Tuesday, 2023-05-23

opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Reproducer for bug 2003991 unshelving offloaded instance  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/87247001:09
opendevreviewmelanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce quota usage from placement when unshelving  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/87247101:09
opendevreviewGhanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add integrated job to test the Nova RBAC old defaults  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88355703:31
WJeffsHey all, I have a unique case, where I need to allocate 380 cores to a x86 VM has anyone got around the i440fx or q35 limits? 09:51
opendevreviewAmit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Reproducer for dangling volumes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88145710:24
opendevreviewAmit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Delete dangling bdms  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88228410:24
sean-k-mooneyWJeffs: it should be possibel to do that in the newer releases of nova10:30
sean-k-mooneyif we mreged the patch im thinking of let me check10:31
WJeffssean-k-mooney: were already on Zed, I'm wondering if its due to the kernel setting "KVM_MAX_VCPU"10:31
WJeffssean-k-mooney: were already on Zed, I'm wondering if its due to the kernel setting "KVM_MAX_VCPU"10:32
sean-k-mooneyWJeffs: if you enable the viommu in the guest https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/zed/implemented/libvirt-viommu-device.html#proposed-change10:33
sean-k-mooneywe also enable the eim feature 10:33
sean-k-mooneyhttps://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#iommu-devices10:34
sean-k-mooneyThe eim attribute (with possible values on and off) can be used to configure Extended Interrupt Mode. A q35 domain with split I/O APIC (as described in Hypervisor features), and both interrupt remapping and EIM turned on for the IOMMU, will be able to use more than 255 vCPUs. Since 3.4.0 (QEMU/KVM only)10:34
sean-k-mooneyWJeffs: im not sure if that is enough to allow more then 255 vcpus or if you also need to have a machine type and kernel that is set up to deal with that10:35
sean-k-mooneyWJeffs: buy ya try adding  hw:viommu_model=auto to the flavor or hw_viommu_model=auto to the image10:36
sean-k-mooneythis is new in zed10:36
sean-k-mooneyWJeffs: we havve not tested that by the way we just did not see any harm in enabling it when enabling the viommu so we made the feature as generic as possible10:39
WJeffsThanks, I will give it a try. No luck yet. I need to check this kernel has the supported part for more than 288 cores too - I'm pushing to get a 6.x kernel to support the new AMDs currently from my kernel team.10:45
sean-k-mooneyack, we dont often have request to supprot that many cores so your kind of forging your own path here.10:51
WJeffsYea, I'm not surprised, its a pretty extreme case. Sometimes asking here can save me hours of work 10:52
sean-k-mooneyif you figure out what combination of libvirt features we need to enable im sure we could actully add support for this usecause but i personlaly have not tested over 64 cores10:52
WJeffsI will take a look and report back if its anything major.10:53
WJeffsCheers for your help10:53
sean-k-mooneyWJeffs: hehe i feel the same about random blog posts i find about obsucre virt/hardware features10:53
opendevreviewAmit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Reproducer for dangling volumes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88145710:54
opendevreviewAmit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Delete dangling bdms  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88228410:54
WJeffssean-k-mooney: Generally its way over my head. And I try to stay out of it.10:54
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Reproducer for bug 1983753  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85327311:21
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Update RequestSpec.pci_request for resize  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85327411:21
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Add reno for fixing bug 1941005  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85327511:21
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Reproducer for bug 1983753  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85327311:35
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Update RequestSpec.pci_request for resize  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85327411:35
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Add reno for fixing bug 1941005  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85327511:35
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Reproducer for bug 1983753  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88390411:45
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Update RequestSpec.pci_request for resize  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88390511:45
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Add reno for fixing bug 1941005  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88390611:45
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Reproducer for bug 1983753  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88390811:56
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Update RequestSpec.pci_request for resize  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88390911:56
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Add reno for fixing bug 1941005  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88393011:56
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Mounting the shares as part of the initialization process  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88007512:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Deletion of associated share mappings on instance deletion  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88147212:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (api)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/83683012:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Check shares support  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85049912:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add metadata for shares  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85050012:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach notification  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85050112:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach notification  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85102812:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add shares to InstancePayload  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85102912:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to attach/detach shares  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85208512:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt test to ensure metadata are working.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85208612:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add virt/libvirt error test cases  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85208712:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to reboot method for each driver (driver part)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85482312:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebooting an instance with shares (compute and API part)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/85482412:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach_error notification  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/86028212:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach_error notification  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/86028312:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to resume method for each driver (driver part)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/86028412:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support resuming an instance with shares (compute and API part)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/86028512:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to rescue/unrescue shares  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/86028612:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares (driver part)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/86028712:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares (compute and API part)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/86028812:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to mount manila share using Cephfs protocol  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88386212:04
opendevreviewribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Docs about Manila shares API usage  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/87164212:04
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Reproducer for bug 1983753  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88393212:13
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Update RequestSpec.pci_request for resize  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88393312:13
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Add reno for fixing bug 1941005  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88393412:13
*** han-guangyu_ is now known as han-guangyu13:42
opendevreviewSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: [wip]network: convert usage of neutronclient to openstacksdk  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88271413:51
sahido/ I initiated a work to get ride of neutronclient and use openstacksdk. I started the work by isolating the work on security_groups.py13:54
sahidbefore to start adressing allllll the tests :-) I would appreciate to have some eyes on it, at least to ensure that I'm in the good direction13:55
sahidI have made some schance on neutron fixture, but I'm not sure on how to deal with the is_admin point since get_sdk_adapter does not have the context13:57
sahids/schance/changes13:58
bauzassahid: I'll try to do it later this week14:01
bauzassahid: thanks for working hard on it btw.14:02
sahidcool thanks bauzas I think it's going to be long run work anyway, tke for your time14:02
sahid:-)14:02
ykarelbauzas, sean-k-mooney when you get chance please also revisit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868419, i incorporated the comments in latest PS14:10
ykarelthx in advance14:10
bauzasykarel: noted14:15
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova stable/victoria: CI: fix backport validator for new branch naming  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88296914:21
bauzasreminder: nova meeting in 54 mins here :)15:06
opendevreviewAmit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Reproducer for dangling volumes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88145715:55
opendevreviewAmit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Delete dangling bdms  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88228415:55
bauzas#startmeeting nova16:01
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue May 23 16:01:33 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:01
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:01
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'nova'16:01
bauzasgood meeting folks16:01
dansmitho/16:01
bauzas#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting16:01
auniyal_o/16:02
Uggla_o/16:03
gibio/16:04
bauzasok, starting (sorry was reviewing some patch)16:04
bauzas#topic Bugs (stuck/critical) 16:04
bauzas#info No Critical bug16:04
bauzas#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 15 new untriaged bugs (+0 since the last meeting)16:04
bauzas#info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster16:05
elodilleso/16:05
bauzaselodilles: anything to report ?16:05
elodillesnothing16:05
elodillesi was only able to triage one bug :/16:05
bauzasno worries16:06
bauzasmoving on then16:06
bauzasauniyal: can you do a bit of triage this week ?16:06
auniyal_yes16:07
bauzascool thanks16:07
bauzas #topic Gate status 16:07
bauzasoops16:07
bauzas#undo16:07
opendevmeetRemoving item from minutes: #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster16:07
bauzas#info bug baton is being passed to auniyal16:07
bauzasdoh16:07
bauzas#info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster16:07
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Reproducer for bug 1983753  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88393216:08
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Update RequestSpec.pci_request for resize  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88393316:08
opendevreviewBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Add reno for fixing bug 1941005  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88393416:08
bauzas#topic Gate status 16:08
bauzas#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs 16:08
bauzas#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures16:08
dansmithI think CI has been pretty decent lately.. just yesterday we merged the mysql memory de-tune by default16:08
bauzasgibi: dansmith: or others, do you want to discuss some failures ?16:08
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: CI: fix backport validator for new branch naming  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/88297016:09
bauzasdansmith: excellent16:09
dansmithalso, I got an update on the powerkvm CI from the owners16:09
bauzascool, so ?16:09
dansmithit's known to be totally broken right now, apparently due to libraries dropping ppc support16:09
dansmithnot sure what the outlook on that is, but I've suggested disabling it until it can possibly run successfully16:09
bauzas++16:09
gibibauzas: on my side I looked at https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2015065/comments/8 16:10
dansmithalso, not supported on rhel9, and I thought it was a dead product now, so I'm not sure why there's any reason to keep running it, but they do want to keep it running if/when they fix the library stuff16:10
bauzasdansmith: yeah, that's not that it's holding our gate, it's just confusing 16:10
dansmithmeaning it can only run on rhel8, nothing newer16:10
dansmithbauzas: yep, and creating noise16:10
bauzaswe had some CI interface in the paste where we were gathering results of 3rd party CI 16:11
bauzasbut afaics, this is dead horse noxw16:11
bauzasciwatch.mmedvede.net/project?project=nova is timing out for me16:11
bauzasdansmith: on another point, I've seen good progress on bumping cirros16:12
dansmithyeah I was going to ask gmann about that - I saw a test patch that seemed successful;16:12
bauzas#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/881437?usp=email Cirros is now bumped to 0.6.116:12
bauzasa revert of a revert16:13
bauzaskeep following, dudes :)16:13
dansmithah okay16:13
dansmithso it'll be interesting to see if that improves our guest kernel crash issues16:13
bauzasyup, related is https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/200646716:13
bauzasand https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/201861216:14
dansmithyeah16:14
bauzasand some other IIRC16:14
bauzasanyway, I'll try to look at it when I have time16:14
bauzasgibi: want to discuss your recent findings on https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2015065/comments/8 for the group ?16:15
gibiyou a summary16:15
gibiahh16:15
gibiso 16:15
gibijust a summary16:15
gibihttps://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2015065/comments/8 feels like an eventlet issue16:15
bauzasit was just a question, people can click :)16:15
gibiso I opened https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/issues/79816:15
gibiwaiting for the maintainer to say my reproduction is valid or not in pure eventlet16:16
bauzasgibi: kudos for your detective skills16:16
gibikudos to ykarel for getting the stacktrace of the stuck thread16:16
bauzasindeed16:17
bauzasokay, anyting else to mention on failures before we brag too much ?16:17
bauzasnah, ok16:17
bauzas#link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status16:18
bauzasthe centos9 job on fips had a blip16:18
bauzaswith a fun "/usr/bin/python3.9: No module named pip"16:18
bauzas#link https://zuul.openstack.org/build/23afe450b9cc457bb094563b3f45aafd16:19
dansmithblip? on the qa meeting just now it sounded unresolved16:19
bauzaspossibly16:19
bauzasI just saw the blip, not the whole Thanos universe clap16:19
opendevreviewMerged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: fup: Print message logging uncaught nova-manage exceptions  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/87733416:21
bauzasdoh, can't query https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?skip=0 with job=centos16:21
bauzasand I don't know if it supports regexs16:21
bauzasanyway16:22
bauzasmy Zuul query foo is rusty, so moving on16:22
bauzasand I'll lurk #openstack-qa meanwhile16:23
bauzas#info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.16:23
bauzas#info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures16:23
bauzasthat's it for gate16:23
bauzas#topic Release Planning 16:23
bauzas#link https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html16:23
bauzas#info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule16:23
bauzasworth saying now :16:23
bauzas#info Nova spec review day in two weeks16:23
bauzasyou're all noticed16:24
bauzastake your pens and your paper, and write your best poetry16:24
bauzasspec freeze will only be on the first week of July 16:25
bauzasnoted ?16:25
bauzasso,16:26
bauzas#topic pPTG Planning 16:26
gibipPTG?16:26
gibiphysical? partial?16:26
bauzasI will be quick, I have two questions, one related to the other16:26
bauzasgibi: hah, both :p16:26
gibippPTG16:26
bauzasWho will be at the pPTG in VancouverĀ ?16:26
bauzasand related,16:27
bauzas#link https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html Should we book some table for the PTGĀ ?16:27
bauzasI've got one email from the Foundation asking to whether I would want to book a table16:27
bauzasand honestly, I don't know what to do16:27
bauzasthe Forum will compete with the PTG16:27
gibibook a table, then might be unused16:28
bauzasthe whole 2 days ? works for me16:28
bauzasat least I'd have a spot to sit down16:28
gibi:)16:29
gibiI think that is the exact reason to publish where to find the PTL16:29
bauzasthat's a bit premature but I should start to gather information about topics that people wanna bring at the PTG and who could be present16:29
bauzasand if some people that are NOT at the PTG wanna chime on such topics, that would give us some insight too16:30
bauzas#action bauzas to prepare a PTG etherpad for calling about topics and attendace16:30
bauzasthat's it, I wanted to keep it short16:31
bauzas#topic Review priorities 16:31
bauzas#link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)16:31
bauzas#info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review16:31
bauzas#topic Stable Branches 16:32
bauzaselodilles: your turn !16:32
elodilleso/16:32
elodilles#info stable nova release patches merged on Wednesday: 2023.1 Antelope (27.1.0), Zed (26.2.0), Yoga (25.2.0)16:32
bauzashuzzah16:32
elodillesso these have been released ^^^ \o/16:32
elodilles#info stable/wallaby is unblocked as gmann's nova-ceph-multistore job fix has merged (thanks!) -- https://review.opendev.org/87192016:32
bauzasthose include the CVE 2023-2088 fixes, I'm happy to have them now :)16:32
elodillesbauzas: yepp16:33
bauzashuzzah again16:33
elodilles:]16:33
bauzasabout the ceph-multistore problem16:33
elodillesyepp-yepp16:33
elodilles#info stable/train is blocked by failing openstacksdk-functional-devstack job16:33
bauzasdoh16:33
elodillesthis is probably because of heat's stable/train eol16:33
elodillesi'm looking at multiple ways of possibilities to unblock the gate16:34
elodilleswill see which is the best / working :P16:34
elodillesand the general info:16:34
elodilles#info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci16:34
elodillesEOM16:35
bauzasabout Train, given some parts of the universe started to EOL it16:35
bauzasthen, my question is, should we copy them ?16:35
elodillesheat EOL'd their ussuri as well16:36
bauzasI know that my paycheck comes partly from Train, but that's still a question to me16:36
elodillesbauzas: i still say that until we can merge patches (hehh) we can keep it open o:)16:36
bauzasstable/train also doesn't include the previous CVE fix you know ;)16:37
elodilleshmmm, i forgot that16:38
elodillesthough there are some who still wanted rocky to accept patches ;)16:38
bauzasI'm not only talking of the brick CVE16:38
bauzasI'm also taking of the VMDK CVE16:38
bauzasif people want to risk their lifes, I'm OK16:39
elodillesgood point16:39
bauzasbut that is still two serious security flaws that haven't been fixed 16:39
elodillesi cannot ague with that16:39
sean-k-mooneyi would may keep it alive for a few more months and ask operators at the summit16:39
sean-k-mooneybut i could see use retiring it after bobcat in either case16:40
dansmithI'm fine (and prefer) to keep branches available, but if we're maintaining part of it but not backporting critical CVEs it really sends a mixed message16:40
bauzasdansmith: that's my whole point16:40
dansmithmixed and confusing I would say16:40
elodillesdansmith: true16:40
sean-k-mooneythe vmdk cve however makes me more inclided to say we should be keeping train16:41
bauzasdansmith: we can't reasonably say we're open to keep a branch open and accept backports if the most critical ones aren't done16:41
sean-k-mooneywe fixed it downstream in our train based product but it causes a lot fo pain because it had a bug that would have been caught if we fixed it upstream instead16:42
dansmithbauzas: I just like the branches to be open over tags personally, but if people see "last commit X days ago" they're likely to assume that some of those commits are critical fixes16:42
bauzassean-k-mooney: train doesn't include the vmdk fix16:42
sean-k-mooneyi know16:42
bauzasah, missed your poiint16:42
bauzassean-k-mooney: truly, we missed something downstream because we lacked some upstream backport16:43
sean-k-mooneyif we had fixed the cve via the upstream backport process it would have caught the missing patch we had downstream16:43
bauzasbut the upstream branch isn't really arguably in a good shape if the two most major CVEs that I know since a decade aren't fixed16:43
sean-k-mooneywell they could be fixed16:44
sean-k-mooneywe just dont have peopel volentering to fix it 16:44
bauzassean-k-mooney: true, and this hadn't been done because of the way we manage our dependencies upstream is tough16:44
dansmithright the point is that we're not meant to be maintaining these.. so we either need to do it, or stop *signaling* that we're doing it16:44
bauzas+1 16:45
sean-k-mooneyyep16:45
bauzasthe brick CVE isn't AFAIK proposed against train now16:45
dansmithso I guess I'll say I'm +1 for EOLing train16:45
bauzasso, honestly, if we want to keep train, let's do the efforts to backport both CVE fixes to train16:46
dansmithare we even sync/importing from train downstream anymore?16:46
bauzasdon't look at me, I'm not rushing to do it16:46
sean-k-mooneywe are16:46
sean-k-mooneybut our last release that will do that is planed for q316:46
sean-k-mooneyso after bobcat is release we wont be16:47
bauzasdon't speak redhat greek in this channel please :)16:47
sean-k-mooneywell the point being that we will stop consuming form the stable branch anyway in the next few months16:47
dansmithright16:47
sean-k-mooneyfor our downstream uses16:47
bauzasyeah, but we still don't provide the CVE fixes to it ? :)16:48
sean-k-mooneyyou know i orgianly wanted use to fix both of those on upstream train right16:48
dansmithsean-k-mooney: so then why didn't you?16:49
sean-k-mooneyi asked the peopel that did the backprot to do it16:49
bauzaswe all have priorities and I don't blame anyone16:49
bauzasparticularly me, since I was owning the backports for the VMDK one and I intentionally skipped the train one16:50
bauzasbecause it would have required some oslo.utils release number belly dance 16:50
bauzasand as a reminder, Extended Maintenance is clear on its intents 16:51
dansmithbauzas: exactly16:51
bauzashttps://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#extended-maintenance16:51
bauzasanyway, seems we won't reach a consensus, but I can propose to send an email to openstack-discuss16:52
bauzaswe'll see if people argue16:52
* bauzas just hopes that operators read our mailing lists16:53
bauzas#action bauzas to send an email to -discuss to gauge the freakiness of EOLing stable/train now16:53
bauzasI guess we're done with this hot topic16:54
bauzas#topic Open Discussion16:54
bauzasnothing on the agenda16:54
bauzasis anyone having a thought to share with the team ?16:55
bauzaslooks not16:56
bauzassorry this week I won't save too much of your time16:56
bauzasthanks all16:56
bauzas#endmeeting16:57
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue May 23 16:57:03 2023 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:57
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-05-23-16.01.html16:57
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-05-23-16.01.txt16:57
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-05-23-16.01.log.html16:57
gibithanks16:58
elodillesthanks o/16:58
Uggla_thx16:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!