Thursday, 2025-01-23

mariosweekly watcher irc meeting starting here in 30 mins o/ add your agenda items to https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-watcher-irc-meeting 11:32
marios*28* mins11:32
mariosstarting the weekly irc meeting here in a minute11:59
marios#startmeeting watcher12:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Thu Jan 23 12:00:00 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is marios. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.12:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.12:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'watcher'12:00
marioshello folks, lets do a roll call for a minute and we'll get going.12:00
marioswho is around today?12:00
amoralejo/12:00
rlandyo/12:00
jgilabero/12:00
marios#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-watcher-irc-meeting weekly agenda topics 12:00
marioswe'll take those in order as usual please add any topics you want to present ^^ 12:01
chandankumaro/12:01
dviroelo/12:01
mariosok lets get going12:02
marios#topic     sean: Reset the DPL model for Watcher project: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/939488  12:02
mariossean-k-mooney: o/ around ^ 12:02
marioslooks like sean-k-mooney is not currently available or momentarily afk... either way does anyone have any updates or comments on that ^ 12:03
mariosI believe we discussed it last week too... checking the review for any latest 12:03
mariosso, still needs votes from the other folks 12:03
rlandymaybe Martin still needs to -1 it12:04
rlandyor whoever we replace Martin with?12:04
marios#info needs votes from all existing DPL members https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/93948812:04
mariosright in fact that info is wrong12:04
mariosMartin doesn't need to -1 it12:04
mariosthe opposite12:04
mariossince he won't be working there any more12:04
rlandyok - I'll ping Martin and ask to take a look12:04
rlandyjust for this case12:05
mariosi mean, he should +1 it if anything, like he wants to reset his involvement12:05
rlandybut not the whole model12:05
rlandy" Watcher team either needs to opt-in the DPL12:06
rlandymodel for the next cycle or have the PTL in coming election." per the description on the change12:06
mariosso we need Martin and Dan to have a look. if they don't comment i think we can take that as they don't/can't be involved moving forward right?12:06
rlandyok - I'll take the action item to ping them and ask them to take a look12:06
mariosdid we say chandankumar was interested in going into tact-sig? that would leave us with someone for tact-security then if Dan is not going to continue 12:07
dviroelwe need to reach gmann on how to proceed, since watcher plans to continue with DPL but we also need to replace at least one liaison12:07
rlandy^^ dansmith when you are in? can you comment?12:07
chandankumaryes, I was about to say that, you can add me at the place of martin12:07
marios#action rlandy will reach out to Dan and Martin about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/93948812:07
mariosthank you rlandy 12:07
mariosso should/will one of us update that patch or should be ping Ghanshyam about it12:08
mariosto add Chandan and whoever else might take on the tact-sig does anyone know the proper etiquete?12:08
mariostbd i guess we can revisit this next week12:09
mariosany further comments on this one? 12:09
mariosk moving to the next topic ... 12:10
marios#topic     (rlandy): watcher-tempest-plugin review ready for core votes:12:11
marios#link     https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin12:11
mariosis that the right link rlandy ^ 12:11
marios(i got it from the etherpad)12:11
marios this one ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/93951712:12
chandankumari think https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/938136/12:12
rlandycorrect12:13
mariosright, both of those then? one is rebased on the other right?12:13
chandankumarmarios: you have already added the other one12:13
chandankumaryes 12:13
dviroelall open: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin+status:+open12:13
chandankumarTested here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/939702?usp=search12:13
marios#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/93951712:13
marios#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/938136/12:13
marios#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/939702?usp=search Tested here12:14
mariossean-k-mooney: please check when you next have reviews time ^^^ thank you12:14
amoralejhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/939517 needs rebase i think12:15
mariosack thanks amoralej  ... chandankumar can you check ^ and then sean-k-mooney can vote 12:15
chandankumaramoralej: marios sure, let me rebase it12:16
mariosthanks12:16
mariosanything further on this topic ? 12:16
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Run make_host/instance statistics function for gnocchi datasource  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/93951712:16
mariosmoving on ... 12:17
marios#topic     marios: watcher decision engine prometheus datasource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/93442312:17
mariosso i think we can merge this? sean-k-mooney as previously discussed12:18
mariosthe last update was ~2 weeks ago (tomorrow)12:18
mariosthere are no further requests or comments and -112:18
opendevreviewchandan kumar proposed openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin master: Run make_host/instance statistics function for gnocchi datasource  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher-tempest-plugin/+/93951712:19
mariosso sean-k-mooney please have a look and merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/934423 when you next have time for reviews o/ thanks12:19
dviroel+1 to merge it12:19
mariosthank you dviroel 12:20
mariosand all reviewers12:20
sean-k-mooneyyep i will do that today12:20
mariosthank you sean-k-mooney 12:20
sean-k-mooneyand sorry i was not around before but i am now12:20
marios#info merging prometheus datasource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/93442312:20
mariosnp sean-k-mooney 12:20
mariosanything else before we move to the next topic?12:21
sean-k-mooneynope12:21
marios;)12:21
mariosmoving on 12:22
marios#topic    (marios): bug triage summary 12:22
mariosso i think rlandy you added a related item on the agenda12:22
marioswe had another bug triage call/irc meeting combination this week12:22
mariosfetching logs12:22
marios#info weekly bug triage meeting minutes     Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/watcher_bug_triage_21_january_2025/2025/watcher_bug_triage_21_january_2025.2025-01-21-12.00.html12:23
opendevreviewAlfredo Moralejo proposed openstack/watcher master: Add support for instance metrics to prometheus datasource  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/93889312:23
marioswe got through a few this week, we did them newest first this time around12:23
mariosanything anyone wants to add or hilight? 12:23
mariosper rlandy item on the agenda, we said we would have one more call/irc combination next week at the same time (tuesday 1200 utc)12:24
rlandyjust if anyone else wants to run the call?12:24
marioswe need someone to chair so we can give rlandy a well deserved rest12:24
mariosthank you rlandy 12:24
rlandyotherwise I can do it 12:24
mariosdo you *want* to do it? :D12:25
rlandyit will be the last focused bug call12:25
rlandyI'm fine with it either way12:25
mariosi mean, if you want/don't mind then we can cancel the call for volunteers... ;)12:25
rlandyI'll do it12:25
marios\o/12:25
mariosthank you rlandy 12:25
dviroelrlandy++ 12:25
marios#info rlandy will chair bug triage call tue 28 1200 UTC12:25
mariosrlandy: bug czar12:26
mariosk any other comments or concerns before we move on12:26
dviroelonly rlandy can talk on gmeet, write on lauchnpad and on irc at the same time12:27
mariosyes :) 12:27
rlandylol - not that hard12:27
mariosmoving to the next topic 12:28
marios#topic     (marios): chair for irc meeting feb 0612:28
marioswe have a chair for next week thank you dviroel o/12:28
dviroel:) 12:28
marioscan we have a volunteer for the next one on feb 06?12:28
rlandyI'll do it12:28
mariosi.e. this meeting in 2 weeks 12:29
mariosok thank you again rlandy :)12:29
marios#info rlandy will chair irc meeting feb 06 1200 UTC12:29
mariosok moving on then... 12:30
mariosi don't see any other topics so...12:30
marios#topic open floor12:30
mariosanything else someone wants to bring up?12:30
mariosanything from the mailing list we can hilight?12:30
rlandymarios: do we need to return to the governance discussion if sean-k-mooney is with us now?12:30
mariossure12:30
amoraleji just sent a new ps on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/938893/ with doc fix12:31
amoralejplease reset your vots12:31
mariosthanks for updating amoralej looking now12:31
sean-k-mooneythe DPL topic12:31
sean-k-mooneywe can if ye want. at the end12:32
marioswe are there :)12:32
mariossean-k-mooney: ^12:33
sean-k-mooneyso we have 2 related topics actully. on the dpl topic, we coudl revert to the PTL model but i think we would need to propose nomination this week if we wanted to do that12:33
sean-k-mooneyotherwise we can continue with the dpl process for one more cycle to see if that works for us12:33
mariosi think we only one we don't have is replacement for dan tact-security12:33
mariosah.. onboarding too 12:34
marioske chen12:34
sean-k-mooneyso onboarding is not actully required12:34
mariosok12:34
sean-k-mooneyif needed i cna do the tact-security role but ill reach out to dan and see if they are willing to continue in that role later today12:34
sean-k-mooneymarios: are you ok to contiue to be the infra liasion12:35
marios#info please revisit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/938893 (and parent patch merging today)12:35
mariossean-k-mooney: yes12:35
sean-k-mooneyso the 3 required roels are infra, security and release12:35
mariosand chandankumar also wanted to join sean-k-mooney 12:35
sean-k-mooneyack12:36
sean-k-mooneylets check with gman what the process is and if we shoudl propsoe a new revision to the patch after we check with dan12:36
mariossean-k-mooney: so rlandy already has an action item to reach out to dan and martin can you please coordinate with rlandy ?12:36
rlandydo we need martin to vote or can chandankumar just replace?12:36
rlandyno problem to reach out to martin if that is the way to go12:36
sean-k-mooneyso i think if we follow the process stictly12:36
rlandysean-k-mooney, you can coordinate with dan12:37
rlandyI'll reach out to martin12:37
sean-k-mooneyif we dont all vote -1 in time then the patch is merged and we revert to ptl model12:37
sean-k-mooneythen we can submit a new patch to go back to dpl12:37
marioswell i mean, if its like that we already have a couple -1s on it12:37
mariosso as you said (and we mentioned earlier in this meeting) we also need to ask Ghanshyam if we can update the patch or post new one12:37
sean-k-mooneyand if they are ok to contues as release liason12:38
mariosright12:38
sean-k-mooneylets follow up with peopel asyc of the meetign and try and resolve this by the end of the week12:38
mariosdo you want to do that and rlandy will reach out to dan and martin as previously agreed here?12:38
mariosthat being reach out to ghanshyam12:38
sean-k-mooneyi can reach out to dan and gmann 12:39
mariosok thank you sean-k-mooney 12:39
marios#action sean-k-mooney to reach out Dan and Ghanshyam re https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/93948812:39
dviroelwhat about chenke?12:39
mariosright dviroel 12:39
sean-k-mooneyi can email them too i guess and see if they resopond12:39
mariosgreat thanks sean-k-mooney 12:40
sean-k-mooneythe ohter option is we coudl have a ptl election  + still have addtional liaons12:40
marios#action sean-k-mooney to reach out to chenker re https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/93948812:40
sean-k-mooneyso that always our backup plan if this does not pan out12:40
mariosany other topic for open floor? 12:41
dviroelok so we first need to check with them if they plan to continue, and after that decide who is going to take the empty chairs :) 12:41
mariosright dviroel 12:41
sean-k-mooneyyep 12:41
sean-k-mooneyso related topic.12:41
mariosbut i think as we discussed here we should be covered on the 'who will take them'12:41
mariosso mostly it is a sanity check that indeed they won't be around/interested 12:41
marios(unless they might be i don't know)12:41
marios;)12:41
sean-k-mooneyi didnt get to send this yet but im currently working on an email regarding expandign the watcher core teams12:42
sean-k-mooneyi am going to try and send that today and ill reach out to peopel before i do to confirm if they are ok with being nominated12:43
mariosgreat thanks sean-k-mooney 12:43
sean-k-mooneyfor now i am not going to propose removign anyoen form the core groups with the excption fo martin12:43
dviroel++12:43
marioswe have discussed this in a couple of the recent irc meetings too... this being expanding our core group especially since reviews are starting to back up 12:43
sean-k-mooneysince martin will nolonger be aroudn ill remove them form the watcher tempest plugin core group but if they return we can alwasy readd them12:44
mariosas just one example my prometheus datasource has been sitting for 2 weeks12:44
mariosbecause we will merge it with one core +212:44
sean-k-mooneyyep so im going to be conservite in my proposal and we can revisit this topic again after/at the ptg12:45
sean-k-mooneybut my propsal is to email the list12:45
sean-k-mooneyand reivew next week12:45
mariossounds good12:45
sean-k-mooneyif there are no objections after the next meetign ill apply the chagnes in gerrit12:45
dviroellgtm12:46
sean-k-mooneythat was all i had on that topic.12:46
mariosany further comments or concers on this one? 12:46
marios#info sean-k-mooney will propose expanding the core groups with post to openstack-discuss12:47
mariosany other topics for today? 12:47
mariosthanks all for your participation o/ 12:49
marios#endmeeting12:49
opendevmeetMeeting ended Thu Jan 23 12:49:17 2025 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)12:49
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/watcher/2025/watcher.2025-01-23-12.00.html12:49
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/watcher/2025/watcher.2025-01-23-12.00.txt12:49
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/watcher/2025/watcher.2025-01-23-12.00.log.html12:49
dviroeltks marios o/12:49
amoralejthanks marios !12:49
rlandythanks marios12:49
mariosthanks all 12:49
chandankumarthank you marios :-)12:49
opendevreviewOpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/puppet-watcher master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/2023.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-watcher/+/94004316:12
gmannsean-k-mooney: yeah,i can continue on watcher TC liaison but honestly saying if its not me then it can be someone else from TC. I mean this is not mandatory requirement fromproject team instead it is from TC18:41
gmannsean-k-mooney: also we need Ke Chen feedback also there but not sure if they are active?18:41
sean-k-mooneywell we can also remove it form the list18:41
sean-k-mooneyya i have not reached out to them yet, or seen them for a while18:42
sean-k-mooneyluna new year is soon too right? i assume they will not be aviabel as a result soon18:42
sean-k-mooneyWed, Jan 29, 202518:42
gmannyeah18:43
sean-k-mooneygmann: what is the dealine for this?18:43
gmannFeb 5th nomination of election https://governance.openstack.org/election/18:43
sean-k-mooneyworstcase we can revert to ptl, ill submit my candacy and then also add liasons so that we can spread the work18:44
gmannsean-k-mooney: one way can be to remove now and if they come back you can always add them back anytime18:44
gmannsean-k-mooney: that also work18:44
gmannsean-k-mooney: as you know, as PTL, they can always spread the tasks/work18:44
sean-k-mooneywhile we have been trying to get everythign workign i kind of have been trying not to be the bottel neck and or take on all the rols of ptl18:45
sean-k-mooneyso ya if we whent that route i would hope ot spread the roles if we had the same volenteers18:46
sean-k-mooneygmann: so we have a week or so before we hit that deadline, ill send an email to chenke this evening and we can see if we get an responce18:47
gmannsean-k-mooney: perfect, thanks18:47
sean-k-mooneyif we dont hear back by next weeks irc meeting we can decied how to proceed18:47
gmannsean-k-mooney: if DPL needs to be continue then you can propose new change on top of it with new list of liaison https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/93948818:48
gmannsean-k-mooney: sounds good18:48
sean-k-mooneyack i guess there i no harm in doing that now anyway just to have it there18:48
sean-k-mooneywe can alwasy just merge both (reset and change back)18:49
sean-k-mooneysince we need to update the names anyway18:49
gmann++, I was about to say that. it will help to have TC votes in advance just in case18:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!