restult but that would just be a nice benift and not the intent | 16:51 |
| kashyap | Yep; there will be slight improvement | 16:51 |
| bauzas | OK, nice to hear | 16:52 |
| bauzas | are we done ? | 16:52 |
| kashyap | bauzas: That's all. I don't want to take up more time. But those interested / affected in CI/QE/Infra are notified, and I'm working w/ them. | 16:52 |
| kashyap | Yep. | 16:52 |
| bauzas | kashyap: excellent, thanks for providing guidance | 16:52 |
| gibi | kashyap++ | 16:52 |
| bauzas | I think we can reasonably call this meeting a wrap | 16:53 |
| * gibi agrees | 16:53 | |
| bauzas | I was expecting it to be shorter, but meh, good talks | 16:53 |
| bauzas | #endmeeting | 16:53 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Oct 26 16:53:33 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:53 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-10-26-16.00.html | 16:53 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-10-26-16.00.txt | 16:53 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-10-26-16.00.log.html | 16:53 |
| gibi | bauzas: thanks! | 16:53 |
| * gibi leaves for today | 16:53 | |
| bauzas | yeah me too | 16:53 |
| * bauzas just wants to finish sooner than 7pm this time as last week was busy and yesterday too | 16:54 | |
| sean-k-mooney | fyi like bauzas i will be taking some pto around the weekend | 16:54 |
| bauzas | I'll be Parisian for the weekend | 16:55 |
| bauzas | although I'm already grumbling for nothing. | 16:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | i need to book it still but firday and monday for sure and maybe ill exened it from thursday-turuseday inclusive | 16:55 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: ack, noticed. | 16:55 |
| sean-k-mooney | thanks for doing the PTG summary by the way | 16:56 |
| sean-k-mooney | i have not read it yet but ill try and skim over it later | 16:56 |
| elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ping we if you updated the libvirt/os-vif related patches that you mentioned for the ussuri release, and I'll try to review them ASAP | 16:57 |
| sean-k-mooney | elodilles: i need to redo it for the newer reelase first | 16:58 |
| sean-k-mooney | elodilles: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790447 is missing one of the 3 patches that were ment to be squashed together | 16:59 |
| elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ack | 16:59 |
| sean-k-mooney | so i need to fix that one first and then propose it we have had some asks to backport this downstream recently too so i need to fix these up | 16:59 |
| sean-k-mooney | if it end up missing the final release its proably ok but would be nice to include | 17:00 |
| elodilles | hmm, so it needs to be merged in wallaby then victoria then ussuri :S | 17:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | yep which is why im not sure it will make it in 2 weeks | 17:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | so this is really just a nice to have not something to hold the release for | 17:00 |
| elodilles | OK, no problem, let's try then. just ping me and I'll review them :) | 17:01 |
| sean-k-mooney | ack thanks | 17:01 |
| gmann | gibi: 1 comment on this otherwise lgtm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/809168 | 17:38 |
| gmann | gibi: sorry for not mentioning about that method to use in my previous comment | 17:40 |
| sean-k-mooney | gmann: i know this is a little out of your normal review spcace but feel like taking a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811947 | 18:33 |
| sean-k-mooney | gmann: ill ping some other folks tomorow if you dont have time to look but it would be nice to get the last +2 on that | 18:34 |
| sean-k-mooney | anyway going to call it a night o/ | 18:34 |
| opendevreview | Ilya Popov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix to use NUMA cell with more free memory first https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805649 | 19:24 |
| opendevreview | Ilya Popov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix to use NUMA cell with more free memory first https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805649 | 20:22 |
| opendevreview | Ilya Popov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix to use NUMA cell with free resources first https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805649 | 20:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!